 Testing checklist Lubuntu Jammy looks good - thanks @guiverc 😉
[12:28] <guiverc> Thanks particularly to you too @Leokolb... Yeah I'm happy, still plan on refreshing 1 or 2 a day (also doing a Xubuntu etc.)
[12:31] <guiverc> fossfreedom (in -flavors) mentioned printing... I barely print 2-3 pages a year, so haven't tested that in (unknown!) ...  I have no idea if the cups (in snap) makes a difference as there is a good chance I've not printed on my machine since installed in february 2023.
[12:33]  * guiverc discovers i installed in jan-2023... 
 Np here printing Lubuntu and Ubuntu .. (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <guiverc> discovers i installed in jan-2023...)
[13:35] <guiverc> thanks @Leokolb...   if it changes (esp. if we need to document anything) I'd love to know...
[13:36] <guiverc> btw.. I noted the first LXQt 1.3 packages hitting my debian box a few hours ago :)   (thus expecting them to flow thru to my mantic system too with some more time)
 Debian and Ubuntu are doing the transition separately.
 If anyone syncs over Ubuntu packages with the Debian ones without telling me, ping me immediately so I can revert please
 That being said, we're about halfway done in the archive
[13:59] <guiverc> :) @ half-way done...
[14:14] <guiverc> @leokolb, a bug that hit my primary box (jammy install) is now tagged as a 'blocker' for 22.04.3   .. (my installed lubuntu/xubuntu/ubuntu desktop meta packages got removed)...    22.04.3 release may be delayed !??!
[14:14] <guiverc> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jammy-jellyfish-22-04-3-lts-point-release-status-tracking/37439
[14:16] <guiverc> (my details can be found  in now-marked-dup of the bug)
 yes i saw that @guiverc (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <guiverc> (my details can be found  in now-marked-dup of the bug))
 :)
 riber!$23p$
[15:57] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Jammy 22.04.3] (20230807) has been added
 I think we need to discuss the upgrade strategy from 22.04 Backports to devel
 Or at least 23.04
 I'm thinking about it and it just does not make sense.
 I would also like to know if we have any pop-ups enabled for new version upgrades, how we'd test that, and how we deliver a better experience to users
 wxl @guiverc @kc2bez @Leokolb etc. thoughts appreciated ^^
 Also
 wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl wxl
 XD
 Well, if the user is *able* to do the upgrade, shouldn't they be prevented from doing so? Or at least warned that all of LXQt will be downgraded?
[17:13] <wxl> i agree with @kc2bez regarding keeping the backports focus on lts