nishitLocutusOfBorg: llvm-toolchain-13 on devel release was FTBFS - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-13/1:13.0.1-11ubuntu15, I tried patching few security issues on top of proposed version and next version(1:13.0.1-11ubuntu16) is also FTBFS, this is just to notify you that if the team tries to solve FTBFS on llvm-toolchain-13 then it will good to retain my cve patches on top of proposed releases.07:24
LocutusOfBorgnishit, ack,  I'm trying to fix the gcc failure07:44
mwhudsonbryceh: thanks for ppa-dev-tools :)10:25
rbasak@pilot in11:08
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2_, rbasak
ahasenackLocutusOfBorg: thanks for fixing rspamd/riscv64!12:13
LocutusOfBorgahasenack, please forward the patch upstream if possible...12:22
ahasenackLocutusOfBorg: does that linking with latomic need to happen for all architectures?13:27
ahasenackany idea how to do that with cmake?13:27
LocutusOfBorgsadly checkatomic.cmake is available only in some cmake-extra or similar13:28
ahasenacksomething is wrong with launchpad13:30
ahasenackhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rspamd is only listing rspamd 3.4-113:30
ahasenacksince then we have had 3.5-1ubuntu1, 1ubuntu2, and now 1ubuntu313:30
LocutusOfBorgahasenack, migration time13:36
LocutusOfBorg 2023-07-31 13:37:09 CEST Pending Mantic release universe misc 3.5-1ubuntu313:36
ahasenackLocutusOfBorg: found it in extra-cmake-modules13:56
ahasenackwhich is nice enough for ubuntu/debian, but unsure about upstream13:56
ahasenackanyway, it starts with a bug report and one proposed solution13:56
LocutusOfBorgahasenack, I copy-pasted on some upstream project14:10
LocutusOfBorgduplication is bad, but meh14:10
ahasenackI thought using extra-cmake-modules as a build-depends would work, but looks like it's more complicated than that14:10
ahasenackfiled upstream bug for now: https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/issues/455214:10
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Issue 4552 in rspamd/rspamd "[BUG] Build failure on riscV64" [Open]14:10
ahasenackok, reading manpage14:12
ahasenackmaybe it's easier to just add a build-time option, and we can use that in d/rules when building for riscv6414:14
ogayotI am trying to trigger an autopkgtest of this sysvinit build from my ppa: https://launchpad.net/~ogayot/+archive/ubuntu/mantic-proposed/+build/26464676 - but I get "You submitted an invalid request: Package sysvinit does not have any tests results."16:57
ogayotoh nevermind, there really are no tests in the package16:58
brycehmwhudson, thanks glad you're finding it useful!18:58
GunnarHjHi vorlon! Two new binaries are about to be added to ibus Build-Depends:22:54
GunnarHjThey are not present in i386, though. Thoughts?22:54
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit 47da15a in debian/ibus "Added libdbusmenu to Build-Depends"22:54
vorlonGunnarHj: once this lands in -proposed, ping ubuntu-archive to have those build-deps bootstrapped on i38622:55
GunnarHjvorlon: Ok, thanks for the guidance.22:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!