| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpupower-gui [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpupower-gui [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpupower-gui [s390x] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpupower-gui [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpupower-gui [armhf] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cpupower-gui [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:39 | |
| ItzSwirlz | vorlon, so im going on vacation for next week (which sounds like I won't do anything, but I do have plenty of downtime in early mornings since everyone will still be sleeping), before I turn off my bouncer and pack up, anything you need from me until 2 PM EDT | 11:38 |
|---|---|---|
| ItzSwirlz | ig all i can do now is wait for the next livefs build that picks up the changes | 11:40 |
| ItzSwirlz | well anyways - you got my email if you need anything | 12:24 |
| kathenas | I see some of the mesa updtes are passing to 22.04 systems and breaking booting to GDM etc. Have we an issue or am I asking in the wrong place? | 13:12 |
| kathenas | s/updtes/updates | 13:12 |
| kathenas | https://pasteboard.co/CFoO1ojsLGbG.png | 13:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chkservice [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 17:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chkservice [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 17:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chkservice [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 17:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chkservice [s390x] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 17:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chkservice [armhf] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 17:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chkservice [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.3-1.1] (no packageset) | 17:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chkservice [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.3-1.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chkservice [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.3-1.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chkservice [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.3-1.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpupower-gui [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-2.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpupower-gui [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-2.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chkservice [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.3-1.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chkservice [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.3-1.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chkservice [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.3-1.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpupower-gui [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-2.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpupower-gui [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-2.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpupower-gui [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-2.1] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cpupower-gui [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-2.1] | 18:03 | |
| ahasenack | debian has removed the armhf build of blender (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024626) | 18:03 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1024626 in src:blender "blender FTBFS on 32bit" [Important, Open] | 18:03 | |
| ahasenack | rmadison confirms it | 18:03 |
| ahasenack | but I don't see anything in its d/control to not build on armhf | 18:03 |
| ahasenack | for ubuntu, do we just remove the armhf builds too (old ones in mantic: current one doesn't build anymore), or do we need to omit armhf in d/control and do the same in debian? | 18:04 |
| ahasenack | iirc if we just pull the debian source, we will try to build everywhere d/control allows it, right | 18:04 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: I could be wrong, but afaik, if Debian removes an upstream build, we remove the build as well and then just hint Britney so that it's not a migration blocker. | 18:10 |
| ahasenack | it's not a migration issue, it doesn't build | 18:11 |
| ahasenack | ah, maybe I see what you mean | 18:11 |
| Eickmeyer | Right, but Britney will freak out if it's missing a build. | 18:11 |
| ahasenack | britney will say "missing build on X", but that will be ignored | 18:11 |
| Eickmeyer | Right. | 18:11 |
| ahasenack | let me see if there is an example in the hints repo | 18:11 |
| ahasenack | # We no longer produce armhf builds for this package. | 18:12 |
| ahasenack | force-badtest nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/all/armhf | 18:12 |
| ahasenack | maybe that | 18:12 |
| Eickmeyer | Yep. That sounds right. | 18:12 |
| Eickmeyer | I mean, I'm not release team, but I have interest in Blender since it's in Studio and have a rudimentary knowledge on how this works. | 18:13 |
| ahasenack | so are you aware upstream doesn't support 32bit anymore? | 18:13 |
| ahasenack | I was fixing an ftbfs in mantic due to other issues, and now I see it doesn't build on armhf | 18:13 |
| ahasenack | and found https://archive.blender.org/lists/bf-committers/2019-August/050124.html | 18:14 |
| Eickmeyer | Yes, 100%. Studio really doesn't care since we only support amd64 as an arch. | 18:14 |
| ahasenack | and a corresponding debian bug | 18:14 |
| ahasenack | ok | 18:14 |
| ahasenack | I'll PR a hint change | 18:14 |
| Eickmeyer | I *do* care when thinks fail to migrate, as you might imagine. :) | 18:14 |
| Eickmeyer | 👍 | 18:15 |
| ahasenack | it ftbfs on s390x now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/+bug/2030291 | 18:21 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2030291 in blender (Ubuntu) "FTBFS on s390x" [Undecided, New] | 18:22 | |
| ahasenack | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/3.4.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1 armhf should be taked care of by that hints pr | 18:22 |
| ahasenack | arm64 should build, riscv64 should also build eventually ;) | 18:22 |
| Eickmeyer | That's unexpected (s390x). Same issue in Debian? | 18:22 |
| ahasenack | no, but the last build there was months ago | 18:23 |
| ahasenack | https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blender | 18:23 |
| Eickmeyer | I see that, was just looking myself and answered my own question. | 18:24 |
| Eickmeyer | Very old version, they're being molasses slow on updating it. Just checked salsa, and same issue there. | 18:25 |
| ahasenack | what did you see in salsa? | 18:25 |
| Eickmeyer | https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/blender/ is where they do the packaging. | 18:26 |
| Eickmeyer | No updates for 6 months. | 18:26 |
| ginggs | ahasenack: your hint would work if the autopkgtest was failing on armhf | 18:37 |
| ahasenack | ginggs: I copied what apw did for nvidia, pasted above | 18:39 |
| ginggs | but it's a FTBFS, so would need an AA to remove the armhf binaries from mantic-release | 18:39 |
| RikMills | blender in the release pocket already fails on armhf so looks good I think as is | 18:39 |
| ginggs | but i think this has already been done | 18:39 |
| ahasenack | ginggs: right, but how to keep the armhf build from being tried again when debian updates? | 18:39 |
| ginggs | you don't need to, it will just fail | 18:40 |
| ahasenack | and so it did, I just uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/3.4.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1 | 18:40 |
| ahasenack | question is if that failure (armhf) will prevent migration | 18:40 |
| RikMills | it won't | 18:40 |
| ahasenack | but since s390x failed too, that might prevent the migration instead | 18:40 |
| ahasenack | ah, I see in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/3.4.1+dfsg-2build3 that armhf already failed, ok, I missed that | 18:41 |
| ginggs | no, britney already does not complain about armhf: | 18:41 |
| ginggs | missing build on amd64: blender, blender-data (from 3.4.1+dfsg-2build3) | 18:41 |
| ginggs | missing build on arm64: blender (from 3.4.1+dfsg-2build3) | 18:41 |
| ginggs | missing build on ppc64el: blender (from 3.4.1+dfsg-2build3) | 18:41 |
| ginggs | missing build on riscv64: blender (from 3.4.1+dfsg-2build3) | 18:41 |
| ginggs | missing build on s390x: blender (from 3.4.1+dfsg-2build3) | 18:41 |
| ahasenack | ok, so just s390x needs a real fix | 18:42 |
| ginggs | but s390x will be an issue, then an AA needs to remove the binaries from mantic (or the build fixed) | 18:42 |
| ginggs | fwiw, blender/armhf was already removed in kinetic https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/armhf/blender | 18:43 |
| ahasenack | ok, that's sorted then | 18:45 |
| ahasenack | I only touched blender because of my patch pilot shift yesterday :) | 18:46 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: I appreciate your work. :) | 18:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ktextaddons [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ktextaddons [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ktextaddons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ktextaddons [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ktextaddons [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ktextaddons [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:43 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
