[02:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dovecot (mantic-proposed/main) [1:2.3.20+dfsg1-1ubuntu2 => 1:2.3.20+dfsg1-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)
[04:42] <mwhudson> dear release team how do we feel about uploading util-linux 7.5 days before release https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2037417
[04:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037417 in systemd (Ubuntu Mantic) "mantic images after 20230917 are failing to deploy with failure to mount root and kernel filesystems" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[06:51] <LocutusOfBorg> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4bb1ae3c13ce4fb72129229de66f5ffbcd45fe4c _doko what about updating gcc-12 and gcc-13? this is the fix for LP: #2038351
[06:51] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038351 in darktable (Ubuntu) "darktable FTBFS" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2038351
[06:52] <LocutusOfBorg> Eickmeyer, mitchdz mentioning the Debian bug in Ubuntu changelog, makes easier to understand next time Debian uploads to check if the same bug is fixed and the delta can be dropped. Even if Debian doesn't check LP, the LP developers know when the same bug gets a fix and can drop delta (specially when the fix is in a patch or somewhere else, we get to merge something that is a sync)
[06:56] <LocutusOfBorg> reassigning the Debian bug to gcc-13
[07:04] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. mentioning the changelog for Debian in this case helps understanding if the delta can be dropped even without a new Debian upload, because a gcc one will automatically make it build
[07:05] <LocutusOfBorg> _doko, the fix was backported also to gcc-12
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (mantic-proposed/main) [1:23.10.7 => 1:23.10.8] (core)
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted amazon-ec2-net-utils [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.22.04]
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libpisp (mantic-proposed/primary) [1.0.0-0ubuntu23.10.1]
[08:47] <xnox> sil2100: vorlon : uploaded libpisp it is NEW source package for pi5 picamera support. Please do thorough review. I think i am actually missing vendored dep copyright.
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.18 => 1:18.04.11.19] (core)
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.44.2-1ubuntu1]
[09:15] <xnox> and the question also is if we really want libpisp publically or not
[09:20] <xnox> because libcamera can build with it statically linked in as a vendored source.
[09:20] <xnox> and we have not yet tested this on pi5
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.42.1-2]
[09:21] <waveform> xnox, I can give it a whirl if you want -- I've got a few pi-zero cameras that should theoretically work on the 5
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (mantic-proposed) [45.0-3ubuntu2]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-django [source] (mantic-proposed) [3:4.2.4-1ubuntu2]
[09:23] <waveform> (but I'm not *that* concerned about having libcamera at release -- if it has to come via an update later, that's fine)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dovecot [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:2.3.20+dfsg1-1ubuntu3]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aodh [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceilometer [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:21.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate-dashboard [source] (mantic-proposed) [17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glance [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:27.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (mantic-proposed) [4:23.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted barbican [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ironic [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:21.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:29] <xnox> waveform: do you have the pi5 cable?
[09:30] <xnox> waveform: also libcamera is not on the rpi desktop images at all........ should it be? should pipewire / gnome-cheese thing use it ?
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ironic-inspector [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:11.7.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted magnum [source] (mantic-proposed) [17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari-monitors [source] (mantic-proposed) [16.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mistral [source] (mantic-proposed) [17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano-dashboard [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:16.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ironic-ui [source] (mantic-proposed) [6.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari [source] (mantic-proposed) [16.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:16.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manila [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano-agent [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:12.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:31] <xnox> waveform: ok, maybe i can give you a libcamera with pi5 support as we think it should be done.
[09:31] <waveform> xnox, a "proper" pi5 cable, no, but apparently cables from the pi zero's camera cable are compatible (they just lack the extra data lanes, but that doesn't matter on the older modules). And no libcamera isn't installed by default (which is why I'm not that concerned about it landing "for release")
[09:32] <waveform> anyway, more than happy to test any libcamera related stuff
[09:32] <xnox> waveform: indeed, maybe we should cancel libcamera FFe, and move it to SRU
[09:32] <xnox> and it means we are ready to ship rpi images
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat-dashboard [source] (mantic-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manila-ui [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted magnum-ui [source] (mantic-proposed) [13.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-sfc [source] (mantic-proposed) [17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:32] <xnox> cc: vorlon sil2100 ^^^^^
[09:33] <waveform> sure; incidentally, is the libcamera you wanted to test the one in the PPA we were using?
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-bgpvpn [source] (mantic-proposed) [19.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-vpnaas [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia-dashboard [source] (mantic-proposed) [12.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openstack-trove [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:20.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted placement [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:19.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:13.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (mantic-proposed) [3:28.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ovn-octavia-provider [source] (mantic-proposed) [5.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:35] <xnox> waveform: no, that one is old and not what we want
[09:35] <juergh> waveform, no. that is an early version. still working on an updated one.
[09:36] <xnox> tjaalton: i have mesa backport for jammy, and it is multi-step thing https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-concept/+archive/ubuntu/x13s/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=jammy
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-bagpipe [source] (mantic-proposed) [19.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-dynamic-routing [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara-plugin-vanilla [source] (mantic-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted trove-dashboard [source] (mantic-proposed) [21.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted watcher [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:11.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-l2gw [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:20.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted senlin [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:16.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zaqar-ui [source] (mantic-proposed) [15.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara-plugin-spark [source] (mantic-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vitrage [source] (mantic-proposed) [11.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] <xnox> because rust didn't do switch to llvm15 in full / correctly in jammy; and then i had to fix that up
[09:37] <tjaalton> xnox: rusticl is disabled in the current backport because of that
[09:37] <tjaalton> and can be
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:24.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-taas [source] (mantic-proposed) [12.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-saharaclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [4.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara-dashboard [source] (mantic-proposed) [19.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zaqar [source] (mantic-proposed) [17.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-arista [source] (mantic-proposed) [2023.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-vmware-nsxlib [source] (mantic-proposed) [19.4.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.i18n [source] (mantic-proposed) [6.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted watcher-dashboard [source] (mantic-proposed) [10.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:38] <tjaalton> but if you made it work, then that's fine
[09:38] <tjaalton> the sru bug is 2037604
[09:39] <tjaalton> which is still wip and tries to do too much, like llvm16 which didn't happen
[09:47] <xnox> ah
[09:48] <xnox> tjaalton: yeah our rustc is half broken in jammy; one out of 3 rust packages changed from llvm14 to llvm15; which is want causing things to break that want to use rust + bindgen during build of a new thing (like mesa)
[09:49] <xnox> tjaalton: yeah i want parity with mantic for the snap content
[09:49] <xnox> for firefox
[09:50] <tjaalton> okay
[10:56] <xnox> vorlon: sil2100: apw: please force linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency migration as it intentionally drops two dead end transitionals that should have been removed after jammy shipped
[10:56] <xnox> trying: linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency linux-lowlatency linux-restricted-signatures-lowlatency linux-signed-lowlatency linux-meta-lowlatency
[10:56] <xnox> skipped: linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency linux-lowlatency linux-restricted-signatures-lowlatency linux-signed-lowlatency linux-meta-lowlatency (0, 0, 343)
[10:57] <xnox>     got: 3+0: a-2:a-0:a-0:i-0:p-0:r-0:s-1
[10:57] <xnox>     * amd64: linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-lowlatency-hwe-20.04, linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge
[10:57] <xnox> or plesse RM binaries from release pocket of linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-lowlatency-hwe-20.04, linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge
[10:57] <xnox> to allow smooth migration
[11:35] <xnox> hang on, maybe i am confused
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: censys (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.2.6-1 => 2.2.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted censys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2.2.7-1]
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ipython (mantic-proposed/universe) [8.14.0-1 => 8.14.0-2] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ipython (mantic-proposed/universe) [8.14.0-1 => 8.14.0-2] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ipython [sync] (mantic-proposed) [8.14.0-2]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ipython [sync] (mantic-proposed) [8.14.0-2]
[12:28] <apw> xnox, did you bottom out on the lrm removals?
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: doublecmd (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.1.2-1 => 1.1.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted doublecmd [sync] (mantic-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bumblebee (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-29 => 3.2.1-29ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bumblebee [source] (mantic-proposed) [3.2.1-29ubuntu1]
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.54 => 23.10.55] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[12:42] <xnox> apw: yes, lrm-lowlatency respin incoming
[12:42] <xnox> apw: and it drops all the hwe-20.04 transitionals, which we will need to remove in the release archive
[12:42] <xnox> because pre-jammy transitionals are dead to us
[12:42] <apw> xnox, ok, ping when it arrives
[12:42] <xnox> something we didn't do right in kinetic
[13:21] <mitchdz> LocutusOfBorg: That makes sense with the debian bug. Thanks!
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvpx (mantic-proposed/main) [1.12.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.12.0-1ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvpx [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.12.0-1ubuntu2]
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grilo-plugins (mantic-proposed/main) [0.3.16-1.1ubuntu2 => 0.3.16-1.1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:15] <Eickmeyer> LocutusOfBorg: Absolutely hence mentioning the bug (and not closing it) in the changelog was important there as was the goal. We got it done. :)
[14:25] <mjdonis> hi, just wanted to inform everyone that I'll be taking care of release from the CPC side of things this time around
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.14 => 1:22.04.15] (core)
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.15]
[14:31] <seb128> the ^ grilo-plugins upload there disable plugins that are just crashing today because they didn't catch up with internet services changing (visible for example in the totem channel tab)
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grilo-plugins [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.3.16-1.1ubuntu3]
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.16]
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.15]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.11.19]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.14 => 1:22.04.15] (core)
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.15 => 1:20.04.10.16] (core)
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.18 => 1:18.04.11.19] (core)
[15:09] <seb128> ahasenack, ^ reuploaded with the extra space, thanks again for catching the error!
[15:09] <ahasenack> awesome
[15:26] <mitchdz> Could someone take a look at amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.20.04 in Focal unapproved queue, and push to -proposed if you are happy? Lunar is in -proposed already, and I'd like to test both Lunar/Focal together. Here's my LP bug for history - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amazon-ec2-net-utils/+bug/2037437
[15:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037437 in amazon-ec2-net-utils (Ubuntu) "Include amazon-ec2-net-utils in Jammy/Focal archive" [Undecided, New]
[16:40] <ahasenack> ricotz: I'm missing DEP3 headers in the arm64 patch you are adding to this upload, and am having a hard time finding the origin of that patch. I just checked https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/refs/heads/distro/lhm/libreoffice-7-6+backports/sc/inc/kahan.hxx and it's not committed there
[16:40] <ahasenack> ricotz: it would speed up my review if the patch had dep3 headers telling me where it comes from, why it's needed, which upstream bug is it fixing, etc
[16:40] <ahasenack> I would rather not have to clone the whole libreoffice repository :)
[16:41] <ahasenack> (ops, sorry, should have brought this up in ubuntu-devel, not here)
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (jammy-backports) [299-1~bpo22.04.1]
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (jammy-backports) [77-1~bpo22.04.1]
[16:50] <xnox> apw: is there 0day sru plan for 535 nvidia for mantic? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-535/+bug/2038292 it is currently lower version than jammy & lunar, thus it is unsafe to turn on upgrades.
[16:50] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038292 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 lower than in lunar" [Undecided, New]
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: masakari (mantic-proposed/main) [16.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 16.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (lunar-proposed) [4:7.5.7-0ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[17:46] <xnox> apw https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/2037969 is the lowlatency tracker ready for mantic to drop stray transitionals
[17:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037969 in Kernel SRU Workflow "mantic/linux-lowlatency: 6.5.0-8.8.1 -proposed tracker" [Medium, In Progress]
[17:46] <xnox> that's what's needed for lowlatency to migrate
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.55]
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.8]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari [source] (mantic-proposed) [16.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-scciclient (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.12.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.15.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[17:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phoc (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.31.0+ds-1 => 0.32.0+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phoc [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.32.0+ds-1]
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phosh-mobile-settings (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.31.0-1 => 0.32.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phosh-mobile-settings [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.32.0-1]
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (mantic-proposed/main) [45.0-3ubuntu2 => 45.0-3ubuntu3] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (lunar-proposed/main) [1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2 => 1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gtk4-macros (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3 => 0.7.2-6] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gtk4-macros [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-6]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.15]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.16]
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.11.19]
[19:07] <seb128> ahasenack, thanks
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.7 => 23.10.8] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:11] <dbungert> ^ implements fix for LP: #2036999
[19:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036999 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity: Wifi password not copied to new install Edit" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036999
[19:18] <Eickmeyer> dbungert: Thanks! That's a huge nice-to-have! One of those unintended netplan side-effects.
[19:20] <dbungert> Eickmeyer: Welcome!  Yea, not a great UX.  Congrats on your install, you get to configure wifi again.
[19:21] <Eickmeyer> dbungert: LOL
[19:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (mantic-proposed/main) [2.9.1-2ubuntu1 => 2.9.1-2ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (mantic-proposed/main) [4.2+20230508-6ubuntu1 => 4.2+20230508-7ubuntu1] (core)
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-scciclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.15.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:08] <apw> xnox, n-g-d updates, no plan as of this instant.  i guess we need an LRM respin against -release to go with that.  i will consider how to do that.
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.8]
[20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.9.1-2ubuntu2]
[20:25] <ItzSwirlz> hey release team, for some reason on cinnamon's image, when booting, the background doesnt seem to activate in the image (when you get to the try/install screen)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbmuxd (mantic-proposed/main) [1.1.1-3 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu1] (core)
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (mantic-proposed/main) [1:21.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:21.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (mantic-proposed/main) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:17.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: irqbalance (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.0-1build1 => 1.8.0-1ubuntu0.1] (core)
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aodh (mantic-proposed/main) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:17.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:21.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aodh [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:17.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (mantic-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[21:27] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-release: Does anybody have an answer to ItzSwirlz's question up above? He's having trouble with ubiquity-dm/maybe-ubiquity it seems, and I don't know how to answer that question necessarily.
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted barbican [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[21:28] <Eickmeyer> Seems as though Cinnamon isn't really supported as a DE in ubiquity-dm.
[21:30] <xnox> ItzSwirlz: it used to be "a feature"
[21:30] <xnox> i recall i tried to fix that on one flavour years ago.
[21:31] <xnox> and i was told look it is trying to load your wallpaper but fails, and it was shrugged off as "oh well" it makes things faster
[21:31] <xnox> ItzSwirlz: please remind me what is DE for cinnamon? and i can poke things
[21:37] <Eickmeyer> xnox: Cinnamon is the de, the wm is muffin.
[21:38] <Eickmeyer> muffin is a fork of mutter.
[22:05] <ItzSwirlz> The path to the wallpaper file is correct in relevant gsettings in -environment and -artwork, idk what else could be the issue
[22:06] <xnox> Eickmeyer: ItzSwirlz: gtk2 gtk3 ?
[22:06] <Eickmeyer> xnox: gtk3
[22:06] <ItzSwirlz> isnt gtk2 out of the archive?
[22:06] <xnox> and does that stuff, still do enough g...... what's it face, to trigger correct wallpapaer paint
[22:07] <xnox> Eickmeyer: ItzSwirlz: i thought one of those forks kept gtk2 going as a fork or something.
[22:07] <ItzSwirlz> cinnamon is all gtk3, it was forked from an early versoin of gnome 3
[22:07] <ItzSwirlz> The wallpaper is correct, in the live session it is showing the ubuntu cinnamon mantic wallpaper
[22:08] <xnox> what is the name of settings-daemon? is it renamed?
[22:08] <ItzSwirlz> cinnamon-settings-daemon
[22:08] <xnox> what is the expected path and key for it?
[22:09] <xnox> what is the expected path and key for desktop image?
[22:09] <xnox> hmmm we know about mate & unity settings-daemon
[22:09] <ItzSwirlz> org.cinnamon.desktop.background
[22:09] <ItzSwirlz> picture-uri='file:///usr/share/backgrounds/ubuntucinnamon/mantic/ubuntu_cinnamon_mantic_minotaur.jpg'
[22:09] <ItzSwirlz> [org.gnome.desktop.background]
[22:09] <ItzSwirlz> picture-uri='file:///usr/share/backgrounds/ubuntucinnamon/mantic/ubuntu_cinnamon_mantic_minotaur.jpg'
[22:09] <ItzSwirlz> picture-uri-dark='file:///usr/share/backgrounds/ubuntucinnamon/mantic/ubuntu_cinnamon_mantic_minotaur.jpg'
[22:10] <Eickmeyer> ItzSwirlz: To save yourself a headache you might think about symlinking that in the future. :)
[22:10] <ItzSwirlz> yeah that'd be good
[22:10] <ItzSwirlz> It looks like the way the desktop background settings is loading the images is actually causing it to not.. work (using a removed thing from PIL.Image) so that's a cinnamon bug probably
[22:11] <xnox> does binary on path called `gsettings` exists and is it used by `cinnamon-settings-daemon` or is it called something else?
[22:11] <xnox> like cinnamon-gsettings ?
[22:11] <ItzSwirlz> There's no 'cinnamon-gsettings' package
[22:11] <Eickmeyer> I'm fairly certain good ol' gsettings will work, iirc.
[22:12] <ItzSwirlz> org.cinnamon.desktop actually might be cinnamon-desktop lemme check
[22:12] <xnox> can you get into live session
[22:12] <xnox> then dpkg -S for ubiquity-dm
[22:12] <xnox> and then do
[22:12] <xnox> sed 's/mate-settings-daemon/cinnamon-settings-daemon/' on it
[22:13] <xnox> and then do $ systemctl restart ubiquity
[22:13] <xnox> and hopefully be dropped back into "try or install" screen and hopefully it will show that background picture is there
[22:13] <xnox> if yes
[22:13] <xnox> you need to submit pr to add csd = '/usr/bin/cinnamon-settings-daemon' and add one more extra else if before msd is started
[22:14] <ItzSwirlz> Ubiquity is now failing to start?
[22:14] <ItzSwirlz> PAM pam_end: NULL pam handle passed
[22:14] <xnox> horum, check what it complains about
[22:14] <xnox> and like kill more processes
[22:14] <xnox> or you can reboot live iso with `break=bottom`
[22:14] <xnox> remote /root RW
[22:14] <xnox> remount /root RW
[22:15] <xnox> and then sed ubiuqty-dm file from initrd
[22:15] <xnox> exit shell and see "clean patched" boot
[22:15] <xnox> and hopefully with correct background
[22:15] <xnox> there was a way to kill enough stuff to restart ubiquity-dm but cannot remember
[22:15] <ItzSwirlz> break=bottom as grub cfg?
[22:17] <Eickmeyer> xnox, ItzSwirlz: Restarting ubiquity-dm is easy in this case. Open a TTY (ctrl-alt-f3), login, "sudo systemctl stop lightdm; sudo systemctl start ubiquity".
[22:18] <ItzSwirlz> thats wonderful, just give me a few mins
[22:19] <Eickmeyer> Then, of course, getting back to GUI is easy, just go back to the tty and start lightdm.
[22:19] <Eickmeyer> (after exiting ubiquity )
[22:21] <ItzSwirlz> i got a cursor.. and
[22:21] <ItzSwirlz> nope
[22:21] <ItzSwirlz> still a black background
[22:22] <ItzSwirlz> it's no longer screen tearing though when moving the widnow, thats nice
[22:22] <ItzSwirlz> oh nvm it didnt make the changes
[22:23] <ItzSwirlz> sorry i dont really use sed
[22:24] <ItzSwirlz> Nope. Still no change, even with replacing mate-settings-daemon with cinnamon-settings-daemon
[22:29] <ItzSwirlz> OH. That's because cinnamon-settings-daemon isn't a command; I misunderstood you, sorry
[22:29] <ItzSwirlz> I'll try putting in csd-background
[22:29] <Eickmeyer> ItzSwirlz: I'm surprised the addition of xfce4-wm didn't help.
[22:30] <ItzSwirlz> how heavy would adding mate's settings daemon to piggy back off of be if i cant figure this out
[22:31] <Eickmeyer> ItzSwirlz: Probably wouldn't do what you want it to do.
[22:34] <ItzSwirlz> I can't seem to find anything.. sadly i have to go in a few mins
[22:35] <ItzSwirlz> so later when I get home at around 9 PM (yikes ill be up late working on this school project) I'll try adding mate-settings-daemon to the live session and see if it does anything
[22:35] <Eickmeyer> ItzSwirlz: Ok. Just FYI, we're past Final Freeze, but since this is an installer bug, it's worthwhile, even though it's relatively cosmetic, though I would consider it UX.
[22:36] <ItzSwirlz> yep :thumbs_up:
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (mantic-proposed) [45.0-3ubuntu3]
[22:36] <ItzSwirlz> it ended up in my junk section of my email :madge: