[08:52] goood morning IRC [09:29] seb128, i'll test locally and then send a PR to a patch to stable for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1854179 [09:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1854179 in Toolkit "Crash in OOM | large | thin_vec::header_with_capacity" [--, Resolved: Fixed] [09:36] lissyx, great, I don't understand Gabriele's comment there [09:36] is he saying that upstream isn't going to fix the issue and than we should distro patch somehow? [09:37] seb128, no, it's more that we dont know when a new 118 might come out, and it's serious enough but only for ubuntu that you might want to pick the patch and do a new build for stable channel [09:38] ah, ok [09:38] bandali, ^ [10:43] I would like to talk with someone about a possible preparation in mantic for 23.10->24.04 distupgrades. [10:43] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2034986/comments/18 [10:43] Does my reasoning make sense? seb128? jbicha? Somebody else? [10:43] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Launchpad bug 2034986 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Mantic) "some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade" [Critical, In Progress] [10:50] GunnarHj, I'm not a font expert but I do wonder if somehow the release upgrader should include a ttf in a private path and use that instead of relying on system fonts? [10:53] seb128: I can't tell if that would be possible. But even if it is, other programs like the desktop itself and possible other open applications are affected. So personally I see the workaround in the making as a decent permanent solution. With reservation, then, for what I wrote in that bug comment. [10:53] the real fix is to stop applying updates in session... [10:54] GunnarHj, but I agree with what you wrote, unsure which font would be right to depends on though [10:56] seb128: DejaVu Sans is on my mind, which is a bit sad because I made some effort to *avoid* fonts-dejavu-core among the default fonts... [10:57] seb128: It's basically unmaintained which in this context is good. :/ === pizzaiolo is now known as pizza === Guest5602 is now known as ogra === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [12:52] good morning [12:53] thanks lissyx will look into those [13:19] ricotz, hey, as a FYI I finally managed to push your thunderbird 115 updates to the security ppa, sorry for the delay! [13:25] ricotz, but I see now that we will need a nodejs update for 22.04. It got updated in 20.04 by Olivier a while ago but I guess he didn't need it in 22.04 because firefox as a snap there [13:26] well that was nodejs-mozilla in focal [13:26] oh nodejs [13:26] good luck. [13:26] shrug [13:26] I expect that might not be as easy :/ [13:26] so many horrors story to share about that [13:27] :-( [13:28] I wonder if thunderbird 115 could easily be makde to build with 12.22.9 instead of 12.22.12 [13:29] you should ask the #thunderbird-dev channel on matrix [13:29] folks are responsive [13:30] ack, thanks for the hint [13:34] seb128, ah sorry, I am implicitly using a nodejs backport from kinetic to jammy for the ppa builds :( [13:37] ricotz, did you try to build with the jammy version of nodejs? do you know why .12 is required? [13:38] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nodejs/node/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V12.md [13:43] seb128: Back to the pre lunch topic: Does it make sense to you to add fonts-dejavu-core as a Depend in desktop-common to prepare for the 23.10->24.04 upgrades? [13:43] seb128, the requirement is explicit and would need to be patched, I assume the bump was made by choice for security reasons [13:43] GunnarHj, I don't understand fonts enough to have an opinion on whether that's enough [13:44] seb128, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1782523 [13:44] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1782523 in Firefox Build System "We install node version v16.0.0 which is 1.5y old and has several security updates" [--, Resolved: Fixed] [13:44] https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr115/rev/839f7f52434489ff18172cbc8232731fe54f0ecc [13:46] seb128, I am currently busy, sorry [13:47] ricotz, there isn't much difference between .9 and .12 it seems, it feels like we could try to build it with .9 and see how it goes [13:47] seb128: It's enough under the assumption that DejaVu Sans does not undergo changes. The upstream repo was last updated 6 years ago. [13:47] ricotz, no worry [13:47] GunnarHj, the proposal would work for me at least [13:48] seb128: Then I'll do it. Thanks! [13:51] np! [14:09] seb128: Is App Center itself translatable? [14:18] GunnarHj, the string or the application? [14:22] seb128: Actually I think about both the string "App Center" and the whole application. [14:23] seb128: I just noticed that you had made Swedish translations for gnome-initial-setup which i just changed. :/ [14:25] lissyx, hey did you get a chance to check https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/1854179 locally? wondering if i should tackle it or if you may already be working on it [14:25] GunnarHj, sorry, I just made the string replace thing Steve asked for [14:25] bandali, multiple times on nightly yes [14:25] bandali, sorry, I am about to go out, school time and I wont be able to come back [14:25] lissyx, excellent, thanks. would you like to do a PR for it or okay if i do? [14:26] I wont have time for a PR before tomorrow [14:26] ah okay np, many thanks anyway, i'll just do a PR and tag you and seb as reviewers [14:26] and you probably want to ship it to beta and stable as well [14:26] lissyx, right. afaik it's already in the next beta tho yeah? so i'd only need a PR for stable? [14:26] bandali, you can ask help from gabriele on matrix, I pinged both [14:27] but I really really have to go [14:27] thank you thank you. okay see ya later o/ [14:27] seb128: The most urgent thing, I suppose, is the label of the icon in the dock, and I don't know where to translate that. Think it would be appropriate to provide a pointer to the translators.