| zhsj | hi, could someone retry the build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-golang-x-tools/1:0.6.0+ds-1/+build/26311726 | 08:19 |
|---|---|---|
| ginggs | zhsj: . | 10:18 |
| paride | @pilot in | 11:01 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: paride | ||
| === Guest277 is now known as ogra | ||
| === ogra is now known as Guest711 | ||
| === Guest711 is now known as ogra | ||
| adrien | \o | 12:19 |
| adrien | I'm doing +1 (I actually started on yesterday but I was digging in and tooling); can someone retry dolphin on armhf? retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocked-by-tests dolfin | grep armhf | 12:29 |
| adrien | there have been many timeouts on armhf over the week-end and this one has shown timeouts too | 12:29 |
| jawn-smith | adrien: I'm on it | 13:03 |
| adrien | jawn-smith: \o/ | 13:23 |
| adrien | and thanks :) | 13:23 |
| jawn-smith | yw! | 13:24 |
| adrien | ftr coq packages are blocked by 3 FTBFS: two of them will be fixed by merging from debian and one of them will also be fixed by merging but it does so by dropping 32-bit arches and I think there's a better fix (from upstream); I've added a report on LP with update-excuse tag and debian bug watch | 13:59 |
| paride | @pilot out | 14:32 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| adrien | can someone retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocked-by-tests gnustep-base | grep amd64 | 14:38 |
| adrien | thanks :) | 14:38 |
| adrien | basically, gnustep-base uses httpbin.org for some of its tests and the host been unreliable but it seems fixed now so there's a window for making this pass | 14:39 |
| adrien | I think it's safe to do it on all arches; I'll let you judge if you want to do on more | 14:39 |
| adrien | there's also a patch upstream to use example.org/net instead but there's no reason to wait on that (it's not part of a release yet but I'm filling a bug in debian) | 14:40 |
| === coreycb_ is now known as coreycb | ||
| lvoytek | @pilot in | 15:00 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: lvoytek | ||
| ginggs | adrien: gnustep-base triggered (on all arches) | 15:11 |
| adrien | thanks :) hopefully the timing is right and it passes | 15:11 |
| === mmikowski5 is now known as mmikowski | ||
| === klebers_ is now known as klebers | ||
| kanashiro[m] | vorlon: I'd like to ask if it is possible to remove containerd/1.7.2-0ubuntu2 (source and binaries) from mantic-proposed. I filed this bug with more details of what is happening LP: #2024490 | 18:58 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2024490 in containerd (Ubuntu) "[RM] Remove containerd from mantic-proposed" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2024490 | 18:58 | |
| lvoytek | @pilot out | 18:59 |
| kanashiro[m] | sorry, this should have gone to #ubuntu-release | 19:00 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| seb128 | kanashiro[m], removed | 19:05 |
| kanashiro[m] | seb128: thank you! | 19:05 |
| seb128 | np! | 19:05 |
| adrien_ | kanashiro[m]: btw, I'm looking at rack-related migrations and I'm wondering why it Replaces: ruby-rack (<< 3.0.0-1); disclaimer: I'm not familiar with these packages and I might also be unaware of some trick | 20:02 |
| adrien_ | ftr, R packages seem to often need https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#Converting-a-package-to-use-registration which is part of https://github.com/edzer/intervals/commit/a8078e662b857fbee418e0c545c9805012b5f011 AFAIU | 20:10 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit a8078e6 in edzer/intervals "address various CRAN issues" | 20:10 | |
| adrien_ | unfortunately I'm not sure all these packages are well-maintained | 20:12 |
| adrien_ | s/packages/sources/ | 20:12 |
| kanashiro[m] | adrien_: those are new packages and some code there used to be in ruby-rack before 3.0. I need to work on the transition to ruby-rack 3 in the debian side | 20:15 |
| kanashiro[m] | it is in my todo list | 20:16 |
| adrien_ | kanashiro[m]: ok; so, is ruby-rack 3.0.0-1 usable? I'm asking because of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack/3.0.0-1ubuntu1 | 20:22 |
| adrien_ | and https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ruby-rack | 20:22 |
| kanashiro[m] | adrien_: some apps still do not support ruby-rack version 3 upstream, if you check the bug in the end of the excuses entry you'll see that I added the block-proposed tag to not let it migrate until I make sure everything is good to go | 20:24 |
| adrien_ | kanashiro[m]: ah, right, sorry for the noise; I've been using other frontends to excuses today and they're not showing bugs! | 20:26 |
| adrien_ | thanks! | 20:26 |
| kanashiro[m] | yw :) | 20:26 |
| kanashiro[m] | adrien_: I suppose you are working on a +1 maintenance shift, right? If you want to submit patches to the packages blocking ruby-rack I'd be happy in reviewing them, but I'd like to tackle them in Debian first | 20:28 |
| adrien_ | right, +1; there are quite a few things stuck at the moment and which seem to only need small nudges so I'm focusing on these at the moment; or at least analyzing the current set of excuses so that subsequent people on +1 have an easier time | 20:31 |
| adrien_ | (plus I really don't know ruby) | 20:31 |
| adrien_ | but I might have a look | 20:31 |
| kanashiro[m] | it is up to you :) | 20:31 |
| adrien_ | it probably depends on whether I have the courage to look at the 50 or so R packages with issues :D | 20:31 |
| kanashiro[m] | have fun! | 20:32 |
| === adrien_ is now known as adrien | ||
| adrien | hah, for R: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034683 | 20:44 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 1034683 in src:r-base "r-base: new upstream release unintentionally uploaded to unstable" [Serious, Open] | 20:44 | |
| adrien | > r-base (4.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium | 20:44 |
| adrien | > . | 20:44 |
| adrien | > * New upstream release (into 'experimental' while Debian is frozen) | 20:45 |
| adrien | spot the issue | 20:45 |
| sarnold | oops | 20:45 |
| sarnold | how bad is that to undo? | 20:45 |
| adrien | it seems it was fine for debian but for us, r-base probably needs to be removed from proposed for now | 20:46 |
| sarnold | ah nice, it looks like debian gets to just sit back and let things run their course... I bet that'd work for us, too? | 20:48 |
| adrien | dunno, I don't have enough experience to judge :) | 20:49 |
| adrien | but I can say that there are 23 packages impacted by the "registration" issue with native code bindings | 20:50 |
| adrien | at least one project is maybe abandonned (I looked at two, maybe three, so the ratio is not good) | 20:51 |
| mitya57 | Hi! I'm getting 500 error when trying to retry an autopkgtest: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=mantic&arch=armhf&package=python-hypothesis&trigger=sphinx-rtd-theme%2F1.2.2%2Bdfsg-1 | 21:08 |
| bluca | for the cloud autopkgtest environment, is it LXD running the relevant ubuntu version under test? I need to reproduce the exact same running environment, to debug some weird test issues | 22:28 |
| bluca | if some documentation on how to replicate locally exist, would greatly appreciate a pointer | 22:29 |
| bdmurray | lxd is only used for the armhf instances otherwise we are launching instances with openstack and connecting to them via ssh | 22:57 |
| bluca | is that qemu VMs then? | 23:01 |
| bluca | (never used openstack, not familiar with it) | 23:02 |
| bluca | found https://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/auto-pkg-test.html#executing-the-test | 23:07 |
| bdmurray | I would start with using qemu as a backend and see if you can recreate the issue | 23:14 |
| bdmurray | mitya57: I restarted a service and was able to submit the test again | 23:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!