[23:12] <Phibs> How come 6.2 has been released for Jammy but it is EOL upstream already ?
[23:17] <jeremy31> Phibs: Because Ubuntu developers will maintain it for the time it is supported
[23:17] <Phibs> gotcha
[23:18] <Phibs> I wish there was a clear roadmap since we need 6.3+ for hardware enablement :(
[23:18] <jeremy31> It will get security updates merged from upstream
[23:19] <Phibs> 6.2 isn't even listed on kernel.org as it is EOL, do they still add security updates ?
[23:20] <jeremy31> They will pull from the latest stable
[23:20] <Phibs> wouldn't it be easier to just offer the latest stable ;)
[23:20] <Phibs> or at least a longterm
[23:21] <jeremy31> The new security updates get applied to all Ubuntu supported kernels 
[23:22] <jeremy31> Been that way for some time
[23:22] <Phibs> nod
[23:22] <Phibs> I mean obv i'm not gonna change any minds, but it just strikes me as odd to offer non-LTS (vanilla) kernels
[23:23] <Phibs> I was hoping to read the kernel team blog / roadmap but that was a 404
[23:26] <jeremy31> It will likely be a month or so before anyone knows what replaces 6.2 for hwe
[23:26] <Phibs> nod