[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added dracut to i386-whitelist in mantic [00:06] _doko: you whitelisted onetbb on i386 because it was needed by mold; but despite the changelog entry and the build-dependency on libtbb-dev, debian/rules has mold using the bundled tbb. Do you know anything about this? I'm not clear why we want mold whitelisted at all [00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added appstream to i386-whitelist in mantic [00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxmlb to i386-whitelist in mantic === chris14_ is now known as chris14 [03:35] Eickmeyer: needed a no change rebuild, which I have done [08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) [08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) [08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) [08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) [09:23] dbungert: that package is not yet approved so it is not possible to verify it (it's the octavia packages from https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2030526 and it's been sat in the unapproved queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=octavia for almost a month) [09:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2030526 in octavia (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] yoga stable releases" [High, Triaged] [09:24] dbungert: that package is not yet approved so it is not possible to verify it (i.e. octavia package from https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2030526 which has been in the unapproved queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=octavia for almost a month) [09:24] oops sorry for dbl post [09:24] therein fact no octavia releases pending verification - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia [09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) [09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset) [11:08] s390x tests now look broken. large number 'running' on excuses, but no sign of the tests. not queued, running, or completed [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset) [19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset) [19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset) [19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset) [19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] [19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] [19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset) [19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [20:52] vorlon: we didn't file a removal bug for mumax3/arm64 yet as there'll be further investigation === ubot3 is now known as ubottu === southey2 is now known as foxtrot === orndorffgrant1 is now known as orndorffgrant === haggertk_ is now known as haggertk === coreycb_ is now known as coreycb === philroche_ is now known as philroche [21:26] ginggs: I think mitchdz was asking permission to not investigate further [21:30] Yeah, I was curious if I should file that removal bug/look more into the issue? Wouldn’t want to spend time if we will just disable it. [22:00] ginggs, mitchdz: my top-line analysis of it is "intractable, baroque, and not worth spending the time fixing for a multiverse package" [22:06] vorlon: if it's better for the state of the archive, would you go ahead with removal based on LP: #2032624, or would you prefer a separate bug? [22:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2032624 in mumax3 (Ubuntu) "mumax3 test suite fails against glibc 2.38" [Critical, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2032624 [22:06] ginggs: existing bug is fine as long as it's ok for it to be closed when I'm done [22:18] vorlon: sounds good [22:20] vorlon: That's fair. I was/am under a similar impression. I'm not sure how many people are running CUDA code on ARM64 silicon using this specific libary. [23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-font-downloader (mantic-proposed/primary) [10.0.0-2]