[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: compiz (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:0.9.14.2+22.10.20220822-0ubuntu3 => 1:0.9.14.2+22.10.20220822-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glmark2 [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.01+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glmark2 [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.01+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glmark2 [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.01+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glmark2 [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.01+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glmark2 [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.01+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glmark2 [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.01+dfsg-1]
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glmark2 [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [2023.01+dfsg-1]
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glmark2 [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [2023.01+dfsg-1]
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glmark2 [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.01+dfsg-1]
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glmark2 [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [2023.01+dfsg-1]
[01:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glmark2 [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.01+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[01:06] <vorlon> tsimonq2: lubuntu respin in progress https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/lubuntu/+build/500873
[01:19] <guiverc> thanks vorlon, will that appear in daily listing on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/446/builds  (still showing 20230919 currently, job shows as "Finished 5 minutes ago", or your working on 'beta' requires different?
[01:22] <utkarsh2102> guiverc: hey, unless I am reallyyyy mistaken, it should show up on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/448/builds
[01:23]  * guiverc gotta be a little more 'patient' i guess... i'll wait a bit.
[01:23] <Eickmeyer> I was about to answer, without being an expert: "Much like a Facebook relationship status, it's complicated."
[01:23] <guiverc> thanks utkarsh2102
[01:23] <utkarsh2102> I'll keep a tab, too
[01:23] <utkarsh2102> I'll let you know once I see them
[01:23] <guiverc> thanks, appreciated !  :)
[01:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been updated (20230922)
[01:30] <guiverc> I see it now at https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu//daily-live/
[01:31] <guiverc> and http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/446/builds , thanks utkarsh2102 & vorlon
[01:32] <guiverc> yeah & at beta (448) too  :)
[01:51] <rs2009> hey vorlon, yep, just tested the ISO myself and it looks good for the beta to me +1
[01:52] <rs2009> (aside from the missing 23.10 backgrounds ofc, but those could come in after the beta)
[01:52] <rs2009> (just woke up)
[02:09] <Eickmeyer> utkarsh2102: Do you have the access to mark Ubuntu Unity as ready per rs2009 ^?
[02:09] <Eickmeyer> Afaik, there's no Ubuntu Unity Release team on Launchpad with the proper ACLs to do so.
[02:17] <rs2009> Eickmeyer: I've just marked it as ready +1
[02:18] <Eickmeyer> ope, nvm!
[02:18] <Eickmeyer> rs2009: 😃
[02:19] <Eickmeyer> rs2009: I don't think it took?
[02:20] <rs2009> Eickmeyer lol :D it does appear ready for me on the QA tracker
[02:21]  * Eickmeyer goes to kick his dns and/or cvn...
[02:22] <Eickmeyer> rs2009: We'd also be getting a notice in here from queuebot .
[02:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Unity Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[02:26] <Eickmeyer> There we go. :)
[02:26] <rs2009> forgot to mark it under the beta milestone lol; have an exam in 30 mins, so gtg
[02:27] <Eickmeyer> o/
[03:00] <guiverc> i've done some testing of lubuntu 20230922 iso; I don't see any change on prior 0919  :(  so we've not progressed; and no install testing done on this iso yet.
[04:00] <vorlon> I've double-checked that 20230922 contains the package updates it was supposed to for the respin
[04:03] <Eickmeyer> He meant no difference in terms of functionality, i.e. the RC bug they were trying to fix wasn't fixed per his testing.
[04:04] <Eickmeyer> (save as dialog from firefox won't even function aiui)
[04:06] <vorlon> tsimonq2: since this didn't fix the issue, do you want the beta to go out the door with this bug?
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glmark2 [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [2023.01+dfsg-1]
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pyasn1-modules-lextudio [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.9-3]
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pysnmp-lextudio [sync] (mantic-proposed) [5.0.26-2]
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-spki [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-1]
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pyasn1-lextudio [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.1.2-2]
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pkcs8 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.10.2+ds-7]
[04:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pysmi-lextudio [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pyasn1-lextudio [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [1.1.2-2] (no packageset)
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pysnmp-lextudio [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [5.0.26-2] (no packageset)
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-spki [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-spki [s390x] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pysmi-lextudio [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-spki [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-spki [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pyasn1-lextudio [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.1.2-2]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pysnmp-lextudio [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [5.0.26-2]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-spki [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-spki [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pysmi-lextudio [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-spki [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-spki [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-spki [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)
[04:32] <vorlon> teward: from flavors I see you were saying this should be a blocker and Lubuntu should not release a beta with this bug unfixed?
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-spki [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)
[04:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-spki [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-1]
[04:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-spki [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-1]
[04:46] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I doubt teward is up right now as it's after midnight for him, but I recall that as well.
[04:53] <utkarsh2102> Eickmeyer, rs2009: thank you for Unity +1. :)
[04:54] <utkarsh2102> vorlon: hey! Simon told me that we could do beta without them - "if you're delaying *everyone's* beta for us now, pull the trigger, we'll follow in the next 6 hours"
[04:56] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: yeah, we're still waiting for kubuntu and riscv64 though
[04:56] <utkarsh2102> yep
[04:56] <utkarsh2102> but just letting you know
[04:56]  * vorlon nods
[05:01]  * Eickmeyer goes to bed because... ain't no way & getting too old. 💤
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (mantic-proposed/universe) [298-1 => 299-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-podman (mantic-proposed/universe) [76-1 => 77-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [sync] (mantic-proposed) [299-1]
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [sync] (mantic-proposed) [77-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[05:35] <vorlon> oh, someone is happy with the kubuntu image then
[05:40] <RikMills> vorlon: yes. sorry was a bit awol
[05:40] <vorlon> RikMills: no worries.  We're still waiting for Germany to come online to finalize things wrt riscv64
[06:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tp-smapi (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.44-1 => 0.44-1ubuntu1] (kernel-dkms)
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8812au (lunar-proposed/universe) [4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu19 => 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu20~23.04] (kernel-dkms)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.17-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 => 15.2.17-0ubuntu0.20.04.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (jammy-proposed/main) [17.2.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 17.2.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (ubuntu-server)
[08:32] <jamespage> Hi release team - the upload for bug 2033428 (new upstream ceph release for mantic) is ready but as this impacts media (mainly due to reverse-depends libs) I'll hold it until beta freeze lifts - unless you would like me to upload it and park it in the unapproved queue?
[08:32] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2033428 in ceph (Ubuntu Mantic) "[FFe] Update Ceph to new 18.2.0 (Reef) version" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2033428
[09:18] <vorlon> jamespage: please go ahead and upload to unapproved
[09:19] <jamespage> vorlon: ack - uploading now
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (mantic-proposed/main) [17.2.6-0ubuntu1 => 18.2.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[09:34] <guiverc> thanks everyone (mantic beta release) & utkarsh2102 (ML post I can push to fridge primarily)
[09:34] <utkarsh2102> \o/
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.42 => 23.10.43] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:35] <utkarsh2102> guiverc: re: Lubuntu, Simon said they'll follow up in 6 hours time, is that still on the table?
[09:35] <utkarsh2102> is there any chance Lubuntu would still participate in the beta as originally planned?
[09:36] <guiverc> the ML post actually includes Lubuntu (flavors when listed, and Lubuntu section)
[09:36] <utkarsh2102> I know
[09:36] <guiverc> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2023-September/000295.html
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pyasn1-modules-lextudio [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.2.9-3] (no packageset)
[09:36] <guiverc> (right now I'm thinking about Ubuntu News... posting that to fridge..)
[09:37] <utkarsh2102> well but those images are a bit broken, aren't they?
[09:37] <utkarsh2102> yep, go ahead with that
[09:37] <guiverc> when I saw that; I made public our discourse post (https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/lubuntu-23-10-beta-released/4553) though to my knowledge we have no blog post yet (I've not made one anyway; except for text itself)
[09:38] <utkarsh2102> ah, super
[09:38] <utkarsh2102> I'll look into it
[09:38] <utkarsh2102> and also talk to tsimonq2 ;)
[09:38] <guiverc> utkarsh2102, we have an issue (right-click, save-as in firefox) doesn't work as expected.. but to me that's a PETTY/MINOR issue, it just irked Simon..
[09:39] <guiverc> (I may make an alteration to the ISSUES bit relating to that issue, adding a work-around (instead of grab daily in next couple of days what I posted says)
[09:41] <guiverc> I'm very aware of what Simon thinks (we've spoke a bit last couple of days over issue; PM or lubuntu private rooms).... I'm happy.
[09:42] <guiverc> thank you utkarsh2102 !
[10:02]  * guiverc misunderstood what I think Utkarsh said ^ sorry; Simon maybe hard to get in contact with for abit
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (mantic-proposed/main) [4.0.0~alpha2-0ubuntu4 => 4.0.0~alpha2-0ubuntu5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-hwe [source] (lunar-proposed) [7.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1.23.04.1]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (lunar-proposed) [7.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-hwe [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-hwe [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[11:11] <seb128> hey release team, I've submitted an UIFe for the Ubuntu welcome wizard/new snap store, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-initial-setup/+bug/2036981 , I would appreciate a review
[11:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036981 in gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu) "UIFe: update for the new snap store naming and icon" [Undecided, In Progress]
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pkcs8 [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.10.2+ds-7] (no packageset)
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ghostscript (mantic-proposed/main) [10.01.2~dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 10.01.2~dfsg1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind9 (mantic-proposed/main) [1:9.18.18-0ubuntu1 => 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups (mantic-proposed/main) [2.4.6-0ubuntu1 => 2.4.6-0ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libppd (mantic-proposed/main) [2:2.0~rc1-0ubuntu3 => 2:2.0~rc1-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apitrace (mantic-proposed/universe) [11.1+repack-1.1 => 11.1+repack-1.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: colobot (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-2build4 => 0.2.0-2.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apitrace [sync] (mantic-proposed) [11.1+repack-1.2]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted colobot [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.0-2.1]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (lunar-proposed/main) [20230323.gitbcdcfbcf-0ubuntu1.6 => 20230323.gitbcdcfbcf-0ubuntu1.7] (core, kernel)
[13:13] <ahasenack> the mantic beta header.html has this text next to all choices: "Choose this if you are at all unsure."
[13:13] <ahasenack> desktop, server, netboot
[13:14] <ahasenack> and another thing: the header also says "Ubuntu is distributed on four types of images described below.", but there are only 3
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (jammy-proposed/main) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.18 => 20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.19] (core, kernel)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (mantic-proposed/main) [20230919.git3672ccab-0ubuntu1 => 20230919.git3672ccab-0ubuntu2] (core, kernel)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected edubuntu-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.2.4]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.72.4]
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (lunar-proposed) [20230323.gitbcdcfbcf-0ubuntu1.7]
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.19]
[13:50] <xnox> hmmm
[13:50] <xnox> https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu-images/+git/ubuntu-images/+merge/449865
[13:50] <xnox> does release team monitor ubuntu-images PRs? or who is owner for them?
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-tegra-defaults (jammy-proposed/primary) [1.2~22.04]
[14:22] <xnox> vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2037099 i would like to request FFe to release Ubuntu Desktop arm64 x13s image
[14:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037099 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Build and release ubuntu desktop arm64 x13s image on cdimage.ubuntu.com" [Undecided, New]
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk4 (mantic-proposed/main) [4.12.1+ds-2ubuntu1 => 4.12.2+ds-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pyasn1-modules-lextudio [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.9-3]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pkcs8 [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.10.2+ds-7]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (mantic-proposed/main) [45.0-1ubuntu1 => 45.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[15:31] <jbicha> ubuntu-release: ^ that mutter upload fixes a high priority mantic issue
[15:33] <jbicha> are you able to drop the -proposed migration block now?
[15:40] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: lubuntu-default-settings .3 fixes the bug, I've tested it myself.
[15:40] <tsimonq2> The only snag is that if Firefox has been opened in the session, xdg-desktop-portals needs to be restarted, and that's a user service that I'd rather not hack around with restarting in a postinst script.
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: inetutils (mantic-proposed/main) [2:2.4-2ubuntu1 => 2:2.4-2ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist)
[15:43] <tsimonq2> vorlon: ^^ (since both Uktarsh and sil2100 are absent ;) )
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-default-settings (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.2 => 23.10.3] (lubuntu)
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-default-settings [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.3]
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-iscsi (mantic-proposed/main) [2.1.8-1ubuntu1 => 2.1.8-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:52] <jbicha> tsimonq2: yes, changes to x-d-p don't take effect until it is restarted; or more easily log out and log back in
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-menu (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.9 => 23.10.11] (no packageset)
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-menu (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.79 => 0.81] (ubuntustudio)
[15:56] <tsimonq2> jbicha: Restarting SDDM doesn't work, which is curious, but a restart does.
[15:57] <jbicha> yes, when I was working on your bug, I ended up rebooting the VM each time I changed something
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-menu (lunar-proposed/universe) [23.04.2.3 => 23.04.2.4] (no packageset)
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-menu (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.72.3 => 0.72.4] (ubuntustudio)
[15:57] <jbicha> x-d-p-lxqt isn't a proper systemd user service yet; or maybe sddm just doesn't do all the things it is expected to yet
[15:57] <Eickmeyer> ahasenack: ^ Reuplaods
[15:58] <Eickmeyer> + maintscript helpers
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.13 => 1:22.04.14] (core)
[16:24] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: l-d-s> Thank you!
[16:36] <bdmurray> I wanted to make sure you didn't forget about me - since I wasn't pinged. :-(
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (lunar-proposed/main) [1:0.9.7.1.1 => 1:0.9.7.1.2] (desktop-core)
[16:41] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: We could never forget about you. (too many suspicious bug reports. ;) )
[16:43] <tsimonq2> :))
[16:52] <vorlon> tsimonq2: hi, looking
[16:52] <vorlon> ah, bdmurray got it? ok
[16:53] <tsimonq2> vorlon, bdmurray: thank you both :)
[16:53] <vorlon> ahasenack: wrt the header.html, can you file a bug against lp:ubuntu-cdimages to track this?
[16:54] <ahasenack> sure
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.4.0-0ubuntu2] (lubuntu)
[16:57] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/2037118
[16:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037118 in Ubuntu CD Images "header.html has confusing text" [Undecided, New]
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected edubuntu-menu [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.10]
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-menu [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.80]
[16:59] <tsimonq2> xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt and plasma-discover are both related to the bug report (simply following advice from jbicha ), but are not a Beta blocker. I'd like them in for final though, if possible :)
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (jammy-proposed/main) [1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.5 => 1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.6] (desktop-core)
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-discover (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.27.8-0ubuntu1 => 5.27.8-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[17:03] <vorlon> jbicha: proposed-migration block was waiting on lubuntu and riscv64 images to get sorted; still have a bit to chase up this morning
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (jammy-proposed/main) [2022.01+dfsg-2ubuntu2.4 => 2022.01+dfsg-2ubuntu2.5] (core)
[17:06] <vorlon> xnox: I wouldn't block a new hardware enablement image wrt FFe, but you're asking to build out of a ppa and we Don't Do That for official images
[17:06] <vorlon> xnox: why is this not in the main archive yet?
[17:06] <vorlon> xnox: (I'm ok building daily images out of a ppa; not release images)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+icicle [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+licheerv [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+nezha [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive2 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: puma (mantic-proposed/main) [5.6.5-4ubuntu1 => 5.6.5-4ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted puma [source] (mantic-proposed) [5.6.5-4ubuntu2]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libde265 (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.0.12-1build1 => 1.0.12-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.42 => 23.10.43] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.43]
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.42 => 23.10.44] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.43]
[18:15] <vorlon> tsimonq2, bdmurray: lubuntu-default-settings didn't get an unblock hint; I've added one now, but we're waiting for another p-m cycle.  I'm afk for ~1.5h now, if someone sees it published before I do feel free to kick off the lubuntu image build
[18:18] <bdmurray> I'll setup a watch for it
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind9 (lunar-proposed/main) [1:9.18.12-1ubuntu1.2 => 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.23.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind9 (jammy-proposed/main) [1:9.18.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 => 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind-dyndb-ldap (lunar-proposed/universe) [11.10-4ubuntu0.2 => 11.10-4ubuntu0.3] (no packageset)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind-dyndb-ldap (jammy-proposed/universe) [11.9-5ubuntu0.22.04.3 => 11.9-5ubuntu0.22.04.4] (no packageset)
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sqlalchemy (mantic-proposed/main) [1.4.47+ds1-1 => 1.4.47+ds1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie)
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby3.1 (mantic-proposed/main) [3.1.2-7ubuntu1 => 3.1.2-7ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist)
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wcwidth (mantic-proposed/main) [0.2.5+dfsg1-1.1 => 0.2.5+dfsg1-1.1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[19:21] <jbicha> ubuntu-release: could mutter get accepted for mantic so we can get more testing over the weekend?
[19:24] <apw> jbicha, i assume that is urgent bugfixes only ?
[19:25] <jbicha> apw: yes, it is a fix for the multimonitor bug I mentioned in the Beta release notes
[19:26] <jbicha> the same bug you found apparently :/
[19:27] <tsimonq2> The lxqt-session upload adds two fallbacks for the aforementioned XDG portals bug, until KDE's has better support. Not a Beta blocker, but hopefully in time for final.
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxqt-session (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu3] (lubuntu)
[19:28] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: ^ :)
[19:28] <tsimonq2> Just let me know re: image churn.
[19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (mantic-proposed) [45.0-2ubuntu1]
[19:30] <apw> jbicha, ^
[19:35] <vorlon> tsimonq2: lxqt-session 0ubuntu3 not required for beta, right?
[19:39] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Correct.
[19:40] <vorlon> bdmurray's watch has triggered but I don't see an image build running from it
[19:41] <vorlon> so I'll trigger one now
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libgedit-gtksourceview (mantic-proposed/primary) [299.0.4-0ubuntu1]
[19:44] <vorlon> as soon as I confirm that's building, I'm afk again for a bit (not sure how long).  bdmurray if I'm not back when lubuntu is ready to publish, will you take care of it?
[19:45] <vorlon> lubuntu-amd64: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/lubuntu/+build/501150
[19:45] <tsimonq2> Thanks for your help!
[19:59] <bdmurray> I'm gonna have some lunch but will look when I return
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been updated (20230922.1)
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-netaddr (mantic-proposed/main) [0.8.0-2 => 0.8.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-netaddr [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.8.0-2ubuntu1]
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-eventlet (mantic-proposed/main) [0.33.1-4 => 0.33.1-4ubuntu1] (openstack)
[21:03] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: Is Lubuntu good to go now?
[21:05] <vorlon> I don't see any test results marked yet
[21:17] <Eickmeyer> If their tests weren't so rigid and beyond what the testcases are in the iso tracker, I'd do some, but they're above and beyond those.
[21:33] <bluesabre> I'll run some lubuntu tests to help :)
[21:33] <Eickmeyer> bluesabre: Do you have the testcases they actually run?
[21:33] <Eickmeyer> They're not in the iso tracker.
[21:34] <bluesabre> That's not very useful when we use the iso tracker to sign off on isos
[21:34] <bdmurray> +1
[21:34] <Eickmeyer> bluesabre: I agree, but the Lubuntu team uses testcases above and beyond those that are in the .iso tracker.
[21:35] <Eickmeyer> That's why I tend not to touch them.
[21:35] <vorlon> the test cases for the iso tracker are in a public git repository, maybe they should push those changes where others can see them
[21:36] <Eickmeyer> +1
[21:36] <bluesabre> I'll just smoke test then and complain if things are terrible
[21:36] <vorlon> lp:ubuntu-manual-tests
[21:36] <Eickmeyer> I 100% agree. Ubuntu flavors aren't islands of distributions within Ubuntu, we're all Ubuntu.
[21:37] <bdmurray> There was a conversation about this last year - https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/2022-October/thread.html
[21:37] <Eickmeyer> Ongoing issue. 🤦
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lptools (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-7ubuntu1 => 0.2.0-7ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lptools [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.0-7ubuntu2]
[21:49] <vorlon> bdmurray, tsimonq2: I think I want to make the call now that we need to move on from the beta freeze and that if the latest fixes still don't get us a Lubuntu Beta that's releasable then there's just no Lubuntu Beta (without compromising Lubuntu's qualification to participate in the final release)
[21:50] <vorlon> other things are stacking up in the queue
[21:52] <mparillo> The test cases are in a public git repo? Is the link documented? I am familiar with the PR process in GitHub, less familiar with MRs in GitLab, but when I tried poking around I saw cgit, which I am unfamiliar with. It looks as if https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/tree/testcases/image/1301_Install (auto-resize) might correspond to http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/446/builds/287087/testcases/1301/results but it is empty in
[21:52] <mparillo> my browser.
[21:53] <vorlon> mparillo: https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests
[21:53] <mparillo> Hmm, Konversation mangled the URL encoding for the space
[21:55] <bdmurray> loading the tests cases in a browser at git.launchpad.net fails for me too
[21:55] <bdmurray> vorlon: I'm +1 on unfreezing
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (mantic-proposed/main) [2.116.3ubuntu2 => 2.116.3ubuntu3] (core)
[22:12] <bluesabre> Lubuntu *seems* OK to me, but I can’t speak for their team. :)
[22:12] <bluesabre> (Reminds me of Xfce back in the day, very nostalgic)
[22:55] <mwhudson> would now be a particularly good or particularly bad time for an ubuntu-meta upload?
[22:57] <bdmurray> mwhudson: It depends on the changes!
[22:57] <mwhudson> bdmurray: i'm running the update script now, will get back to you on that
[22:58] <mwhudson> bdmurray: actually just the change i am interested in https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/gnF8v2c67B/
[23:06] <bdmurray> looks fine to me
[23:18] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Sorry, got caught up, full green light.
[23:20] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: I'd like to apologize on behalf of the Lubuntu Team for the fiasco of the past 48 hours. It was certainly out of the ordinary. Come see me in Riga and I'll buy you a beer. :)
[23:36] <mwhudson> bdmurray: thanks, uploaded
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:38] <vorlon> mwhudson, bdmurray: good that there aren't any other changes, since metapackages are supposed to be uploaded right before beta ;)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (mantic-proposed/main) [1.520 => 1.521] (core)
[23:38] <mwhudson> vorlon: yay for processes or something
[23:39] <mwhudson> probably should have done this ssh-import-id thing ages ago but well
[23:40] <vorlon> tsimonq2: lubuntu beta publishing now
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libde265 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.0.12-2]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.116.3ubuntu3]