/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/09/27/#ubuntu-devel.txt

Unit193Eickmeyer: `seeded-in-ubuntu yt-dlp` shows several flavors, but I'm presuming only due to mpv.  As Studio is in that list, can you confirm?  Having yt-dlp the latest at release time would seem ideal to me.01:19
EickmeyerUnit193: Can confirm, due to haruna specifically.01:20
EickmeyerUnit193: I can do a sync.01:20
Unit193I was going to, but I didn't want to upset any flavors.  Seems the autopkgtest sometimes throws STDERR, but otherwise passes just fine.01:21
EickmeyerI see.01:22
EickmeyerWell, I have no issue with it.01:22
Unit193Cool, sounds great to me then.01:22
Unit193https://dpaste.com/ELWS67DMA that's the STDERR that sometimes hits.01:24
EickmeyerYikes!01:31
cpaelzerteward: mapreri: thanks for all the content let me read the backlog ...04:40
cpaelzerteward: mapreri: btw line wrapping made misread and send the mail to backports@ instead of ubuntu-backports@, but given the amount of answers I see that mail might not have been required04:41
cpaelzerteward: mapreri: read the backlog, thanks already - I'll have a look at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/689166277/distro-info_0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1~bpo18.04.1_source.changes as well to give you this ack04:49
cpaelzerteward: mapreri: you already ruled it out, but to fill in the gaps why serving this via pro would make even less sense ... broken distro-info from backports affects the pro client, which depends on it, in negative ways. I don't know how bad, but it would make consuming the fix via that even less practical04:51
cpaelzerteward: I've left traces of this discussion and my testing in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-info/+bug/186230505:49
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1862305 in Xenial Backports "distro-info in xenial backports needs a newer distro-info-data and versioned dependency" [Undecided, Won't Fix]05:49
cpaelzerteward: mapreri: for process sake I've also added a backport template to bug 186230505:55
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1862305 in Xenial Backports "distro-info in xenial backports needs a newer distro-info-data and versioned dependency" [Undecided, Won't Fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186230505:55
cpaelzerteward: it LGTM, and I'd ask you or mapreri / ddstreet to consider accepting it05:56
schopin@pilot in10:50
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic post-Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: schopin
rbasakwaveform, apw: bug 2007827 - go :-)13:10
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2007827 in flash-kernel (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] flash-kernel failure when upgrading f-k and kernel in the same cycle" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200782713:10
waveformhi!13:10
apwhi, the unerlying resistance to a flash-kernel specific fix is that this drives all consumers to implement the same kind of fixes.13:11
apwwe have a proposed solution, which is going to be fleshed out and spec'd up soon13:12
apwthat envisions not having kernel binaries in /boot unless they are complete and consumable; so that the existing gates on including /boot/vmlinuz* or whatever we are using returns to safety.13:12
apwbut, i personally have no objection to a short-term flash-kernel fix to paper over the lack of this.13:13
waveformokay, I agree entirely that the f-k fix is ... horrid, and that it should be short-term but we were blocked on the SRU team wanting the kernel team to weigh in (even if that was "not going to happen yet, go with the horrid f-k fix until we can sort stuff out") -- could you add something to that effect to the bug?13:14
apwdone.13:16
rbasakThank you!13:18
waveform brilliant, thanks!13:18

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!