=== JanC is now known as Guest8709 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
rbasak | lvoytek: the dovecot dep8 failure for mysql-8.0 should go away after the sync - there's a new version of dovecot in the mantic release pocket with the issue fixed. | 11:06 |
---|---|---|
rbasak | But there's no point chasing it because the s390x failure will remain, and might as well wait for the Debian sync for that. | 11:07 |
rbasak | I didn't see anything else held up on a failure on the older version of dovecot's dep8 test, so there's nothing else to retry. | 11:07 |
lvoytek | rbasak: Thanks for letting me know! I'll get the sync mp set up today | 13:55 |
nteodosio | ogra, how do you run snapcraft to get logs? 'snapcraft --verbosity=trace --debug' gives me 'No such option: --verbosity Did you mean --verbose?' | 14:28 |
nteodosio | --verbosity is an option according to the help page... | 14:29 |
ogra | nteodosio, heh, snapcraft behaves completely different based on your "base:" ... some need --verbose, others need --verbosity= | 14:29 |
ogra | i always forget which needs which and ususally do trial and error ... | 14:30 |
ogra | (and the older core and core18 bases dont need anything and just make it behave like a developer tool as expected ? ) | 14:31 |
nteodosio | Ah OK so it depends on the core thing... I wonder why the help section says nothing about that. Thanks for the help! | 14:33 |
nteodosio | I just determined that on core22 snapcraft doesn't complain about "--verbose", but the build doesn't become verbose, so you need --verbosity; on core20, --verbosity doesn't work (as reported above), only --verbose. | 14:39 |
nteodosio | This confused me to no end. | 14:39 |
ogra | nteodosio, well, be happy you dont have to deal with customers relying to 100% on snapcraft ? i have to explain the odd behavior about twice a week ... | 14:45 |
nteodosio | Ouch | 14:46 |
ahasenack | jbicha: hey, did you mean to include this diff in your lunar sponsoring of gdm3? | 14:56 |
ahasenack | -Uploaders: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>, Marco Trevisan (Trevi?o) <marco@ubuntu.com> | 14:56 |
ahasenack | +Uploaders: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com> | 14:56 |
jbicha | ahasenack: Seb was the sponsor, but I encourage you to ignore the Uploaders field. It is controlled by the dh_gnome_clean script & names come & go there for unimportant reasons | 15:00 |
ahasenack | cool. np | 15:02 |
mdeslaur | juliank: I'm stealing your libraw merge | 16:55 |
ahasenack | things that don't help an sru: patching two ubuntu releases with the same patch, but with a) different patch filename; b) different dep3 headers | 17:19 |
ahasenack | why oh why | 17:20 |
seb128 | ahasenack, if that's gdm that's because I started doing the SRUing from email ping before noticing that the bug had patches and sponsors subscribed and I though it was not nice for the submitter to not have used those but I've enough to do that I didn't want to reject and reupload for the other series, sorry :-/ | 17:22 |
danilogondolfo | Hi folks, may I ask someone to review/sponsor this network-manager MR? https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/network-manager/+git/ubuntu-1/+merge/443876 | 17:32 |
danilogondolfo | It's addressing 2 LP bugs related to the changes we've made during the netplan integration. | 17:32 |
seb128 | danilogondolfo, I can review/sponsor it, and feel free to request me as reviewer in n-m changes | 17:37 |
danilogondolfo | thanks seb128! | 17:38 |
seb128 | np! | 17:39 |
danilogondolfo | I just requested another one hehehe | 17:40 |
mdeslaur | did "optional=lto" go away in symbols files in mantic? | 17:42 |
ahasenack | if it did, builds will fail | 17:45 |
ahasenack | no? | 17:46 |
bdmurray | enr0n: Have you looked at the halted phased update of systemd for Kinetic? | 17:46 |
mdeslaur | ahasenack: yeah, I'm having failing builds :) | 17:48 |
ahasenack | oops | 17:48 |
mdeslaur | at least, locally | 17:48 |
mdeslaur | let me upload and see if it,s a local problem | 17:48 |
ahasenack | where these using lto before? | 17:48 |
mdeslaur | same package builds fine in lunar | 17:49 |
ahasenack | maybe it was being disabled via the lto-disabled-list package? And you don't ahve it for some reason? | 17:49 |
mdeslaur | uh, let me research that | 17:49 |
ahasenack | it's an rdep of dpkg-dev, so unlikely, but... | 17:50 |
mdeslaur | nope not in that list | 17:50 |
enr0n | bdmurray: oh, yes that was lost in my mail. There is no retrace info or logs on any of the occurrences, however, so I don't think those are actionable. | 17:50 |
mdeslaur | ahasenack: oh wait a sec, I think I'm actually the issue ;) | 17:51 |
ahasenack | the individual on the chair? | 17:52 |
mdeslaur | ahasenack: yeah, that's the idiot I'm talking about | 17:52 |
ahasenack | it keeps us rubber ducks employed | 17:52 |
mdeslaur | hehe :) | 17:52 |
bdmurray | enr0n: ugh - if https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/7b3d6633f7edcb113a9a8d688d970b31087ac5fe failed to retrace it shouldn't block the SRU then | 17:55 |
bdmurray | enr0n: not that it matters for the SRU but https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/6ce92393c63aca4e5c471dabfba1b9e1acd8dbc2 looks similar to https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/d00331a0400fe4f6d7a69d80935214be783b0fe9 | 18:04 |
cjwatson | Launchpad's Debian importer is working again now, on its new deployment. | 18:05 |
enr0n | bdmurray: yeah they do look similar | 18:14 |
bdmurray | For the record - I went through all the other regression crash reports blocking phased updates and only those two systemd ones failed to retrace. | 18:16 |
enr0n | Often I find that when looking at those errors for systemd, the crashes are caused by wider system failures. Maybe there were other issues that prevented proper crash data from being obtained? | 18:19 |
=== orndorffgrant4 is now known as orndorffgrant |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!