| Saviq | G'day \o | 07:04 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | Ooooh! *That's* why the smoke tests fail here! But why is it trying to use the gbm renderer on X11? :blobfox_thinking: | 07:52 |
| RAOF | Ah, but that should be for tomorrow. | 07:59 |
| RAOF | Today: | 08:06 |
| RAOF | * Reviewed the last WLCS PR lying around - [Sophie's popup dismissal ordering PR](https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/pull/223). There are now no more outstanding WLCS PRs in an almost-mergable state 🎉 | 08:06 |
| RAOF | * Hunted down why the smoke-tests are failing (on X11) in platform-API branch: it's incorrectly using the gbm rendering platform, rather than the X11 rendering platform | 08:06 |
| RAOF | - | 08:06 |
| RAOF | * Today:... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/09b091e1f1be5974e1dbb02dcfdb968ae7828e38>) | 08:07 |
| * RAOF needs to come up with a better name than DumbDisplayProvider, too. | 08:07 | |
| RAOF | Now soliciting suggestions :) | 08:08 |
| Saviq | RAOF: > * <@chris:cooperteam.net> needs to come up with a better name than `DumbDisplayProvider`, too. | 08:11 |
| Saviq | Stub? | 08:11 |
| alan_g[m] | What does DumbDisplayProvider do? How does it differ from {,Foo}DisplayProvider? | 08:16 |
| RAOF | It provides CPU accessible framebuffer. | 08:40 |
| RAOF | s/framebuffer/framebuffers/ | 08:40 |
| RAOF | Which, I guess, already provides a better name! | 08:41 |
| alan_g[m] | You're welcome! | 08:41 |
| alan_g[m] | FWIW we've done well landing stuff, this was a couple of pages when I opened it on Monday, now down to a more managable four items: | 09:27 |
| alan_g[m] | https://github.com/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+org%3AMirServer+archived%3Afalse+draft%3Afalse | 09:27 |
| Saviq | Hey sophie, you said in Prague we don't support fractional scaling, but my experience with Miriway is that… we do, at least to some extent (I mean, if I use `scale: 1.5`, it's different to `scale: 1` and `scale: 2`). Or did you mean we're missing protocol support, for example? | 11:12 |
| alan_g[m] | <Saviq> "Hey sophie, you said in Prague..." <- It's (some of) the Wayland protocols that decided scale is integer: we need to work stuff through as clients should be able to pre-scale buffers for better rendering | 11:21 |
| alan_g[m] | <Eighth_Doctor> "alan_g, RAOF (he/they): do..." <- As Saviq said, Sophie did the work to prove a migration path with a few desktop components working on Wayland, but nothing meaning has happened since. | 11:55 |
| Eighth_Doctor | alan_g: how far along is Mir's Wayland protocol support? | 11:56 |
| Eighth_Doctor | vs wlroots or kwin, for example? | 11:56 |
| alan_g[m] | It depends on the protocol. For example xdg-shell: | 11:57 |
| alan_g[m] | https://wayland.app/protocols/xdg-shell#compositor-support | 11:57 |
| alan_g[m] | https://wayland.app/protocols/wayland#compositor-support | 11:59 |
| Saviq | alan_g does Alt not get stuck for you after Alt+Tab from time to time in Miriway? | 12:21 |
| Saviq | alan_g also, can you interact with X decorations? I can't drag or X. | 12:42 |
| alan_g[m] | I noticed "X" not working yesterday (not filed a bug yet). Can now confirm other controls and drag/resize don't work either. | 13:00 |
| Saviq | Filed | 13:01 |
| Saviq | https://github.com/MirServer/mir/issues/2943 | 13:01 |
| Saviq | https://github.com/MirServer/mir/issues/2583 also back as far I can tell | 13:02 |
| Saviq | Ah, but that last one is b/c we've not enabled primary selection by default | 13:06 |
| alan_g[m] | Saviq: It is a reasonable question whether we should (by default) for Miriway | 13:07 |
| Saviq | Looks like there's movement on the upstream bug at least: | 13:10 |
| Saviq | https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791417 | 13:10 |
| alan_g[m] | Saviq I'm going to bisect #2943 - is likely something stupidly simple | 13:19 |
| alan_g[m] | <Saviq> "https://github.com/MirServer/mir..." <- BFI fix proposed: https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2945 | 14:58 |
| Saviq | We should add Miriway to Mir CI | 15:00 |
| alan_g[m] | Feel free | 15:02 |
| Saviq | I know I know! | 15:02 |
| alan_g[m] | AN | 15:11 |
| alan_g[m] | Any thoughts on how to clean up $PATH without shopt -s extglob? | 15:12 |
| Saviq | sed? | 15:17 |
| alan_g[m] | <alan_g[m]> "Any thoughts on how to clean up..." <- Actually, I don't think it is needed anymore... | 15:18 |
| Saviq | A'it. Today:... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/951a2573baa8a02b15b34c28cd98d4242e79b72d>) | 16:01 |
| sophie-w | Conan Kudo: None of us have worked on MATE Wayland support for some time, and as far as I know no one from MATE has done much either. Some MATE things work in a Wayland session, many do not. | 16:22 |
| sophie-w | <Saviq> "Hey sophie, you said in Prague..." <- My memory is that someone else said we don't support fractional scaling and I said we do support it. in any case Alan is right that it kinda works currently and with support for more protocols we could probably make it look better. | 16:24 |
| alan_g[m] | Today:... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/d86fa913590af6a628782dfa17d1de4d1324ad30>) | 16:38 |
| RAOF | <sophie-w> "My memory is that someone else..." <- Specifically: there's an explicit [fractional scale](https://wayland.app/protocols/fractional-scale-v1) protocol, but also I understand some clients use [`wp_viewporter`](https://wayland.app/protocols/viewporter) to do a similar trick. | 23:35 |
| RAOF | So, we support fractional scaling, but we don't allow clients to submit fractionally-scaled buffers. | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!