| lissyx | bandali, looks like all branches are following old llvm :( | 05:42 |
|---|---|---|
| lissyx | nteodosio, hello, by any chance do you know more about the ci infra for launchpad? | 06:56 |
| lissyx | nteodosio, I'm curious about the current state of arm64 workers wrt cpu and ram | 06:56 |
| nteodosio | Hi lissyx. I do not. | 06:59 |
| nteodosio | lissyx, wlll nothing up to date at least, last I checked a year ago it was 4 virtual cores with 8 GB RAM. | 07:01 |
| nteodosio | I was suggested to introspect from within a build, possibly with procenv. | 07:02 |
| lissyx | i've found some random launchpad thread mentionning 16GB dated back end of november 2022 | 07:02 |
| lissyx | I dont have access to launchpad | 07:02 |
| lissyx | I was looking at whether we might enable debug symbols on armhf/arm64 builds again | 07:03 |
| nteodosio | lissyx, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/658944530/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-arm64.procenv_0.51-0.2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 07:09 |
| nteodosio | So yes 16 GB memory | 07:10 |
| lissyx | and 4 CPUs | 07:10 |
| lissyx | thx | 07:10 |
| lissyx | I'm testing an arm64 build on a gcp host with those settings ... | 07:11 |
| lissyx | nteodosio, can you just triple check on an armhf? | 07:43 |
| nteodosio | Same there lissyx, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/658944733/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-armhf.procenv_0.51-0.2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 07:45 |
| lissyx | thanks! | 07:45 |
| nteodosio | For the record, I find that via https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20230324-lunar/+packages | 07:45 |
| ricotz | bandali, hi, please retry https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/26321843 | 07:45 |
| ricotz | good morning desktopers | 07:46 |
| nteodosio | Good morning, ricotz! | 07:46 |
| lissyx | seb128, took me a bit, but https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1839317 | 09:04 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1839317 in Taskcluster "Build upstream snap on treeherder" [--, New] | 09:04 | |
| seb128 | lissyx, sorry but I don't know what treeherder is, is that a new infra? | 10:37 |
| ricotz | seb128, hi :), could you retry https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/26321843 | 11:02 |
| seb128 | ricotz, hey, retried | 11:13 |
| ricotz | seb128, thank you | 11:14 |
| ricotz | seb128, jfyi, this is relevant for thunderbird 115 as well - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cargo/+bug/2021427 | 11:15 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Launchpad bug 2021427 in rustc (Ubuntu) "rustc 1.66 and cargo 0.67 required by firefox 115" [Undecided, New] | 11:15 | |
| seb128 | ricotz, ack | 11:15 |
| lissyx | seb128, no, that's where all our ci runs | 11:23 |
| lissyx | SIGKILL on arm64 :( | 11:23 |
| === Guest277 is now known as ogra | ||
| === ogra is now known as Guest711 | ||
| === Guest711 is now known as ogra | ||
| nteodosio | lissyx, out of memory? | 12:08 |
| lissyx | I guess | 12:08 |
| lissyx | I'm trying the reduce rust debuginfo patch | 12:08 |
| seb128 | lissyx, why are you trying to build the snap there? to integrate a build in your CI? | 12:28 |
| lissyx | seb128, yeah and testing status of arm builds as well | 12:30 |
| lissyx | seb128, so we can monitor more easily, leverage mozregression without facing launchpad/github limitations (artifacts expiration etc) | 12:46 |
| seb128 | what's the goal? to build the official snap there? | 12:49 |
| lissyx | no | 12:50 |
| lissyx | seb128, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1839365 isn't this expected by xdg? | 12:51 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1839365 in Firefox Build System "Can't mount/browse shares on GVFS/GIO" [--, Unconfirmed] | 12:51 | |
| lissyx | seb128, the current launchpad/github situation makes it complicated for us to follow breakages more directly, or to test with try, or to use mozregression with a build that is yours (we have a repackage snap task, but it's diverging too often) | 12:52 |
| lissyx | -rw-rw-r-- 1 alissy alissy 134213974 Jun 20 12:50 firefox_114.0.2-1_arm64.debug | 13:01 |
| lissyx | -rw-r--r-- 1 alissy alissy 238317568 Jun 20 12:50 firefox_114.0.2-1_arm64.snap | 13:01 |
| lissyx | so maybe we can enable debug symbols now :) | 13:01 |
| lissyx | seb128, https://paste.debian.net/1283610/ | 13:03 |
| seb128 | lissyx, the xdg thing is basically https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/merge_requests/67 no ? | 13:11 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Merge 67 in GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome "Send remote file URIs as local FUSE URIs" [Opened] | 13:11 | |
| lissyx | seb128, no I think they complain there's no way to mount a remote share directly from the dialog? | 13:15 |
| seb128 | lissyx, 'In the file browser, I can only see local paths, and no "other locations" where I could browse the smb shares.' | 13:16 |
| seb128 | well I think it's the same issue than the portal doesn't expose non local mounts atm | 13:16 |
| lissyx | this MR is about changing the /run/xxx paths | 13:17 |
| seb128 | hum | 13:18 |
| seb128 | in any case it's an issue of the portal | 13:18 |
| lissyx | it sounds much like the bug I filed | 13:20 |
| lissyx | https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/issues/48 | 13:21 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Issue 48 in GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome "File picker should not display remote gvfs mountpoint it cannot handle until https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/issues/213 is fixed" [Opened] | 13:21 | |
| lissyx | except it's still open | 13:21 |
| lissyx | seb128, do you think you can give a round of armhf/arm64 builds on launchpad and on github to check if debug symbols are still a problem? | 13:21 |
| seb128 | lissyx, if you would basically mean do a build with the pastbin patch you shared? | 13:23 |
| lissyx | https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/694428 mentions an upgrade to 16GB end of 2022 | 13:23 |
| seb128 | bandali, ^ could you perhaps help there? | 13:23 |
| lissyx | seb128, yeah, this patch was on core22 stable arm64 though | 13:23 |
| lissyx | might need a bit more adaptations for others | 13:23 |
| seb128 | well we can try on core22 if that's only to test how the infra handles it | 13:23 |
| lissyx | but I tested that on a gcp arm64 host, 16GB RAM, no swap, 4 CPUs so similar to the setup | 13:24 |
| lissyx | at least from what procenv returned shared by nteodosio earlier today | 13:24 |
| ricotz | seb128, looks like it needs another kick https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/26321843 | 14:03 |
| bandali | hey lissyx i'll do test arm builds with your debug symbol patch later tonight | 14:33 |
| bandali | ricotz, done | 14:33 |
| lissyx | opt and debug builds: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=62e022def101d27ae5c679631147427f8fa11f8d :) | 14:43 |
| lissyx | seb128, do we have any guarantee that network will be available besides during pull? https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/issues/4220#issuecomment-1598923779 | 14:53 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Issue 4220 in snapcore/snapcraft "Using after leads to pull after instead of waiting for complete part" [Open] | 14:53 | |
| seb128 | no, the builder go in offline mode after 3 hours, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1885164 | 14:55 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Launchpad bug 1885164 in Rutabaga "snap builds: network access timeout" [High, Triaged] | 14:55 | |
| lissyx | ok, that's 3h whatever the step | 15:01 |
| lissyx | nvm, we dont care about upload on launchpad | 15:01 |
| seb128 | lissyx, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1839170 was closed but don't we need to fix https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/issues/4220 first to have back debug symbols? | 16:59 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1839170 in Firefox Build System "Missing debug symbols for Firefox Snap core22" [--, Resolved: Fixed] | 16:59 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Issue 4220 in snapcore/snapcraft "Using after leads to pull after instead of waiting for complete part" [Open] | 16:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!