| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpgme1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.13.1-7ubuntu2.1 => 1.13.1-7ubuntu2.2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 00:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpgme1.0 (jammy-proposed/main) [1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.1 => 1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 00:24 | |
| xnox | vorlon: trying to fix kenrel renames on daily-live images (which would otherwise prevent build oem intel-iot and the laptop desktop images) https://git.launchpad.net/~xnox/livecd-rootfs/commit/?id=3e4f4c68b3b96c33d52340ba2db9085d53457f9b | 00:28 |
|---|---|---|
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit 3e4f4c6 in ~xnox/livecd-rootfs "remove live-build/ubuntu/hooks/020-ubuntu-live.binary: handled elsewhere fix-desktop-live-kernel-renames" | 00:28 | |
| xnox | uploading into ppa, and doing test builds before submitting MR | 00:29 |
| * vorlon nods | 00:29 | |
| xnox | as i realised there is unfixable ubuntu-cdimage / debian-cd / livecd-rootfs integration problem of missmatched / unexpected file names | 00:29 |
| vorlon | xnox: I'm afk shortly to pick up dinner, but can review later tonight. when will I have an actual kernel to go with it? | 00:29 |
| xnox | vorlon: kernel is built in a ppa, and pending AA review...... i guess i can copy it into the unapproved queue for you to review? as it has no signing. | 00:30 |
| xnox | it has the right variant and can be build the image. it still missing hooks / patches to meta. | 00:30 |
| vorlon | "pending AA review" well it's not in any queue I look at | 00:31 |
| xnox | to do the correct module order in the initrd. | 00:31 |
| xnox | vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/2037451 but clearly new-review is trianged! | 00:31 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037451 in Kernel SRU Workflow "mantic/linux-laptop: 6.5.0-1003.5 -proposed tracker" [Medium, In Progress] | 00:31 | |
| xnox | anyway, i am hoping to fixup meta, and land it normally with tracker / kernel team routings / tomorrow EU time | 00:32 |
| xnox | i was just doing ubuntu-cdimage local tests and realised that all build scripts fail | 00:32 |
| xnox | livebuild kicked off, off to sleep | 01:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.48 => 23.10.49] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 05:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxs-parse-sublike-perl (mantic-proposed/main) [0.20-1ubuntu1 => 0.20-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 05:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxs-parse-sublike-perl [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.20-1ubuntu2] | 05:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.26 => 2.765.27] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 06:00 | |
| mitya57 | ginggs: Sorry for the late response. Alacarte NEWS only says about updated translations. Anyway, this sync has been already accepted by someone. | 06:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nbdkit (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.34.3-1ubuntu1 => 1.34.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nbdkit [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.34.4-1ubuntu1] | 07:00 | |
| arighi | apw, bdmurray, vorlon (or whoever is in charge) the current mantic/linux kernel in proposed 6.5.0-6.6 is regressing with the new systemd, but from the log shows it doesn't really seem a kernel regression (failure to download an lxd image), could we hint/ignore this test, so that we can get this new kernel in release? Do you see any problem with that? | 07:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.49] | 08:15 | |
| ginggs | mitya57: np, j.bicha already clarified that and i accepted | 08:15 |
| ginggs | jbicha: there's a webkit2gtk sync in the queue, but d/changelog is only "New upstream release" and I don't see any mention of it in the backlog. would you please provide some context? | 08:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxs-parse-sublike-perl (mantic-proposed/main) [0.20-1ubuntu2 => 0.20-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 08:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxs-parse-sublike-perl [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.20-1ubuntu3] | 08:30 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | +What's new in WebKitGTK 2.42.1? | 08:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | + | 08:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | + - Fix enable-html5-database setting to properly enable/disable IndexedDB API. | 08:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | + - Fix the build with GBM disabled. | 08:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | + - Fix several crashes and rendering issues. | 08:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ginggs, ^^^ | 08:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | 600000l lines changed of documentation, if you drop that, the delta becomes really small | 08:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so totally bugfix only release | 08:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-artwork (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.0 => 23.10.1] (ubuntu-mate) | 09:05 | |
| Wimpy | Please accept ubuntu-mate-artwork/23.10.1 | 09:05 |
| ginggs | LocutusOfBorg: thanks, I'd like an ack from the owning team though | 09:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.1] | 09:19 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | ginggs, please consider that build on riscv64 takes almost one week | 09:22 |
| ginggs | Wimpy: ^ | 09:24 |
| ginggs | ricotz, seb128: i removed libreoffice/i386 from never_run, and now britney correctly considers is 'Not a regression', so manual hints for each upload should no longer be needed | 09:25 |
| ginggs | s/is/it/ | 09:26 |
| seb128 | ginggs, hey, great! | 09:26 |
| Wimpy | Thanks ginggs | 09:30 |
| philroche | Apologies if this has been covered already but I saw recent autopkgtest failures for a livecd-rootfs versions for mantic and the test logs appear to be related to `No space left on device` . Specifically livecd-rootfs/23.10.48 - see https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-rootfs/mantic/amd64 Is this cause for a Canonical internal IS request ticket for investigation? | 09:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi (mantic-proposed/restricted) [9-0ubuntu1 => 10-0ubuntu1] (raspi) | 09:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-firmware-raspi [source] (mantic-proposed) [10-0ubuntu1] | 09:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi (mantic-proposed/restricted) [9-0ubuntu1 => 10-0ubuntu1] (raspi) | 09:55 | |
| ginggs | philroche: i suggest checking with qa-team first | 09:57 |
| ginggs | paride, bdmurray: ^ | 09:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-raspi [source] (mantic-proposed) [10-0ubuntu1] | 10:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpiozero (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.6.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.0-0ubuntu1] (raspi) | 11:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpiozero [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.0-0ubuntu1] | 11:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:20230926-1ubuntu1 => 1:20230928-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 11:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:20230928-1ubuntu1] | 11:23 | |
| paride | philroche, hi, looking into that | 11:23 |
| jbicha | ginggs: new webkit2gtk point releases are bugfix and security updates | 11:23 |
| philroche | paride: Thank you | 11:23 |
| jbicha | could gnome-shell-pomodoro be hinted in? I don't know why the i386 autopkgtest failure is preventing migration (gnome-shell-pomodoro was removed earlier in mantic but reintroduced now that it works with GNOME 45) | 11:25 |
| ginggs | jbicha: re: webkit2gtk, thanks. i wish there was some way for this info to be communicated for syncs | 11:28 |
| ginggs | jbicha: looking at gnome-shell-pomodoro... | 11:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2.42.1-1] | 11:30 | |
| ginggs | jbicha: hint added for gnome-shell-pomodoro | 11:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs115 (mantic-release/universe) [115.3.0-0ubuntu1 => 115.3.0-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 11:40 | |
| seb128 | I've self approved ^ since that's a copy over including binaries to enable the i386 build | 11:47 |
| ginggs | seb128: ack, thanks | 11:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mozjs115 [sync] (mantic-release) [115.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 11:47 | |
| ginggs | seb128, jbicha: as desktop owns libwebp, would one of you please comment on LP: #2037527 ? | 11:48 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037527 in libwebp (Ubuntu) "[Ffe] libwebp" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2037527 | 11:48 | |
| seb128 | ginggs, ack, I've asked for some rational and testing on the bug, seems risky for no real reason (we already have the security fixes cherrypicked) | 11:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added mozjs115 to i386-whitelist in mantic | 11:56 | |
| ginggs | seb128: thank you! | 12:06 |
| seb128 | np! | 12:06 |
| === Guest5602 is now known as ogra | ||
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (mantic-proposed/main) [22.11.2-3 => 22.11.3-1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-server) (sync) | 12:54 | |
| cpaelzer | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2035367/comments/1 is about that dpdk sync that just showed up in mantic-unapproved ^^ Please consider accepting once not a problem for any ongoing beta builds or any such. | 13:08 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2035367 in dpdk (Ubuntu Mantic) "MRE updates 21.11.5/22.11.3" [Undecided, New] | 13:08 | |
| arighi | ''/quit | 13:25 |
| ginggs | cpaelzer: thanks, looking... | 13:27 |
| cpaelzer | thank you ginggs, If you need any more formal templates for the process or an explanation or any such, just let me know | 13:30 |
| cpaelzer | Oh I see it accepted, thank you | 13:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [sync] (mantic-proposed) [22.11.3-1] | 13:31 | |
| ginggs | yw! | 13:32 |
| cpaelzer | I did the related bug updates, no extra work on that end for you ginggs | 13:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (mantic-proposed/main) [18.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 18.2.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-barbicanclient (mantic-proposed/main) [5.6.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.6.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-castellan (mantic-proposed/main) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.3.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-mistralclient (mantic-proposed/main) [1:5.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-neutronclient (mantic-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.config (mantic-proposed/main) [1:9.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:9.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-tooz (mantic-proposed/main) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-zaqarclient (mantic-proposed/main) [2.5.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-keystoneclient (mantic-proposed/main) [1:5.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-os-vif (mantic-proposed/main) [3.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-watcherclient (mantic-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-monascaclient (mantic-proposed/main) [2.7.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.db (mantic-proposed/main) [12.3.2-0ubuntu1 => 14.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (mantic-proposed/main) [18.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 18.2.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server) | 14:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.14 => 1:20.04.10.15] (core) | 14:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.log (mantic-proposed/main) [5.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.3.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (mantic-proposed/main) [14.3.1-0ubuntu1 => 14.4.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 14:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (mantic-proposed/main) [1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 15:03 | |
| kanashiro | vorlon could you please take a look at docker-{buildx,compose-v2} in NEW queue for focal, jammy and lunar when you have some time? This is the special case where someone with SRU and AA hats could sort it out easily | 15:07 |
| vorlon | kanashiro: will have to be tomorrow during my vanguard day | 15:12 |
| kanashiro | vorlon ok, thanks! | 15:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (mantic-proposed) [18.2.0-0ubuntu3] | 15:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (mantic-proposed) [18.2.0-0ubuntu3] | 15:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu2] | 15:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnocchi (mantic-proposed/universe) [4.6.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.6.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack) | 15:40 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | can anybody please have a look at virtualbox SRU? | 16:00 |
| rbasak | LocutusOfBorg: I'm not on shift today, but pitti did *not* approve https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VirtualboxUpdates as an exception, contrary to what you've written at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#virtualbox. He merely said that what you described appeared to meet the policy (which is currently at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases and I don't think has | 16:12 |
| rbasak | substantially changed since then) | 16:12 |
| rbasak | What you've written at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VirtualboxUpdates looks like a good start though, from a quick glance. | 16:13 |
| rbasak | But for example you seem to be missing a credible test plan. "Install virtualbox, run VMs" is what the bug says right now and it isn't sufficient. I don't see any test plan on the wiki page. | 16:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok sorry for my misunderstanding about pitti | 16:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm really trying to remember what happened that long ago | 16:15 |
| rbasak | Sorry, I should clarify. | 16:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and also, I got SRU for vbox since like 10 years, so this is why probably I thought it was an ack | 16:16 |
| rbasak | I'm not claiming anything from memory. I'm just going by the post you linked. That post doesn't read as an exception approval to me. | 16:16 |
| rbasak | Anyway, the wiki page is a good start - thank you for writing it up. | 16:17 |
| rbasak | The key thing is that it should explain how the package meets the criteria at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases | 16:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'll update the test plan thanks | 16:18 |
| rbasak | I also suggest that you put a detailed test plan in the wiki that you intend to follow during SRU verification. Then it only needs to be reviewed and approved once, rather than on every upload. | 16:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | of course I do much more of what I wrote there | 16:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sure | 16:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnocchi [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.6.0-0ubuntu2] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-castellan [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mistralclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:5.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-neutronclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.config [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:9.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.log [source] (mantic-proposed) [5.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-tooz [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-zaqarclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-barbicanclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [5.6.1-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-monascaclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.db [source] (mantic-proposed) [14.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-watcherclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-keystoneclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:5.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.messaging [source] (mantic-proposed) [14.4.1-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-os-vif [source] (mantic-proposed) [3.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 16:21 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | I hope you like it more now | 16:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected edubuntu-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.2.4] | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected edubuntu-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.2.4] | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.72.4] | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.72.4] | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dipy (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-2 => 1.7.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dipy [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.7.0-3] | 16:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (mantic-proposed/main) [1.521 => 1.522] (core) | 17:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (lunar-proposed/main) [1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2 => 1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mystic [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset) | 17:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.4 => 23.10.5] (ubuntu-desktop) | 17:27 | |
| xnox | vorlon: do you have time to check-in on x13s stuff? | 17:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.15] | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mystic [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.1-1] | 18:10 | |
| vorlon | xnox: now | 18:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.522] | 19:07 | |
| xnox | vorlon: oooh | 19:12 |
| xnox | did i miss it? | 19:12 |
| vorlon | xnox: still here | 19:12 |
| xnox | https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/452363 | 19:13 |
| vorlon | yes | 19:14 |
| xnox | is that comprehensible? | 19:14 |
| xnox | or do i need to explain myself more? | 19:14 |
| xnox | because it is needed for https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-cdimage/+git/ubuntu-cdimage/+merge/452162 to work | 19:15 |
| xnox | and review comments there addressed | 19:15 |
| xnox | also i hosed my laptop, so i need installer to reinstall it =) | 19:16 |
| vorlon | xnox: part of the description there isn't quite coherent, "noticing that binary hooks are called on a live years" | 19:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.5] | 19:33 | |
| xnox | vorlon: live layer | 20:12 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: so ubuntucinnamon never had a size limit set which means it has inherited the size limit for a CD by default, which is obviously not correct. and the lunar release image that went out is bigger than the mantic image is today. So I'm going to go ahead with a limit of 4.2GB which covers what's currently being produced. | 20:14 |
| xnox | vorlon: basically what i'm trying to say is that c00bbf3fb3 ("desktop: place kernel in the live layer") was completely wrong. | 20:15 |
| vorlon | xnox: ack | 20:15 |
| xnox | (attempting to do on desktop, what server image does, without realising that generic-hwe is flavour generic, and when there is only one of them existing functionality does the right thing, and for desktop / single kernel none of that custom stuff needed, and even subiquity hook used to only run on .2-.5 releases) | 20:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: amazon-ec2-net-utils (focal-proposed/primary) [2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.20.04] | 20:27 | |
| dbungert | xnox: kernel was in the wrong layer. I get that you're objecting to the hook, but the other part was needed. | 20:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: amazon-ec2-net-utils (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.22.04] | 20:29 | |
| vorlon | xnox: ^^ I'm going to let you discuss this with dbungert first and maybe reach a consensus, perhaps that will save me time in trying to trace all the side effects of the --linux-packages=--initramfs=KERNEL_FLAVOURS=none | 20:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parsinsert (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.04-15 => 1.04-15ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted parsinsert [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.04-15ubuntu1] | 20:44 | |
| vorlon | xnox: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-concept/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu/+build/504032/+files/livecd.ubuntu.minimal.standard.manifest does not list a kernel. But https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-concept/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu/+build/504032/+files/livecd.ubuntu.minimal.standard.live.manifest also does not list a kernel. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/689427027/livecd.ubuntu.minimal.manifest | 20:59 |
| vorlon | lists the kernel, and as dbungert says, we don't want it there because enhanced secureboot | 20:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rust-convert-case (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debvm (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.2.12ubuntu1 => 0.2.13] (no packageset) (sync) | 21:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debvm [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.13] | 21:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-xarray (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.08.0-1ubuntu5 => 2023.09.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 21:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-xarray [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2023.09.0-1] | 21:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.14 => 23.10.15] (ubuntustudio) | 21:45 | |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: ^ This is for bug 2037676, which I'd love your input on. It's a dirty hack and makes me feel icky. | 21:45 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2037676 in ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) "ubiquity needs to use Materia-dark theme when launched from live session" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2037676 | 21:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uwsgi (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.0.22-1 => 2.0.22-4] (no packageset) (sync) | 21:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uwsgi [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2.0.22-4] | 21:48 | |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: ok definitely not this | 21:51 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: That's what I thought. | 21:51 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: bug says "Materia is using the Adwaita GTK theme"; do you mean "ubiquity is [...]"? | 21:52 |
| Eickmeyer | Yes. heh | 21:52 |
| Eickmeyer | Updated. | 21:53 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: if you have to modify /usr/share/applications/ubiquity.desktop in this environment then dpkg-divert is the supported interface for that. But you should probably move up a level and make sure GTK_THEME is set in the live session generally | 21:54 |
| vorlon | and then modifying ubiquity.desktop in the ubiquity package to include GTK_THEME in preserve-env is reasonable | 21:54 |
| Eickmeyer | Yeah, it's not. GTK_THEME isn't set as an environment variable in KDE, and never has been. They use their own way to set the GTK theme. | 21:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (mantic-proposed/main) [23.3.1-0ubuntu1 => 23.3.1-0ubuntu2] (core, ubuntu-cloud) | 21:55 | |
| Eickmeyer | Go ahead and reject, that gave me something to think about. | 21:55 |
| vorlon | yes, but we can change the behavior there so that it is | 21:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-default-settings [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.15] | 21:56 | |
| vorlon | at minimum, in the live session | 21:56 |
| Eickmeyer | Yep. | 21:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.3.1-0ubuntu2] | 22:00 | |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: Ok, looks like this bugfix will be in two parts: GTK_THEME will be set by a file in /etc/profile.d provided by ubuntustudio-live-settings, and I'll file (yet another) MR for ubiquity to add GTK_THEME to --preserve-env=. | 22:59 |
| vorlon | sounds plausible | 23:00 |
| Eickmeyer | 👍 | 23:00 |
| Eickmeyer | I tested the modifications here, and it works. | 23:01 |
| Eickmeyer | Of course, testing on other flavors too just to be sure it doesn't foul them up. | 23:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (mantic-proposed/main) [2.27.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.27.0-0ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist) | 23:11 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!