[00:28] <vorlon> lvoytek: do you happen to have plans for merging bind9 9.18.13 soon for mantic?  (bind-dyndb-ldap in -proposed is waiting for it)
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pipewire-sys [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pipewire-sys [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pipewire-sys [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pipewire-sys [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libspa-sys [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pipewire-sys [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pipewire-sys [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pipewire-sys [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pipewire-sys [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pipewire-sys [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[04:16] <doko> vorlon: we just can remove python3.10 again, just wanted to have it on snapshot.debian.org
[05:05] <vorlon> doko: ah ok
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tfk8s [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.1.10-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tfk8s [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.1.10-1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pipewire-sys [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tfk8s [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.1.10-1]
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tfk8s [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.1.10-1]
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocrand [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [5.3.3-5ubuntu1]
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-diesel [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [2.0.3-1ubuntu1]
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocrand [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [5.3.3-5ubuntu1]
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppad [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.00.00.0-3] (no packageset)
[05:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppad [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.00.00.0-3] (no packageset)
[05:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppad [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.00.00.0-3] (no packageset)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppad [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.00.00.0-3] (no packageset)
[06:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppad [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.00.00.0-3] (no packageset)
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppad [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.00.00.0-3] (no packageset)
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppad [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.00.00.0-3]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppad [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [2023.00.00.0-3]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppad [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.00.00.0-3]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppad [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.00.00.0-3]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppad [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [2023.00.00.0-3]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppad [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [2023.00.00.0-3]
[07:12] <vorlon> xnox, apw: well, there's an nvidia-open-gpu-kernel-modules synced from Debian that's stuck in -proposed due to wrong build-dependencies.  Do I want to fix this or remove it?
[07:19] <tjaalton> I'd say remove
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-editing-services1.0 (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-2 => 1.20.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oauth2token [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gromacs [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gromacs [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gromacs [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gromacs [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:47] <tjaalton> ahasenack: hi, right.. it was just confusing, so I invalidated the lunar task, but it will get the same string fix via 23.0.4 backport
[11:54] <ahasenack> noted, but I can't release it today
[11:54] <ahasenack> should be fine on monday
[11:55] <tjaalton> sure
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rocsparse [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.3.0+dfsg-6] (no packageset)
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-remote-desktop (lunar-proposed/main) [44.0-1 => 44.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:10] <lvoytek> vorlon: I was hoping Debian would release 9.18.15 to unstable soon since they have the code ready. I'll go ahead and get a merge going today though to get bind-dyndb-ldap through then get it synced up later
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwpe (jammy-updates/universe) [1.12.0-1 => 1.12.0-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwpe [sync] (jammy-updates) [1.12.0-1]
[14:46] <vorlon> lvoytek: cheers
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unifdef (jammy-updates/universe) [2.10-1.1 => 2.10-1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unifdef [sync] (jammy-updates) [2.10-1.1]
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unifdef (jammy-updates/universe) [2.10-1.1 => 2.10-1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[14:59] <vorlon> seb128: ^^ rejected?
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unifdef [sync] (jammy-updates) [2.10-1.1]
[15:07] <seb128> vorlon, launchpad emails states 'unifdef 2.10-1.1 in jammy (binaries conflicting with the existing ones)'
[15:07] <seb128> vorlon, I did
[15:07] <seb128> $ ./copy-package -b -s jammy --to-suite jammy-updates -e 2.10-1.1  unifdef
[15:08] <seb128> is that the wrong incantation?
[15:09] <vorlon> seb128: possibly an issue because the binaries were built across two different series.  I'll try a couple workarounds and let you know if it works, and if not we need to do a build1
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added unifdef to i386-whitelist in jammy
[15:10] <seb128> vorlon, thanks
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unifdef (jammy-updates/universe) [2.10-1.1 => 2.10-1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[15:11] <vorlon> seb128: ^^ copy from -s focal (the release the riscv64 binary built in) worked
[15:11] <coreycb_> hello sru team, if anyone gets a chance we could use a review for LP:#1996229
[15:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1996229 in python-magnumclient (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] magnum ui can not delete the coe cluster" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1996229
[15:11] <seb128> vorlon, how do you know? my copy also ended up in the queue, the rejection was when I accepted the upload out of the queue (which you didn't do yet?)
[15:12] <vorlon> seb128: oh
[15:12] <vorlon> yes you're right, let's see
[15:12] <vorlon> ok yes it was rejected
[15:12] <vorlon> seb128: I think this needs to be a build1 then
[15:12] <seb128> vorlon, k, I will do that, thanks
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gromacs [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gromacs [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.1-2ubuntu1]
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gromacs [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [2023.1-2ubuntu1]
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gromacs [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.1-2ubuntu1]
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gromacs [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [2023.1-2ubuntu1]
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gromacs [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.1-2ubuntu1]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oauth2token [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.0.3-1]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocsparse [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [5.3.0+dfsg-6]
[15:38] <seb128> unifdef rebuild uploaded, unsure if that should go through the SRU team or isn't required?
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unifdef (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.10-1.1 => 2.10-1.1build0.1] (i386-whitelist)
[15:41] <vorlon> seb128: tada, it's gone through the SRU team
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unifdef [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.10-1.1build0.1]
[15:48] <vorlon> seb128: (but not the SRU process; if you see that it's built before I do, let me know and I'll copy it straight to -updates)
[15:59] <Trevinho> vorlon: hey, if you've time in your SRU slot please check that yaru change as you should be faimilar with it already. also gjs is an interesting one
[15:59] <vorlon> Trevinho: absolutely
[16:00] <Trevinho> thanks!
[16:21] <vorlon> #   Copyright 2006, Bryce Harrington <bryce@osdl.org>
[16:21] <vorlon> suss
[16:23] <vorlon> ("why is this stack of perl modules being pulled into desktop-minimal? oh, because xdg-utils recommends it libnet-dbus-perl.  Hmm do we really need this?  What's xdg-screensaver...")
[16:23] <bryceh> hah
[16:24] <bryceh> that's a blast from the past.
[16:26] <vorlon> I wonder if we should drop the direct seeding of xdg-utils.  it wouldn't drop it from the images tho, it has reverse-depends/reverse-recommends
[16:27] <vorlon> anyway, moral of the story, don't put me in charge of an MIR because I'll yak shave
[16:29] <bryceh> vorlon, iirc xdg-* itself is all bash, but they serve as wrappers to various underlying tools as kind of a universal adapter.
[16:29] <bryceh> so it's possible one of the scripts is pulling in some sub-component piece for adaptation purposes, and so may be resolvable by just patching that sub-part out
[16:30] <bryceh> but it's been years and years since I even looked at any of that code so YMMV :-)
[16:30] <bryceh> man I'm old
[16:31] <vorlon> yeah it's not worth investing a whole lot of effort for minimal dependency/size savings, it's just funny that doing dbus in perl pulls in libwww-perl
[16:31] <bryceh> perl's gonna perl
[16:36] <bryceh> vorlon, btw speaking of perl -- followup status on the spamassassin 4 component mismatch you asked christian about the other day.  I've researched a bit about the various perl modules involved (it is indeed quite a list) and looked for pruning opportunities.  I've written up a prelim MIR at LP: #2023971, but need to figure out what to put for the Security and Quality Assurance headings in the paperwork.
[16:36] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2023971 in libmail-dmarc-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2023971
[16:37] <bryceh> but other than that, I'm not sure if there's anything else to do prior to submitting it.  If you have any further advice/tips/requests lemme know.
[16:37] <vorlon> bryceh: no advice, sorry :)
[16:40] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: soooo llvm-toolchain-15 ftbfs on ppc64el now after an unrelated change... https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-15/1:15.0.7-4ubuntu2/+build/26311880
[16:40] <vorlon> (and it's reproducible)
[16:42] <vorlon> also apparently my change didn't fix things, boo
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-remote-desktop (jammy-proposed/main) [42.7-0ubuntu1 => 42.8-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:08] <dbungert> oh I skipped a few versions of livecd-rootfs
[17:09] <dbungert> 849->890
[17:11] <dbungert> ubuntu-archive: should I attempt to fix the above version skip or should we skip 50 versions?
[17:12] <vorlon> dbungert: fixing it would be a footgun for whoever is following up 2.889.  I would leave it as-is
[17:12] <vorlon> (you didn't use dch -U?)
[17:12] <dbungert> I used dch but "fixed" the version manually
[17:13] <dbungert> good note on dch -U, thank you
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: stdgpu [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [1.3.0+git20220507.32e0517-2] (no packageset)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted stdgpu [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.3.0+git20220507.32e0517-2]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.22.1-1ubuntu0.1]
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.20.0-1ubuntu0.3]
[20:07] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: and after an unrelated change now it ftbfs on all arches <tableflip> https://launchpad.net/~vorlon/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/26313388
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected opencryptoki [source] (lunar-proposed) [3.20.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1]
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libppd [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:2.0~rc1-0ubuntu1.2]
[20:36] <vorlon> Trevinho: libadwaita-1 in lunar-proposed looks good, but LP: #2013126 needs a test case (this isn't part of the upstream release but a change to debian/patches)
[20:36] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2013126 in libadwaita-1 (Ubuntu Lunar) "file chooser dialog doesn't respect system theme" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2013126
[20:36] <Trevinho> vorlon: oh, right... I thought it was already defined, let me format the bug
[20:41] <Trevinho> vorlon: done
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [source] (lunar-proposed) [44.1-1ubuntu0.1]
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.0.4-2ubuntu2.3]
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-remote-desktop (jammy-proposed/main) [42.7-0ubuntu1 => 42.8-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected evince [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.3-0ubuntu3.1]
[21:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-video-effects [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.5.0-1ubuntu2]
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hplip [source] (lunar-proposed) [3.22.10+dfsg0-1ubuntu1]
[21:34] <vorlon> lvoytek: I've recently been reprimanded myself for not using dpkg-buildpackage -v for SRUs that need to be landed on top of other SRUs still in -proposed; I'm going to reupload mysql-8.0 to also point at LP: #180466, so it's clear to other SRU team members this is an SRU that should be released and not just an autopkgtest-fixing upload that should be staged in -proposed
[21:34] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 180466 in Feisty Backports "Latest clamav backport (0.91.2-3ubuntu2.1~feisty1) stuck in dependency wait" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/180466
[21:34] <vorlon> lvoytek: lvoytek: make that LP: #1980466, we probably don't need to reference a feisty backports bug
[21:34] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1980466 in mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu Lunar) "mysql_secure_installation can not set root password and ends up with loop" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980466
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mysql-8.0 [source] (lunar-proposed) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.23.04.4]
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (lunar-proposed/main) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.23.04.3 => 8.0.33-0ubuntu0.23.04.4] (core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[21:38] <vorlon> rs2009: ubuntu-unity daily images are over their indicated size limit.  Do you plan to do some work to shrink them again, or should the limit be raised for mantic?
[21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.76.2-1~ubuntu23.04.1]
[21:56] <jbicha> vorlon: I replied to bug 2023675 if you're still handling SRUs today
[21:56] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2023675 in gnome-video-effects (Ubuntu) "flip effect doesn't work on  GStreamer 1.22" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2023675
[21:57] <vorlon> jbicha: the comment about tradeoffs of risk/reward under https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Staging_low_priority_uploads is also relevant here
[21:58] <jbicha> yes, I think that if we're going to include the Cheese app by default, the Flip feature is expected to work
[21:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hplip (lunar-proposed/main) [3.22.10+dfsg0-1 => 3.22.10+dfsg0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[21:59] <jbicha> (I am planning to propose that we not include Cheese by default for Desktop 23.10)
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gjs [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.72.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (jammy-proposed/main) [1.72.2-0ubuntu2 => 1.72.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla)
[22:07] <vorlon> jbicha: I'll give this some more thought; for the moment I'm processing other SRUs
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1]
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-remote-desktop [source] (lunar-proposed) [44.2-0ubuntu1]
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-remote-desktop [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.8-0ubuntu1]
[22:11] <vorlon> jbicha, Trevinho: gnome-remote-desktop in jammy-proposed seems to incorrectly reuse the already-closed SRU bug #1998966
[22:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1998966 in gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Jammy) "Update gnome-remote-desktop to 42.7" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1998966
[22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mysql-8.0 [source] (lunar-proposed) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.23.04.4]
[22:13] <jbicha> vorlon: I believe Trevinho wants to make another change to the gnome-remote-desktop jammy SRU
[22:13] <vorlon> ok
[22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mysql-8.0 [source] (kinetic-proposed) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.22.10.4]
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (kinetic-proposed/main) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.22.10.3 => 8.0.33-0ubuntu0.22.10.4] (core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mysql-8.0 [source] (jammy-proposed) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.22.04.4]
[22:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mysql-8.0 [source] (kinetic-proposed) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.22.10.4]
[22:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mysql-8.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.20.04.4]
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (jammy-proposed/main) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 => 8.0.33-0ubuntu0.22.04.4] (core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (focal-proposed/main) [8.0.33-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 8.0.33-0ubuntu0.20.04.4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hplip [source] (lunar-proposed) [3.22.10+dfsg0-1ubuntu1]
[22:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libadwaita-1 [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.3-0ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-debian [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.46ubuntu1]
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-debian [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.1.43ubuntu1.1]
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-debian [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.36ubuntu1.1]
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlb [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.8-1ubuntu0.1]
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlb [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.6-2ubuntu0.1]
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlb [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.6-2ubuntu0.1~20.04.1]
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1ubuntu0.1]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plume-hashmap-util-java [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.0.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-bitflags-1 [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [1.3.2-5] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plume-reflection-util-java [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.2.2+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-bitflags-1 [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [1.3.2-5] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-bitflags-1 [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [1.3.2-5] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-bitflags-1 [armhf] (mantic-proposed/none) [1.3.2-5] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plume-reflection-util-java [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.2+ds-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-bitflags-1 [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [1.3.2-5]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-bitflags-1 [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [1.3.2-5]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-bitflags-1 [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.3.2-5]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-bitflags-1 [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [1.3.2-5]
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plume-hashmap-util-java [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.0.1+ds-1]
[23:43] <vorlon> Trevinho: it's not worth blocking the SRU over, but fwiw I don't see anywhere that gnome-shell/src/gnome-shell-sass/widgets/_calendar.scss maps to a linked bug
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.5]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jool [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.1.7-1ubuntu1]