[02:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[02:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[02:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Minimal amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[03:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [amd64] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.25-1] (ubuntu-server)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [armhf] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.25-1] (ubuntu-server)
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.25-1] (ubuntu-server)
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [s390x] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.25-1] (ubuntu-server)
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [arm64] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.25-1] (ubuntu-server)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (lunar-proposed/main) [3.1.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.1.2-1] (core) (sync)
[06:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.25-1] (ubuntu-server)
[06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+nezha [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+icicle [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+licheerv [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [3.25-1]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [3.25-1]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [3.25-1]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [3.25-1]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [3.25-1]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [3.25-1]
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-13 (lunar-proposed/main) [13-20230320-1ubuntu1 => 13.1.0-2ubuntu2~23.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-13-cross (lunar-proposed/main) [3ubuntu1 => 3ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-13-cross-ports (lunar-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu1 => 3ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.11 (lunar-proposed/main) [3.11.2-6ubuntu0.1 => 3.11.4-1~23.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12 (lunar-proposed/main) [12.2.0-17ubuntu1 => 12.3.0-1ubuntu1~23.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross (lunar-proposed/main) [15ubuntu1 => 15ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross-ports (lunar-proposed/universe) [13ubuntu1 => 13ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross-mipsen (lunar-proposed/universe) [3+c3 => 3+c3ubuntu0.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcsc-lite [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.9.9-1ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcsc-lite [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.9.9-1ubuntu0.22.10.1]
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcsc-lite [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.9.5-3ubuntu1]
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12 (kinetic-proposed/main) [12.2.0-3ubuntu1 => 12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.10] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross (kinetic-proposed/main) [12ubuntu1 => 12ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross-ports (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8ubuntu1 => 8ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12 (jammy-proposed/main) [12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04 => 12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross (jammy-proposed/main) [5ubuntu2.2 => 5ubuntu2.4] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (jammy-proposed/main) [2.38-4ubuntu2.2 => 2.38-4ubuntu2.3] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross-ports (jammy-proposed/universe) [1ubuntu1.1 => 1ubuntu1.3] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11 (lunar-proposed/main) [11.3.0-12ubuntu1 => 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~23.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross (lunar-proposed/universe) [15ubuntu1 => 15ubuntu2.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross-mipsen (lunar-proposed/universe) [5+c3 => 5+c3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross-ports (lunar-proposed/universe) [10ubuntu1 => 10ubuntu2.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11 (kinetic-proposed/main) [11.3.0-6ubuntu1 => 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.10] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross (kinetic-proposed/universe) [15ubuntu1 => 15ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11 (jammy-proposed/main) [11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross-ports (kinetic-proposed/universe) [10ubuntu1 => 10ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross (jammy-proposed/main) [11ubuntu1.2 => 11ubuntu1.3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross-ports (jammy-proposed/universe) [8ubuntu1.2 => 8ubuntu1.3] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Mantic Daily] (20230629) has been added
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.10 (jammy-proposed/main) [3.10.6-1~22.04.2ubuntu1.1 => 3.10.12-1~22.04.2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.10 (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.10.7-1ubuntu0.4 => 3.10.12-1~22.10] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-stdlib-extensions (jammy-proposed/main) [3.10.6-1~22.04 => 3.10.8-1~22.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-stdlib-extensions (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.10.7-1 => 3.10.8-1~22.10] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629.1)
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core amd64 edge [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[09:32] <juergh> SRU vanguards: Please promote linux-firmware packages to updates. They've been sitting in proposed for 20 days now. All bugs verified.
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-13 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [13.1.0-2ubuntu2~23.04]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-13-cross [sync] (lunar-proposed) [3ubuntu1.1]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-13-cross-ports [sync] (lunar-proposed) [3ubuntu1.1]
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.11 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [3.11.4-1~23.04]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcupsfilters [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.0~rc1-0ubuntu1.2]
[10:03] <rbasak> juergh: please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1968604/comments/16. For SRU verification, we expect a report explaining what was tested and how it was tested, as described in the automatic comment posted at the time a package is accepted into proposed.
[10:03] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1968604 in linux-firmware (Ubuntu) "rtl8761b usb bluetooth doesn't work following reboot until unplug/replug" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[10:04] <rbasak> "...please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package..."
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (mantic-proposed/main) [1.68.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[10:14] <fnordahl> rbasak: in an effort to save some cycles I requested a point release update to openvswitch in Lunar as a sync from Debian as it will essentially be the exact same thing as is on its way into Mantic.
[10:14] <fnordahl> rbasak: shortly after doing that I remembered that we tend to modify the versions on SRU'ed packages (i.e. the -0ubuntu023.04.1 suffix)
[10:14] <fnordahl> rbasak: not sure if the sync machinery takes care of that or if it would be appropriate to reject the sync and upload a manually massaged package instead?
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (mantic-proposed) [1.68.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (mantic-proposed/main) [1.68.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.68.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[10:39] <rbasak> fnordahl: it's important that the build will be performed on Lunar rather than on Mantic, and that can be tricky with some of our other constraints (version in Mantic must be equal or higher than Lunar, and cannot do a second build with the same version string)
[10:40] <rbasak> A sync also prevents SRU paperwork from existing unless there's already a bug reference in the changelog.
[10:41] <rbasak> Looking at the current version status across sid, lunar and mantic I don't think that'll work, sorry.
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Mantic Daily] has been updated (5411104873)
[10:42] <rbasak> fnordahl: I think it might be easiest if you "backport" from mantic, adding a changelog entry with a version lower than mantic, and with an SRU bug reference for the SRU paperwork.
[10:43] <rbasak> Version 3.1.2-1~ubuntu0.23.04.1 or something like that
[10:46] <rbasak> Or 3.1.2-0ubuntu0.23.04.1 would work too and perhaps fit the existing pattern better.
[10:47] <rbasak> The former would make it clearer that it's a backport from Debian; the latter tends to be used when we diverge from Debian. But either works.
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openvswitch [sync] (lunar-proposed) [3.1.2-1]
[10:50] <rbasak> ^ rejected because of the above
[10:51] <rbasak> fnordahl: in my suggestion above I'm also assuming that debian/ hasn't changed apart from the changelog or other minor metadata, since that's generally a requirement for microrelease SRUs.
[10:52] <rbasak> HTH!
[10:53] <fnordahl> thx!
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [12.3.0-1ubuntu1~23.04]
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross [sync] (lunar-proposed) [15ubuntu1.1]
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [sync] (lunar-proposed) [13ubuntu1.1]
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross-mipsen [sync] (lunar-proposed) [3+c3ubuntu0.2]
[11:44] <juergh> rbasak: Ah sorry, missed your comment. Updated the bug, let me know if that's (not) sufficient. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1968604/comments/17
[11:44] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1968604 in linux-firmware (Ubuntu) "rtl8761b usb bluetooth doesn't work following reboot until unplug/replug" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[11:55] <blackboxsw> rbasak:  it looks like you may be SRU vanguard today. If there is time, we have uploaded supplemental hot-fix for cloud-init 23.2.1 for F, J,K and L due to an SRU verification issue that was discovered on 23.2 before we promoted from -proposed to -updates. It's a single commit fix which may make the typical review of cloud-init easier.  #2025180
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [11.4.0-1ubuntu1~23.04]
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [sync] (lunar-proposed) [15ubuntu2.1]
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [sync] (lunar-proposed) [10ubuntu2.1]
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-mipsen [sync] (lunar-proposed) [5+c3ubuntu0.1]
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Unity Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12 [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.10]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [12ubuntu1.1]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [8ubuntu1.1]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11 [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.10]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [15ubuntu1.1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [10ubuntu1.1]
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magnumclient (focal-proposed/main) [2.11.0-0ubuntu6 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.10 [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [3.10.12-1~22.10]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-stdlib-extensions [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [3.10.8-1~22.10]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04]
[13:52] <xnox> bdmurray: could you merge mantic hint to migrate riscv kernel https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/445461 for which autopkgtesting makes no sense?
[13:52] <xnox> (as there are no riscv autopkgtests)
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5ubuntu2.4]
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1ubuntu1.3]
[13:56] <rbasak> coreycb: python-magnumclient> can you not use the same method that was used for the current upload? SRUs are supposed to be minimal. Rather than requiring us to analyse and prove that differences aren't relevant, the expectation is that your workflows will ensure that those differences do not exist.
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2.38-4ubuntu2.3]
[13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04]
[13:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [11ubuntu1.3]
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [8ubuntu1.3]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.10 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [3.10.12-1~22.04.2]
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-stdlib-extensions [sync] (jammy-proposed) [3.10.8-1~22.04]
[14:16] <blackboxsw> rbasak: please reject 23.2.1 for cloud-init enqueued for -proposed initial review. I found another regression that'll break this
[14:16] <blackboxsw> so I'll need to re-upload later today
[14:16] <rbasak> blackboxsw: sure. But what day do you think it is? :-P
[14:17] <blackboxsw> sorry I saw your SRU related reviews and thought you may be stepping in for ahase-nack today
[14:18] <rbasak> I can see how it looks that way. SRU reviews tend to need lots of followup and has a tendency to creep beyond SRU shifts :-/
[14:25] <rbasak> ahasenack_: I'm going to look at the ua-tools SRU now, as I reviewed it already.
[14:25] <ahasenack_> ok
[14:25] <rbasak> I already grabbed the card in Trello. Would that be sufficient to sync with you in future?
[14:28] <ahasenack_> always, yes
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (lunar-proposed) [28.1~23.04]
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [28.1~22.04]
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [28.1~22.10]
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [28.1~20.04]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [28.1~18.04]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [28.1~16.04]
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dput (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.1.2ubuntu2 => 1.1.2ubuntu2.1] (core)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dput (jammy-proposed/main) [1.1.0ubuntu2 => 1.1.0ubuntu2.1] (core)
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dput (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.3ubuntu1 => 1.0.3ubuntu1.1] (core)
[15:36] <blackboxsw> the
[15:55] <blackboxsw> ahasenack_: the only unapproved upload to reject for cloud-init is focal 23.2.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 it's a typing issue that only affects focal upload not the rest of 23.2.1 LP: #2025376
[15:55] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2025376 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "apport general hooks break on type annotations" [Critical, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2025376
[15:59] <juliank> ginggs: can you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/445461 to fix the linux-meta-riscv autopkgtest stuff?
[16:01] <juliank> or bdmurray perhaps
[16:01] <blackboxsw> cloud-init 23.2.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.2  is the desired replacement in unapproved queue for 23.2.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-magnumclient [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[16:23] <ginggs> juliank: looking...
[16:29] <ginggs> juliank, xnox: .
[16:35] <juliank> Thanks gi
[16:35] <juliank> Thanks ginggs
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpgme1.0 (jammy-proposed/main) [1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4 => 1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpgme1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.13.1-7ubuntu2 => 1.13.1-7ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [23.2-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 => 23.2.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.2] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[17:28] <ahasenack_> this report has an old timestamp at the top, is it broken? https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/jammy/update_excuses.html
[17:28] <ahasenack_> kinetic and lunar are current
[17:28] <ahasenack_> focal is also current
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-performance [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-performance [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-performance [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:39] <bdrung> ahasenack_, if you have some spare time, the SRUs for python-debian and distro-info are verified: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dput/+bug/1991606
[17:39] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1991606 in drslib (Ubuntu) "Invalid PEP440 package version breaking setuptools >= 66" [High, New]
[17:39] <ahasenack_> bdrung: ack, I'm going through the list
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-performance [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:39] <bdrung> thanks
[17:39] <ahasenack_> blackboxsw: also ack, will check what you wrote in a minute
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-performance [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnustep-performance [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:54] <vorlon> ahasenack_: yes.  I saw some comments from apw the other day that seemed like they might be related to the breakage; but basically britney thinks the archive is inconsistent
[17:54] <vorlon> and aborts
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-performance [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-performance [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-performance [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-performance [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-performance [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnustep-performance [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-2]
[17:57] <bdmurray> juergh: re bug 1968604 comment #15 mentions kinetic and comment #17 does not
[17:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1968604 in linux-firmware (Ubuntu) "rtl8761b usb bluetooth doesn't work following reboot until unplug/replug" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1968604
[17:59] <ahasenack_> vorlon: so no jammy tests have been run since june 15th? We can't release jammy SRUs then, can we?
[18:00] <ahasenack_> without confirming dep8 is green for the package(s) in question
[18:00] <vorlon> ahasenack_: I don't know if tests have been triggered, but there's certainly no report of the results
[18:00] <ahasenack_> vorlon: and the pending sru report page takes the results from there I suspect, so can't be trusted in that regard (that there are no dep8 failures)
[18:00] <vorlon> correct
[18:01] <vorlon> latest full log showing the problem: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/log/jammy/2023-06-29/17:29:43.log
[18:15] <vorlon> ahasenack_, apw: jammy-{security,updates} has linux-restricted-modules 5.15.0-76.83.  That source package lists linux-modules-nvidia-495-generic-hwe-22.04-edge (et al) in its debian/control; however, according to https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa2/+build/26310237 and https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa2/+build/26310236, this binary was not
[18:15] <vorlon> generated.  Instead, the binary present is built from linux-restricted-modules-hwe-5.19.  This has made a lot of britneys very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move
[18:15] <vorlon> ahasenack_, apw: we may need a new upload of linux-restricted-modules which drops these binaries from debian/control
[18:56] <vorlon> apw, ahasenack_: so, digging further, I see that linux-restricted-modules 5.15.0-77.84 in jammy-proposed has correctly dropped these binary packages from its debian/control.  When is that planned to be released?
[18:57] <ahasenack_> blackboxsw: done
[18:57] <vorlon> (and does britney being broken currently make this a chicken and egg problem)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [23.2.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1]
[18:58] <ahasenack_> vorlon: releasing that would just fix the problem you think?
[18:58] <ahasenack_> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules/6.2.0-25.25
[18:59] <vorlon> ahasenack_: that's what I'm speculating
[19:00] <ahasenack_> wow, the bug it mentions has the largest amount of comments I have ever seen in a launchpad bug :)
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[19:11] <blackboxsw> thanks again ahasenack_ are you planning on reviewing the unapproved cloud-init uploads today, or solely the rejection of the unwanted 23.2.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 for focal?
[19:11] <ahasenack_> it looks big, I'm going through some other ones first, I don't know yet
[19:12] <blackboxsw> the unapproved cloud-init uploads for -proposed are not the typical cloud-init WALL-O-TEXT new_upstream_snapshot.... it should be a single commit for J, K and L.. Focal will have 2 functional commits
[19:12] <ahasenack_> oh, cool
[19:12] <ahasenack_> I saw the list of bugs
[19:12] <ahasenack_> 4 bugs, 5 for focal, and multiple releases, multiply that, it gets scarey, that was my 10s analysis
[19:13] <blackboxsw> yeah 23.2 had aged in -proposed for 17 days or something after getting thorough review (and all verification tests passed) it's just a suppplemental fix for nocloud-net on kernel cmdline
[19:13] <blackboxsw> yeah
[19:13] <blackboxsw> +1
[19:13] <blackboxsw> but still > 1 bug and more than the most simple SRU cases. so no worries if there's not time.
[19:29] <ahasenack_> bdrung: quick question while I read through that. Why are ubuntu releases with setuptools < 66 affected? Because they could install it via pip or something?
[19:45] <bdrung> ahasenack, exactly. and that seems to be a quite common practice (judging from the linked github bug)
[22:28] <xnox> may i please ask an archive admin to clean up mantic-proposed old binaries for lowlatency kernel, i.e.: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#linux-lowlatency https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency
[22:28] <xnox> https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#linux-restricted-signatures-lowlatency https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#linux-signed-lowlatency ?
[22:29] <xnox> @ubuntu-archive mantic-proposed NBS ^
[22:30] <apw>  xnox looking
[22:32] <apw> xnox, requested.
[22:35] <vorlon> apw: hi, did you see my highlights above about britney breaking on jammy and possibly being fixed by linux-restricted-modules release?
[22:37] <apw> vorlon, i missed them, but have just read them.  i have a security release for all LRMs in final stages of rebuilding, which is will likely release last thing today.
[22:38] <vorlon> apw: ok excellent
[22:38] <vorlon> then I won't worry about neutering the britney code base :)
[23:09] <ahasenack> vorlon: I'll continue with some SRU processing tomorrow (my) morning, as I wasn't very efficient today. I took cloud-init and libvirt for now
[23:10] <ahasenack> I grabbed the respective cards in trello
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magnumclient (focal-proposed/main) [2.11.0-0ubuntu6 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[23:13] <ahasenack> blackboxsw: ^
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jst-config [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230629)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jst-config [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jst-config [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jst-config [armhf] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:43] <mitchdz> BTW if you are looking to approve my ec2-hibinit-agent package SRUs in the unapproved queue, properly testing it requires an AWS EC2 instance so feel free to defer the testing to me since it's special hardware
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jst-config [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.16.0-1] (no packageset)