/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/09/27/#ubuntu-desktop.txt

seb128goood morning desktopers!08:22
lissyxseb128, hello08:23
seb128lissyx, hey, how are you today?08:24
lissyxcan you try to run a nightly build on launchapd?08:24
lissyxhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185535108:24
-ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1855351 in Firefox Build System "Perma [tier 2] snap-nightly with failure 'override-build' in part 'firefox' failed with code 1." [--, New]08:24
lissyxPGO is broken on our side :(08:24
lissyxand I'm stuck bisecting something else so I can't investigate further for now08:24
seb128lissyx, ack08:25
seb128started on https://launchpad.net/~mozilla-snaps/firefox/+snap/firefox-snap-nightly08:25
seb128the previous builds earlier today failed but that seemed like a connectivity issue 08:26
lissyxamd64 would have been enough08:26
seb128lissyx, right, it's a limitation of the webUI which didn't give me the choice (I could have done if from a command line instead and specified the arch but I'm busy with other things and it was easier to do from the browser)08:48
lissyxseb128, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185539509:10
-ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1855395 in Core "Crash in [@ g_cclosure_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED_BOXEDv]" [--, New]09:10
lissyxfirst reports on sept 20th09:11
lissyxand it's hitting all versions, even a 111.0 ?09:11
seb128fun09:25
seb128lissyx, this 111.0 build isn't a snap right?09:28
lissyxI think it might be: https://buildhub.moz.tools/?q=2023031415303709:28
lissyxor it's a deb09:29
lissyxerr no it'rs a snap.09:29
lissyxhttps://crash-stats.mozilla.org/report/index/fe726f7b-7b7e-455f-8f43-93ff80230921#tab-telemetryenvironment09:29
lissyxdistribution id shows canonical-00209:29
seb128lissyx, I've difficulties to make sense of it09:35
seb128firefox is a confined snap and it gets its glib from the sdk09:35
seb128it's not the switch to core22 since it impacts some old versions like 111 also09:36
lissyxbut it started around sept 20th on multiple versions09:36
seb128and afaik core20/gnome-3-38 didn't have recent glib changes09:36
lissyxwait it shows 20th because it's the limit on the searrch ...09:38
lissyxseb128, https://crash-stats.mozilla.org/signature/?product=Firefox&signature=g_cclosure_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED_BOXEDv&date=%3E%3D2023-02-27T08%3A59%3A00.000Z&date=%3C2023-09-27T08%3A59%3A00.000Z&_columns=date&_columns=product&_columns=version&_columns=build_id&_columns=platform&_columns=reason&_columns=address&_columns=install_time&_columns=startup_crash&_sort=date&_sort=&page=109:39
lissyxseb128, but still crashes at the same time on different versions09:39
seb128lissyx, so the oldest report is on 2023-06-20?09:44
lissyxyes09:44
lissyxsee the link09:44
lissyxmultiple versions affected at the same time09:44
seb128lissyx, which is around the time of that security update, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.64.6-1~ubuntu20.04.609:44
seb128I wonder if there is either some regression in that glib fix09:45
seb128or if firefox is doing something stupid with glib which happened to work before but doesn't anymore after the fix09:45
seb128anyway my guess would be that it has to do with the glib changes from that upload (it was a security fix issues to the different Ubuntu series and which would have been picked up by a gnome sdk rebuild)09:46
lissyxthe stacks I can see on several bugs shows different paths from libxul09:46
lissyxso I'm a bit skeptical we are doing something wrong09:47
seb128lissyx, can you see from the metrics if there are reports from core22 versions of the snap?09:47
lissyxseb128, do you have the dates for uploads to 23.04 and 22.04 ?09:47
seb128lissyx, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.009:47
seb1282023-06-14 was the date for 20.04 and 22.0409:48
seb128there was no upload to 23.04 but maybe that's because the version there already had the fix?09:48
seb128also those are updates to the deb, we would need to see when the sdk snaps were rebuild to pick up that security update09:48
lissyxthis lack of public history :(09:49
lissyxseb128, https://crash-stats.mozilla.org/report/index/8bc01b5d-fc81-46a4-b7aa-b324d0230620#tab-modules09:51
lissyxwe have links to the debug symbols of libglib and others09:51
seb128lissyx, the build dates of https://code.launchpad.net/~desktop-snappers/+snap/gnome-3-38-2004 suggest we didn't have a sdk update to include the new glib before July-810:03
seb128I'm a bit puzzled10:04
lissyxseb128, unrelated, but it looks like pipewire-bin and pipewire-pulse can't be co-installed for amd64/arm6410:24
lissyxhttps://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=430461964&repo=try&lineNumber=266-27110:24
lissyxothers seems fine10:24
lissyxaptitude might be able to do it?10:28
lissyxseb128, for the PGO, it looks like I reproduced locally and that after removing `--enable-linker=gold` as suggested by glandium, I dont have a problem anymore: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D18936210:35
seb128lissyx, the nightly job I retried also failed, https://launchpad.net/~mozilla-snaps/firefox/+snap/firefox-snap-nightly/+build/224249910:47
seb128lissyx, pipewire, seems like a multiarch issue in the package maybe, worth reporting to Debian or on launchpad10:48
lissyxseb128, awesome, the pgo failure is the same as us and my desktop repro11:05
seb128lissyx, is building without gold what we usually want or just a temporary workaround for that problem?11:44
lissyxseb128, I dont know11:44
lissyxseb128, glandium told me it's not required anymore11:44
lissyx> glandium11:45
lissyx--enable-linker=gold should be removed11:45
lissyxI can ask him more details, but he's in japan so wont get the answer now11:45
seb128I would still be interested by the reply even if it's later11:45
seb128we can disable for now but I want to know if that's something we should keep or only do temporarly11:45
lissyxit's not mentionned anymore on https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/build/buildsystem/pgo.html11:47
seb128I wonder why Olivier used gold to start with11:47
lissyxseb128, --enable-lto=cross is also not referred to anymore in any of our build config12:11
lissyxseb128, and the try opt build failed on linkage, while try debug succeeded (we remove this flag on debug)12:11
lissyxseb128, cf https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=c31950211c4f2556ffe31180835a198e6b95c2a712:12
lissyxso maybe we need to just keep MOZ_PGO=112:12
lissyx(as the doc states, btw)12:12
KGB-2nautilus upstream/latest 395768f Jeremy Bicha * pushed 13 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/3g52g12:44
KGB-0nautilus pristine-tar 00ae195 Jeremy Bícha nautilus_45.0.orig.tar.xz.delta nautilus_45.0.orig.tar.xz.id * pristine-tar data for nautilus_45.0.orig.tar.xz * https://deb.li/k16h12:44
KGB-2nautilus upstream/latest b7e51d3 Changwoo Ryu po/ko.po * Update Korean translation * https://deb.li/3hCh412:44
KGB-2nautilus upstream/latest b10b186 Balázs Úr po/hu.po * Update Hungarian translation * https://deb.li/873M12:44
KGB-2nautilus upstream/latest be42ce2 Alan Mortensen po/da.po * Update Danish translation * https://deb.li/3o1cj12:44
KGB-2nautilus upstream/latest 48181e3 Changwoo Ryu po/ko.po * Update Korean translation * https://deb.li/S1TN12:45
KGB-2nautilus upstream/latest c2bbb6c Alan Mortensen po/da.po * Update Danish translation * https://deb.li/3z3Cx12:45
KGB-0glib pipeline Simon McVittie 584331 * pending (extract-source: pending; build: created; build i386: created; build armhf: created; build arm64: created; build source: created; test-build-any: created; test-build-all: created; reprotest: created; lintian: created; autopkgtest: created; blhc: created; piuparts: created)13:39
KGB-0glib pipeline Simon McVittie 584331 * running (extract-source: running; build: created; build i386: created; build armhf: created; build arm64: created; build source: created; test-build-any: created; test-build-all: created; reprotest: created; lintian: created; autopkgtest: created; blhc: created; piuparts: created)13:40
lissyxseb128, bandali, so, we can get armhf and arm64 cross-built even on our current docker setup: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=b0272dc3322ea7fb826c629872da2b02e01515ad14:16
seb128great14:16
lissyxit's a bit hacky, and hopefully I should get provided workers without docker soon14:16
KGB-0glib pipeline Simon McVittie 584331 * [45 minutes and 13 seconds] failed (extract-source: success; build: success; build i386: success; build armhf: failed; build arm64: failed; build source: success; test-build-any: skipped; test-build-all: skipped; reprotest: success; lintian: failed; autopkgtest: success; blhc: success; piuparts: failed)15:00
KGB-0GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745908 (extract-source) stage: provisioning, status: created15:16
KGB-2GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745910 (build i386) stage: build, status: created15:16
KGB-0GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745911 (build source) stage: build, status: created15:16
KGB-2GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745915 (reprotest) stage: test, status: created15:16
KGB-0GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745912 (test-build-any) stage: test, status: created15:16
KGB-2GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745918 (blhc) stage: test, status: created15:16
KGB-0GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745914 (test-crossbuild-arm64) stage: test, status: created15:16
KGB-0GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745913 (test-build-all) stage: test, status: created15:16
KGB-2nautilus pipeline Jeremy Bicha 584352 * running (extract-source: running; build: created; build i386: created; build source: created; test-build-any: created; test-build-all: created; test-crossbuild-arm64: created; reprotest: created; lintian: created; autopkgtest: created; blhc: created; piuparts: created)15:16
KGB-0GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745916 (lintian) stage: test, status: created15:16
KGB-0GNOME / nautilus builds Jeremy Bicha * Build #4745919 (piuparts) stage: test, status: created15:17
KGB-2nautilus pipeline Jeremy Bicha 584352 * [21 minutes and 51 seconds] failed (extract-source: success; build: success; build i386: success; build source: success; test-build-any: failed; test-build-all: success; test-crossbuild-arm64: failed; reprotest: failed; lintian: success; autopkgtest: success; blhc: success; piuparts: success)15:38
lissyxbandali, can we merge https://github.com/canonical/firefox-snap/pull/29 to unblock https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1855351 ?15:52
-ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Pull 29 in canonical/firefox-snap "Bug1855351 pog failure" [Open]15:52
-ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1855351 in Firefox Build System "Perma [tier 2] snap-nightly with failure 'override-build' in part 'firefox' failed with code 1." [--, New]15:52
KGB-0nautilus pipeline Jeremy Bicha 584352 * [21 minutes and 51 seconds] running (extract-source: success; build: success; build i386: success; build source: success; test-build-all: success; lintian: success; autopkgtest: success; blhc: success; piuparts: success; test-build-any: pending; test-crossbuild-arm64: pending; reprotest: pending)15:53
bandalilissyx, sure, now done, thank you!16:08
lissyx:p16:08
KGB-0gnome-shell pipeline Simon McVittie 584373 * pending (extract-source: pending; build: created; build i386: created; build source: created; test-build-any: created; test-build-all: created; test-crossbuild-arm64: created; reprotest: created; lintian: created; autopkgtest: created; blhc: created; piuparts: created)16:34
KGB-0gnome-shell pipeline Simon McVittie 584374 * pending (extract-source: pending; build: created; build i386: created; build source: created; test-build-any: created; test-build-all: created; test-crossbuild-arm64: created; reprotest: created; lintian: created; autopkgtest: created; blhc: created; piuparts: created)16:38
lissyxbandali, I'm abou to go to sleep, but I could use your input on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1854374 ; this is reported by someone using snap package on kde/opensuse and he always hit weird issues, I'm skeptical of the KDE/OpenSUSE integration itself ...20:13
-ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1854374 in Core "'(null)' displayed instead of 'Firefox' in Snap Location Access permission prompt." [--, Unconfirmed]20:13
PLTracehello! can somebody please help me diagnosing a problem? When using a plain "old" Ubuntu 22.04 live pen I'm able to see my Brother MFC-J6530DW printer and use it (both printer and scanner). From my installed version, after some update which I'm unable to identify, it suddenly stopped being found. I'm using it in a "driverless" way. Any ideas on how23:23
PLTraceto diagnose it?23:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!