[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Mantic Beta] has been updated (20230920) === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF [00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready === chris14_ is now known as chris14 [02:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella.cmit-aerodactyl-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [02:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella.cmit-alolan-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [02:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella.cmit-cascppm-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [02:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella.cmit-charmander-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [02:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella.cmit-cascoon-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [02:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella.cmit-nobisuke-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella.cmit-asobo-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella.cmit-bergmite-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [03:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-somerville-cinccino-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-somerville-torchic-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-adair-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-aitland-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-barrington-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-barrett-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-caitir-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-calaminag-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] [03:42] ubuntu-release: Oh, hi. I bring gifts. These fix Lubuntu release blockers, and most certainly require a respin. I've tested them myself (but Jeremy wrote them, thanks). Bug 2036098. [03:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2036098 in lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "[mantic] xdg-desktop-portals no longer working in default Lubuntu after xdg-desktop-portal 1.17.1" [Critical, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036098 [03:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-default-settings (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.1 => 23.10.2] (lubuntu) [03:51] Remind me in Riga, I'll buy beer for acceptance ;) [03:51] lxqt-session is also incoming [04:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxqt-session (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu2] (lubuntu) [04:11] It has arrived. *sirens in the distance* [04:35] tsimonq2: slenderman reference? [05:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-21 (mantic-proposed/universe) [21~35ea-1 => 21+35-1] (i386-whitelist) [05:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-21 [source] (mantic-proposed) [21+35-1] [08:04] is the Lubuntu ISO going to be re-spun as per tsimonq2's ^ request? (I'd like to know if we've got to re-do some install testing with it, OR re-add the known-issue to release.notes (which was deleted on commit of fix)) [08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (mantic-proposed/main) [1:115.2.3+build1-0ubuntu1 => 1:115.2.3+build2-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) [08:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [08:53] guiverc: apologies, missed that one! How high-priority would you consider this to be? [08:56] I don't know... jbicha discovered https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-default-settings/+bug/2036098 and prompted us a couple of times about it.. it doesn't impact install so personally I'm not worried about it (& had written it up on our release notes assuming we'd fix post-beta release) but Simon & Thomas felt too big an issue for that (I can't recall what Dan felt sorry). It was the issue I'd not mentioned couple of [08:56] days ago (despite it being first on lubuntu status tracker I wrote!) [08:56] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036098 in lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "[mantic] xdg-desktop-portals no longer working in default Lubuntu after xdg-desktop-portal 1.17.1" [Critical, Triaged] [08:58] (it'll impact any live users of beta... but as we know about the issue that really doesn't worry me) [08:58] guiverc: I'm a bit worried to delay the Beta any longer, since this would need a cycle of publisher/migration/build-image/testing [08:59] We're a bit low on capacity this week :( [08:59] So if that's fine, I'd like this to land post-Beta [08:59] I'm happy with that, Simon will be disappointed of course.. but then again he won't own you the beer ! [09:01] (dan being kc2bez, thomas being teward, simon of course tsimonq2) [09:02] * guiverc doesn't recall Walter/wxl in relation to this issue; but he may have chimed in too [09:54] sil2100: I'd really, really, much rather hold our Beta back individually a couple of hours. [09:54] sil2100: The native web browser having no working file chooser is pretty important. [09:55] sil2100: Then again, while I may grumble, I can only grumble so much. ;) === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [11:05] cpaelzer, schopin: what was the rationale in LP: #1957932 to keep the -doc packages in universe? i.e. they are now added to extra-excludes in the seeds [11:05] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1957932 in rustc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] rustc, cargo, dh-cargo" [Critical, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1957932 [11:41] please unblock dkms to allow it to migrate https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/2036951 otherwise any -dkms triggered autotests fail in mantic [11:41] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036951 in dkms (Ubuntu Mantic) "unblock request: please migrate dkms from proposed" [Undecided, New] [11:52] doko: rust-doc has Depends on fonts & JavaScript libraries in universe [12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready === ahasenack_ is now known as ahasenack [14:31] hey everyone, would it be possible to approve 'ubuntu-unity-backgrounds'? (backgrounds package for Ubuntu Unity 23.10) [14:41] rs2009: I am not on teh Release Team, but I would expect the background update to be accepted after the 23.10 Beta Release [15:34] uh why is the ubuntu desktop daily bigger again [15:34] after I just raised the size limit [15:34] sil2100: ^^ [15:37] Might be due to Dan's recent changes to 'quick-fix` the TPM FDE case for both minimal and standard installs? [15:37] Or did you bump the size after that landed? [15:37] We worked aournd this I think by basically including the same layer twice. We might want to fix that before release [15:40] the size bump was supposed to be after that change landed [15:41] but we also don't have any earlier ISOs on the server now to compare against [15:42] my commit was Date: Tue Sep 19 12:20:40 2023 -0700 [15:45] so there are both 20230919 and 20230919.1 builds on the server but only one 20230919 livefs build log? [15:45] bdmurray will know more since he was doing the builds [15:46] oh, because launchpad shows me dates in local time :P [15:47] ok https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu/+build/499047 didn't include minimal.enhanced-secureboot, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu/+build/499571 did and corresponds to the 20230919 image build; apparently I failed to update the limits based on the actual result of that change [15:47] so, bumping it again :/ [15:57] How do I know which nvidia package supports my card? I thought I'd see pci ids in a package some time ago. [15:59] ah, nvidia-driver-123 [16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:15.0.0+git2023090714.c898a310-0ubuntu1 => 1:15.0.0+git2023090714.c898a310-0ubuntu2] (openstack) [16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslinux (mantic-proposed/main) [3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu1 => 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (mantic-proposed/main) [2023.07+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 2023.07+dfsg-1ubuntu2] (core) [16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted syslinux [source] (mantic-proposed) [3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu2] [16:05] bdmurray: yeah it should be in the Modaliases fields in the Packages file; 'ubuntu-drivers devices' or 'ubuntu-drivers list' should be helpful here too? [16:06] (as that tells you empirically what ubuntu-drivers says is a match, which may be easier than trying to parse the Modaliases fields visually) [16:07] he said 5 minutes too late ;-) [16:13] okay, my nvidia card is supported by nvidia-driver-470 which is not on the legacy iso [16:14] or the daily-live one [16:17] bdmurray: so, supported for online installs only [16:18] Time to go to micro center [16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fbreader (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.99.4+dfsg-4 => 0.99.4+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fbreader [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.99.4+dfsg-5] [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [17:16] * ahasenack smells the beta release approaching [17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spades (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.15.5+dfsg-4 => 3.15.5+dfsg-5] (no packageset) (sync) [17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spades [sync] (mantic-proposed) [3.15.5+dfsg-5] [17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cacti (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.2.24+ds1-1ubuntu1 => 1.2.25+ds1-2] (no packageset) (sync) [17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cacti [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.2.25+ds1-2] [17:59] Please mark Ubuntu Desktop amd64 & Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 as ready [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdm3 (jammy-proposed/main) [42.0-1ubuntu7.22.04.3 => 42.0-1ubuntu7.22.04.4] (desktop-core) [18:04] jbicha: . [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [18:16] I have uploaded initial rustup to https://mentors.debian.net/package/rust-rustup/ since I need someone to review/sponsor t [18:16] * it [18:20] sorry, wrong channel [19:01] ahasenack, hello, would it be possible to move libreoffice/lunar to -updates already? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2033643 [19:01] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2033643 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.5.6 for lunar" [Medium, Fix Committed] [19:03] ricotz: it has one more day to age, do you need it sooner, or can it wait for whoever is no shift on monday? [19:04] ahasenack, it is already pretty late and it is blocking the backport for jammy [19:05] ricotz: ok, lemme take a look [19:05] and yeah I am aware to the friday-rule which isn't helping so much :( [19:06] jfyi https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2033645 [19:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2033645 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy" [Medium, In Progress] [19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-pysnmp-lextudio (mantic-proposed/primary) [5.0.26-2] [19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-pyasn1-modules-lextudio (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.2.9-3] [19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-pysmi-lextudio (mantic-proposed/primary) [1.0.4-2] [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-pyasn1-lextudio (mantic-proposed/primary) [1.1.2-2] [19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-proliantutils (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.14.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.16.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) === tyhicks_ is now known as tyhicks [19:29] bdmurray, heya you about? I'm mentoring mitchdz on a FFe for a new open-vm-tools release that came in right at FF that we'd like to get included. (LP: #2033687) Would you have time to help mitchdz with a FFe review? [19:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2033687 in open-vm-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFE] open-vm-tools 12.3.0 for Mantic" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2033687 [19:37] RikMills: are we expecting results on the remaining kubuntu test cases before marking Kubuntu ready? [19:38] tsimonq2, teward: is Lubuntu ready to go? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/448/builds/287079/testcases shows plenty of passing tests [19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu9.2] [19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu1.8] [19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-menu (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.9 => 23.10.10] (no packageset) [19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-menu (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.79 => 0.80] (ubuntustudio) [19:42] ^ Both are bugfixes leading to an SRU [19:42] ahasenack: ^ same fix will be for lunar [19:42] ok [19:43] ahasenack: direct installation instead of scripted cp. [19:43] sounds simpler :) [19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-menu (lunar-proposed/universe) [23.04.2.3 => 23.04.2.4] (no packageset) [19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-menu (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.72.3 => 0.72.4] (ubuntustudio) [19:53] ahasenack: ^ [19:54] 👍 [19:56] ahasenack, thank you for libreoffice! [19:57] welcome :) [20:07] Wimpy: hi, is there more testing in progress for MATE? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/448/builds/287089/testcases [20:09] vorlon: I'm just about to mark it ready [20:09] Wimpy: cool [20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [4:7.5.6-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1] [20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [20:12] vorlon: I have advised ItzSwirlz that the issues he's running into on ubuntu cinnamon are things that I wouldn't consider blockers for a beta (lack of background for ubiquity-dm, for instance). I'll do a quick smoke test if you want. [20:17] * Eickmeyer JFDI [20:24] ahasenack: I don't know if you're still doing SRU processing at this point, but if so, LP: #2028862 has been retested and looks ready [20:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2028862 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy) "Mantic hangs during install with continuous 'Job snapd.seeded.service/start running' messages" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2028862 [20:25] I still am [20:25] * ahasenack looks [20:26] vorlon: I'd mark Ubuntu Cinnamon as ready, and ItzSwirlz would request as well since there's no ubuntucinnamon-release team in Launchpad with the acl to do so. [20:28] Eickmeyer: ack, marking [20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Cinnamon Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready [20:31] I have no clue what to do about Unity considering it's a task fail. [20:33] Eickmeyer: what do you mean? [20:33] bug 2036989 [20:33] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2036989 in ubuntu-unity-meta (Ubuntu) "libappindicator3-1 makes the ubuntu-unity-desktop^ task fail, but is installable with apt" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036989 [20:34] uhm [20:34] well I don't know why we care about testing that, frankly; bdmurray ^^ ? [20:35] Eickmeyer: I care more about the fact that not all the tests on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/448/builds/287086/testcases have results [20:35] Right, it has zero, afaics. [20:36] oh, nvm. one. [20:36] 1 of 2 [20:36] I can do a live session real quick. [20:36] thanks [20:36] Not sure how much it matters, but that bug is reported for 23.04 [20:38] hah why does http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/448/builds/287086/testcases/1699/results list two subiquity bugs under 'bugs to look for' [20:39] vorlon: Installing the "ubuntu-unity-desktop" task is part of the way the release upgrade process works right now. [20:39] s/process/testing process/ [20:40] aha [20:40] well uhm that's not going to be fixed (fixable) in lunar [20:41] Sounds like a big release note. [20:41] no [20:41] it's an incompatibility with the *testing process* [20:41] Ah. [20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pastedeploy (mantic-proposed/main) [3.0.1-5 => 3.0.1-5ubuntu1] (no packageset) [20:44] vorlon: Ubuntu Unity LGTM [20:45] Needs a little polish, but I'll talk to Rudra about that separately. :) [20:46] rs2009: ^^ we have iso testing done for Ubuntu Unity, are you happy to sign off on this for beta? [20:49] I messaged him on Telegram. [21:05] I can probably do those last two mandatory tests on Kubuntu. [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.26] [21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.49] [21:17] vorlon: As I said *more than twelve hours ago*, I'm NACK on the Beta until those two uploads go through. [21:17] As I *also* said, if that means our Beta is released last, so be it. [21:18] I get shorthandedness, but I was clear: *this is an RC bug with pending fixes*. [21:19] Now, pretty please, with a cherry on top: review those two uploads, respin Lubuntu, I will *personally* smoke-test, and *then* we can release it. [21:19] Until then, there is no Lubuntu 23.10 Beta. [21:19] lubuntu-default-settings and lxqt-session. Only seeded by Lubuntu. [21:26] vorlon: Just got those last two Kubuntu tests done, just need the ack from RikMills . [21:26] Eickmeyer: you remembered to upload with a proper -v flag, so the changes file includes the previous uploads \o/ [21:26] * ahasenack sheds tears of joy [21:26] ahasenack: Yessir! [21:28] tsimonq2: ok, looking. [21:30] vorlon: Thank you. Apologies for my outburst, certainly not personal (towards you or s_il2100). [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-default-settings [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.2] [21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxqt-session [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu2] [21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been disabled [21:54] tsimonq2: long pole is lxqt-session/riscv64 which looks like it'll take another 15 minutes to build [22:34] vorlon: Thanks again. [22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive2 [Mantic Beta] (20230921) has been added [23:07] tsimonq2: looks like we have one autopkgtest we're waiting for https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-gdm3 [23:21] ack [23:30] and it has finished [23:30] so now we just need another britney run