-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added dracut to i386-whitelist in mantic | 00:01 | |
vorlon | _doko: you whitelisted onetbb on i386 because it was needed by mold; but despite the changelog entry and the build-dependency on libtbb-dev, debian/rules has mold using the bundled tbb. Do you know anything about this? I'm not clear why we want mold whitelisted at all | 00:06 |
---|---|---|
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added appstream to i386-whitelist in mantic | 00:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxmlb to i386-whitelist in mantic | 00:16 | |
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
RikMills | Eickmeyer: needed a no change rebuild, which I have done | 03:35 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) | 08:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) | 08:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) | 08:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) | 08:57 | |
dosaboy | dbungert: that package is not yet approved so it is not possible to verify it (it's the octavia packages from https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2030526 and it's been sat in the unapproved queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=octavia for almost a month) | 09:23 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2030526 in octavia (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] yoga stable releases" [High, Triaged] | 09:23 | |
dosaboy | dbungert: that package is not yet approved so it is not possible to verify it (i.e. octavia package from https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2030526 which has been in the unapproved queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=octavia for almost a month) | 09:24 |
dosaboy | oops sorry for dbl post | 09:24 |
dosaboy | therein fact no octavia releases pending verification - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia | 09:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) | 09:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) | 09:42 | |
RikMills | s390x tests now look broken. large number 'running' on excuses, but no sign of the tests. not queued, running, or completed | 11:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) | 18:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) | 18:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) | 18:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) | 18:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) | 18:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 19:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 19:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 19:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] | 19:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] | 19:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] | 19:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] | 19:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] | 19:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] | 19:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] | 19:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] | 19:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] | 19:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) | 19:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] | 19:14 | |
ginggs | vorlon: we didn't file a removal bug for mumax3/arm64 yet as there'll be further investigation | 20:52 |
=== ubot3 is now known as ubottu | ||
=== southey2 is now known as foxtrot | ||
=== orndorffgrant1 is now known as orndorffgrant | ||
=== haggertk_ is now known as haggertk | ||
=== coreycb_ is now known as coreycb | ||
=== philroche_ is now known as philroche | ||
vorlon | ginggs: I think mitchdz was asking permission to not investigate further | 21:26 |
mitchdz | Yeah, I was curious if I should file that removal bug/look more into the issue? Wouldn’t want to spend time if we will just disable it. | 21:30 |
vorlon | ginggs, mitchdz: my top-line analysis of it is "intractable, baroque, and not worth spending the time fixing for a multiverse package" | 22:00 |
ginggs | vorlon: if it's better for the state of the archive, would you go ahead with removal based on LP: #2032624, or would you prefer a separate bug? | 22:06 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2032624 in mumax3 (Ubuntu) "mumax3 test suite fails against glibc 2.38" [Critical, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2032624 | 22:06 | |
vorlon | ginggs: existing bug is fine as long as it's ok for it to be closed when I'm done | 22:06 |
ginggs | vorlon: sounds good | 22:18 |
mitchdz | vorlon: That's fair. I was/am under a similar impression. I'm not sure how many people are running CUDA code on ARM64 silicon using this specific libary. | 22:20 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-font-downloader (mantic-proposed/primary) [10.0.0-2] | 23:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!