| === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| ahasenack_ | Eickmeyer: looking at the lunar edubuntu-menu and ubuntustudio-menu SRUs, the edubuntu-menu package hasn't "matured" yet in the queue, just 5 days | 13:22 |
|---|---|---|
| ahasenack_ | Eickmeyer: I suppose it's best to release both at the same time? ubuntustudio-menu has aged and would be good to go | 13:23 |
| === ahasenack_ is now known as ahasenack | ||
| smoser | not sure where to report this, but https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/jammy/en/man1/openssl-rehash.1ssl.html , which should be openssl-rehash man page contains content for openssl-x509 | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | I reported some of those already :/ | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | to add it to the mix, follow the link at the bottom of the page to report bugs | 13:35 |
| ahasenack | I'll bring it up in standup today | 13:36 |
| ahasenack | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manpage-repository | 13:36 |
| smoser | ahasenack: thanks. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manpage-repository/+bug/2036978 | 13:49 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2036978 in Ubuntu Manpage Repository "openssl-rehash man page for jammy contains content for openssl-x509" [Undecided, New] | 13:49 | |
| ahasenack | arighi: hi, around? | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | aradesh: it's about LP: #2023661 | 14:08 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2023661 in rtl8812au (Ubuntu Lunar) "rtl8812au-dkms FTBS with linux 6.2 in jammy" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2023661 | 14:08 | |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: Honestly, getting ubuntustudio-menu out asap would be best because we *need* the menu items updated for the IRC redirect as opposed to the dead Matrix rooms. | 14:19 |
| ahasenack | Eickmeyer: ok, I added another question to the bug, could you please take a look? | 14:20 |
| Eickmeyer | Sure. | 14:20 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: The SRU I was referring to was bug 2033992 | 14:22 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2033992 in ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] Change Ubuntu Studio Chat from Matrix to IRC" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2033992 | 14:22 | |
| Eickmeyer | Just FYI | 14:22 |
| ahasenack | ah, correct, my comment was on the other one | 14:22 |
| ahasenack | but it also changes ubuntustudio-menu | 14:22 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: Answered your comment. That was a great question, and I haven't had my coffee yet, so it took me a minute. | 14:28 |
| ahasenack | and I had 3 coffees already, before lunch | 14:28 |
| Eickmeyer | D: | 14:28 |
| Eickmeyer | er.. :D | 14:28 |
| Eickmeyer | (ignore the gasping face) | 14:29 |
| ahasenack | I had no idea D: meant that | 14:29 |
| Eickmeyer | It does on Twitch, and I sometimes get my chat syntax messed-up. | 14:30 |
| Eickmeyer | I can make emojis on my chat client though. 😂 | 14:30 |
| mirespace | Hi! I'm working in the dovecot FTBFS on arm64 from the mantic rebuild, and I found that if I disable the -mbranch-protection it works... I saw that flag was not set by default before. | 14:44 |
| mirespace | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/2036268 | 14:45 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2036268 in dovecot (Ubuntu) "FTBFS in arm64: backtrace failures in build-time tests" [High, New] | 14:45 | |
| mirespace | It seems it affects libunwind (another possibility to fix the ftbfs is removing the libunwind-dev - it was done in the past-), but for me, feels like a regression dropping the dependency | 14:47 |
| mirespace | I don't know if is the return protection or the jump protection, or both, so I'm going to play with the mbrnach-protection flag values ... but I wouldn't want to simply remove the flag, and try to see what is happening | 14:50 |
| mirespace | any clues appreciated...and sharing in the case other arm64 builds can be affected | 14:50 |
| mirespace | _afk_ | 14:52 |
| arighi | ahasenack, about LP: #2023661 I double checked the fix in lunar (just to make sure it still works) and I've tried to upload the package (theoretically I should have dkms upload rights, but some of the dkms are not in the dkms group), we'll see in a bit if it shows up in -proposed... | 14:55 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2023661 in rtl8812au (Ubuntu Lunar) "rtl8812au-dkms FTBS with linux 6.2 in jammy" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2023661 | 14:55 | |
| ahasenack | arighi: awesome, thanks. If it doesn't, maybe reach out to patch pilot and see if someone can sponsor it for you | 14:55 |
| arighi | ahasenack, ok | 14:56 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: RE https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-menu/+bug/2025196/comments/18: What if I left the file in place in the prerm and, since the postinst checks to see if the file is there and doesn't overwrite if it's there? | 16:54 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2025196 in ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] Conflicts with edubuntu-menu and ubuntustudio-menu" [High, Fix Committed] | 16:54 | |
| ahasenack | there is the question of who owns it, and should remove it. When/if both packages are removed, or just one, what will eventually remove that file? | 16:55 |
| ahasenack | and is that related to the matrix->irc change? Can't you leave that for another upload? | 16:55 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: It's not related to the matrix -> irc change. It just happened to coincide. | 16:57 |
| Eickmeyer | what about a case $1 in upgrade, etc. | 16:57 |
| ahasenack | I don't like to rush a fix like this. This needs to be thought out | 16:57 |
| ahasenack | to be honest, what caught my eye at first was exactly the unconditional remove/reinstall bit, for every single upgrade | 16:58 |
| Eickmeyer | Right, alot of that was legacy (before Eickmeyer) code that I have been working with, so I can refactor it to be conditional. | 16:59 |
| ahasenack | but I don't know what that file means, "/etc/dconf/profile/user" doesn't sound specific to edubuntu or ubuntustudio | 16:59 |
| ahasenack | yet currently in lunar at least, those are the only two packages providing it | 17:00 |
| Eickmeyer | So, it's more specific to edubuntu (or really any GNOME install) that it enables a database configuration profile to be enabled. | 17:00 |
| Eickmeyer | It essentially enables pre-configured appfolders in the Applications overview. | 17:00 |
| Eickmeyer | ubunutustudio-menu is meant to be DE-agnostic in that way. | 17:01 |
| ahasenack | is the name "user" special? | 17:02 |
| ahasenack | I have a /etc/dconf/profile/ibus on my system (only file in that dir), owned by the ibus package | 17:02 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: I don't remember, but it's what worked iirc. | 17:03 |
| Eickmeyer | I can try renaming it, I suppose, and see what happens. | 17:04 |
| * Eickmeyer tests | 17:04 | |
| ahasenack | I think it's best if this can be thought about a little more. BUt then again, I'n not a desktop guy, and /etc/dconf is not my cup of tea, so I'm not even qualified to review the inner workings of that | 17:05 |
| Eickmeyer | Sure. Being a desktop guy on both Plasma and GNOME, this is the kind of thing I have to worry about. 😅 | 17:05 |
| * ahasenack bows | 17:05 | |
| jbicha | Eickmeyer: it is possible to do what you need with gsettings overrides instead of dconf directly? | 17:27 |
| Eickmeyer | jbicha: Tried, didn't work. | 17:28 |
| Eickmeyer | Especially for users that are installing after-the-fact. This mostly stems from when someone installs lsp-plugins, it will completely jam-up their activities overview with identical icons. | 17:30 |
| Eickmeyer | The desire to have an appfolder in that case is very high. | 17:30 |
| Eickmeyer | We're talking hundreds of icons. | 17:31 |
| jbicha | the best docs I know for dconf for sysadmin (or distro admin) are https://help.gnome.org/admin/system-admin-guide/stable | 17:37 |
| jbicha | for instance, keys can be locked down to prevent being changed | 17:37 |
| jbicha | the last time I dealt with trying to tweak gnome-menus, I remember it not working as well as I wanted :( | 17:39 |
| Eickmeyer | jbicha: Yeah, that didn't work so well. The good news is I just figured out a solution for what we've got. | 17:45 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: Renaming "user" to "edubuntu" seems to have worked as expected, so I can probably go that route with both. | 17:45 |
| ahasenack | what about co-instalability of those two packages? Would each use a different name? | 17:46 |
| Eickmeyer | Yes. They both have the same contents and are telling the system to do the exact same thing, so again, not a factor. | 17:46 |
| ahasenack | please make sure to update the test case with something creative about this :) | 17:47 |
| Eickmeyer | One would simply be "edubuntu", the other would be "ubuntustudio". | 17:47 |
| ahasenack | install one, check your thing, install the other, check, then install both at the same time, check again | 17:47 |
| Eickmeyer | Yep. :) | 17:47 |
| ahasenack | great | 17:48 |
| ahasenack | phew | 17:48 |
| ahasenack | would be good perhaps, if you have this info, to have a reference in the [other information] part about what this file does (high level), if there are naming conventions for files in /etc/dconf/profile/* (or if they are all just read and merged together) | 17:49 |
| ahasenack | I did an apt-file search for /etc/dconf/profile, in lunar, and only two packages currently have content there: ibus, and ubuntustudio-menu | 17:50 |
| Eickmeyer | They're all read and merged together. Same thing happens in /etc/dconf/db/site.d where, if you have both installed in mantic, you have 00_edubuntu, 00_ubuntustudio, and 01_appfolders (which gets generated dynamically) and are all merged together. | 17:51 |
| === tyhicks_ is now known as tyhicks | ||
| ahasenack | Eickmeyer: I'll continue tomorrow morning, my brain is fried for today, but it looks good | 21:31 |
| Eickmeyer | ahasenack: Awesome. Have a good evening! o/ | 21:32 |
| ahasenack | you too | 21:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!