=== mateus-morais0 is now known as mateus-morais === rpocase_ is now known as rpocase === Kuraokam1 is now known as Kuraokami [15:01] o/ [15:01] o/ [15:01] o/ [15:01] #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team [15:01] Meeting started at 15:01:30 UTC. The chair is juliank. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [15:01] Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick [15:01] o/ [15:01] o/ [15:01] #topic Lightning rounds [15:01] * vorlon waves [15:01] #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-24-aug-2023/ [15:01] o/ [15:02] \o [15:02] o/ [15:02] \o [15:03] cantankerous [15:03] occasionally :) [15:03] moo? [15:03] DPaaS [15:03] o/ [15:03] I just couldn't come up with a good acronym... [15:04] o/ [15:09] o/ [15:10] #topic Release incoming bugs [15:10] #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:10] bug 2031909 [15:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2031909 in glibc (Ubuntu) "tinydns: allocation failures with glibc 2.38/s390x" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2031909 [15:11] schopin: ^ [15:12] Oh right. danilogondolfo fixed the symptoms, but I'm a bit worried about it still since the fix is to double the applied limit, which seems excessive. [15:13] juliank: I didn't notice if you replied to my last ping; are all the grub zfs regressions sorted now in mantic(-proposed)? [15:13] So I think we need to take the time to investigate it some more to see if that's not an actual bug in glibc that causes excess memory usage. [15:13] well, to be fair, the was a patch already increasing that limit, I just increased it a bit more :) [15:13] The patch was going from 3 to 4, you went straight to 8 :D [15:14] why not 11? [15:14] vorlon: to the best of my knowledge they should be, yes, I don't remember seing a ping [15:14] juliank: ack thanks [15:15] bdmurray, next glibc will require 11 I'm pretty sure [15:15] should we tag this todo? [15:15] someone will complain about this later likely :D [15:15] I say yes (obviously) [15:16] counting down from 3 [15:16] 0 [15:16] Added the tag [15:16] bug 2031685 [15:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2031685 in rustc (Ubuntu) "rust-doc depends on fonts-nanum, should use system Korean font instead" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2031685 [15:16] some vorlon font stuff [15:17] if we wind up excluding rust-doc from main, then this doesn't need to be foundations-todo [15:17] but it's still a bug :) [15:17] We already matain a delta/are ahead so it wouldn't be a hard hit to do that [15:18] the dependency on fonts-nanum is itself a delta [15:18] vorlon: is rust-doc demotion in progress? should we revisit this next week then? [15:18] all of rust is currently in universe (still) [15:18] I wouldn't say it's in progress; it was a suggestion from (I think) slyon in response to this [15:18] pending security review of cargo [15:19] vorlon: I think excluding rust-doc was suggested as part of the initial MIR [15:19] slyon: can you point me to the bug? we could add it to Extra-Excludes: now and drop this off the list [15:19] definitely was. [15:20] vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/1957932/comments/3 [15:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 1957932 in rustc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] rustc, cargo, dh-cargo" [Critical, Fix Released] [15:20] "Specific binary packages built, but NOT to be promoted to main: rust-doc, rust-src, rust-all" [15:21] +1 [15:21] thanks, let's lose the tag then [15:22] ack [15:22] bug 2017401 [15:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2017401 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) "Unexpected / unwanted unattended-upgrades behaviour after kernel upgrade when Livepatch enabled" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2017401 [15:22] I think next step is meeting and discussing [15:22] but also server is doing stuff [15:23] and bug 2029148 is a desktop issue [15:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2029148 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) "cups snap - can't add printer" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2029148 [15:23] this bug report is simply about the regression in support for the Unattended-Upgrade::Automatic-Reboot option [15:24] probably should be retagged rls-nn-incoming given the recent email to ubuntu-devel [15:24] I thought it was agreed we should JFDI [15:24] bdmurray: sorry, which email? [15:24] bdmurray: is talking about the cups snap thing.. [15:24] right [15:24] ah right [15:25] 2017401 - it's a functional regression. JFDI! [15:25] I don't think we had a conclusion for the u-u bug last week and wanted to discuss further outside the meeting but didn't [15:25] I'll setup the meeting [15:25] we're not livepatch PM [15:27] let's go to the next list [15:27] #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:27] that one is empty, sorry [15:27] #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:27] bug 1990798 [15:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1990798 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "do-release-upgrade fails if ESM enabled" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990798 [15:28] seems wrong to me, why would it fail? [15:29] we don't add the repository if it's not enabled... [15:30] I mean there must be a bug in the pro client there [15:30] also that pro client seemingly doesn't know about esm-apps, only infra, hmm [15:31] let me add an ubuntu-advantage-tools entry and set the one u-r-u one to Incomplete, because we need more info from the pro people what's going on [15:33] very weird [15:33] that wraps up the incoming bugs [15:33] (ff is empty) [15:33] #topic Team proposed-migration report [15:33] #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs [15:33] I see ginggs created https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/FR-5187 [15:33] and the report is out of date apparently, not sure what we can do? [15:34] 2023.08.24 05:52:36 UTC [15:34] we can assign from what's there and if that means people get a free pass, so be it [15:34] ack [15:34] danilogondolfo: any progress on vim? [15:34] danilogondolfo: fwiw ppc64el is known to have less locked memory available than other archs [15:35] vorlon, yes, I got it building on ppc64el. I'm still testing it [15:35] ok cool [15:35] lots of "depends on glibc" - schopin what's the prognosis here? is more help still needed? [15:35] bdrung: libregexp-pattern-license-perl, carry-over for you? [15:35] I can take libstring-license-perl, it probably needs a rebase of my previous component-mismatch handling. (cc bdrung) [15:36] ack, libregexp-pattern-license-perl vs libstring-license-perl moved to slyon [15:36] vorlon: The MPI thing is sorted but the glibc/armhf one is still a mystery. ginggs suggests we hint it anyway since it's actively being worked on [15:36] vorlon, i only looked quickly into libregexp-pattern-license-perl. I spend more time on ubiquity. [15:36] slyon, do you want to take it over? [15:36] yes [15:36] glibc * requires glibc to migrate ya think [15:37] * juliank hates glibc [15:37] ginggs: are you following up on glibc then? [15:37] juliank: me too, this week. [15:37] yes, i'll follow up [15:37] juliank: are you still working on tzdata? [15:37] btw, the casper autopkgtest seems to be flaky [15:38] vorlon: I don't think I ever started, I forgot to put it into the pulse or something [15:38] so I will start working on it :D [15:38] juliank: ok [15:39] schopin, ginggs: I also still see combblas/armhf, h5py/armhf and mumax3/arm64 autopkgtest regressions outstanding on this report, are those being worked on? [15:40] combblas, h5py are all MPI related [15:40] first two are MPI-related [15:40] ubiquity I'm giving back to mwhudson, I think we triaged this to needing another git dance with tzsetup from Debian; if he's not going to work on it he can pass it on to someone else [15:40] mumax is being worked on by mitchdz right now, it's presumably nvcc weirdness. [15:41] ginggs, schopin: ack. Are we going to hold up for a resolution on mumax3 before migrating? [15:41] vorlon, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2031838 the ticket for ubiquity [15:41] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2031838 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ftbfs with tzdata >= 2023c-8" [Undecided, New] [15:41] systemd: enr0n are you folliwng through on this? [15:41] vorlon: yes [15:42] krb5, I'll take [15:42] s390-tools needs unapproved processing by an AA, I'll sort it [15:42] i don't think we need to wait for a fix for mumax3, but if we want, a quick fix would be to make it amd64 only, it is not built on arm64 in debian, and did not build in jammy [15:42] vorlon: it also needs MIR [15:43] slyon: which, s390-tools? [15:43] yes [15:43] new dep? [15:43] pulling in some of the rust ecosystem [15:43] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/2030482 [15:43] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2030482 in s390-tools (Ubuntu) "[MIR] s390-tools Rust dependencies (vendored)" [Undecided, Incomplete] [15:43] well I'll let the MIR be Frank's problem [15:43] ACtually it's mine, but sure :) [15:43] anyway, that's everything - long list of packages on here but mostly just waiting for glibc [15:44] juliank: [15:45] #topic AOB [15:45] any other business? [15:45] ginggs: I agree with ignoring mumax3 autopkgtest regression and if it ftbfs we can just remove the arm64 binaries in parallel [15:45] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=mantic&arch=amd64&package=casper&trigger=initramfs-tools/0.142ubuntu12 gave me a "A server error occurred. Please contact the administrator." [15:45] oh apparently I might have to take Monday half? off, seems a friend is going to be here [15:46] vorlon: i've confirmed mumax3 does already FTBFS on arm64 [15:46] do we need to make it Architecture: amd64 ? [15:46] the administrators are looking at it [15:46] bdrung: see QA channel in MM [15:46] schopin: oh krb5 is missing strlcat/strlcpy symbols, can I sync with you quickly afterwards about this? [15:46] i might do the same as juliank on monday (family visit) [15:47] vorlon: sure. [15:47] vorlon: this is already be discussed on Debian bug #1043184 [15:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Debian bug 1043184 in src:krb5 "krb5: fails to build against glibc 2.38" [Important, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1043184 [15:47] zhsj: thanks for the pointer [15:49] I think that wraps it up here [15:49] #endmeeting [15:49] Meeting ended at 15:49:50 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-08-24-15.01.moin.txt === nicoz_ is now known as nicoz