[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxisf [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.8-1]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-der [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.7-1]
[01:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.9-1ubuntu0.3]
[05:04] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, any news w.r.t. redmine/s390x?
[05:04] <LocutusOfBorg> now with redmine/5.0.4-6 tests are happy again
[05:04] <LocutusOfBorg> if we unblock we can migrate it
[05:08] <LocutusOfBorg> (two ruby-libs are also preventing migration, but I opened already RC bugs in Debian)
[05:08] <LocutusOfBorg> ruby-gollum-lib and schleuder
[05:13] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, hello, libreoffice/ppc64el fails its autopkgtests, but this can be ignored this early in the cycle. Am I able to achieve this myself?
[05:45] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, I guess not... but you can open a MR against https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+ref/devel
[06:18] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, ah, ok, maybe best to wait for vorlon then
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-abishag-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-acheron-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adamina-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adelia-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-akando-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-abishag-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-acheron-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adamina-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adelia-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-akando-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8812au (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu17~22.04.1 => 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu17~22.04.2] (kernel-dkms)
[12:01] <doko> looking into https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/arm64/c/crash/20230706_081904_c7923@/log.gz
[12:01] <doko> E: Unable to locate package linux-image-5.15.0-76-generic-dbgsym
[12:01] <doko> 477s E: Couldn't find any package by glob 'linux-image-5.15.0-76-generic-dbgsym'
[12:01] <doko> 477s E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'linux-image-5.15.0-76-generic-dbgsym'
[12:01] <doko> are these infrastructure related issues?
[12:10] <LocutusOfBorg> liushuyu[m], hello you there?
[12:11] <LocutusOfBorg> please have a look at this https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/libzstd/-/merge_requests/4
[12:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Merge 4 in pkg-rpm-team/libzstd "d/tests: fix the tests on i386" [Opened]
[12:11] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't think the i386 solution works for us...
[12:11] <LocutusOfBorg> feel free to check logs here https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-costamagnagianfranco-locutusofborg-ppa/?format=plain
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> (I uploaded an ubuntu6 package, will do some more testing)
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> but doing
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> + python3-click:any,
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> + python3-typedload:any,
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> is not making them installable
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> (I also patched click/typedload to me multi-arch: allowed, but it didn't help)
[12:14] <liushuyu[m]> LocutusOfBorg: will take a look
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (focal-proposed/universe) [0.193ubuntu4~20.04.2 => 0.193ubuntu4~20.04.3] (no packageset)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.193ubuntu4~22.04.1 => 0.193ubuntu4~22.04.2] (no packageset)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.193ubuntu4~22.10.1 => 0.193ubuntu4~22.10.2] (no packageset)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.193ubuntu4~23.04.1 => 0.193ubuntu4~23.04.2] (no packageset)
[12:28] <LocutusOfBorg> liushuyu[m], I'm also interested in how you tested it... because I need to use ppa to do the test
[12:28] <rbasak> ahasenack: good morning! When you start your SRU shift, any chance you could prioritise a look at ubuntu-dev-tools in the queues for Focal onwards please? This fixes an SRU regression and will unbreak a bunch of failing git-ubuntu imports once I rebuild the snap after it lands. The patch itself is tiny. The review is more about whether this is the appropriate way to fix this I guess.
[12:31] <LocutusOfBorg> this looks working sudo autopkgtest -a i386 ../libzstd_1.5.5+dfsg2-1ubuntu6.dsc -U --apt-pocket=proposed --shell-fail  -- qemu ~/branches/autopkgtest-mantic-amd64.img
[12:31] <ahasenack> rbasak: will do, is that the pull-lp thing you've been working on?
[12:32] <rbasak> That's the one
[13:33] <LocutusOfBorg> is IS working to improve the capabilities of riscv64 builders? (don't know if possible, but llvm-toolchain-16 build process can take now weeks of failures to have one success)
[13:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I improved by using -g0, but I don't know what else I can do
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, I have a doubt, nvidia-cuda-toolkit is in sync now, but its still shown in https://merges.ubuntu.com/multiverse... maybe we need to cleanup the cache on the server after the new non-free introduced in Debian?
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> I tried to replicate the setup locally, but I need *lot
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> * of space :D
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.193ubuntu4~23.04.2]
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.193ubuntu4~22.10.2]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.193ubuntu4~22.04.2]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.193ubuntu4~20.04.3]
[13:43] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, hey, what do you mean by rust not being available on i386?
[13:44] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, this package I mean https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-rav1e/0.6.6-2
[13:44] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, any reason we can't whitelist it?
[13:45] <LocutusOfBorg> wanna try? it would make things easier for sure
[13:45] <LocutusOfBorg> but I know rust is a ton of little tiny libs, not sure how difficult it might be
[13:45] <seb128> yes I would prefer to do that having to carry a delta on the library
[13:45] <LocutusOfBorg> I would prefer that too :)
[13:46] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: riscv64 isn't managed by IS right now.  The work in progress on that is actually on the OpenStack team right now, specifically https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-nova-compute/+bug/2023211 - once that's done we should be able to take advantage of capacity in PS6
[13:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2023211 in OpenStack Nova Compute Charm "Run emulated riscv64 VMs on amd64" [Undecided, Triaged]
[13:46] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm happy to upload the revert for libheif
[13:47] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: I don't think non-free-firmware should have affected anything (though you've reminded me that I should add it to merge-o-matic).  Can you file a bug about this and I'll try to figure out what's going on?
[13:47] <LocutusOfBorg> wow, nice for having openstack riscv64 :)
[13:47] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, you are right that it might be tricky to enable the required build-depends there :-/
[13:47] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, bug against... lp?
[13:47] <cjwatson> Well, it will be once it works :)
[13:47] <cjwatson> no, against merge-o-matic
[13:48] <cjwatson> it's not related to LP at all really.  I just happen to maintain it for historical reasons
[13:48] <LocutusOfBorg> ok one to have non-free-foo-new and one to check nvidia-cuda-toolkit?
[13:48] <cjwatson> no, just the latter
[13:49] <cjwatson> I already added non-free-firmware
[13:49] <LocutusOfBorg> ack wow that was fast!
[13:49] <cjwatson> one-liner
[13:50] <LocutusOfBorg> it's always one-liner, if you know where and what to change :)
[13:50] <cjwatson> oh right, actually don't bother filing a bug
[13:50] <cjwatson> nvidia-cuda-toolkit was in merge-blacklist.txt because "enormous source package that causes us to run out of space"
[13:50] <LocutusOfBorg> in my daily job once I took like 2 months to fix a one-liner bug :D
[13:50] <LocutusOfBorg> ohhhhhh that makes sense
[13:51] <cjwatson> I wonder why I didn't just ask for resizing the volume
[13:52] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe back in the days, space was too expensive :)
[13:52] <cjwatson> back in the days yes, but I added that blacklist entry in 2022
[13:53] <cjwatson> I'll have to take merges.u.c down for a short while to attempt a resize
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> well, considering that many packages takes a huge amount of space, it might be a good idea anyway
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> nvidia-cuda-toolkit is about 6gb alone? O_O
[13:56] <cjwatson> I've added 512G to that volume and unblacklisted it
[13:56] <cjwatson> (total volume size is 2T now)
[13:57] <LocutusOfBorg> :D wow that is HUGE!
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, so, its a nack, or are you still working on it? just to know if I have to prepare a revert
[13:58] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, nack for now I guess but it sucks :/
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> well, it s a easy delta to carry
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/675945991/libheif_1.16.2-1_1.16.2-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> and probably the suggest [!i386] is not even that important
[13:59] <seb128> the issue is not the complexity of the delta, is to have to manually have to rebase it every time
[13:59] <seb128> it might be a few minutes but over the number of packages that makes days of work wasted in a cycle
[14:50] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I haven't heard that s390x infra is healthier, and now we've got more tests queued on all archs due to python3-defaults etc.  I don't know if ginggs thinks this is ready to un-blacklist.  But I don't think this is a case where we want to skip getting autopkgtest results for this package specifically
[14:56] <vorlon> ricotz: "this can be ignored this early in the cycle" uh no, because once we ignore a failure we basically have no way to track it and ensure it doesn't remain regressed over the cycle.  there's no rule that says it's ok to ignore autopkgtest regressions "early in the cycle".
[15:00] <ricotz> vorlon, I see, I don't want to waste time on fixing libreoffice 7.5.x for mantic/ppc64el while the target is the next release 7.6.x
[15:00] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: I've dropped redmine/s390x/mantic from never_run, will you trigger a test?
[15:00] <ricotz> vorlon, 7.5.5 will target lunar as SRU and the autopkgtests are succeeding there https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/lunar/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20230702_125043_5278f@/log.gz
[15:01] <ginggs> I don't think s390x is any healthier, but I'll keep an eye on this one
[15:02] <ricotz> vorlon, so it makes things easier given the infra is stressed enough
[15:03] <ricotz> vorlon, libreoffice 7.6.0~rc1 will tagged this week, and I am planning to upload it next week
[15:07] <vorlon> ginggs: why was there more than one copy of linux-nvidia-5.19 running with a migration-reference/0 trigger?
[15:11] <ginggs> vorlon: i don't know the cause
[15:13] <schopin> can we all publicly thank bdmurray for the most important item in the entire status thread?
[15:14] <schopin> the autopkgtest permission thing is a game changer for those without core-dev rights :)
[15:16] <schopin> Oh hell. wrong channel. But still, thanks Brian :)
[15:26] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, done!
[15:37] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: I wrote "trigger a test", it seems you have triggered 10 :(
[15:42] <bdmurray> doko: 477s E: Unable to locate package linux-image-5.15.0-76-generic-dbgsym isn't available at ddebs.ubuntu.com
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gupnp-igd [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gupnp-igd [i386] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp-igd [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.6.0-2]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gupnp-igd [i386] (mantic-proposed) [1.6.0-2]
[19:04] <kanashiro[m]> vorlon: would you have time to take a look at golang-1.20 in the focal NEW queue?
[19:08] <bdmurray> doko: ddebs.ubuntu.com is being updated
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.20 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04]
[19:19] <vorlon> kanashiro[m]: ^^
[19:19] <kanashiro[m]> vorlon: thanks!
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencryptoki (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.18.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2 => 3.18.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencryptoki (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.17.0+dfsg+20220202.b40982e-0ubuntu1.1 => 3.17.0+dfsg+20220202.b40982e-0ubuntu1.2] (no packageset)
[19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.20 [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04] (no packageset)
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.20 [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04] (no packageset)
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.20 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04] (no packageset)
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.20 [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04] (no packageset)
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.20 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04]
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.20 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04]
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.20 [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04]
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.20 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.20.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04]
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pipewire (lunar-proposed/main) [0.3.65-3ubuntu1 => 0.3.73-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[21:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dput [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.3ubuntu1.1]
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pipewire [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.73-1ubuntu1]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-seedir [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.4.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset)