[00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nfs-ganesha (mantic-proposed/main) [4.3-2 => 4.3-5] (no packageset) (sync) [00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uwsgi-plugin-php (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.0.15build2 => 0.0.15build3] (no packageset) [00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uwsgi-plugin-php [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.0.15build3] [00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uwsgi-plugin-luajit (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8build1 => 0.0.8build2] (no packageset) [00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uwsgi-plugin-mongo (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.0.9build1 => 0.0.9build2] (no packageset) [00:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uwsgi-plugin-mongo [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.0.9build2] [00:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uwsgi-plugin-luajit [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.0.8build2] [00:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.14 => 23.10.15] (ubuntustudio) [00:42] vorlon: ^ That + https://code.launchpad.net/~eeickmeyer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/452423 = bug 2037676 [00:43] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2037676 in ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) "ubiquity needs to preserve GTK_THEME when launched from live session" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2037676 [00:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.27.0-0ubuntu3] [00:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-default-settings [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.15] === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc === chris14_ is now known as chris14 [03:37] dbungert: i see. [03:38] dbungert: if we are sticking with the hook, and everything works, let me propose two fixes that will unblock x13s with that hook in place then [03:47] xnox: Thanks. An eventual future where we can remove this hook would be great. [03:53] dbungert: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/452427 [03:54] so this ensures that .ubuntu-x13s. is used in the middle of the artifacts names. the suffix stays .kernel-generic (as not redoing auto/config logic of mapping flavour names). And then adjust ubuntu-cdimage code / debian-cd to rename all that to just "vmlinuz" anyway and use. [03:55] to be fair, maybe artifact should always be just .kernel (next cycle) [04:00] xnox: LGTM [04:07] but i guess still i should rerun livebuild of that [04:09] I've broken livecd-rootfs often enough that I'm running a PPA build every time now, but this one sounds safe. Guess that depends on SUBARCH though :) [04:11] and the set -u [04:11] and which environment that hook runs in, if any [04:12] dbungert: i think, in the past live layer was the first one. and then all other layers were _removals_ only which are small. hence i think the portions that install kernel are done "first layer" rather than "live layer" [04:13] (removed packages layer costs different apt/dpkg state db) [04:14] thus initial layer could in theory have all kernels installs, and then there is a forked layer which has one or the other kernel removed at the cost of 3MB each or so, which is then used by curtin to install to target. which should eliminate the need of the kernel in the pool. [04:15] and although non-uefi arches need to copy the kernel out, grub doesn't need to..... it can loop mount and load kernel from live layer [04:17] next cycle === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [05:22] waiting for my ppa to publish, and all other queues are empty [05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (mantic-proposed/main) [23.2.0~rc4-1ubuntu1 => 23.2.1-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) [05:54] xnox, juergh: mesa 23.2.1 released ^ [05:56] meh. I was just about to pull the trigger on my rc4 based pi5 package... [06:03] :) [06:03] rebase to this and I'll add it after the weekend? [06:04] probably needs to be tested on pi4(00) too, for regressions [06:04] note that this is still on the queue [06:10] tjaalton: juergh: rebase, or use the new pi5 upstream pull request? if that is different? not sure if pull request is against master or like a release branch and if they are are the same or not [06:11] Yes. I'll rebase and do testing on Pi 5, 4 and 400. [06:17] the upstream MR is against master, but I tried to apply it on top of 23.2 yesterday, and there was a conflict only on one file [06:25] yeah that's a minor conflict, already fixed locally. [07:27] vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/452427 => fixes the lack of subarch in artifact output; and otherwise doesn't change anything else. and kernel is in live layer. [08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libwebp [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.3.2-0.3] [08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.2.1-1ubuntu1] [09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.13 => 1:18.04.11.18] (core) [10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (mantic-proposed/main) [1.522 => 1.523] (core) [11:47] hello ubuntu-release, please accept thunderbird in the mantic queue [11:53] +1 from desktop, it has an important security fix included [11:59] ricotz, seb128 thanks for the info [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunderbird [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:115.3.1+build1-0ubuntu1] [12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpi-eeprom (mantic-proposed/main) [16.0-1ubuntu1 => 18.4-1ubuntu1] (raspi) [12:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpi-eeprom [source] (mantic-proposed) [18.4-1ubuntu1] [13:13] jbicha: i see another sync from you in the queue, nfs-ganesha, does this need a FFe? [13:14] from 4.3-3, 4.3-4 and 4.3-5 changelogs it seems some 32-bit support dropped [13:15] ginggs: it stops building gluster support on 32-bit because gluster no longer supports that. Doesn't matter much to me whether that sync lands in mantic or next cycle [13:17] well it's openstack's package anyway, coreycb do you want that ^ ? [13:18] jamespage: thoughts? ^ [13:18] I didn't realize nfs-ganesha was in main [13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: weechat-scripts (mantic-proposed/universe) [20230704-1 => 20230928-1] (no packageset) (sync) [13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted weechat-scripts [sync] (mantic-proposed) [20230928-1] [13:22] jbicha: in this stage of the freeze, it's seeded packages that need manual acceptance [13:22] jbicha: seeded-in-ubuntu is your friend ;) [13:23] seeded-in-ubuntu only told me that it was "supported" which is an odd seed to me [13:31] jbicha: 'rmadison nfs-ganesha' is also helpful, and outputs mantic, as opposed to bionic/universe [13:31] but it would be nice if it were more obviously in main [15:18] bluesabre: hi, I'm working my way through the oversized images for mantic, xubuntu is one of the lucky final 2 [15:18] Sweet, we're lucky! [15:19] bluesabre: documented limit is 3.0GB. lunar image was > 3.2GB, mantic image is now just under 3.2GB. So 3.2GB seems like a reasonable new limit to set, it doesn't seem likely you're going to get it down under 3.1GB? [15:19] vorlon: Yes, let's target 3.2GB. Hopefully we can continue the downward trend, but I know it won't be a fast process. [15:20] thanks, I'll plug that in today [15:21] We reduced our wallpapers this cycle, and our icon theme is starting to shed some pounds too. Thanks for the help and persistence! [15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (mantic-proposed/main) [1:0.9.7.5 => 1:0.9.7.6] (desktop-core) [15:29] vorlon: could you review bug 2033403 ? submitted yesterday [15:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2033403 in rust-gtk4 (Ubuntu) "FFE: rust-gtk transition for GNOME 45" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2033403 [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.2] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nfs-ganesha [sync] (mantic-proposed) [4.3-5] [15:32] coreycb, jamespage: i've rejected the nfs-ganesha sync to avoid leaving a loaded footgun in the queue [15:32] ginggs: thanks [15:33] please feel free to sync again if needed [15:34] jbicha: bdmurray is on point today for FFe reviews [15:48] seb128: hmm you didn't merge or upload https://code.launchpad.net/~eeickmeyer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/452423 ? doing now [15:49] vorlon, I merged but forgot to push it seems, it's done now [15:49] I didn't upload because I expect we want to also include new translations [15:49] but I didn't manage to work on that today... [15:49] seb128: ack. I'll upload what's there now, to give ubuntustudio folks time to validate [15:50] uploads are cheap ;P [15:50] ack [15:50] Thanks vorlon and seb128 ! [15:50] seb128: wrt translations, it seems we have not been very good at ensuring pot files get updated despite effort having been made to ensure this is in the beta checklist for the release team [15:51] :( [15:52] seb128: there was a source string change (typo fix) in May 2022. pot files were not updated for 22.10 beta. I attempted to do a pot file update for 23.04 beta but didn't follow the directions in the wiki accurately, managed to do a no-op update of the wrong pot file. sil2100 finally DTRT for 23.10 beta to update the pot file in the git repository, but then didn't upload, so it waited until a [15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:0.9.7.6] [15:52] full week after beta to be available for translation... [15:52] fortunately the string is a message for an error condition that I can't figure out how it would actually happen [15:52] so the impact on users is approximately 0 [15:53] but I wanted to mention it; our translation handling seems to have bit rotted a bit and we probably want to pay attention [15:53] hopefully translations for u-d-i are going well? but I don't have visibility on it [15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.5 => 23.10.6] (ubuntu-desktop) [15:56] jbicha: Is there a more compelling reason than "it would be great"? [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.523] [16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.6] [16:03] vorlon, yes, udi is using weblate which do automatic PR against the vcs and those got merged regularly [16:04] bdmurray: Some GNOME developers are annoyed that we don't ship all of the latest GNOME; updating the GNOME Rust stack gets us closer with no impact except for the 4 apps mentioned [16:07] jbicha: How did you test helvum if it failed to build from source? https://launchpad.net/~jbicha/+archive/ubuntu/rust/+packages [16:08] helvum was a local build using the PPA sources as a source; but retrying the build now after I republished pipewire to the ppa [16:14] now I've done a successful test run of helvum built from the PPA [16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (mantic-proposed/main) [1:23.10.6 => 1:23.10.7] (core) === lan3y is now known as laney [17:12] bdmurray: please let me know as well the decision on this FFe request, as there's a related upload in the NEW queue for it [17:14] jbicha: rust-convert-case debian/copyright says "MIT" for the license which should not be used; "There are many versions of the MIT license. Please use Expat instead, when it matches." https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ [17:15] and this is build-depends: debhelper (>= 12) + debian/compat? that's... archaic [17:28] the debian/compat thing is a team tool issue. See https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo/-/merge_requests/51 [17:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Merge 51 in rust-team/debcargo "Draft: Switch dh compat to 13" [Opened] [17:29] vorlon: do you want a new upload to change the license name to Expat? [17:29] jbicha: yes please === deathcollege__ is now known as deathcollege [17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rust-convert-case (mantic-proposed/primary) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2] [17:39] d/copyright.debcargo.hint also gets generated from the tooling but I've fixed debian/copyright [17:40] ok please NMU the tooling with prejudice [17:50] vorlon: what's your feeling on x13s? i see your approval on 1 merge proposal, approval form dan on livecd-rootfs one, and no comments / re-review on ubuntu-cdimage merge proposal [17:52] i feel anxious that it is not in, and we are heading into final freeze week [17:53] jbicha: and what is the plan for rust-process-viewer? I don't see it in the linked PPA [17:53] so pondering if need to prepare "concept" build instead [17:54] bdmurray: I intend to work on rust-process-viewer today. If I don't finish, Debian Maintainer Matthias Geiger will work on it this weekend [18:05] vorlon do you think you will manage to review docker-{buildx,compose-v2} today? [18:08] and one more now https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/debian-cd/+git/debian-cd/+merge/452477 [18:10] vorlon, jbicha: I approved the rust-gtk transition [18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-cairo-sys-rs (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-1 => 0.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-cairo-sys-rs [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-2] [18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-glib-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-1 => 0.18.1-2] (no packageset) (sync) [18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-glib-macros (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-1 => 0.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gtk3-macros (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.1-1 => 0.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-glib-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gtk4-macros (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.6-1 => 0.7.2-3] (no packageset) (sync) [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gtk3-macros [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-2] [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-glib-macros [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-2] [18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gtk4-macros [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-3] [18:16] bdmurray: Since you already reviewed the PR, can you please look at accepting u-r-u? [18:23] enr0n: I'm looking at it again and wonder what will happen on a server [18:23] with the font change stuff [18:24] Also I saw this "Execution in user context is not supported on non-local systems." when running the systemd-run command on a system to which I was ssh'ed [18:25] bdmurray: oh you're so right, I meant to add a check in there [18:27] bdmurray: I guess right now on a server it would just fail the gsettings get call and bail, but would leave an unnecessary log message [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-ashpd (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1 => 0.6.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-ashpd [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.2-2] [18:40] xnox: you have an MP approval, can you upload livecd-rootfs? [18:41] xnox: instead of making me write changelog entries and sponsor uploads ;P [18:41] kanashiro: it's on the list for today yes [18:42] xnox: and the ubuntu-cdimage bits adjust the default-arches and start it trying to build so I was leaving that until livecd-rootfs and debian-cd were settled first [18:42] bdmurray: please reject u-r-u and I will re-upload with a check to avoid running the quirk on servers/from ssh [18:42] enr0n: okay, I'm taking the afternoon off but will look again when I return [18:42] bdmurray: ack, thanks [18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.7] [18:50] tjaalton: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#mesa [18:50] has already been retriggered [18:51] but this needs watched [18:52] jbicha, seb128: libsoup3 is blocked by a bug saying there are test regressions on s390x; update_excuses sees no test regressions [18:53] jbicha, seb128 because a test was run with trigger=migration-reference/0&all-proposed=1. Oh. Oh no [18:53] the all-proposed was accidental [18:55] The server should disallow that combination, it's EvilBadWrong [19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ovn [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.03.1-1ubuntu0.23.04.1] [19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (mantic-proposed/main) [1:23.10.6 => 1:23.10.7] (core) [19:25] Ha [19:29] * Eickmeyer imagines StrongBad saying "Wrong". [19:35] "wraoawng" [19:35] lol sry [19:37] vorlon: ack. rc4 migrated without issues [19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gobject-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-1 => 0.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gobject-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-2] [19:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-graphene-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-1 => 0.18.1-2] (no packageset) (sync) [19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-graphene-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (lunar-proposed) [1:0.9.7.1.2] [20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.6] [20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind9 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] [20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind9 [source] (lunar-proposed) [1:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.23.04.1] [20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.49 => 23.10.50] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [20:38] vorlon: apw: please process NEW kernel for the new release image https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/2037451 [20:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037451 in Kernel SRU Workflow "mantic/linux-laptop: 6.5.0-1003.6 -proposed tracker" [Medium, In Progress] [20:38] xnox, ack [20:38] boot-testing passed on target device & in openstack, MAAS boot-testing still failing due to regressions in mantic release preventing MAAS deploys [20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:22.1.1-0ubuntu1] [20:39] then as soon as daily pops out, i will do install testing of all test cases [20:40] xnox: happy to leave it to apw, as I really have no idea what the expected process there is and rather than figure it out I'm going to continue reviewing things in the queues I do know how to work [20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:20.3.1-0ubuntu1] [20:41] xnox: ooh you folks have actual hardware boot testing? we don't have any for grub :( [20:41] I have a long and involved objective to 25.04 to get to extreme amounts of testing for it :D [20:42] juliank: it's available for purchase..... i guess ask your director to expense it. It will need POs. I will also ask Lenovo if they can send us some units. [20:43] xnox: i mean generally for hardware, we've got no testing infra and I do wonder what we can steal from kernel there [20:44] like when you test boot for new kernels you can also test boot for new grubs or shims [20:44] I know xy'pron has one of them fancy laptops [20:47] juliank: not sure how useful x13s is for testing though =/ cause some EFI stuff is interesting and we intentnioanally turn off access to lots of runtime services [20:47] I don't think it is [20:47] VMs running on Mac are probably more useful lol [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 (focal-proposed/restricted) [535.113.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 535.113.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 (lunar-proposed/restricted) [535.113.01-0ubuntu0.23.04.1 => 535.113.01-0ubuntu0.23.04.3] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 (jammy-proposed/restricted) [535.113.01-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 535.113.01-0ubuntu0.22.04.3] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [535.104.12-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 535.104.12-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset) (sync) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (lunar-proposed/restricted) [535.104.12-0ubuntu0.23.04.1 => 535.104.12-0ubuntu0.23.04.2] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (jammy-proposed/restricted) [535.104.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 535.104.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [20:49] juliank: yes, indeed [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-atk-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-1 => 0.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gio-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-1 => 0.18.1-2] (no packageset) (sync) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gstreamer-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.20.0-1 => 0.21.0-4] (no packageset) (sync) [20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gio-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.1-2] [20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-atk-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-2] [20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-pango-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-1 => 0.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-pango-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-2] [20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gstreamer-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.21.0-4] [20:54] vorlon: not sure how much stuff i need to seed on the .iso pool, or how to do it for subarch only? unless i am the only daily-live (because generic arm64 one is off?) [20:54] xnox: the pool is only for things that would be installed via apt from the installer; and I don't think there would be anything x13s-specific that fits in that category? [20:55] because everything x13s-specific should be preinstalled [20:55] ... except KERNEL [20:55] because that's in the live layer! [20:55] grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr [20:55] that's what i am thinking too [20:55] do we have per-subarch seeds? [20:55] in germinate? [20:56] cause we need to do intel desktop iso ; and oem desktop iso in 24.04 [20:56] (the ones that boot into intel kernel, and oem kernel) [20:56] i'm just the first one [21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sg3-utils (mantic-proposed/main) [1.46-3ubuntu1 => 1.46-3ubuntu2] (core) [21:03] dbungert, mwhudson_: ^^ ceterum censeo, nucleus in corium quam minimus missus est [21:03] xnox: per-subarch seeds: there are raspi seeds. I guess you get to make another ship-live-foo seed [21:04] xnox: or you can just put it in ship-live for arm64 because it's proto-generic [21:13] vorlon: xnox: if we know for certain that a given kernel is not going to be replaced, then you can just add it directly. This "in the live layer" business is about making it possible to make a different choice. [21:13] dbungert: it is very hard for me to do so, safely, in the same codepath that builds amd64 image. [21:14] darn [21:14] if an answer can be found, then subiquity will detect that the kernel is already installed, and not try to install another, even if you told it to do so by autoinstall. [21:14] dbungert: also i am thinking of the way to do it, in a way that you have catalogue "without any kernel, with this kernel, with that kernel" for both server & desktop, that "works" [21:14] such that if you choose the "default" kernel there is layer that is installable. [21:15] but not a weekend project. [21:15] because i want to abstract all of it too [21:15] as we need to be able to build "custom image with this flavour" without touching anything and just let it be. and yet be able to install any other kernel. [21:15] for 24.04 with all the oem fun [21:16] vorlon: google absolutely mangles your latin. "moreover, I think that the nucleus was sent into the leather as little as possible" [21:31] dbungert: perfect [21:33] dbungert: "furthermore I propose that the kernel is to be shipped in the minimal layer" [21:33] (ish; I made a bit of a hash of it too) [21:41] xnox: I don't want extra layers just to have different kernel selections available in squashfs if it's not something we're going to boot and need in the live environment. we already have a mess wrt minimal.enhanced-secureboot vs minimal.standard.enhanced-secureboot [21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [21:47] kanashiro: well, you have an unnecessary reference to LP: #1968035 in the jammy changelog of docker-compose-v2, considering that's not the package the bug is filed against [21:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1968035 in docker-buildx (Ubuntu Jammy) "[needs-packaging] Docker cli-plugin docker-buildx needed since docker.io 24.0.5 if using DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1968035 [21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected docker-compose-v2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: docker-compose-v2 (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (no packageset) [21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [s390x] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [s390x] (jammy-proposed/none) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [arm64] (jammy-proposed/none) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:02] ubuntu-release: Hi, momentarily I'll have a casper upload fixing bug 2000787. I'd appreciate it if we could get it in before the release. I wouldn't block on it for this release, but it follows policy for this part of the cycle (to the best of my knowledge) and would be nice to have. [22:02] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2000787 in casper (Ubuntu) "Live system cannot leave 'Lock Screen' when selected from menu" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2000787 [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [armhf] (jammy-proposed/none) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:02] (Extra beer for the reviewer in Riga ;) ) [22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-glib (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-4 => 0.18.2-3] (no packageset) (sync) [22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [arm64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-glib [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.2-3] [22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [armhf] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: docker-compose-v2 (focal-proposed/primary) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gdk-pixbuf-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.10-1 => 0.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected docker-compose-v2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [source] (focal-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gdk-pixbuf-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-2] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected oem-somerville-cinccino-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (mantic-proposed/main) [1.482 => 1.483] (desktop-core) [22:24] ^ That one. :) [22:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-buildx [riscv64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: docker-compose-v2 [riscv64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) [22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-aitland-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-aitland-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) [22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-adair-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-adair-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) [22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-barrett-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-barrett-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) [22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-adair-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-barrett-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-aitland-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-barrington-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-barrington-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) [23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-four-cc (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1 => 0.3.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [23:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-four-cc [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.3.0-2] [23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-barrington-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-calaminag-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-caitir-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-caitir-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) [23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-calaminag-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) [23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mailman3 [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.3.8-1ubuntu1~22.04.1] [23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-caitir-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-calaminag-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-tegra-defaults [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2~22.04] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-compose-v2 [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted docker-buildx [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] [23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted amazon-ec2-net-utils [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.22.04] [23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: amazon-ec2-net-utils [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.22.04] (no packageset) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-tegra-defaults [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2~22.04] (no packageset) [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected rust-convert-case [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] [23:34] jbicha: I do love that licensecheck tells me that the license of debian/copyright is MIT when the license string says Expat, tho [23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-convert-case [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2] [23:36] tsimonq2: so I have an upload of casper from you, and an MP from Eickmeyer that I think was raised after your upload? [23:36] the Debian Rust tooling autogenerates the copyright hint file. If the output changes for a new release it forces the maintainer to verify that things are correct [23:36] vorlon: Funny enough, that was related. I thought he was going to wait until I had that ready. [23:37] We were, after all, coordinating. [23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-convert-case [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) [23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-convert-case [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) [23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-convert-case [arm64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) [23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-convert-case [s390x] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) [23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-convert-case [armhf] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) [23:42] enr0n: oh, I like the fix for LP: #2036765 [23:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036765 in snapd (Ubuntu Mantic) "ubuntu-release-upgrader failed to upgrade snap to track new release" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036765 [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.7] [23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.50] [23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sg3-utils [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.46-3ubuntu2] [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-convert-case [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) [23:46] vorlon: Would it be easier if I took the diff from tsimonq2's upload, merged it into my branch, and you took the combined MR? [23:49] Eickmeyer: I'm going to review what's in front of me right now; and if I accept it, I guess I'll also commit it because uh this is one of those VCSes that not everyone who can upload the package can commit to; then I'll review your MP [23:50] Ok, fair enough. I knew it's not something that not everyone can commit to it (I don't think even Simon can), but I know that diff has to get into the VCS eventually. [23:51] Either way, the changelog entry in my MR is going to have to get bumped and the changelog merge isn't going to be very clean. [23:51] correct, Simon can't commit, but best practice is still to send an MP before upload [23:51] Right, which is what I'm surprised he didn't do. [23:52] I would've spotted that. [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-atk (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.17.1-1 => 0.18.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) [23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-libspa-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-5 => 0.7.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-libspa-sys [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-1ubuntu1] [23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-atk [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-3] [23:57] # temporary hack for LP#727783 [23:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 727783 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty) "Installing packages from CD repository fails due to changed CD-ROM default mount point" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/727783 [23:57] sarnold: I think I have a codesearch suggestion for you [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.483]