nteodosio | It seems that if you write any inexisting URL for autopkgtests results, it gets an unauthorized message, e.g. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic. | 09:42 |
---|---|---|
nteodosio | This is a quite confusing when the page doesn't yet exist (simply because the tests haven't finished running). | 09:42 |
nteodosio | What is the right department to file a bug -- or is there already one? | 09:43 |
seb128 | nteodosio, https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+filebug | 09:51 |
ginggs | @pilot in | 11:00 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic post-Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: ginggs | ||
rbasak | Eickmeyer: o/ bug 2033992 is showing in pending-sru as ready for Jammy. Is that status the status you expect, or should it be verification-failed now? | 13:12 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2033992 in ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] Change Ubuntu Studio Chat from Matrix to IRC" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2033992 | 13:12 | |
rbasak | enr0n: regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2036358/comments/28, would it be appropriate to retry these with migration-reference/0 then? I'm not supposed to release without the failures being clean, one way or another. | 13:14 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2036358 in systemd (Ubuntu Lunar) "systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade" [Critical, Fix Committed] | 13:14 | |
=== flag is now known as ppisati | ||
enr0n | rbasak: yes, I think that would be okay then | 13:18 |
rbasak | OK, all submitted, thanks. Let's see if that works. | 13:25 |
enr0n | rbasak: thanks! | 13:26 |
Eickmeyer | rbasak: That one is good for Jammy. It's bad for lunar and needs to be re-done for lunar due to another SRU that was attempted. I've been eyeballs-deep in fixing mantic bugs before final freeze. | 14:17 |
rbasak | Thanks. Released then, with a comment in the bug. | 14:38 |
jbicha | @pilot in | 15:00 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic post-Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: ginggs, jbicha | ||
ginggs | @pilot out | 15:01 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic post-Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: jbicha | ||
tsimonq2 | juliank (cc rbasak): I have a local patch building now for apt to suggest git-ubuntu on Ubuntu machines, when using apt source. Is this an agreeable approach? | 18:39 |
tsimonq2 | If I don't hear anything otherwise, I'll submit it to Salsa for a review. Any feedback, including how to get the vendor information in the cleanest way possible, would be appreciated. | 18:42 |
juliank | tsimonq2: This is going to need a new field in the Release file to specify a default URL for git repositories; similar to Changelogs and Snapshots | 18:48 |
juliank | You could set a default based on Origin though as both of these features do | 18:48 |
juliank | See apt-pkg/init.cc for the funny options to configure those | 18:49 |
tsimonq2 | Cool. What about usage of the `git ubuntu clone` command instead of a bare Git clone, does that seem like a | 18:49 |
juliank | And you can look at the 2.4.y branch for a clean backport of the snapshots feature for inspiration | 18:49 |
tsimonq2 | ..."hackier" approach? | 18:49 |
juliank | Hmm | 18:49 |
juliank | How about Vcs-Clone command | 18:50 |
juliank | Vcs-Clone: git ubuntu clone @SOURCEPACKAGE@ | 18:50 |
juliank | And apt includes "Run <Vcs-Clone here> command to get the source code for this package" | 18:50 |
juliank | I think this probably is the nicest approach | 18:51 |
tsimonq2 | That could certainly work :) if there is an existing Vcs-Git, would Vcs-Clone auto-populate with the appropriate `git clone` command? | 18:51 |
juliank | I have not formed an opinion on that matter | 18:51 |
juliank | Also what happens with missing git-ubuntu repos | 18:52 |
juliank | Some packages are not imported | 18:52 |
juliank | Maybe we can have launchpad figure out which packages have repos and add Vcs-Clone fields to the package entries | 18:52 |
juliank | :D | 18:52 |
tsimonq2 | That's a really good point; I'd almost like to ping Robie and Colin to ask for their input, but part of me thinks this belongs on ubuntu-devel@? | 18:53 |
juliank | Go for the email! | 18:54 |
tsimonq2 | Sounds good! I'll CC you :) | 18:54 |
rbasak | It's...complicated | 18:58 |
rbasak | git-ubuntu is convenient in that it'll give you _actual_ source used to build a package, but there are still some rough edge cases. | 18:59 |
rbasak | But if you are submitting a fix, then the team that maintains the package may prefer that you base your changes from a commit from Vcs-Git (or even somewhere else that no metadata points to) with which the git-ubuntu branch has no common ancestor at all. | 19:00 |
rbasak | OTOH, I'd like for those teams to accept git-ubuntu MPs since rebasing is trivial and that way it's the same workflow for every package, which is much easier for first time contributors. | 19:00 |
jbicha | @pilot out | 19:01 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic post-Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Bionic-Lunar | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
tsimonq2 | juliank, rbasak: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2023-October/042813.html | 19:08 |
mwhudson | what's the easiest way to answer "is this binary package in main" in a script i wonder | 23:02 |
rbasak | rmadison -cmain -aamd64 -sfocal mosh | 23:07 |
rbasak | No answer = not in main | 23:07 |
rbasak | rmadison -cmain -aamd64 -smantic mosh | 23:07 |
rbasak | Answer = in main | 23:07 |
rbasak | You could use -cuniverse to confirm for certain | 23:07 |
rbasak | (rather than just a nonexistent package) | 23:07 |
rbasak | I don't know how well that'll handle all errors though | 23:08 |
rbasak | Another way might be chdist + grep-dctrl | 23:08 |
rbasak | and looking at the Section field | 23:08 |
rbasak | Or APT-Sources | 23:08 |
rbasak | That's probably more reliable but requires setup | 23:09 |
mwhudson | yeah i cooked up something with chdist and indextargets | 23:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!