[00:42] <Guest66> Hey all! Is Launchpad down for maintenance? I didn't see anything on the status Twitter or Mastodon, and it's been down for a little while now. Did I miss something?
[00:57] <JanC> Guest66: seems to be back now
[01:00] <rsupreme4> e
[01:00] <rsupreme4> Is launchpad down?
[01:01] <JanC> no
[01:02] <Guest66> Looks to be, thank you! I was able to get the php8.2 packages.
[01:02] <JanC> it apparently was a little while ago
[01:03] <rsupreme4> It came back finally, thanks!1
[05:21] <guruprasad> There were some firewall issues causing the unannounced downtime. It should be resolved by now.
[09:41] <alkisg> Hi, my recipe-based PPA builds fail since lunar due to "invalid version", e.g.:
[09:41] <alkisg> setuptools.extern.packaging.version.InvalidVersion: Invalid version: '23.08-1-202308210928-ubuntu23.10.1'
[09:42] <alkisg> If I test with `from packaging.version import Version; v=Version('23.08-ubuntu23.10.1')` it still fails.
[09:42] <alkisg> Is there a way to ask launchpad to create a python-compatible version?
[09:44] <alkisg> Or, is there any way to build a python package in lunar+ PPAs?
[09:47] <alkisg> Example failed build: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/682985917/buildlog_ubuntu-mantic-amd64.epoptes_23.08-1+202308210928~ubuntu23.10.1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[10:05] <alkisg> https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/distributing-packages-using-setuptools/#local-version-identifiers says that this form is allowed: Version('23.08+ubuntu23.10.1')
[10:05] <alkisg> So, any way to tell launchpad to append "+ubuntu23.10.1" with plus, instead of "~" or "-"?
[10:16] <alkisg> Reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/2032185
[10:16] -ubottu:#launchpad- Launchpad bug 2032185 in Launchpad itself "Recipe builds of python packages fail with invald version since lunar" [Undecided, New]
[11:40] <cjwatson> -1 on changing ~ to +
[11:40] <cjwatson> I hear you that there is a problem, but that is not a viable fix
[11:41] <cjwatson> can't you mangle the version somewhere before it gets passed to `packaging.version`?
[19:24] <alkisg> cjwatson: thank you, I'll try to do some mangling there