[06:11] <vorlon> @pilot out
[11:41] <nteodosio> RAOF, do you know why bug 2029473 hasn't made it into proposal yet?
[11:41] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029473 in software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2029473
[11:42] <nteodosio> s/proposal/proposed
[11:45] <seb128> nteodosio, he's probably eod at this time but maybe other SRU reviewers can help there, unsure if they regularly review the xenial queue
[13:27] <nteodosio> Ah, so maybe ^bdmurray?
[14:01] <ahasenack> is the TPM support for FDE in the current mantic installer? I downloaded the daily image yesterday, and only see the usual lvm + passphrase encryption. Or will that use TPM, and leave the passphrase as a backup to get in?
[14:16] <seb128> ahasenack, TPM will only be enable on some hardware, also we had a bug that it was not working with 'minimal' (which is the default), that should be fixed in today's daily
[14:17] <ahasenack> seb128: what is the indication that it's available, another option under "advanced"?
[14:17] <ahasenack> I'm trying with a VM, where I did enable TPMv2, which used to satisfy windows 11
[14:17] <ahasenack> (and am also using a non-minimal install)
[14:19] <seb128> ahasenack, yes, it should be in the advanced dialog ... any error in journalctl | grep TPM?
[14:20] <ahasenack> "not encrypting device storage as checking TPM gave: secure boot is disabled"
[14:20] <ahasenack> I used uefi boot, and UEFI x86_64: /usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE_4M.secboot.fd specifically
[14:20] <seb128> ahasenack, that's probably why you don't see the option
[14:21] <ahasenack> but mokutil agrees that secure boot is disabled
[14:28] <seb128> ^ was sorted out on another channel but as a follow up, /usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE_4M.ms.fd is the right file to use
[16:45] <UnivrslSuprBox> It seems like libx32lsan0-amd64-cross and lib32lsan0-amd64-cross are still in mantic's Universe repository, they were last built by `gcc-13-cross (9ubuntu3)`. However, they don't appear on the NBS site. Did they slip through the cracks, maybe on account of having a different version from their source package?
[20:04] <vorlon> UnivrslSuprBox: they haven't entirely slipped through the cracks, in that https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/mantic_outdate.txt knows about them; it's just that this is the last report to be settled because we normally drive things through the NBS report instead
[20:08] <UnivrslSuprBox> vorlon: interesting, thank you. I'll make my code more resilient against this situation (was going to anyway, especially so now that it's an expected state of the archive for a short time)