/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/09/13/#ubuntu-release.txt

Eickmeyer🤦00:00
EickmeyerI mean, I'm even getting daily email notifications (which I'd rather not)00:03
EickmeyerDon't you dare say "patches welcome" and run away. 🤣00:03
vorlonwell turning off all notifications on the dailies is straightforward00:04
vorlonit's just if we wanted to split the IRC vs email notifications that code is required00:04
EickmeyerValid00:04
EickmeyerThough, this *is* the first time I've received email notifications along with the IRC notifications.00:05
vorlonoh, well I did see bdmurray debugging mail delivery sometime recently, so maybe this was turned on for testing00:06
EickmeyerThat would make sense.00:06
bdmurrayYes, I turned on the email notifications for the dailies but feel free to turn it off.00:06
EickmeyerSuccessful test, bdmurray. :)00:07
bdmurrayEickmeyer: You are getting email notifications? I only ever got 1 or they've been filtered away somewhere.00:07
EickmeyerOh? Yes, I've been getting them daily.00:07
vorlonbdmurray: ack thanks00:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 46 entries have been added, updated or disabled00:08
bdmurrayvorlon: speaking of email I've seen mails from ubuntu-archive-toolbox to google not succeeding00:08
vorlon<table flip>00:08
vorlonit would help if gmail believed in email00:09
vorlonyou know they also bounce lkml these days00:09
EickmeyerThat's been an ongoing battle between IS and gmail.00:09
bdmurrayconnection timed out to ...google.com00:09
vorlon"timed out" interesting00:09
vorlonthat doesn't look like a google problem00:09
Eickmeyer"timed out" is new. Usually it's a complete reject.00:09
vorlonand mailq on the host shows mail backed up for other smtp destinations00:10
bdmurrayI mention it as I saw similar on limequat00:10
vorlonwell no actually, mailq shows mail backed up *only* for debian.org00:10
vorlonopening an RT00:11
bdmurrayfeel free to CC me00:12
vorlonhmm maybe I should be raising a firewall MP instead00:12
bdmurraythat'd be my bet00:13
vorlonwell there's actually an existing firewall rule that's supposed to grant us outbound access to the SMTP relay so why don't I test that instead00:14
vorlonuh ok there's an smtp-relay-services-0.canonical.com and an smtp-relay-services-1.canonical.com but there's no smtp-relay-services.canonical.com... so much for redundancy?00:16
vorlonok postfix accepts multiple values for relayhost00:18
vorlon... in postfix 3.5 and later. ANYWAY00:19
vorlonRelay access denied.  Off to an RT it is00:20
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
vorlonbdmurray: I realized mails from cdimage-master seemed to be going out ok, so I cross-checked the config there... nope, same config, and same problem with non-delivery of non-ubuntu destinations05:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted budgie-backgrounds [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-2]05:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]05:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nautilus-wipe [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.alpha2-0.1]05:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)05:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nautilus-wipe [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.4.alpha2-0.1] (no packageset)05:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)05:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nautilus-wipe [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.4.alpha2-0.1] (no packageset)05:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [armhf] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)05:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nautilus-wipe [armhf] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.4.alpha2-0.1] (no packageset)05:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)05:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nautilus-wipe [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.4.alpha2-0.1] (no packageset)05:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pytorch-text (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.15.2-1]05:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pytorch-cuda (mantic-proposed/primary) [2.0.1+dfsg-3]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nautilus-wipe [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.alpha2-0.1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nautilus-wipe [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.alpha2-0.1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytorch-cuda [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2.0.1+dfsg-3]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nautilus-wipe [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.alpha2-0.1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytorch-text [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.15.2-1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nautilus-wipe [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.alpha2-0.1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-impl-trait-for-tuples [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytorch-text [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.15.2-1] (no packageset)05:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytorch-text [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.15.2-1] (no packageset)05:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytorch-text [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.15.2-1] (no packageset)05:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: yade (mantic-proposed/primary) [2023.02a-3]06:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytorch-text [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.15.2-1]06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytorch-text [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.15.2-1]06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytorch-text [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.15.2-1]06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yade [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2023.02a-3]06:12
dokomanually removed the libsuitesparseconfig5 binary from the release pocket. NBS didn't catch that automatically08:32
LocutusOfBorghello, anybody from release team wants to merge this one? https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs/+merge/45125508:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: tensorpipe-cuda (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.0~git20220513.bb1473a-5]08:36
LocutusOfBorgdoko, ^^08:36
LocutusOfBorgneeded for pytorch-cuda08:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tensorpipe-cuda [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.0~git20220513.bb1473a-5]08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tensorpipe-cuda [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.0~git20220513.bb1473a-5] (no packageset)08:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tensorpipe-cuda [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [0.0~git20220513.bb1473a-5] (no packageset)08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tensorpipe-cuda [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.0~git20220513.bb1473a-5]09:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tensorpipe-cuda [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.0~git20220513.bb1473a-5]09:15
LocutusOfBorgdoko, hello, if possible lp: #2034944?09:36
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2034944 in moc (Debian) "proposed-migration for moc 1:2.6.0~svn-r3005-3build2" [Unknown, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/203494409:36
LocutusOfBorgmoc should be the last ffmpeg blocker09:40
ricotzrbasak, hello :), please take a look at the libreoffice SRU for lunar -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/203364310:09
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2033643 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.5.6 for lunar" [Medium, In Progress]10:09
zhsjdoko: i'm on +1 and looking at the nbs related to ffmpeg 6.0. I've nmu moc, gpac, xpra in debian to fix the build. then I just find you have already removed them from mantic. I didn't catch up with that since I'm on an old nbs page...10:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gloo-cuda (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.0~git20230117.1090929-2]10:17
LocutusOfBorg^^ another one :/10:17
LocutusOfBorgzhsj, they should be all sorted out with pqiv migration10:18
LocutusOfBorgdeal.ii needs to finish riscv64 build (libumfpack5 nbs)10:18
LocutusOfBorginkscape needs i386 build fix10:19
dokozhsj: it should be all done now10:59
dokobut yes, fixing the ftbfs for some packages would be good too10:59
zhsjdoko: are you looking/removing other transitions? i could switch other things other than nbs/transitions. currently i'm looking at quaternion wrt libquotient transition11:02
dokozhsj: no, I'm not looking at transitions, just cleaning up nbs.html. Note that new versions of these libraries already migrated. so the transition itself is done. I didn't look at quaternion yet11:04
dokolibgl1-mesa-glx also should be done once some riscv64 builds finish11:05
zhsji feel the nbs.html is aligned with the transition tracker :)11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-parity-scale-codec [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.6.4-1] (no packageset)12:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-parity-scale-codec [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.6.4-1] (no packageset)12:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-parity-scale-codec [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.6.4-1] (no packageset)12:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-parity-scale-codec [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.6.4-1] (no packageset)12:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gloo-cuda [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.0~git20230117.1090929-2]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-parity-scale-codec [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [3.6.4-1]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-parity-scale-codec [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [3.6.4-1]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-parity-scale-codec [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [3.6.4-1]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-parity-scale-codec [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [3.6.4-1]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gloo-cuda [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.0~git20230117.1090929-2] (no packageset)12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gloo-cuda [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.0~git20230117.1090929-2] (no packageset)12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gloo-cuda [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.0~git20230117.1090929-2]12:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gloo-cuda [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.0~git20230117.1090929-2]12:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (lunar-proposed) [29.4~23.04]13:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [29.4~22.04]13:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [29.4~20.04]13:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [29.4~18.04]13:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [29.4~16.04]13:18
ricotzLocutusOfBorg, hi, please could you cancel these https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-16/1:16.0.6-14/+build/26696919 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-16/1:16.0.6-14/+build/2669691513:38
LocutusOfBorgricotz, .13:40
jbicharbasak: when you have time for SRUs, please see my followup comment on bug 202808214:24
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2028082 in glib2.0 (Ubuntu Lunar) "Update glib to 2.76.4" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202808214:24
xnoxrelease team! need help16:08
xnoxall the v6.5 kernels are trying to move16:09
xnoxautohinter is hinting them all16:09
xnoxand then it ends up with16:09
xnox finish:16:09
xnox[linux,linux-aws,linux-azure,linux-gcp,linux-lowlatency,linux-meta,linux-meta-aws,linux-meta-azure,linux-meta-gcp,linux-meta-lowlatency,linux-meta-oracle,linux-oracle,linux-restricted-modules,linux-restricted-modules-aws,linux-restricted-modules-azure,linux-restricted-modules-gcp,linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency,linux-restricted-modules-oracle,linux-restricted-signatures,linux-restricted16:09
xnox-signatures-aws,linux-restricted-signatures-azure,linux-restricted-signatures-gcp,linux-restricted-signatures-lowlatency,linux-restricted-signatures-oracle,linux-signed,linux-signed-aws,linux-signed-azure,linux-signed-gcp,linux-signed-lowlatency,linux-signed-oracle,nvidia-graphics-drivers-535,nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server]16:09
xnoxendloop: 14+0: a-3:a-3:a-0:i-0:p-3:r-2:s-316:09
xnox    now: 16+0: a-5:a-3:a-0:i-0:p-3:r-2:s-316:09
xnox    * amd64: linux-modules-nvidia-390-lowlatency-hwe-20.04, linux-modules-nvidia-390-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge16:09
xnoxand i cannot tell why or what it means.16:09
xnoxhm maybe there is something odd about it.16:12
xnoxfigured it out!16:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.47 => 2.664.49] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:17
vorlonxnox: what it means is only that those are the newly-uninstallable binaries.  everything else you have to figure out for yourself16:26
vorlonzhsj: on +1, it might be worth looking at why libdeal.ii-9.4.1 is still in mantic, it is uninstallable AND depends on an NBS package16:30
vorlon(it's unusual that we let a package like that regress installability)16:31
dokodeal.ii needs the build on riscv64 to finish. nothing to investigate17:07
seb128hum, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/446/builds is labelling 'Ubuntu Desktop amd64 (re-building)' but there is no pending build on https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu17:15
LocutusOfBorgsigh pytorch https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs/+merge/45129617:16
seb128could someone reset the state somehow?17:16
bdmurrayseb128: The only way I know to clear the re-building state is to run a build again from the cdimage server17:31
seb128bdmurray, I don't think I've access to the server, could you do that for me?17:36
bdmurrayI could build a new Ubuntu desktop image but are the issues with building them fully fixed?17:37
vorlonI thought some work was done in the geological recent past to make it possible to cancel rebuilds17:38
vorlonfrom the ISO tracker17:38
vorlonanyway, now that livecd-rootfs 23.10.36 is in the release pocket we should be good to retry17:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (focal-proposed/main) [3:18.3.5-0ubuntu2.1 => 3:18.3.5-0ubuntu2.2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)17:38
bdmurrayOkay, I just tried to cancel the rebuild but nothing has changed.17:39
vorlondoko: that doesn't explain why deal.ii is currently uninstallable in the release pocket; and as the uninstallable report shows it also has no reverse-depends, we could remove deal.ii from the release pocket now, get the new one to migrate without riscv64, and move NBS along17:40
dokogo for it17:40
vorlonzhsj: ^^17:40
vorlonbdmurray: ok and I may have invented the idea that someone had fixed the cancel option, the last commit mentioning it at all is stgraber in 2015 :P17:41
seb128bdmurray, what Steve said, the new livecd-rootfs is published so we would like a retry17:41
vorlonanyway I'll take care of retrying17:41
seb128thanks!17:41
vorlonretrying amd64 only because the arm64 images are currently uselessly bad17:42
seb128ack17:46
vorlondoko: so, it was your removal of libsuitesparseconfig5 that triggered the new uninstallables fwiw; it only had NBS reverse-dependencies but those weren't candidates for removal yet because they had dependencies in turn, if you're going to remove one of the NBS packages why not remove them all at once?17:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [amd64] (mantic-proposed/main) [4:7.6.1~rc2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-keystonemiddleware (jammy-proposed/main) [9.4.0-0ubuntu1 => 9.4.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack)18:45
ricotzhello ubuntu-archive, please bump the priority of this llvm riscv64 build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-16/1:16.0.6-15/+build/2670313819:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-keystonemiddleware (focal-proposed/main) [9.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 9.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)19:13
seb128ricotz, afaik archive admin don't have access to build scores19:41
vorlonseb128: don't we? I have some priv level that gives me access to that and I thought it was ubuntu-archive.19:42
vorlonanyway, the riscv64 builders are in disarray, as seen by the page listing no estimated start time, so there's an infrastructure issue to be sorted19:42
vorlonI'm not going to prioritize this build over others in the face of that without a compelling justification19:42
ricotzvorlon, hi :), please bump it anyway this missing toolchain build is holding up things :(19:43
seb128vorlon, well as I said 'afaik', it's not documented on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration and I don't know what cmd/api can be used to change scores19:44
ricotzvorlon, aka the default llvm toolchain is not installable on riscv64 is letting builds fail, e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.6.1~rc2-0ubuntu1/+build/2670403719:44
vorlonseb128: if you have access, that page has an edit icon next to the 'Needs building' status19:45
vorlonseb128: unrelated, Desktop daily images have outgrown the current limit again after the current refactoring. Should we bump it? I guess size should be fairly stable from now until release19:46
seb128vorlon, https://people.canonical.com/~seb128/build.png19:46
seb128so I guess I don't have access?19:47
vorlonricotz: thanks, that's a concrete justification (package with a long build needs build retried after this is done, developer has to watch until it's available).  Still, https://launchpad.net/builders/ currently has 0 riscv64 builders available so there's *currently* no point19:47
vorlonseb128: the round yellow icon19:47
seb128ohhhh19:48
seb128thanks, I learnt something new :)19:48
seb128(so it's not next to the 'Needs building', but next to the score :p)19:48
seb128vorlon, +1 on bumping the desktop ISO limit again yes19:49
ricotzvorlon, "riscv64 0 10217 jobs (29 weeks)" , so such a package should be prioritized to whatever is queue there19:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia-dashboard (lunar-proposed/main) [11.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 11.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack)19:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia-dashboard (jammy-proposed/main) [9.0.0-0ubuntu1.1 => 9.0.0-0ubuntu1.2] (openstack)20:01
Eickmeyervorlon: If you're around, Ubuntu Studio went back to normal sizes, but Edubuntu increased in size this cycle, about 200MiB.20:01
EickmeyerProbably same as desktop experienced.20:02
vorlonseb128: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/commit/?id=f1fd88cb9a35d88c7d4e75e4c3d9b318ba506ea8 should be just enough for right now; may alert us again if the image grows again unexpectedly20:12
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit f1fd88c in ubuntu-cdimage "Bump Ubuntu size limit per seb128 HEAD main"20:12
seb128vorlon, ack, thanks20:12
vorlonEickmeyer: Ubuntu's size increase is an added 261.6 MB squashfs to support the TPM FDE feature, which isn't applicable to edubuntu.  Do you want to look at what's grown before bumping the limit?20:14
Eickmeyervorlon: I mean, bump the limit, but what it came down to was +basic256, deja-dup, gnome-music, totem, convertall, mnemosyne, onboard, gnome-shell-extension-manager and -pdfmod, lightspeed, ktouch.20:18
EickmeyerNet was about +200MiB.20:19
vorlonok20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [4:7.6.1~rc2-0ubuntu1]20:20
Eickmeyers/onboard/openboard. I think openboard was the biggest there, but that's pretty essential for teachers these days with projectors. We're considering adding an ubuntu-edu-teacher metapackage next release.20:22
EickmeyerAnd a music education metapackage, TBD if Studio or Edubuntu.20:23
ricotzplease retry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-16/1:16.0.6-15/+build/2670313820:49
vorlonricotz: done20:52
xnoxi hope britney is not stuck for mantic https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/log/mantic/2023-09-13/?C=M;O=D it should have printed stats by now22:08
EickmeyerI see logs that are only 15 minutes old?22:11

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!