[03:37]  * tsimonq2 blinks at all the OEM packages being added to the sponsorship report
[03:38] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: 🤣 cron-daemon go brrrrrrrrr
[03:39]  * tsimonq2 removes sponsors from them since fourdollars already ran syncpackage :)
[03:39] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: hah
[03:40]  * tsimonq2 wonders whether the SRU team is particularly apt to review packages synced from a non-Bileto PPA
[03:41] <Eickmeyer> The infra piece that will sunset "tomorrow"?
[03:41] <tsimonq2> That's quite a shame, assuming we still don'
[03:41] <tsimonq2> *don't have virtualized riscv64 builders.
[03:42] <tsimonq2> Even if they're emulated on like, amd64, *something* would be nice.
[03:42] <Eickmeyer> Oh, but that's the infra piece that's coming soon*.
[03:42] <tsimonq2> Oh?
[03:42] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, but don't quote me.
[03:42] <Eickmeyer> I think it needs actual riscv64 hw first.
[03:44] <tsimonq2> That would be cool.
[03:44] <tsimonq2> Especially for symbols and such. I know I could just use a porterbox if I needed to, or emulate it locally, but that's not the point. :)
[03:45] <Eickmeyer> Right. What we've got for riscv64 is just virtual machines anyhow, which isn't ideal, and would get overwhelmed if one opened it up to millions of PPAs.
[03:53] <liushuyu> tsimonq2: Okay. We will move the conversation
[03:54] <liushuyu> And also, https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rust-test-case does not have the up-to-date source
[03:55] <liushuyu> Hmm, it does now
[03:59] <tsimonq2> liushuyu: Yes, I just pushed it. :)
[04:00] <tsimonq2> liushuyu: I'll tag it once it actually hits Debian. In 48 hours the upload will go through, so I'd say give it 72 hours (or less) total and we can sync it.
[04:00] <liushuyu> tsimonq2: Ah, I see
[04:00] <liushuyu> tsimonq2: Thank you!
[04:00] <tsimonq2> liushuyu: No worries!
[04:02] <tsimonq2> FYR, https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html will show that upload shorly.
[04:02] <tsimonq2> *shortly
[04:07] <liushuyu> It's not a very urgent issue though some other autopkgtests do have dependency on it
[04:08] <tsimonq2> Makes sense. In Ubuntu, I'd wait for this upcoming Britney one or the next one.
[04:09] <tsimonq2> lvoytek: python-django-tagging> Please send your fix up to Debian as well. Thanks in advance. :)
[04:19] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: you failed :P
[04:19]  * Eickmeyer drags tsimonq2 back to #ubuntu-release
[04:19] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: Also, we should probably get the Calamares settings cleaned up (and ran through source NEW) at some point.
[04:20] <tsimonq2> We're sticking it through the LTS.
[04:20] <tsimonq2> *to it
[04:20] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: For Jammy?
[04:20] <tsimonq2> Nah, 24.04.
[04:20] <tsimonq2> Well, I guess we could clean it up for Mantic.
[04:21] <Eickmeyer> Oh. Well, feel free to remove ubuntustudio for 23.10 and 24.04... we've moved back to Ubiquity (GTK) and will be going forward with ubuntu-desktop-installer if we can ever solidify help with it.
[04:22] <Eickmeyer> (The Calamares settings packages that is)
[04:22] <tsimonq2> See, I'm not quite motivated enough to do an installer switch yet. We have a really good test suite. I'm still holding out hope that we can get things polished for the LTS.
[04:38] <Eickmeyer> I was able to get Ubiquity polished so quick it made my head spin. git tags are nice.
[11:10] <paride> @pilot in
[12:14] <tsimonq2> @pilot in
[12:15] <tsimonq2> (I'll be in for a while. :) )
[12:38] <tsimonq2> I'm not *100%* comfortable sponsoring bug 2006402 given the existing discussion on the bug.
[12:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2006402 in landscape-client (Ubuntu) "Update focal, jammy to landscape-client 23.02" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2006402
[13:14] <tsimonq2> paride: Looks like we're down to bug 1995197 (security, sbeattie), bug 2012644 (security, ebarretto, needs a refreshed diff), and the aforementioned landscape bug. :)
[13:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1995197 in pysha3 (Ubuntu Jammy) "Vulnerable to CVE 2022-37454 (SHA-3 buffer overflow)" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1995197
[13:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2012644 in u-boot-nezha (Ubuntu Lunar) "Add security fixes" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2012644
[13:14]  * tsimonq2 dusted off some of the Debian queue too - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests
[13:15] <paride> tsimonq2, hi, thanks! I'm currently looking at the landscape bug.
[13:15] <tsimonq2> paride: Sweet, looks like that covers our bases. Thank you!
[14:43] <mitchdz> Hi! I'm looking to help out with the glibc merge. Is anyone looking at the mumax3 arm64 autopkgtest regression? If not I'll look into it.
[14:44] <tsimonq2> mitchdz: Hey! We coordinate that in -release. I think that one is clear, go for it!
[14:45] <tsimonq2> mitchdz: If you don't have upload rights, feel free to ping me or p_aride if you get a fix. :)
[14:45] <mitchdz> whoops I thought I was in -release, my bad
[14:59] <dbungert> @pilot in
[15:01] <tsimonq2> dbungert: Welcome to the club. :)
[15:01] <dbungert> heh
[15:02] <schopin> That's a weird plane that has 3 pilots in the cockpit...
[15:04] <Eickmeyer> It's like a Concorde with 3 pilots (yes, the flight engineer was a fully-fledged pilot as well).
[15:08] <tsimonq2> I was going to call the 3rd person the engineer, but that doesn't seem right. :P
[15:17] <paride> heh! I'm ending my shift ~soon
[15:25] <tsimonq2> @pilot out
[15:25] <tsimonq2> There, have some breathing room :D
[16:26] <paride> @pilot out
[16:26] <paride> o/
[17:16] <Odd_Bloke> Hey folks, I'm still looking for a sponsor for my debootstrap patches in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/1990856, if anyone has spare cycles!
[17:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1990856 in debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy) "Does not consider all versions in Packages files" [Undecided, In Progress]
[17:33] <bdmurray> dbungert: ^^
[17:33] <dbungert> sure, I can look at that next
[18:54] <dbungert> Odd_Bloke: uploaded
[19:01] <dbungert> @pilot out
[19:26] <Odd_Bloke> dbungert: Much appreciated, thank you!!
[23:19] <tsimonq2_mobile> So, we just entered some somewhat unprecedented territory and I'd like an informal DMB vote (or acknowledgement, at the very least). As Release Manager, I take full responsibility.
[23:20] <tsimonq2_mobile> !dmb-ping | through the delegated power granted to ~lubuntu-dev, wxl has been re-added to the team after several years
[23:21] <sarnold> welcome back wxl :)
[23:21] <tsimonq2_mobile> This is very unusual, because usually DMB policy is "oh, if you let it lapse a few months, it's fine". This has been over a year.
[23:21] <tsimonq2_mobile> He's proven himself, but I'm shedding light on it publicly to allow myself to be grilled on his behalf if necessary. :)
[23:24] <bdmurray> well I was going to say something
[23:25] <teward> *shoves tsimonq2_mobile into the pit of lions*
[23:25] <sarnold> kitties!
[23:25] <tsimonq2_mobile> XD
[23:26] <teward> Lubuntu's dev team has delegated access to specific packages and is under the Lubuntu Council purview last I checked.  Hence delegated rights there, at least if I remember right from a DMB perspective
[23:27] <teward> lol sarnold
[23:27] <bdmurray> I seem to recall a recent discussion amongst the DMB about development policies changing a lot recently and I think it would be good if tsimonq2_mobile were to explain how wxl has proven themselves and whether or not they are familiar with current policy.
[23:32] <tsimonq2_mobile> wxl has proven himself recently with a lubuntu-artwork update. He remembered the full Git workflow and how to update the package for a new release (entirely), and presented a diff to review before this happened. He bumped standards-version, an expectation in this case. I ACKed it. In the past, wxl has helped with quite a few packages under the
[23:32] <tsimonq2_mobile> lubuntu packageset, mostly with new code and bash script polishing. As a fair disclaimer, he's been a mentor of mine since I started in the project. That being said, I don't have a problem rejecting diffs if they're wrong, and he hasn't shown that he's forgotten much.
[23:32] <tsimonq2_mobile> I get it, one package update alone may be considered flimsy and I agree. What stands out is the knowledge that kept, and despite asking for a second set of eyes, he got it right.
[23:33] <tsimonq2_mobile> I would certainly agree to responsibility for his uploads in the near future if that is a necessary step to further trust.
[23:36] <tsimonq2_mobile> (My mobile connection is flimsy, I'll be back at irssi soon.)