[06:00] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: Are you planning to file an FFe for qprompter? AFAICT it was uploaded past-FF, so I'd expect one?
[06:30] <RAOF> jbicha: Likewise for fdk-aac-free and mozjs115 look like they need FFes; do they have them?
[10:51] <bdrung> cpaelzer, dracut and initramfs-tools are uploaded.
[11:00] <ginggs> @pilot in
[11:01] <ginggs> for your own safety, please keep your seatbelts fastened for the duration of the flight
[11:01] <cpaelzer> For the sake of pilots not yet getting much interaction here :-P; Hi ginggs glad you work on the sponsoring queue!
[11:03] <cpaelzer> bdrung: great, I see it in component mismatches, but the subscription of foundations-bugs to src:dracut is still missing
[11:03] <ginggs> please store your packages in the overhead bins, unless you require sponsoring, in which case one of our attendants can assist :)
[11:04] <cpaelzer> awww, /me likes this role-play-patch-piloting :-)
[11:08] <bdrung> cpaelzer, subscribed foundations-bugs to dracut
[11:21] <bdrung> ginggs, please stay in the role. I like it. :)
[11:38] <ahasenack> LocutusOfBorg: hi, I saw https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-vte/2.91.30-1ubuntu1 and debian just uploaded -2 with the same fix, it can become a sync I think
[11:38] <ahasenack> (I had subscribed to this package in debian because it came across my desk during my +1 maintenance shift)
[11:40] <jbicha> RAOF: my understanding is that NEW packages don't require FFEs. We will file a FFe to switch gjs to mozjs115 later
[11:41] <jbicha> I don't expect anything to depend on fdk-aac-free for mantic, but it needs to get into Ubuntu for the Main Inclusion process to continue, bug 1977614
[11:41] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1977614 in fdk-aac (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fdk-aac" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1977614
[11:47] <LocutusOfBorg> ahasenack, I did upload it in Debian :D
[11:47] <ahasenack> oh, look at that :D
[11:47] <LocutusOfBorg> sleep 36000 && syncpackage -f haskell-gi-vte
[11:47] <LocutusOfBorg> and this is on my bash
[11:47] <LocutusOfBorg> :D
[11:56]  * ahasenack happily unsibscribes from the package in debian's tracker
[12:30] <cpaelzer> bdrung: dracut-install should be moving on as planned now
[13:08] <bdrung> thanks
[14:34] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: No FFe needed for entirely new packages that aren't going to be seeded.
[14:37] <ahasenack> kanashiro: there are two docker.io-app uploads to jammy unapproved, same version
[14:38] <ahasenack> you need one deleted?
[14:38] <ahasenack> same for lunar, and I guess other releases
[15:00] <ginggs> @pilot out
[15:00] <ginggs> thank you for flying Ubuntu Air!
[15:02] <kanashiro> ahasenack yes, I want to keep the last one, removing the Suggests for docker-buildx and docker-compose-v2
[15:02] <kanashiro> this is in lunar, jammy and focal
[15:03] <ahasenack> ok
[17:07] <ahasenack> kanashiro: in the non-lunar docker.io-app uploads, do you want to keep mentioning "lunar" in the changelog?
[17:07] <ahasenack>      - d/control: do not suggest docker-buildx and docker-compose-v2. They are
[17:07] <ahasenack>        not available in Lunar at the moment.
[17:07] <ahasenack> oh, in jammy you used "jammy"
[17:08] <ahasenack> so it's only the focal upload that is mentioning lunar (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/683222725/docker.io-app_24.0.5-0ubuntu1~20.04.1_source.changes)
[17:16] <ahasenack> kanashiro: also, is it ok to have docker.io and docker.io-app at such different versions? With this update, for example, jammy will have docker.io=20.10.21 and docker.io-app=24.0.5
[19:05] <liushuyu> Hi ubuntu-devel, I have opened an MP https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/python-requests-toolbelt/+git/python-requests-toolbelt/+merge/449762 and considering to forward this to Debian. Can someone help me by reviewing it? Thanks!
[19:09] <kanashiro> @ahasenack it is fine keep those 2 versions, that's the purpose of the split. And about mentioning lunar in focal was a mistake, should I upload it again?
[19:09] <ahasenack> liushuyu: you just missed the patch pilot on duty, their shift ended at the top of the hour
[19:09] <ahasenack> kanashiro: yes please, since the others are correct
[19:09] <liushuyu> ahasenack: Aww. Guess I will wait until tomorrow
[19:10] <ahasenack> liushuyu: first shift tomorrow starts at 15UTC
[19:15] <kanashiro> ahasenack done
[19:15] <ahasenack> I see it,thanks
[20:31] <ahasenack> coreycb: hi, around?
[20:31] <ahasenack> coreycb: I see two neutron uploads to focal. One fixing only 1948466, the other fixing 1948466 and 1939723. I presume the former should be deleted?
[20:33] <coreycb> ahasenack: hi, yes please, the former should be deleted.
[20:34] <ahasenack> k
[22:46] <xnox> bdrung: yes i agree that all serial should be included if possible.
[22:47] <bdrung> xnox, thanks
[22:48] <bdrung> xnox, the first sentence of your comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2019435/comments/1 was confusing to me.
[22:48] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2019435 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "Default initramfs is missing qcom_geni_serial module" [Medium, Fix Committed]
[22:56] <xnox> bdrung: note it was wrtting at 8pm on a friday
[22:56] <xnox> the wednesday xnox doesn't understand it either =)
[22:57] <bdrung> :D
[22:57] <bdrung> xnox, btw, when will the kernel with zstd modules land in mantic?
[22:57] <xnox> bdrung: when your team accepts src:rustc-1.68 that i just synced ;-)
[22:58] <xnox> bdrung: basically there are multiple issues preventing upload of v6.5 kernel in mantic. in the various state of being resolved.
[22:58] <xnox> some of it is public (i.e. we just fixed up zfs & nvidia) other things are partner related and not suitable for public forum
[22:58] <xnox> but like real soon now, and it is in in kernel team's unstable & bootstrap ppas
[22:59] <bdrung> great to hear that it is closer than i expected