=== arraybolt32 is now known as arraybolt3
[03:03] <zhsj> hi, could someone retry the build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-v2ray-core/4.34.0+ds-3? it's in "Dependency wait", but lp doesn't seem to retry the build automatically.
[03:18] <amurray> zhsj: done
[03:36] <zhsj> amurray: thanks
=== nkshirsa_ is now known as nkshirsa
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
[11:01] <rbasak> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: rbasak
[11:08] <Phalanxer> WHY is Canonical withholding SECURITY updates from me when they say they will provide them to me via the Universe channel on a best effort basis? How is withholding them from me best effort?!
[11:08] <Phalanxer> https://i.ibb.co/R6XsH3v/Untitled.png
[11:08] <Phalanxer> This is a MASSIVE red line to find another distro.
[11:10] <Phalanxer> So now I've gotta uninstall everything installed from the Universe repository seeing I have packages installed (some by default) which are vulnerable and nothing is being done about them. I'm not way in hell signing up to that Ubuntu Pro® rubbish which no longer makes me anonymous.
[11:11] <Phalanxer> I've just had to pull my systems offline.
[11:11] <Phalanxer> I'll be finding another distro.
[11:20] <rbasak> bdrung: what are your plans with dracut in Ubuntu? I didn't think we used it? Bug 1937873 is in the sponsorship queue and I'm not sure it's worth adding a delta for, but then I see that you're now maintaining a delta in Mantic?
[11:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1937873 in dracut (Ubuntu) "overlay-root doesn't work by default" [Low, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1937873
[11:27] <bdrung> rbasak, i am working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dracut/+bug/2031304 for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2031185 . I can include that patch in my next upload.
[11:27] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2031304 in dracut (Ubuntu) "[MIR] dracut" [Undecided, Incomplete]
[11:27] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2031185 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "manual_add_modules is slow / consumes the most time" [Medium, Fix Committed]
[11:42] <rbasak> bdrung: thanks! I'll leave it to you then.
[12:02] <ahasenack> Eickmeyer: hi, debian uploaded blender 3.6.2, but it's still failing to build
[12:43] <juliank> Eickmeyer: I scheduled Reinstate 'GRUB_FLAVOUR_ORDER functionality' for 28 Aug - 09 Sep
[12:43] <juliank> I forgot it in this week's upload
[15:02] <GunnarHj> Hi vorlon! Do you have any thoughts/doubts on this:
[15:02] <GunnarHj> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/reconsider-the-preinstalled-lcg-latin-etc-fonts/37762
[15:28] <Eickmeyer> ahasenack: ack, saw the upload email, I'll continue to monitor.
[15:28] <Eickmeyer> juliank: OK, keep me informed. :)
[16:22] <Eickmeyer> ahasenack: Looking at the logs, and knowing blender has dropped 32-bit support, I have zero hope for armhf. My only real concern is s390x, but seeing as how that's not a desktop architecture, we might be able to justify removing the s390x builds since blender is a desktop application.
[16:23] <Eickmeyer> ahasenack: And riscv64 is  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[16:29] <vorlon> GunnarHj: I don't really have anything to add, I was hoping the Desktop Team would weigh in on that one :)
[16:29] <vorlon> GunnarHj: anyway it sounds fine to me
[16:45] <GunnarHj> vorlon: Ok, that answer helps. The two font packages I would like to drop (or their equivalents) have been there all since the early days of Ubuntu. I kind of feared that I'm about to do something bad by dropping them. But probably not. More modern and better quality fonts have been added since, and sooner or later the old stuff must go.
[18:15] <rbasak> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: N/A
=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF
[20:55] <ahasenack> bdmurray: hi, question about dep8 tests. When a package has no dep8 tests, and I add one, and upload the package to a ppa
[20:55] <ahasenack> and want to trigger the newly added test, the system responds with "this package has no tests"
[20:55] <ahasenack> example: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=mantic&package=bind-dyndb-ldap&ppa=ahasenack/bind9-dyndb-ldap&arch=amd64&&trigger=bind-dyndb-ldap/11.10-5ubuntu1~ppa1
[20:56] <ahasenack> it looks like it doesn't take into account that a test could have been added to the package in the ppa
[20:56] <ahasenack> whereas the one in the ubuntu archive currently does not have any test yet
[20:56] <ahasenack> sounds like a bug, and if yes, where could I file it?
[21:00] <bdmurray> ahasenack: File it here https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+filebug
[21:00] <ahasenack> cheers
[21:00] <bdmurray> I was looking at that bit of code the other and suspected your issue would be a problem
[21:05] <bdmurray> ahasenack: Its this check for the record https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/charms/focal/autopkgtest-web/webcontrol/request/submit.py#n138