[00:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpgme1.0 (focal-proposed/main) [1.13.1-7ubuntu2.1 => 1.13.1-7ubuntu2.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpgme1.0 (jammy-proposed/main) [1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.1 => 1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:28] <xnox> vorlon: trying to fix kenrel renames on daily-live images (which would otherwise prevent build oem intel-iot and the laptop desktop images) https://git.launchpad.net/~xnox/livecd-rootfs/commit/?id=3e4f4c68b3b96c33d52340ba2db9085d53457f9b
[00:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit 3e4f4c6 in ~xnox/livecd-rootfs "remove live-build/ubuntu/hooks/020-ubuntu-live.binary: handled elsewhere fix-desktop-live-kernel-renames"
[00:29] <xnox> uploading into ppa, and doing test builds before submitting MR
[00:29]  * vorlon nods
[00:29] <xnox> as i realised there is unfixable ubuntu-cdimage / debian-cd / livecd-rootfs integration problem of missmatched / unexpected file names
[00:29] <vorlon> xnox: I'm afk shortly to pick up dinner, but can review later tonight. when will I have an actual kernel to go with it?
[00:30] <xnox> vorlon: kernel is built in a ppa, and pending AA review...... i guess i can copy it into the unapproved queue for you to review? as it has no signing.
[00:30] <xnox> it has the right variant and can be build the image. it still missing hooks / patches to meta.
[00:31] <vorlon> "pending AA review" well it's not in any queue I look at
[00:31] <xnox> to do the correct module order in the initrd.
[00:31] <xnox> vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/2037451 but clearly new-review is trianged!
[00:31] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037451 in Kernel SRU Workflow "mantic/linux-laptop: 6.5.0-1003.5 -proposed tracker" [Medium, In Progress]
[00:32] <xnox> anyway, i am hoping to fixup meta, and land it normally with tracker / kernel team routings / tomorrow EU time
[00:32] <xnox> i was just doing ubuntu-cdimage local tests and realised that all build scripts fail
[01:19] <xnox> livebuild kicked off, off to sleep
[05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.48 => 23.10.49] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[05:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxs-parse-sublike-perl (mantic-proposed/main) [0.20-1ubuntu1 => 0.20-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[05:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxs-parse-sublike-perl [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.20-1ubuntu2]
[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.26 => 2.765.27] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[06:52] <mitya57> ginggs: Sorry for the late response. Alacarte NEWS only says about updated translations. Anyway, this sync has been already accepted by someone.
[06:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nbdkit (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.34.3-1ubuntu1 => 1.34.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nbdkit [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.34.4-1ubuntu1]
[07:26] <arighi> apw, bdmurray, vorlon (or whoever is in charge) the current mantic/linux kernel in proposed 6.5.0-6.6 is regressing with the new systemd, but from the log shows it doesn't really seem a kernel regression (failure to download an lxd image), could we hint/ignore this test, so that we can get this new kernel in release? Do you see any problem with that?
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.49]
[08:15] <ginggs> mitya57: np, j.bicha already clarified that and i accepted
[08:22] <ginggs> jbicha: there's a webkit2gtk sync in the queue, but d/changelog is only "New upstream release" and I don't see any mention of it in the backlog.  would you please provide some context?
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxs-parse-sublike-perl (mantic-proposed/main) [0.20-1ubuntu2 => 0.20-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxs-parse-sublike-perl [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.20-1ubuntu3]
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> +What's new in WebKitGTK 2.42.1?
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> +
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> +  - Fix enable-html5-database setting to properly enable/disable IndexedDB API.
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> +  - Fix the build with GBM disabled.
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> +  - Fix several crashes and rendering issues.
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, ^^^
[08:40] <LocutusOfBorg> 600000l lines changed of documentation, if you drop that, the delta becomes really small
[08:40] <LocutusOfBorg> so totally bugfix only release
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-artwork (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.0 => 23.10.1] (ubuntu-mate)
[09:05] <Wimpy> Please accept ubuntu-mate-artwork/23.10.1
[09:18] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: thanks, I'd like an ack from the owning team though
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.1]
[09:22] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, please consider that build on riscv64 takes almost one week
[09:24] <ginggs> Wimpy: ^
[09:25] <ginggs> ricotz, seb128: i removed libreoffice/i386 from never_run, and now britney correctly considers is 'Not a regression', so manual hints for each upload should no longer be needed
[09:26] <ginggs> s/is/it/
[09:26] <seb128> ginggs, hey, great!
[09:30] <Wimpy> Thanks ginggs
[09:40] <philroche> Apologies if this has been covered already but I saw recent autopkgtest failures for a livecd-rootfs versions for mantic and the test logs appear to be related to `No space left on device` . Specifically livecd-rootfs/23.10.48 - see https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-rootfs/mantic/amd64 Is this cause for a Canonical internal IS request ticket for investigation?
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi (mantic-proposed/restricted) [9-0ubuntu1 => 10-0ubuntu1] (raspi)
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-firmware-raspi [source] (mantic-proposed) [10-0ubuntu1]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi (mantic-proposed/restricted) [9-0ubuntu1 => 10-0ubuntu1] (raspi)
[09:57] <ginggs> philroche: i suggest checking with qa-team first
[09:58] <ginggs> paride, bdmurray: ^
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-raspi [source] (mantic-proposed) [10-0ubuntu1]
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpiozero (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.6.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.0-0ubuntu1] (raspi)
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpiozero [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.0-0ubuntu1]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:20230926-1ubuntu1 => 1:20230928-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:20230928-1ubuntu1]
[11:23] <paride> philroche, hi, looking into that
[11:23] <jbicha> ginggs: new webkit2gtk point releases are bugfix and security updates
[11:23] <philroche> paride: Thank you
[11:25] <jbicha> could gnome-shell-pomodoro be hinted in? I don't know why the i386 autopkgtest failure is preventing migration (gnome-shell-pomodoro was removed earlier in mantic but reintroduced now that it works with GNOME 45)
[11:28] <ginggs> jbicha: re: webkit2gtk, thanks.  i wish there was some way for this info to be communicated for syncs
[11:30] <ginggs> jbicha: looking at gnome-shell-pomodoro...
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2.42.1-1]
[11:35] <ginggs> jbicha: hint added for gnome-shell-pomodoro
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mozjs115 (mantic-release/universe) [115.3.0-0ubuntu1 => 115.3.0-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[11:47] <seb128> I've self approved ^ since that's a copy over including binaries to enable the i386 build
[11:47] <ginggs> seb128: ack, thanks
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mozjs115 [sync] (mantic-release) [115.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[11:48] <ginggs> seb128, jbicha: as desktop owns libwebp, would one of you please comment on LP: #2037527 ?
[11:48] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037527 in libwebp (Ubuntu) "[Ffe] libwebp" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2037527
[11:55] <seb128> ginggs, ack, I've asked for some rational and testing on the bug, seems risky for no real reason (we already have the security fixes cherrypicked)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added mozjs115 to i386-whitelist in mantic
[12:06] <ginggs> seb128: thank you!
[12:06] <seb128> np!
=== Guest5602 is now known as ogra
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (mantic-proposed/main) [22.11.2-3 => 22.11.3-1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[13:08] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2035367/comments/1 is about that dpdk sync that just showed up in mantic-unapproved ^^ Please consider accepting once not a problem for any ongoing beta builds or any such.
[13:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2035367 in dpdk (Ubuntu Mantic) "MRE updates  21.11.5/22.11.3" [Undecided, New]
[13:25] <arighi> ''/quit
[13:27] <ginggs> cpaelzer: thanks, looking...
[13:30] <cpaelzer> thank you ginggs, If you need any more formal templates for the process or an explanation or any such, just let me know
[13:31] <cpaelzer> Oh I see it accepted, thank you
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [sync] (mantic-proposed) [22.11.3-1]
[13:32] <ginggs> yw!
[13:33] <cpaelzer> I did the related bug updates, no extra work on that end for you ginggs
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (mantic-proposed/main) [18.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 18.2.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-barbicanclient (mantic-proposed/main) [5.6.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.6.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-castellan (mantic-proposed/main) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.3.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-mistralclient (mantic-proposed/main) [1:5.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-neutronclient (mantic-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.config (mantic-proposed/main) [1:9.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:9.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-tooz (mantic-proposed/main) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-zaqarclient (mantic-proposed/main) [2.5.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-keystoneclient (mantic-proposed/main) [1:5.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-os-vif (mantic-proposed/main) [3.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-watcherclient (mantic-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-monascaclient (mantic-proposed/main) [2.7.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.db (mantic-proposed/main) [12.3.2-0ubuntu1 => 14.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (mantic-proposed/main) [18.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 18.2.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.14 => 1:20.04.10.15] (core)
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.log (mantic-proposed/main) [5.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.3.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (mantic-proposed/main) [14.3.1-0ubuntu1 => 14.4.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (mantic-proposed/main) [1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[15:07] <kanashiro> vorlon could you please take a look at docker-{buildx,compose-v2} in NEW queue for focal, jammy and lunar when you have some time? This is the special case where someone with SRU and AA hats could sort it out easily
[15:12] <vorlon> kanashiro: will have to be tomorrow during my vanguard day
[15:13] <kanashiro> vorlon ok, thanks!
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (mantic-proposed) [18.2.0-0ubuntu3]
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (mantic-proposed) [18.2.0-0ubuntu3]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnocchi (mantic-proposed/universe) [4.6.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.6.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please have a look at virtualbox SRU?
[16:12] <rbasak> LocutusOfBorg: I'm not on shift today, but pitti did *not* approve https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VirtualboxUpdates as an exception, contrary to what you've written at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#virtualbox. He merely said that what you described appeared to meet the policy (which is currently at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases and I don't think has
[16:12] <rbasak> substantially changed since then)
[16:13] <rbasak> What you've written at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VirtualboxUpdates looks like a good start though, from a quick glance.
[16:14] <rbasak> But for example you seem to be missing a credible test plan. "Install virtualbox, run VMs" is what the bug says right now and it isn't sufficient. I don't see any test plan on the wiki page.
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> ok sorry for my misunderstanding about pitti
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm really trying to remember what happened that long ago
[16:16] <rbasak> Sorry, I should clarify.
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg> and also, I got SRU for vbox since like 10 years, so this is why probably I thought it was an ack
[16:16] <rbasak> I'm not claiming anything from memory. I'm just going by the post you linked. That post doesn't read as an exception approval to me.
[16:17] <rbasak> Anyway, the wiki page is a good start - thank you for writing it up.
[16:17] <rbasak> The key thing is that it should explain how the package meets the criteria at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases
[16:18] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll update the test plan thanks
[16:18] <rbasak> I also suggest that you put a detailed test plan in the wiki that you intend to follow during SRU verification. Then it only needs to be reviewed and approved once, rather than on every upload.
[16:18] <LocutusOfBorg> of course I do much more of what I wrote there
[16:18] <LocutusOfBorg> sure
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnocchi [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.6.0-0ubuntu2]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-castellan [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mistralclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:5.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-neutronclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.config [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:9.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.log [source] (mantic-proposed) [5.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-tooz [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-zaqarclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-barbicanclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [5.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-monascaclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.db [source] (mantic-proposed) [14.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-watcherclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-keystoneclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:5.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.messaging [source] (mantic-proposed) [14.4.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-os-vif [source] (mantic-proposed) [3.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope you like it more now
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected edubuntu-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.2.4]
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected edubuntu-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.2.4]
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.72.4]
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-menu [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.72.4]
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dipy (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-2 => 1.7.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dipy [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.7.0-3]
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (mantic-proposed/main) [1.521 => 1.522] (core)
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (lunar-proposed/main) [1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2 => 1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mystic [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.4 => 23.10.5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:31] <xnox> vorlon: do you have time to check-in on x13s stuff?
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.15]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mystic [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[18:50] <vorlon> xnox: now
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.522]
[19:12] <xnox> vorlon: oooh
[19:12] <xnox> did i miss it?
[19:12] <vorlon> xnox: still here
[19:13] <xnox> https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/452363
[19:14] <vorlon> yes
[19:14] <xnox> is that comprehensible?
[19:14] <xnox> or do i need to explain myself more?
[19:15] <xnox> because it is needed for https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-cdimage/+git/ubuntu-cdimage/+merge/452162 to work
[19:15] <xnox> and review comments there addressed
[19:16] <xnox> also i hosed my laptop, so i need installer to reinstall it =)
[19:18] <vorlon> xnox: part of the description there isn't quite coherent, "noticing that binary hooks are called on a live years"
[19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.5]
[20:12] <xnox> vorlon: live layer
[20:14] <vorlon> ItzSwirlz: so ubuntucinnamon never had a size limit set which means it has inherited the size limit for a CD by default, which is obviously not correct. and the lunar release image that went out is bigger than the mantic image is today.  So I'm going to go ahead with a limit of 4.2GB which covers what's currently being produced.
[20:15] <xnox> vorlon: basically what i'm trying to say is that c00bbf3fb3 ("desktop: place kernel in the live layer") was completely wrong.
[20:15] <vorlon> xnox: ack
[20:16] <xnox> (attempting to do on desktop, what server image does, without realising that generic-hwe is flavour generic, and when there is only one of them existing functionality does the right thing, and for desktop / single kernel none of that custom stuff needed, and even subiquity hook used to only run on .2-.5 releases)
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: amazon-ec2-net-utils (focal-proposed/primary) [2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.20.04]
[20:28] <dbungert> xnox: kernel was in the wrong layer.  I get that you're objecting to the hook, but the other part was needed.
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: amazon-ec2-net-utils (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.22.04]
[20:41] <vorlon> xnox: ^^ I'm going to let you discuss this with dbungert first and maybe reach a consensus, perhaps that will save me time in trying to trace all the side effects of the --linux-packages=--initramfs=KERNEL_FLAVOURS=none
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parsinsert (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.04-15 => 1.04-15ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted parsinsert [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.04-15ubuntu1]
[20:59] <vorlon> xnox: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-concept/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu/+build/504032/+files/livecd.ubuntu.minimal.standard.manifest does not list a kernel.  But https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-concept/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu/+build/504032/+files/livecd.ubuntu.minimal.standard.live.manifest also does not list a kernel. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/689427027/livecd.ubuntu.minimal.manifest
[20:59] <vorlon> lists the kernel, and as dbungert says, we don't want it there because enhanced secureboot
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rust-convert-case (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debvm (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.2.12ubuntu1 => 0.2.13] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debvm [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.2.13]
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-xarray (mantic-proposed/universe) [2023.08.0-1ubuntu5 => 2023.09.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-xarray [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2023.09.0-1]
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.14 => 23.10.15] (ubuntustudio)
[21:45] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ^ This is for bug 2037676, which I'd love your input on. It's a dirty hack and makes me feel icky.
[21:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2037676 in ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) "ubiquity needs to use Materia-dark theme when launched from live session" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2037676
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uwsgi (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.0.22-1 => 2.0.22-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uwsgi [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2.0.22-4]
[21:51] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ok definitely not this
[21:51] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: That's what I thought.
[21:52] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: bug says "Materia is using the Adwaita GTK theme"; do you mean "ubiquity is [...]"?
[21:52] <Eickmeyer> Yes. heh
[21:53] <Eickmeyer> Updated.
[21:54] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: if you have to modify /usr/share/applications/ubiquity.desktop in this environment then dpkg-divert is the supported interface for that.  But you should probably move up a level and make sure GTK_THEME is set in the live session generally
[21:54] <vorlon> and then modifying ubiquity.desktop in the ubiquity package to include GTK_THEME in preserve-env is reasonable
[21:55] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, it's not. GTK_THEME isn't set as an environment variable in KDE, and never has been. They use their own way to set the GTK theme.
[21:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (mantic-proposed/main) [23.3.1-0ubuntu1 => 23.3.1-0ubuntu2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[21:55] <Eickmeyer> Go ahead and reject, that gave me something to think about.
[21:56] <vorlon> yes, but we can change the behavior there so that it is
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-default-settings [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.15]
[21:56] <vorlon> at minimum, in the live session
[21:56] <Eickmeyer> Yep.
[22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.3.1-0ubuntu2]
[22:59] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Ok, looks like this bugfix will be in two parts: GTK_THEME will be set by a file in /etc/profile.d provided by ubuntustudio-live-settings, and I'll file (yet another) MR for ubiquity to add GTK_THEME to --preserve-env=.
[23:00] <vorlon> sounds plausible
[23:00] <Eickmeyer> 👍
[23:01] <Eickmeyer> I tested the modifications here, and it works.
[23:03] <Eickmeyer> Of course, testing on other flavors too just to be sure it doesn't foul them up.
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (mantic-proposed/main) [2.27.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.27.0-0ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)