| lubot | [telegram] <Leokolb> Testing checklist Lubuntu Jammy looks good - thanks @guiverc 😉 | 12:26 |
|---|---|---|
| guiverc | Thanks particularly to you too @Leokolb... Yeah I'm happy, still plan on refreshing 1 or 2 a day (also doing a Xubuntu etc.) | 12:28 |
| guiverc | fossfreedom (in -flavors) mentioned printing... I barely print 2-3 pages a year, so haven't tested that in (unknown!) ... I have no idea if the cups (in snap) makes a difference as there is a good chance I've not printed on my machine since installed in february 2023. | 12:31 |
| * guiverc discovers i installed in jan-2023... | 12:33 | |
| lubot | [telegram] <Leokolb> Np here printing Lubuntu and Ubuntu .. (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <guiverc> discovers i installed in jan-2023...) | 13:34 |
| guiverc | thanks @Leokolb... if it changes (esp. if we need to document anything) I'd love to know... | 13:35 |
| guiverc | btw.. I noted the first LXQt 1.3 packages hitting my debian box a few hours ago :) (thus expecting them to flow thru to my mantic system too with some more time) | 13:36 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> Debian and Ubuntu are doing the transition separately. | 13:58 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> If anyone syncs over Ubuntu packages with the Debian ones without telling me, ping me immediately so I can revert please | 13:58 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> That being said, we're about halfway done in the archive | 13:58 |
| guiverc | :) @ half-way done... | 13:59 |
| guiverc | @leokolb, a bug that hit my primary box (jammy install) is now tagged as a 'blocker' for 22.04.3 .. (my installed lubuntu/xubuntu/ubuntu desktop meta packages got removed)... 22.04.3 release may be delayed !??! | 14:14 |
| guiverc | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jammy-jellyfish-22-04-3-lts-point-release-status-tracking/37439 | 14:14 |
| guiverc | (my details can be found in now-marked-dup of the bug) | 14:16 |
| lubot | [telegram] <Leokolb> yes i saw that @guiverc (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <guiverc> (my details can be found in now-marked-dup of the bug)) | 14:28 |
| lubot | [telegram] <guiverc> :) | 14:47 |
| lubot | [telegram] <guiverc> riber!$23p$ | 15:45 |
| -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy 22.04.3] (20230807) has been added | 15:57 | |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> I think we need to discuss the upgrade strategy from 22.04 Backports to devel | 16:24 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> Or at least 23.04 | 16:24 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> I'm thinking about it and it just does not make sense. | 16:24 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> I would also like to know if we have any pop-ups enabled for new version upgrades, how we'd test that, and how we deliver a better experience to users | 16:25 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> wxl @guiverc @kc2bez @Leokolb etc. thoughts appreciated ^^ | 16:26 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> Also | 16:26 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl | 16:26 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> XD | 16:26 |
| lubot | [matrix] <kc2bez> Do we support upgrades from 22.04 to 23.04 or 23.10 with backports now? I am not sure how well that works currently. I think we should keep the focus on LTS to LTS upgrades with backports. That is the point of it in my estimation. Keeping the LTS base and the current DE. | 16:36 |
| lubot | [telegram] <tsimonq2> Well, if the user is *able* to do the upgrade, shouldn't they be prevented from doing so? Or at least warned that all of LXQt will be downgraded? | 16:40 |
| lubot | [matrix] <kc2bez> I would have to check but I think the upgrade script would error out when it does the preflight check. Sounds like a good experiment. | 16:50 |
| wxl | i agree with @kc2bez regarding keeping the backports focus on lts | 17:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!