[00:18] <RikMills> Eickmeyer: slight insomnia
[00:21] <Eickmeyer> RikMills: That was me last night, so I totally understand. Thanks for the blender upload.
[00:22] <RikMills> thought I may as well as it was there to go
[00:23] <RikMills> one step closer in https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/transitions/html/html/auto-ffmpeg.html
[00:25] <RikMills> ok, ffmpeg 6 migrated with smooth updates, but really want to get rid of the 5 binaries before mantic closes
[00:25] <Eickmeyer> It's a good idea.
[00:26] <RikMills> looking at a fix for gpac, but the upstream patch would need some changes to backport
[00:26] <Eickmeyer> RikMills: Debian got the haruna bugfix as well like you did, so I did a syncpackage.
[00:26] <RikMills> I saw. thanks for that
[00:27] <Eickmeyer> np
[00:27] <RikMills> right. going to try a 2nd attempt at sleep. thanks again
[00:27] <Eickmeyer> Np. Have a good rest.
[01:41] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: Around? I've got some feedback on qprompt for you.
[01:42] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Hello!
[01:42] <RAOF> So, least importantly: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qprompt/+bug/2034470
[01:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2034470 in QPrompt "debian/copyright points users to GPL-2 despite being GPL-3" [Undecided, New]
[01:43] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Ooops! XD I can't believe I missed that!
[01:43] <RAOF> But also you seem to have missed the copyright of everything under src/fonts, _most_ of which is various versions of SIL but some of which does not appear to have a licence associated?
[01:43] <RAOF> Particularly: src/fonts/editor/Palanquin-Regular.ttf
[01:43] <Eickmeyer> Looking...
[01:49] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: I don't thinkn Palanquin is used outside of the Android build. The others definitely should be included in debian/copyright, so please reject. I can get that fixed pronto.
[03:14] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: In case you aren't watching #ubuntu-release, reuploaded with fixes. :)
[03:25] <Terminal-V> It would be good if Ubuntu's firewall man page included usage examples in IPv6.
[04:08] <RAOF> Hm. Palanquin still doesn't have license mentioned. (Some googling reveals that it's also SIL-licenced, assuming that it's the same version that's easily findable)
[04:11] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: Even though that font is only used in the android build, _we_ distribute it in the source package, and the OFL license requires that the license be includedd.
[04:25] <RAOF> Wait, no, how did I miss that you actually included it?
[04:25] <RAOF> Sorry!
[04:38] <RAOF> Accepted from the -rejected queue.
[05:49] <RAOF> 🤦‍♀️ Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh I accepted the wrong version from -rejected 😠
[06:13] <RAOF> I'm going to leave this because I'm grumpy and have been making mistakes, but my understanding is that the way to fix this is (a) upload a -0ubuntu2 with the correct contents (debian/copyright change). My understanding is the -0ubuntu1 version is now burnt, and we don't need to yank it.
[07:07] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: All good. It's midnight here and I'm going to bed. I'll reupload with -0ubuntu2 and everything corrected in the morning. My understanding was if you had rejected from source NEW was that -0ubuntu1 wasn't burnt unless you accepted it. Oh well, cest la vie
[07:10] <Eickmeyer> Oh, I misread that. It's late. Bed.
[07:11] <RAOF> Yeah, I mistakenly rejected it and then accepted the *wrong damn version* from -rejected.
[10:50] <luis220413> Can a core dev or MOTU trigger these PPA autopkgtests? https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/GmVGqXYn6r/
[11:01] <ginggs> @pilot in
[11:03] <ginggs> luis220413: looking...
[11:06] <ginggs> You submitted an invalid request: ppa luis220413/lp2023955 not found
[11:07] <luis220413> OK
[11:08] <ginggs> also
[11:08] <ginggs> You submitted an invalid request: ffmpeg/4.2.9-0ubuntu0.1 is not published in PPA luis220413/lp2033955 focal
[11:09] <ginggs> ah, 2023955 should be 2033955
[11:10] <ginggs> and
[11:11] <ginggs> versions should include the epoch, so 7:5.1.3-0ubuntu0.1 instead of 5.1.3-0ubuntu0.1
[11:13] <ginggs> luis220413 has left :(
[15:00] <ginggs> @pilot out
[15:00] <ginggs> thank you for flying Ubuntu Air!
[15:08] <Eickmeyer> 🛬
[15:09] <bittin> what is Patch pilots btw?
[15:09] <Eickmeyer> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/welcome-back-patch-pilots-ubuntu-s-guiding-stars-return/37911
[15:09] <bittin> ah i see