[09:14] <dnegreira> Hey all, for the sosreport package, upstream has recently introduced a dependency on the avocado framework. I see that there is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993862 asking for inclusion in Debian, but no reaction for a while. Since we would need to package avocado in Ubuntu, what do you reckon it should be the correct way to go here? I believe that I should work with the
[09:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 993862 in wnpp "ITP: avocado -- Framework for automated testing" [Wishlist, Open]
[09:14] <dnegreira> avocado upstream and work for inclusion in Ubuntu, but since the request has been done into Debian (without any feedback for 2 years), I just want to ensure I am not stepping on any toes and I can go ahead and do the package inclusion for Ubuntu.
[09:23] <xnox> rbasak:  it should have been a force sync a long time ago, oh well, did force sync now, will submit the patch to do fapi backend changes. and not sure what to do about the SRU bug in question. It is probably very real and makes the whole thing unusable without the fix.
[14:32] <rbasak> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchCross is incomplete, right? It wasn't implemented?
[14:32] <rbasak> Someone is asking for a multiarch -dev package but I think we currently don't do that?
[19:02] <rbasak> !dmb-ping
[19:05] <enr0n> Can a core dev please trigger these baseline tests for ganeti, which is blocking openssh on lunar? retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks openssh -s lunar --no-proposed
[19:06] <enr0n> (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2011458/comments/37 if your curious for justification)
[19:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2011458 in openssh (Ubuntu Lunar) "ssh fails to rebind when it is killed with -HUP" [Medium, Fix Committed]
[19:07] <bdmurray> I can do this.
[19:09] <bdmurray> Or rather will do. ;-)
[19:19] <enr0n> bdmurray: thanks!
[20:34] <teward> rbasak: blah i'm really tripping here, slow A F today because in the middle of my day on mondays things explode :\