[07:23] <bryceh> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: N/A
[14:06] <rbasak> bryceh: your multipath-tools Focal sponsorship upload is missing bug references. Please could you take a look?
[14:06] <rbasak> mitchdz: ^ FYI
[14:07] <mitchdz> Yes! I'll look into that right now
[14:09] <rbasak> mitchdz: thanks! If the only change is to add them, just ping me here with the update and I can re-upload for you.
[14:10] <mitchdz> Is it only for Focal, or the other releases too?
[14:11] <rbasak> Only Focal. I haven't reviewed the other releases fully - it's easiest to do them all at once - but the others do have bug references.
[14:11] <rbasak> https://trello.com/c/dwCVEaPU/6001-multipath-tools is what I see :)
[14:12] <mitchdz> That's strange, the reference should be there - https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/447587
[14:13] <mitchdz> Maybe a weird bug during upload and a reupload will fix it?
[14:14] <rbasak> That's odd
[14:14] <rbasak> Here it is in the queue: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/681087400/multipath-tools_0.8.3-1ubuntu2.2_source.changes
[14:14] <rbasak> Let me do some digging
[14:21] <mitchdz> On a tangential note, arm64 && ppc64el livecd-rootfs autopkgtest is failing which is blocking my multipath-tools mantic update - https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#multipath-tools
[14:26] <rbasak> mitchdz: OK so this is interesting. I've not seen this before. What's happening is that your first bullet point in debian/changelog was prefixed by only one space, but the convention is two spaces. As a result, dpkg-genchanges is dropping it when it prepares the Changes: field in the changes file.
[14:27] <rbasak> mitchdz: I'll just fix this up for you.
[14:28] <rbasak> mitchdz: but you might want to adjust how you edit debian/changelog to avoid this happening. I use "dch" to add an entry. That invokes an editor with the first bullet point already present, and I edit it from there.
[14:28] <rbasak> I suspect others do something similar and that's why I've never seen this happen before.
[14:29] <rbasak> You might want to learn the dch command well - it is pretty obtuse but usually has an appropriate mode which should help with this kind of thing.
[14:29] <rbasak> Sorry this is so obtuse!
[14:30] <rbasak> Also vim (or your editor of choice) syntax colouring sort of helps, but it's not really obvious.
[14:31] <mitchdz> Ah my apologies, I just created that changelog manually
[14:32] <mitchdz> I usually use `dch` or `git-ubuntu.reconstruct-changelog`
[14:32] <rbasak> No worries :)
[14:36] <mitchdz> I was always curious what would happen if someone forgot to do the 2 spaces there... Now I know!
[14:38] <rbasak> debian.changelog.ChangelogParseError: Could not parse changelog: Unexpected line while looking for start of change data:  * Do not install init scripts (LP: #2000186)
[14:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2000186 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu Jammy) "update fails on cloud server (invoke-rc.d restart failed) when using an unsupported kernel" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2000186
[14:39] <rbasak> Well now I'm having fun verifying that what I rejected is identical to the new upload apart from that change :)
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie
[16:33] <athos> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: athos
=== pizzaiolo is now known as pizza
[17:48] <ahasenack> LocutusOfBorg: rspamd 3.6-1 is a sync candidate, upstream fixed the -latomic issue that made the riscv64 build fail
[17:48] <ahasenack> just waiting for launchpad to ingest it
[17:48] <ahasenack> but if it happens overnight and you happen to see it...
[17:49] <ahasenack> ah, wait
[17:49] <ahasenack> there is still the -Bsymbolic-functions delta :/
[18:11] <ahasenack> tjaalton: hi, is it doabla to get dogtag-pki to use tomcat10 before feature freeze?
[18:11] <ahasenack> is there an upstream patch/update or something like it?
[18:29] <Eickmeyer> I filed bug 2030902, got some major grub issues.
[18:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2030902 in grub2 (Ubuntu Mantic) "grub-pc 2.12~rc1-4ubuntu1 fails to install/upgrade" [Critical, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2030902
[18:31] <Eickmeyer> juliank: Have you heard anything about upgrade/installation issues with this?
[18:33] <juliank> Eickmeyer: there's no valuable information in the bug
[18:33] <juliank> You only quote the outcome but not the reason why it's failing
[18:34] <Eickmeyer> juliank: Right, I was wondering if you had heard any other information. I'm not getting any valuable information as to why it's failing.
[18:34] <juliank> It should be failing in a postinst script or something which dpkg should have told you about much earlier
[18:35] <juliank> So you really want to attach /var/log/apt/term.log for examplr
[18:36] <Eickmeyer> Hmmm... I think I see what's going on. It's not grub, it's ubuntustudio-lowlatency-settings. We make sure lowlatency is always the #1 selection if there's more than one flavor. It can't find it, so it's failing.
[18:36] <juliank> I'm only aware of zfs setups failing
[18:36] <juliank> The flavour selection support in grub also isn't there yet
[18:36] <juliank> The GRUB_FLAVOR_ORDER or what's it called
[18:37] <Eickmeyer> juliank: That's new then, we had a very hacky way of doing it.
[18:38] <Eickmeyer> From *years* ago.
[18:38] <juliank> OK
[18:38] <juliank> Flavour ordering was introduced in 20.04 I think for OEM
[18:38] <Eickmeyer> Yeah. This was clear back in 18.10.
[18:39] <juliank> It's coming back by 24.04 the latest, it's not the highest priority for 23.10 right now as it's undocumented and used by OEM only which only is a thing on LTS
[18:40] <juliank> I think I subconsciously came up with a solution by now though.
[18:40] <Eickmeyer> Ah.
[18:41] <juliank> (it was modifying the old CMP style function, but grub now uses sort -V, so needs porting)
[20:12] <Eickmeyer> juliank: Who would I ping about gettingg GRUB_FLAVOR_ORDER prioritized a little and made available for non-LTS releases (basically, kept in the code and not removed)?
[20:15] <juliank> Eickmeyer: I will take care of that next week
[20:15] <Eickmeyer> juliank: Oh, ok! :)
[20:42] <athos> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: N/A
[21:50] <LocutusOfBorg> ahasenack, maybe we can see if armhf is fixed with a sync?
[21:50] <LocutusOfBorg> and then merge if fails
[23:37] <bluca> bdmurray: the webhooks to trigger systemd autopkgtest are failing with "HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error", known issue?
[23:59] <ahasenack> LocutusOfBorg: I'm giving 3.6-1 a run in a ppa first