| ogayot | hello, may I kindly ask somebody to trigger this autopkgtest for me? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=mantic&arch=amd64&package=dbus&ppa=ogayot%2Fmantic-proposed&trigger=dbus%2F1.14.6-1ubuntu1~ppa1 - thanks! | 09:47 |
|---|---|---|
| schopin | ogayot: . | 09:50 |
| ogayot | schopin: thanks! | 09:51 |
| rbasak | @pilot in | 11:00 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: rbasak | ||
| rbasak | I was using the fact that ~ubuntu-sponsors is requested for review in a git-ubuntu MP to make it appear in the sponsorship queue. | 11:06 |
| rbasak | But if somebody in ~ubuntu-sponsors reviews (let's say with Needs Fixing) then they "grab" that review slot, and ~ubuntu-sponsors no longer has one. I think this might cause the entry to disappear from the sponsorship queue - for example after the contributor has fixed the issue. | 11:07 |
| rbasak | Any suggestions on what I should do instead? | 11:07 |
| rbasak | On the Server Team, we use a review slot for ~canonical-server-reporter that nobody is a member of in order to avoid this happening. That way the "marker" remains. But to do this for ~ubuntu-sponsors would mean we have to use a separate team name. | 11:08 |
| rbasak | Separately, there's a bot that actually adds ~ubuntu-sponsors as a reviewer if there is nobody else. Maybe that could subscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors-reporter or similar? | 11:08 |
| rbasak | juliank: I'm patch piloting today but I can't progress https://code.launchpad.net/~macg3/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+git/gdebi/+merge/414211 because I'm not in ~gdebi-developers - surely this should go upstream rather than in an Ubuntu delta? What's the plan there please? | 11:22 |
| juliank | rbasak: it's been dead and unmaintained for 8 years? | 11:23 |
| rbasak | That wasn't my question :) | 11:25 |
| juliank | Well there's no upstream, you can find a DD to NMU it and sync it | 11:26 |
| juliank | There's no version control any of the 6 NMUs are imported in and I'm on a long weekend so I'm not doing anything today | 11:27 |
| rbasak | mapreri or utkarsh2102: I think https://code.launchpad.net/~macg3/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+git/gdebi/+merge/414211 is good to land but I'm not sure where. As recent NMUers to gdebi, could you help me with an NMU to Debian please if that's appropriate? | 11:42 |
| rbasak | The previous NMUs don't look like they were done with a BTS bug or the delayed queue. What's the etiquette here? | 11:42 |
| utkarsh2102 | rbasak: I can look at it this weekend or early next week. If that’s okay, please have it assigned to me and I’ll get back. | 11:44 |
| rbasak | utkarsh2102: sure. Thanks! | 11:48 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| rbasak | coreycb: bug 1996010 is in the general sponsorship queue, but it was added automatically and it's not clear to me if this is ready/wanted by the openstack team. Please could you take a look? | 12:25 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1996010 in ceph (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] the leak in bluestore_cache_other mempool" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1996010 | 12:25 | |
| rbasak | xnox: are you planning on merging tpm2-pkcs11? https://code.launchpad.net/~danfuhry/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-pkcs11/+git/tpm2-pkcs11/+merge/437163 is affected and it looks like the merge has been outstanding for over a year. | 14:30 |
| bdmurray | rbasak: How much longer are you piloting for? | 16:01 |
| rbasak | Oh | 16:42 |
| rbasak | @pilot out | 16:42 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| rbasak | Sorry | 16:42 |
| rbasak | I'm done, just writing up. | 16:42 |
| bdmurray | @pilot in | 18:02 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: bdmurray | ||
| bdmurray | @pilot out | 22:04 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| bdmurray | sarnold: Do you know about adding bug watches? bug 2020826 | 22:27 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2020826 in needrestart (Ubuntu Lunar) "VM detection is broken, leading to prompt to restart for microcode updates" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2020826 | 22:27 | |
| bdmurray | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Watches | 22:29 |
| sarnold | bdmurray: I think "vaguely" is the right answer -- I know about them, and I thought putting the debian bug url in the description would just automatically hook it up | 22:42 |
| bdmurray | sarnold: It shows up in the "Remote bug watches" info box but that isn't nearly as useful | 22:47 |
| sarnold | bdmurray: hah then I guess I need to amend my previous answer and spend more time onthe wiki page.. | 22:50 |
| sarnold | bdmurray: so.. I thought there was (a) tracking the status in the info box thing (b) importing comments from the remote bug tracker; re-reading this bug, I see that (a) you added the bug watch very recently (b) no comments imported from debian -- does launchpad only import comments made after the bug watch was installed? or do we need to wait for midnight to import them? | 22:53 |
| vorlon | rbasak: so I've routinely found that I have to explicitly claim MP reviews on behalf of e.g. ~ubuntu-archive, else it doesn't show as the team review happening | 22:54 |
| vorlon | rbasak: and AFAIK this is not a launchpad per-team configuration issue? | 22:54 |
| rbasak | vorlon: I don't know. It was a long standing issue on the server team until we started using a team we deliberately don't belong to instead | 22:58 |
| rbasak | I'm fairly sure that this was happening without anyone clicking on the Claim Review button | 22:58 |
| vorlon | interesting | 22:59 |
| rbasak | In our case we actually belonged to two or three separate teams that had review slots | 22:59 |
| bdmurray | sarnold: I don't think debian comments get imported but the status of the Debian bug task would change some time when the sync runs | 22:59 |
| rbasak | One would get randomly "claimed", and if it was the one we didn't intend, then that messed up our process. | 22:59 |
| vorlon | wow definitely not my experience | 23:00 |
| rbasak | I think I need to set some time aside to experiment. | 23:00 |
| sarnold | " 1 → 75 of 4771 trackers " https://launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/ *wow*. I thought we had something like 20, which felt very impressive until now :) | 23:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!