[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libleidenalg [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-1] (no packageset)
[01:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/main) [23.08.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[01:54] <zhsj> vorlon: ack, i'll take petsc4py.
[02:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libleidenalg [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.1-1]
[02:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libleidenalg [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.1-1]
[02:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libleidenalg [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.1-1]
[02:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libleidenalg [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.1-1]
[02:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libleidenalg [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.1-1]
[02:09] <zhsj> vorlon: and re ASLR for go, i'm not sure if upstream thinks it's an security improvement in go. for example i find this old thread https://groups.google.com/g/golang-nuts/c/Jd9tlNc6jUE it may be good to re-evaluate now since the thread is 7 years old ..
[02:14] <zhsj> oh, a newer thread https://groups.google.com/g/golang-nuts/c/cXhRsmNsMwo/m/VUZlLqo9AwAJ "not completely useless"
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [23.08.0-2ubuntu1]
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [23.08.0-2ubuntu1]
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [23.08.0-2ubuntu1]
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [23.08.0-2ubuntu1]
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [23.08.0-2ubuntu1]
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [23.08.0-2ubuntu1]
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (mantic-proposed) [23.08.0-2ubuntu1]
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kirigami-addons [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kirigami-addons [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kirigami-addons [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kirigami-addons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kirigami-addons [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kirigami-addons [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:00] <RikMills> ubuntu-archive: please remove ppc64el s390x riscv64 binaries from the release pocket for sources akonadi-calendar, libkf5calendarsupport, libkf5eventviews, libkf5incidenceeditor and zanshin
[10:01] <RikMills> those sources cannot build on those archive in new release in proposed due to new requirements on qtwebengine
[10:02] <RikMills> s/archive/archs
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (mantic-proposed/main) [2.28.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.29.0-0ubuntu1] (core)
[14:39] <vorlon> RikMills: riscv64 is not meant to be a server-only arch the way ppc64el and s390x are; the architecture filtering in qtwebengine-opensource-src looks wrong here.  Has anyone tried building it on riscv64?
[14:40] <RikMills> mitya57: ^^ ?
[14:43] <RikMills> vorlon: I don't know. Hopefully Dmitry will
[14:50] <mitya57> vorlon, RikMills: It requires a huuuuge patch which will be a pain to maintain unless upstream applies it: debian #1030895
[14:50] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1030895 in src:qt6-webengine "qt6-webengine: Enable riscv64 support" [Wishlist, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1030895
[14:50] <vorlon> ok
[14:51] <RikMills> mitya57: cheers. I just found that bug, but great that you confirmed!
[14:51] <mitya57> I had a similar story with mipsel, where the patch was much smaller, but had to drop support for it after all.
[14:53] <RikMills> yeah, I saw discussion on that
[15:33] <kanashiro> hi SRU team, I have a quick request to update the docker.io group exception here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2023-August/005713.html . Could any of you please take a look?
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: steam-installer [i386] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:1.0.0.78~ds-3] (i386-whitelist)
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted steam-installer [i386] (mantic-proposed) [1:1.0.0.78~ds-3]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added steam-installer to i386-whitelist in mantic
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [s390x] (mantic-proposed/main) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [amd64] (mantic-proposed/main) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/main) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (lunar-proposed/main) [2:4.17.7+dfsg-1ubuntu2 => 2:4.17.7+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/main) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mutter [arm64] (mantic-proposed/main) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kirigami-addons [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kirigami-addons [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kirigami-addons [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kirigami-addons [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kirigami-addons [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kirigami-addons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:13] <vorlon> jbicha: why does libmutter's -dev package have the ABI in its name, this is an antipattern
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [45~beta.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected squid [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squid (jammy-proposed/main) [5.2-1ubuntu4.4 => 5.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[21:06] <jbicha> vorlon: I suppose we could drop the -dev version, but mutter breaks its API with every major release & is only used by gnome-shell (Budgie is switching to their mutter fork Magpie now)
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]