[00:00] <amurray> (by required kernel, I mean required for this feature to be actively tested - the FFe itself doesn't require that kernel)
[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Unity Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntucinnamon-environment (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.1 => 23.10.2] (no packageset)
[00:27]  * ItzSwirlz grumbles
[00:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919) has been added
[00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:35] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: If you have a quick cycle, ubuntucinnamon-environment 23.10.1 is awaiting approval, should fix the build issue per ItzSwirlz 's testing.
[00:35] <Eickmeyer> er, .2
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:36] <bdmurray> looking
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919) has been added
[00:37] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: tia
[00:37] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: Did y'all test it this time?
[00:37] <ItzSwirlz> yes
[00:37] <ItzSwirlz> i did
[00:37] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: As stated, ItzSwirlz tested it. I don't have the environment.
[00:37] <ItzSwirlz> if it still has problems I will be *stunned*
[00:39] <bdmurray> I don't see any substance to the changes in this upload https://launchpadlibrarian.net/688164315/ubuntucinnamon-environment_23.10.1_23.10.2.diff.gz
[00:40] <ItzSwirlz> `Binary files /tmp/tmp_wuqskp1/wE4oZYE0Sp/ubuntucinnamon-environment-23.10.1/usr/share/cinnamon/thumbnails/cinnamon/unknown.png and /tmp/tmp_wuqskp1/HSDy9FNhHs/ubuntucinnamon-environment-23.10.2/usr/share/cinnamon/thumbnails/cinnamon/unknown.png differ` it was removed
[00:40] <bdmurray> Got it
[00:40] <ItzSwirlz> https://github.com/ubuntucinnamon/ubuntucinnamon-environment/commit/ac8a6dd74c70fef420f099ac7253ef1c0d7cdadb
[00:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit ac8a6dd in ubuntucinnamon/ubuntucinnamon-environment "23.10.2 - dont replace identical conflicting file usr/share/cinnamon/thumbnails/cinnamon/unknown.png"
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[00:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919) has been added
[00:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntucinnamon-environment [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.2]
[00:48] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Thanks
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-default-settings (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.04.0 => 23.10.0] (xubuntu)
[01:32] <bluesabre> (not required for beta)
[01:34] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: the environment> literally just requires trying to install the two packages together in a chroot or container
[01:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-default-settings [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.0]
[01:35] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Fair, but that didn't occur to me. I was thinking the entire flavor, but I'm a total completionist like that. :P
[02:10] <ItzSwirlz> been about an hour, i assume -environment is good? if so, you can add the cinnamon build whenever you want
[02:25] <bdmurray> I was eating dinner, looking now
[02:30] <vorlon> hasn't made it through a britney run yet
[02:30] <bdmurray> I'm working on adding an unblock hint for it
[02:31] <ItzSwirlz> oh well, im going to sleep. msg me on telegram if anything happens
[02:32] <bdmurray> vorlon: is there a reason not to do that?
[02:32] <vorlon> bdmurray: none
[02:38] <bdmurray> That's done then, waiting for britney
[02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-artwork (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.5 => 23.10.6] (no packageset)
[02:48] <Eickmeyer> bug 2036683 ^
[02:48] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2036683 in edubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Software disappeared from default dock" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036683
[02:48] <Eickmeyer> I will be bugging the desktop team about that one.
[02:54] <Eickmeyer> That's a definite respin for edubuntu as it's a UX issue.
[03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Mantic Beta] (20230919.1) has been added
[03:00] <bdmurray> Respin for the Beta?
[03:01] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Yes, because otherwise it won't show up in the dock for the beta.
[03:01] <Eickmeyer> At all.
[03:01] <Eickmeyer> Not even upon update.
[03:08] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: So you'd like me to review the edubuntu-artwork upload then and unblock it and respin the image?
[03:08] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: If you have a cycle to spare. It is getting late, and I know there are others.
[03:09] <Eickmeyer> It's a one-line change to a conf file.
[03:09] <bdmurray> I see that
[03:10] <Eickmeyer> I've had to deal with that one line all dev cycle because the file name kept changing.
[03:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted edubuntu-artwork [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.6]
[03:14] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: tyvm
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Mantic Beta] (20230920) has been added
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Mantic Beta] (20230920) has been added
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+icicle [Mantic Beta] (20230920) has been added
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+licheerv [Mantic Beta] (20230920) has been added
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+nezha [Mantic Beta] (20230920) has been added
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Mantic Beta] (20230920) has been added
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive [Mantic Beta] (20230920) has been added
[06:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adair-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[06:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adair-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-barrett-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-barrington-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-caitir-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-calaminag-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-barrett-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-barrington-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-caitir-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-calaminag-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (lunar-proposed) [252.5-2ubuntu3.2]
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.11]
[08:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: davmail (mantic-proposed/universe) [6.1.0.3423-4 => 6.1.0.3423-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted davmail [sync] (mantic-proposed) [6.1.0.3423-5]
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: abyss (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [2.3.7-1 => 2.3.7-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted abyss [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2.3.7-2]
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfile-fcntllock-perl (mantic-proposed/main) [0.22-4build1 => 0.22-4ubuntu1] (core)
[11:54] <AlsoItzSwirlz> What's cinnamon's status, has the ubuntucinnamon-environment binary been uploaded?
[12:00] <fossfreedom_> In the release pocket 8 hours ago https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntucinnamon-environment
[12:01] <AlsoItzSwirlz> ok, status of the ISO?
[12:04] <fossfreedom_> ah - the last attempt of the build was 13 hours ago - so before that package migrated.
[12:14] <fossfreedom_> AlsoItzSwirlz: ordinarily I would say to kick the ISO to be rebuilt via the ISO tracker - but given we are in beta thats probably a Release Team request
[12:14] <AlsoItzSwirlz> yeah, thats my request, can the RT add cinnamon to the list of images/build a cinnamon image
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boot-managed-by-snapd (mantic-proposed/main) [2 => 3] (no packageset)
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boot-managed-by-snapd [source] (mantic-proposed) [3]
[14:08] <bdmurray> Hunh, I thought I built cinnamon last night
[14:09] <bdmurray> Doing so now
[14:15] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: verification done bug 2033992, but I probably just missed you. :)
[14:15] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2033992 in ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] Change Ubuntu Studio Chat from Matrix to IRC" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2033992
[14:36] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: I'm gonna rebuild edubuntu too b/c I don't see the latest edubuntu-artwork in the manifest
[14:36] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Huh. I'll take it!
[14:37] <bdmurray> I'm sorry, you'd a) like a reubild or b) are going to do one?
[14:38] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: ?
[14:39] <Eickmeyer> I'd like the rebuild. It's necessary for that package to show the defaults properly.
[14:39] <Eickmeyer> I'm sorry if that was mistyped
[14:39] <Eickmeyer> Lost in translation, I guess.
[14:39]  * Eickmeyer hasn't had coffee yet.
[14:39] <bdmurray> Or the fog of sleep deprivation
[14:40] <Eickmeyer> That too. Woke up to a deluge outside this morning.
[14:42] <Eickmeyer> Do get some rest at some point, though.
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Cinnamon Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] (20230920) has been added
[14:46] <bdmurray> \o/
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been updated (20230920)
[15:13] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Bad news. The system I was on was upgraded less than a week ago, and ubuntu-release-upgrader did not upgrade the snap-store snap to track latest/stable/ubuntu-23.10 as it was still tracking 23.04. What we have is a bug in ubuntu-release-upgrader. I'll be reverting the change in edubuntu-artwork and requiring a respin. 😞
[15:16]  * Eickmeyer bangs head against wall
[15:16] <Eickmeyer> This is why we test though, right?
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hello (bionic-proposed/main) [2.10-1build3 => 2.10-1build3+test1] (core)
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hello [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.10-1build3+test1]
[15:18] <cjwatson> (me again)
[15:19] <cjwatson> upload.ubuntu.com is on a new deployment now
[15:22] <Eickmeyer> cjwatson: \o/
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-artwork (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.6 => 23.10.7] (no packageset)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hello (bionic-proposed/main) [2.10-1build3 => 2.10-1build3+test1] (core)
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hello [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.10-1build3+test1]
[15:35] <Eickmeyer> Ok, let's try this again. Undoing the changes to edubuntu-artwork, will need a respin. 🤦
[15:35] <Eickmeyer> bug 2036683
[15:35] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2036683 in edubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Software disappeared from default dock" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036683
[15:36] <Eickmeyer> Related: bug 2036765
[15:36] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2036765 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-release-upgrader failed to upgrade snap to track new release" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036765
[15:50] <bdmurray> accepting edubuntu-artwork again
[15:51] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Thanks again. 😞
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted edubuntu-artwork [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.7]
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (mantic-proposed/main) [1.2.9-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.9-1ubuntu3] (core)
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nwchem (mantic-proposed/universe) [7.0.2-4 => 7.0.2-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nwchem [sync] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.2-5]
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been disabled
[17:16] <Eickmeyer> Trying to help ItzSwirlz investigate bug 2036764, and why indicator-keyboard is even being autopkgtested against ubuntucinnamon-meta.
[17:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2036764 in ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu) "indicator keyboard crashes when upgrading from lunar->mantic on ubuntu cinnamon" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036764
[17:43] <GunnarHj> bdmurray: Bug #2034986 is rather ugly, and I have an idea for a fix. Please see the latest comment. Any chance such a change could make it for the beta?
[17:43] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2034986 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Mantic) "some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2034986
[17:46] <bdmurray> GunnarHj: its been around for a while. Could you explain why you think it should be sorted this week?
[17:48] <GunnarHj> bdmurray: Well, since the beta is the starting point for many testers, many users will probably run into it otherwise. Guess that's the best I can come up with. :)
[17:53] <Eickmeyer> We figured it out. rdeps showed problems, and the autopkgtest might be wrong as it couldn't be reproduced in a vm.
[18:07] <bdmurray> Respinning edubuntu
[18:07] <Eickmeyer> 👍 Thanks so much.
[18:13] <jbicha> I don't think we have triggered the font upgrade issue in a while but I believe it triggers reliably with update-manager to 23.10 now. But to fix it for the upgrader itself, do we need to SRU ubuntu-release-upgrader?
[18:14]  * Eickmeyer has seen the font upgrade issue first-hand.
[18:14] <bdmurray> No, the way the upgrade process works is it downloads the dist-upgrader tarball for the release to which the system is upgrading
[18:15] <bdmurray> e.g. http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/mantic/main/dist-upgrader-all/current/mantic.tar.gz as seen in the meta-release-development file
[18:20] <jbicha> ok then yes, I think we ought to fix it for Beta, but maybe we could zero-day it so we don't need to respin ISOs
[18:30] <jbicha> there's also bug 2036765
[18:30] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2036765 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-release-upgrader failed to upgrade snap to track new release" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036765
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been updated (20230920.1)
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnocchi (mantic-proposed/universe) [4.5.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.6.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[19:29] <bdmurray> I clicked rebuild too soon and the old edubuntu-artwork is in the image, retrying now
[19:29] <Eickmeyer> ope
[19:29] <Eickmeyer> Happens. I've done that too.
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-mlnx (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:19.0.0+git2023011010.0a69b971-0ubuntu1 => 1:21.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-l2gw (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:18.0.0+git2022100517.fbebe30-0ubuntu1 => 1:19.0.0+git2023092015.20542bf0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been updated (20230920.2)
[20:45] <bdmurray> Now edubuntu is good
[20:47] <Eickmeyer> 👍 I'll re-zsync here just to make sure.
[20:52] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: re bug 2036765: snapd?
[20:52] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2036765 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-release-upgrader failed to upgrade snap to track new release" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036765
[20:55] <bdmurray> The Foundations team meeting is tomorrow so it'll at least be discussed then
[20:56] <sergiodj> vorlon: I have a fix for apt-cacher-ng. I assume it's better to wait until the beta freeze is lifted before uploading, but let me know otherwise
[20:58] <bdmurray> sergiodj: Is it seeded?
[20:59] <sergiodj> bdmurray: not sure, let me check
[21:00] <sergiodj> bdmurray: no, it doesn't seem that it is
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.04.1-0ubuntu1 => 23.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:08] <sergiodj> uploaded, then
[21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt-cacher-ng (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.7.4-1build3 => 3.7.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt-cacher-ng [source] (mantic-proposed) [3.7.4-1ubuntu1]
[21:35] <vorlon> sergiodj: and in general unless you think your upload is going to interfere with some /other/ change to the package that will be beta-critical, it's still better to upload it to the queue and let the release team unblock it as needed
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:28] <dbungert> bdmurray: we appear to have a plan on how to build a s390x subiquity snap without LP: #2036424.  I should have a candidate in a few minutes, which I will hand-verify.  If that looks good then I will suggest a live-server rebuild for s390x
[22:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036424 in subiquity "Mantic s390x install fails: grep-status: *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036424
[22:38] <dbungert> bdmurray: yes, the snap appears to be built correctly.  Would you rebuild s390x mantic live-server?
[22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Minimal amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:07] <bdmurray> dbungert: I'd stepped away for a bit. So the snap will have the same features but just be built differently for s390x?
[23:08] <bdmurray> same features for every arch
[23:09] <dbungert> bdmurray: this snap build for s390x was done with core22 from edge instead of stable.  Note that if you want this to match commit for commit it would have to be an all-arch live-server rebuild, or I would have to backtrack a branch for a specific s390x snap build to match the actual beta ISO candidates.
[23:11] <bdmurray> dbungert: I gather you and mwhudson think using this snap for 390x is the best option?
[23:12] <mwhudson> yes
[23:12] <dbungert> bdmurray: yes.  mwhudson also note as such at https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2036424/comments/13
[23:12] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036424 in subiquity "Mantic s390x install fails: grep-status: *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated" [Undecided, Triaged]
[23:12] <mwhudson> i don't know what the differences are between the subiquity source between the broken one and the working one
[23:13] <dbungert> a rebuild for current state is also good as it should pick up another s390x fix, LP: #2029479
[23:13] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2029479 in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems "mantic daily (on s390x) does not reboot (post-install) from correct disk" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2029479
[23:14] <mwhudson> i am reasonably sure that building with edge core22 doesn't result in any differences to the contents of the snap
[23:16] <bdmurray> Okay, I'll kick off a re-build then
[23:17] <dbungert> bdmurray: to be clear, will that be an all-arch rebuild or just s390x?
[23:18] <bdmurray> just s390x
[23:18] <bdmurray> the other ones have good results so far
[23:18] <dbungert> understood, thanks
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-contacts (mantic-proposed/universe) [45~beta-1 => 45.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:50] <liushuyu> Hi Ubuntu Release Team, Security team has gave their final approvals and confirmations on these MIRs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/http-parser/+bug/1990655    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh2/+bug/1991650
[23:50] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1990655 in http-parser (Ubuntu) "MIR: libgit2, http-parser" [High, In Progress]
[23:50] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1991650 in libssh2 (Ubuntu) "MIR: libssh2" [High, In Progress]
[23:51] <liushuyu> Can someone in the release team do the actual promotion process?
[23:52] <bdmurray> that's an archive admin task but some release team members are archive admins
[23:52] <bdmurray> just not me! ;-)
[23:54] <liushuyu> bdmurray: Ah, then I will rephase my message to include "archive admin" or "AA"
[23:55] <liushuyu> Is there any archive admin to do the actual promotion process for libssh2 and http-parser?