[02:17] <bandali> lissyx, we've indeed been building firefox snap nightlies on LP for a while, like the other firefox snap variants, though so far only for amd64
[02:17] <bandali> mainly because that was my initial focus when trying to urgently find a path forward for building the nightly, since github actions was giving us no end of grief
[02:18] <bandali> i just went ahead and enabled arm64 and armhf for it as well though, and will keep an eye to see if they'll succeed already or if they'll need some work to make them succeed
[02:20] <bandali> lissyx, oh and if you happen to have a link to your experimental arm64 cross build i'd be happy to try it on my rpi
[06:24] <lissyx> bandali, I already tested on my rpi4 running ubuntu :)
[11:33] <GunnarHj> Hi seb128! Please look at bug #2036453. Can that possibly be related to the transition between the old and new Ubuntu font?
[11:33] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Bug 2036453 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Fonts messed up at upgrade from 23.04 to 23.10" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036453
[11:48] <seb128> GunnarHj, those type of issues show the limitation of doing in session upgrade, replacing files under the feet of running applications
[12:06] <GunnarHj> seb128: Wasn't the very reason for keeping the "legacy" ones to prevent that?
[12:10] <jbicha> I believe that font issue should be a duplicate of bug 2034986
[12:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Bug 2034986 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Mantic) "some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2034986
[12:12] <GunnarHj> Probably.
[12:12] <GunnarHj> But this will make a lot of people nervous!
[12:14] <jbicha> yes, it's very bad. I think it can make the final step of the upgrade (remove these packages??) unreadable
[12:15] <GunnarHj> seb128, jbicha: Could the problem be avoided by using some other font but Ubuntu in update-manager/ubuntu-release-upgrader? A font which hasn't undergone a fundamental change...
[12:16] <jbicha> that was my suggestion too. I think Foundations owns that package so we should work with them on that
[12:16] <GunnarHj> ok.
[12:19] <seb128> I don't understand fonts enough to be able to tell why the UI can't cope with the disk changing when the UI is already loaded
[12:25] <KGB-2> gnome-shell ubuntu/lunar ab93cef Jeremy Bicha * pushed 10 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/3dnO2
[12:25] <KGB-2> gnome-shell ubuntu/lunar 113bcb4 Dušan Kazik po/sk.po * Update Slovak translation * https://deb.li/3qo1
[12:25] <KGB-2> gnome-shell ubuntu/lunar f3ccc0d Bruce Cowan po/en_GB.po * Update British English translation * https://deb.li/32grN
[12:26] <KGB-2> gnome-shell ubuntu/lunar 43c498f Андрей Гриценко js/ui/magnifier.js * magnifier: Fix cursor offset * https://deb.li/zywV
[12:26] <KGB-2> gnome-shell ubuntu/lunar 624c709 Florian Müllner js/misc/parentalControlsManager.js * parentalControlsManager: Don't log error when disabled * https://deb.li/38jeg
[12:26] <KGB-2> gnome-shell ubuntu/lunar b409084 Florian Müllner js/ui/workspace.js * workspace: Reapply border radius on background changes * https://deb.li/Hj6G
[12:40] <bandali> oh okay cool :-)
[12:40] <bandali> also, good morning/day y'all
[12:44] <lissyx> bandali, ok so we dont have a sysroot for armhf linux, so I dont think it's worth trying to get cross-compilation for that?
[12:45] <lissyx> bandali, I could not get the build to start without using our sysroot, I'm not sure what clang is looking for when it chokes on <cstddef> include
[12:45] <lissyx> and looking at the metrics, there's so few users on armhf ...
[13:27] <bandali> lissyx, hmm right. yeah i mean if we typically manage to compile it for armhf on launchpad, i don't think there's an urgent need for it? especially considering the metrics as you mentioned
[13:51] <tjaalton> hi, I've filed a FFe for mesa, so I'd like a pre-ack from the desktop team if plausible? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2036611
[13:51] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Launchpad bug 2036611 in mesa (Ubuntu) "FFe: Mesa 23.2.0" [Undecided, New]
[13:57] <KGB-2> gnome-shell ubuntu/lunar 6d9ac6a Simon McVittie debian/patches/ series screenshot-Do-not-wrongly-enable-window-button.patch screenshot-Only-handle-mode-switch-shortcut-when-supporte.patch * Backport upstream fixes for CVE-2023-43090 * https://deb.li/3zLwy
[13:57] <KGB-2> gnome-shell ubuntu/lunar 92fd385 Jeremy Bícha debian/changelog * releasing package gnome-shell version 44.3-0ubuntu2 * https://deb.li/33loG
[13:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-43090>
[14:21] <Eickmeyer> Good morning desktopers! Wanted to bring to your attention bug 2036683 which happened as a result of the constant changing of the .desktop file in the store snap without notification to myself (or the Edubuntu team, really).
[14:21] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Bug 2036683 in edubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Software disappeared from default dock" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036683
[14:22] <Eickmeyer> Changes like that should *not* happen that close to beta. Required a fix and respin.
[14:23]  * Eickmeyer has no idea how to get better communication about that or how to communicate this frustration better
[14:49] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: I don't understand why that change is needed. Ubuntu Desktop sets the same key and it works there
[14:50] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: The .desktop file name changed repeatedly from snap-store_snap-store to snap-store_ubuntu-software and back repeatedly over the course of the cycle.
[14:51] <jbicha> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/tree/debian/ubuntu-settings.gsettings-override#n78
[14:51] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: ^ this is what Ubuntu has now and it works on today's pending ISO
[14:51] <Eickmeyer> It didn't work on Edubuntu.
[14:52] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: what track are you on? I believe  snap info snap-store  should say latest/stable/ubuntu-23.10
[14:52] <Eickmeyer> Same track.
[14:53] <Eickmeyer> I mean, we have to be.
[14:53] <Eickmeyer> Can't seed otherwise.
[14:53] <jbicha> echo $XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP
[14:55] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu:GNOME
[14:56] <Eickmeyer> Oh... the system I'm on is an upgrade.
[14:56] <Eickmeyer> tracking:     latest/stable/ubuntu-23.04
[14:56] <Eickmeyer> That does, however, point to a problem with the upgrade process.
[14:57] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: ^
[14:58] <jbicha> when did you upgrade?
[14:58] <Eickmeyer> 2-3 days ago.
[14:58] <jbicha> and how did you upgrade?
[14:58] <Eickmeyer> upgrade-manager -d
[14:59] <Eickmeyer> er.. update-manager -d
[14:59] <Eickmeyer> On this particular machine, that is.
[15:00] <jbicha> you can open a bug against ubuntu-release-upgrader . It is supposed to update the stable/ubuntu- tracking snap channels
[15:00] <jbicha> that's why I asked what track you were on :)
[15:02] <Eickmeyer> Ok, still: the change from snap-tore_ubuntu-software to snap-store removes it from the favorites upon upgrade. That might not be welcome to users.
[15:02] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: ^
[15:04] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: please use https://github.com/ubuntu/app-center/issues I'm not a maintainer of the store & haven't been following all its details
[15:04] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: Totally agree, and thanks for the pointer.
[15:21] <lissyx> bandali, ftr https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1854157 we might be missing debug symbols on several builds, maybe since we introduced core22
[15:21] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1854157 in Firefox Build System "Snap build can be missing configure statements" [S2, New]
[15:27] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: I think the bug for ubuntu-release-upgrader is a a candidate for rls-mm-proposed (I might have the tag wrong?).
[15:32] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: Nvm. rls-mm-incoming.
[16:09] <bandali> lissyx, ack, thanks, i'll look into it. i guess we might have to fold 'mozconfig' into 'firefox'? (and perhaps also 'apikeys' into that as well?)
[16:22] <loose> hey Eickmeyer - I've been working on the new store for quite a while now and this is the first time I'm hearing about the desktop file issue. clearly there's a communication issue somewhere - sorry for your troubles!
[16:23] <Eickmeyer> loose: Hey! Yeah, and the change in the .desktop file name might irk the people who keep it in the dock and suddenly, when upgrading, it will be gone.
[16:23] <Eickmeyer> Reason: user dconf settings.
[16:38] <loose> agreed, that's quite annoying and shouldn't happen!
[16:44] <GunnarHj> seb128, jbicha: Maybe closer to a solution to the upgrade/fonts issue:
[16:44] <GunnarHj> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2034986/comments/8
[16:44] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Launchpad bug 2034986 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Mantic) "some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade" [Critical, Confirmed]
[17:34] <jbicha> GunnarHj: could you check with bdmurray about that idea? we may want to fix if possible before the beta release
[17:34] <jbicha> in #ubuntu-release probably
[17:44] <GunnarHj> Done. (But you probably saw that.)
[18:00] <bandali> lissyx, btw does this seem to you like a shortage of memory issue, or something completely unrelated? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/688277042/buildlog_snap_ubuntu_jammy_armhf_firefox-snap-nightly-preview_BUILDING.txt.gz
[18:29] <jbicha> bandali: I ran into bug 2036765 when upgrading from 23.04 to 23.10 so my firefox is on latest/stable/ubuntu-23.04 and there isn't a Firefox launcher in my Dock or Applications Overview :(
[18:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Bug 2036765 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-release-upgrader failed to upgrade snap to track new release" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036765
[18:46] <KGB-2> gnome-contacts signed tags 03b4ca1 Jeremy Bicha upstream/45.0 * Upstream version 45.0 * https://deb.li/pqtG
[18:56] <KGB-2> libsecret signed tags 3a3cdea Jeremy Bicha upstream/0.21.1 * Upstream version 0.21.1 * https://deb.li/iwQMe
[18:56] <KGB-0> libsecret pristine-tar eb637be Jeremy Bícha libsecret_0.21.1.orig.tar.xz.delta libsecret_0.21.1.orig.tar.xz.id * pristine-tar data for libsecret_0.21.1.orig.tar.xz * https://deb.li/sBF
[18:57] <KGB-2> libsecret upstream/latest 9f4f7ee Jeremy Bicha * pushed 11 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/it6fG
[18:57] <KGB-2> libsecret upstream/latest 2f00bf3 Anders Jonsson po/sv.po * Update Swedish translation * https://deb.li/56oF
[18:57] <KGB-2> libsecret upstream/latest bf0ddf7 Dhanuka Warusadura egg/egg-tpm2.c * TPM2: fix `g_memdup` deprecated warning * https://deb.li/3nEr1
[18:57] <KGB-2> libsecret upstream/latest 1374b09 Dhanuka Warusadura egg/egg-tpm2.c * Merge branch 'fix_depricated' into 'master' * https://deb.li/cE8h
[18:57] <KGB-2> libsecret upstream/latest 8bbdfa3 Amn Alam po/pa.po * Update Punjabi translation * https://deb.li/3Gatc
[18:57] <KGB-2> libsecret upstream/latest ae7c52b Efstathios Iosifidis po/el.po * Update Greek translation * https://deb.li/3wz6C
[19:00] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: I feel like bug 2036765 would be a blocker for *everyone*.
[19:00] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Bug 2036765 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-release-upgrader failed to upgrade snap to track new release" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036765
[19:18] <bandali> :-(