| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntucinnamon-wallpapers [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10] (no packageset) | 00:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntucinnamon-wallpapers [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [23.10] | 05:45 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello, can we please kick ulex0.8 out from mantic? Debian bug: #1051377 | 08:05 |
|---|---|---|
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1051377 in ftp.debian.org "RM: ulex0.8 -- ROM; no more rdeps; FTBFS" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1051377 | 08:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-1.15 (mantic-proposed/primary) [1.15.9-6] | 11:00 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | please REJECT IT ^^ | 11:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mistype 15 instead of 19 | 11:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | meh | 11:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (I'm syncing due to CVE-2023-29409 and CVE-2023-29406. | 11:01 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Extremely large RSA keys in certificate chains can cause a client/server to expend significant CPU time verifying signatures. With fix, the size of RSA keys transmitted during handshakes is restricted to <= 8192 bits. Based on a survey of publicly trusted RSA keys, there are currently only three certificates in circulation with keys larger than this, and all three a... <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-29409> | 11:01 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- The HTTP/1 client does not fully validate the contents of the Host header. A maliciously crafted Host header can inject additional headers or entire requests. With fix, the HTTP/1 client now refuses to send requests containing an invalid Request.Host or Request.URL.Host value. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-29406> | 11:01 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | (and other cves, such as CVE-2023-39320 CVE-2023-39318 CVE-2023-39319 CVE-2023-39321 CVE-2023-39322 | 11:15 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-39320> | 11:15 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-39318> | 11:15 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-39319> | 11:15 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-39321> | 11:15 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-39322> | 11:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsync [source] (focal-proposed) [3.1.3-8ubuntu0.7] | 12:06 | |
| rbasak | doko: is your sync of valgrind-is-available into Jammy unapproved intentional? | 13:36 |
| rbasak | *if | 13:36 |
| doko | rbasak: I added it to the i386-whitelist, yes. but if we cannot add it, I think I can work around it as well, replacing b-d's with valgrind [!riscv64] | 14:03 |
| rbasak | doko: I don't understand it as it appears in the Unapproved queue. 3.18.1 is already in Jammy, no? | 14:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (lunar-proposed/main) [4:7.5.5-0ubuntu0.23.04.1 => 4:7.5.6-0ubuntu0.23.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:20 | |
| ricotz | rbasak, hi :), in case you are still doing SRU reviews today, there is libreoffice for lunar ^ | 14:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted edubuntu-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.2.1] | 14:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.72.1] | 14:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-menu [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.55.1] | 14:27 | |
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: Reuploaded ubuntustudio-menu with changes to d/control reverted. | 14:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-menu (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.72 => 0.72.1] (ubuntustudio) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-websockets [source] (jammy-proposed) [10.2-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] | 14:38 | |
| rbasak | Eickmeyer: thanks. Did you see the Jammy issue too? | 14:40 |
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: That's about to be uploaded too. :) | 14:40 |
| Eickmeyer | There was a problem in the git history between jammy and kinetic, so that's why it wasn't caught. | 14:41 |
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: Uploaded. | 14:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-menu (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.55 => 0.55.1] (ubuntustudio) | 14:42 | |
| * Eickmeyer isn't messing around with this .desktop file update :) | 14:43 | |
| rbasak | ack, looking | 14:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.106.1-7ubuntu0.23.04.2] | 14:52 | |
| rbasak | Looks good now. Accepting - thanks! | 14:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.72.1] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-menu [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.55.1] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (jammy-proposed/main) [1:1.94.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~22.04.04 => 1:1.94.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~22.04.06] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected golang-1.15 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.15.9-6] | 15:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.1] | 16:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.2] | 16:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu11.22.04.4] | 17:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu13.3] | 17:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu9.5] | 17:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mokutil (focal-security/main) [0.6.0-2~20.04.1 => 0.6.0-2~20.04.2] (core) (sync) | 17:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mokutil (jammy-security/main) [0.6.0-2~22.04.1 => 0.6.0-2~22.04.2] (core) (sync) | 17:53 | |
| Eickmeyer | Is there something weird going on with lunar-proposed? Trying to test a package, enabled the repo, and all packages are up to date. Confirmed the box is looking and getting the lists, and proposed wasn't enabled prior to 'apt update.' | 18:08 |
| Eickmeyer | In other words, everything is correct/as it should be. | 18:09 |
| RikMills | Eickmeyer: lunar was 1st release with not-automatic, so you need to actively ask apt to install the new version IIRC | 18:11 |
| Eickmeyer | RikMills: I did. | 18:11 |
| ricotz | see apt-cache policy PKG | 18:12 |
| RikMills | yes, apt upgrade won't be enough | 18:13 |
| Eickmeyer | I never use upgrade when proposed is enabled. | 18:13 |
| RikMills | what is the command you are using then? | 18:14 |
| RikMills | so we are very clear | 18:14 |
| Eickmeyer | sudo apt install ubuntustudio-menu. I guess I need to use --from | 18:14 |
| RikMills | what about sudo apt install ubuntustudio-menu/lunar-proposed | 18:15 |
| Eickmeyer | That works. | 18:15 |
| RikMills | kool :) | 18:16 |
| Eickmeyer | I guess I didn't get the memo that it wouldn't be not-automatic. Again, one of those communication failures I've been screaming about. | 18:16 |
| RikMills | it is documented 'somewhere' | 18:16 |
| Eickmeyer | Not good enough. | 18:16 |
| Eickmeyer | I mean, I'm not saying it's intentional or that it's in bad faith, but things like that need to be sent out in ML post. | 18:17 |
| RikMills | I don't recall where I learnt that from | 18:18 |
| ricotz | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed ;) | 18:19 |
| Eickmeyer | ricotz: Like I said, "documented somewhere" isn't good enough when it's a major change. | 18:20 |
| RikMills | has always been the case when you manually in proposed lower | 18:21 |
| ricotz | I guess this is outdated while "selective upgrading" would be the default now | 18:21 |
| RikMills | but I do think there was a mailing list notification when that became defult | 18:21 |
| Eickmeyer | I don't recall seeing a ML notification about this. | 18:21 |
| RikMills | but can't find it just this sec | 18:21 |
| Eickmeyer | And I'm not subscribed to every single discourse post. | 18:22 |
| RikMills | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2022-November/042338.html | 18:31 |
| RikMills | all I can find in a quick look | 18:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (jammy-proposed/main) [1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.13 => 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.14] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 18:33 | |
| Eickmeyer | RikMills: That looks like it stalled-out with no clear notice that it was being done. Still a lack of communication and continuation of that thread. | 18:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mokutil [sync] (focal-security) [0.6.0-2~20.04.2] | 19:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mokutil [sync] (jammy-security) [0.6.0-2~22.04.2] | 19:12 | |
| * RikMills shrugs | 19:16 | |
| vorlon | "I have set this flag now" isn't clear? | 19:25 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: It's not a clear notice *to everyone* that this is a major change and not merely a discussion. I feel that, as such, it needs to be a separate thread and made a major announcement that the behavior is changing so people aren't off-guard. | 19:32 |
| Eickmeyer | It's not a clear announcement. It's merely discussion. | 19:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.25 => 2.765.26] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 20:05 | |
| vorlon | did someone here retry the deal.ii/riscv64 build? | 20:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-menu (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.72.1 => 0.72.2] (ubuntustudio) | 21:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-menu (lunar-proposed/universe) [23.04.2.1 => 23.04.2.2] (no packageset) | 21:12 | |
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: If you're still around, bug 2025196 is verification-failed, so ^ those two uploads fix the issue. | 21:13 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2025196 in ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] Conflicts with edubuntu-menu and ubuntustudio-menu" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2025196 | 21:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 46 entries have been added, updated or disabled | 22:16 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | <LocutusOfBorg> hello, can we please kick ulex0.8 out from mantic? Debian bug: #1051377 | 22:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | -ubottu/#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1051377 in ftp.debian.org "RM: ulex0.8 -- ROM; no more rdeps; FTBFS" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1051377 | 22:30 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1051377 in ftp.debian.org "RM: ulex0.8 -- ROM; no more rdeps; FTBFS" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1051377 | 22:30 | |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: doesn't show up as a build failure on https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20230830-mantic-mantic.html ? | 22:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ulex0.8/1.2-2build4 | 22:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | proposed pocket shows the failure... | 22:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it's related to camlp5 | 22:34 |
| vorlon | ah got it | 22:35 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: done | 22:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | camlp5 got a minor update, for compatibility with newer ocaml and some pcre->pcre2 moving and fixes (will we ever remove pcre3 from the archive? ) | 22:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm really working to port/fix pcre3 apps to move to pcre2 | 22:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Mantic Daily] has been updated (20230907) | 22:53 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!