[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added dracut to i386-whitelist in mantic
[00:06] <vorlon> _doko: you whitelisted onetbb on i386 because it was needed by mold; but despite the changelog entry and the build-dependency on libtbb-dev, debian/rules has mold using the bundled tbb.  Do you know anything about this?  I'm not clear why we want mold whitelisted at all
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added appstream to i386-whitelist in mantic
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxmlb to i386-whitelist in mantic
[03:35] <RikMills> Eickmeyer: needed a no change rebuild, which I have done
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset)
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset)
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset)
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset)
[09:23] <dosaboy> dbungert: that package is not yet approved so it is not possible to verify it (it's the octavia packages from https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2030526 and it's been sat in the unapproved queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=octavia for almost a month)
[09:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2030526 in octavia (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] yoga stable releases" [High, Triaged]
[09:24] <dosaboy> dbungert: that package is not yet approved so it is not possible to verify it (i.e. octavia package from https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2030526 which has been in the unapproved queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=octavia for almost a month)
[09:24] <dosaboy> oops sorry for dbl post
[09:24] <dosaboy> therein fact no octavia releases pending verification - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset)
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: settle [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.39.11-1] (no packageset)
[11:08] <RikMills> s390x tests now look broken. large number 'running' on excuses, but no sign of the tests. not queued, running, or completed
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted settle [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.39.11-1]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset)
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-chinese-addons [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-chinese-addons [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2]
[19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gir-rust-code-generator [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2] (no packageset)
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2]
[20:52] <ginggs> vorlon: we didn't file a removal bug for mumax3/arm64 yet as there'll be further investigation
[21:26] <vorlon> ginggs: I think mitchdz was asking permission to not investigate further
[21:30] <mitchdz> Yeah, I was curious if I should file that removal bug/look more into the issue? Wouldn’t want to spend time if we will just disable it.
[22:00] <vorlon> ginggs, mitchdz: my top-line analysis of it is "intractable, baroque, and not worth spending the time fixing for a multiverse package"
[22:06] <ginggs> vorlon: if it's better for the state of the archive, would you go ahead with removal based on LP: #2032624, or would you prefer a separate bug?
[22:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2032624 in mumax3 (Ubuntu) "mumax3 test suite fails against glibc 2.38" [Critical, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2032624
[22:06] <vorlon> ginggs: existing bug is fine as long as it's ok for it to be closed when I'm done
[22:18] <ginggs> vorlon: sounds good
[22:20] <mitchdz> vorlon: That's fair. I was/am under a similar impression. I'm not sure how many people are running CUDA code on ARM64 silicon using this specific libary.
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-font-downloader (mantic-proposed/primary) [10.0.0-2]