[00:06] <vorlon> kanashiro_: why was LP: #1981598 never verified?
[00:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1981598 in resource-agents (Ubuntu Jammy) "fails to upgrade" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1981598
[00:07] <vorlon> kanashiro_: there's a new resource-agents SRU in the queue for Jammy so I'd like to see the previous one resolved so we don't wind up stalling two sets of changes
[00:16] <athos> vorlon: well, I added it in isc-dhcp because isc decided to go that way. this may be a long shot, but I suppose it assumes you will only want to migrate (and use the tool) if you do have isc-dhcp installed - which makes sense
[00:16] <athos> as for a timeline, IIRC we are aiming for demotion in 24.04 and possible removal on 24.10
[00:17] <athos> it also depends on how the dhclient replacement oges
[00:18] <vorlon> athos: so in 24.10 we could drop the source package including the new binary package?
[00:18] <vorlon> athos: dhclient replacement appears to be on track for initramfs-tools, I don't know about cloud-init...
[00:21] <athos> vorlon: I'd say so, yes. if we do get to demote dhcpd in 24.04 in favor of kea (which is already in main), the idea is that users will use keama there (24.04?) to migrate to kea. If dhcpd is not available, there is no need for a migration tool I suppose.
[06:21] <juliank> vorlon: yeah gotta wait one publisher run between each series
[06:22] <juliank> I'll redo the syncs so they're back in the queue
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: fwupd-efi (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:1.4-0ubuntu0.1]
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.2-3ubuntu0.2 => 1:1.4-0ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (jammy-proposed/main) [1:1.2-3ubuntu0.2 => 1:1.4-0ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:35] <juliank> Sorry I think we have the sync in bionic like three times now
[07:35] <juliank> two times
[07:35] <juliank> I only looked at unapproved queue to see what needs resyncing
[07:36] <juliank> vorlon: ^ resynced the fwupd-efi ones
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-algo26-idna-convert [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [3.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-atomic-refcell (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.1.9-1]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-wayland-backend (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.1.1-1]
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-efi [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1:1.4-0ubuntu0.1]
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-signed [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.51.1~22.04.1]
[17:52] <ahasenack> autopkgtest queue going bonkers again?
[17:52] <ahasenack> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running
[18:41] <vorlon> bdmurray: did you skip the debootstrap/bionic SRU intentionally, or ENOTIME?
[18:42] <vorlon> ahasenack: large queues due to a perl upload (security update) across all series; https://ubuntu-release.kpi.ubuntu.com/d/yIC34LpGk/ubuntu-metrics?viewPanel=4&orgId=1&from=now-2d&to=now doesn't look unhealthy so far, just working the queue
[18:43] <vorlon> low job failure rate (https://ubuntu-release.kpi.ubuntu.com/d/76Oe_0-Gz/autopkgtest?viewPanel=16&orgId=1&from=now-7d&to=now&refresh=10s), pretty consistent throughput (https://ubuntu-release.kpi.ubuntu.com/d/76Oe_0-Gz/autopkgtest?viewPanel=10&orgId=1&refresh=10s&from=now-2d&to=now)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-efi [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:1.4-0ubuntu0.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-signed [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.51.1~20.04.1]
[19:31] <bdmurray> vorlon: I don't think I got prompted about it by sru-review
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.95ubuntu0.13]
[20:18] <vorlon> bdmurray: ah race condition, it hadn't been uploaded yet at that point :)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libobject-result-perl [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.000003-1] (no packageset)