[11:49] <ubottu> lotuspsychje called the ops in #ubuntu (corey-aid bad news)
[14:08] <ubottu> lotuspsychje called the ops in #ubuntu (GUest1)
[14:15] <ubottu> nteodosio called the ops in #ubuntu (GUest1)
[15:03] <ubottu> leftyfb called the ops in #ubuntu (guest33)
[15:06] <leftyfb> @user/user9d , @96.76.125.161 and @69.1.99.3 are all hosts that "user9d has joined with to troll #ubuntu for over a year now
[15:06] <ubottu> An error has occurred and has been logged. Please contact this bot's administrator for more information.
[15:06] <leftyfb>  @user/user9d , @96.76.125.161 and @69.1.99.3 are all hosts that "user9d has joined with to troll #ubuntu for over a year now
[15:11] <Eickmeyer> leftyfb: I don't think you're being ignored. Just seems as if there's no active ops at the moment. :(
[15:14] <leftyfb> yeah, I figured that. But I'm also providing the hosts they keep using so both get banned.
[15:14] <leftyfb> it's mainly the 1st 2 hosts that they have used. The 3rd one they used once back in last May
[15:15] <Eickmeyer> leftyfb: Those are VPNs and it's impossible to keep up with those, so the best that can happen is *!*@user/user9d
[15:16] <leftyfb> Eickmeyer: 96.76.125.161 is Comcast, not a VPN. They've joined 41 times with that ip since last month
[15:17] <Eickmeyer> Interesting.
[15:18] <leftyfb> Eickmeyer: 69.1.99.3 is also a municipal service, not a VPN
[15:19] <leftyfb> so I'm not sure where you got VPN for either of them
[15:19] <Eickmeyer> Assumption in this case, I couldn't be bothered to research (it's early here).
[15:20] <Eickmeyer> Apparently user9d isn't too smart then because using a municipal service is a great way to dox onesself.
[15:20] <leftyfb> yep
[15:21] <leftyfb> though their Comcast ip shows the other side of the country. So it's sort of a tossup
[15:21] <Eickmeyer> Then they're likely VPN-ing into one of those.
[15:21] <leftyfb> I'm gonna go with the Comcast ip since they only used the municipal once
[15:59] <Eickmeyer> leftyfb: Sometimes the best course of action is to ignore trolls, but yeah, this one has been persistent, so I get it. It wouldn't be their first ban either.
[17:43] <ubottu> In #ubuntu-discuss, lotuspsychje said: !no 22.10 is <reply> Ubuntu 22.10 (Kinetic Kudu) was the 37th release of Ubuntu, support ended on July 20, 2023. See !eol and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2023-July/000293.html
[19:07] <tomreyn> ubottu: !22.10
[19:07] <ubottu> Ubuntu 22.10 (Kinetic Kudu) is the 37th release of Ubuntu and the previous regular release – Download at https://ubuntu.com/download :: Release notes at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-release-notes
[19:07] <tomreyn> ubottu: !21.10
[19:07] <ubottu> Ubuntu 21.10 (Impish Indri) was the 35th release of Ubuntu, support ended on July 14, 2022. See !eol and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2022-May/000280.html
[19:08] <tomreyn> ubottu: !no 22.10 is <reply> Ubuntu 22.10 (Kinetic Kudu) was the 37th release of Ubuntu, support ended on July 20, 2023. See !eol and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2023-July/000293.html
[19:08] <ubottu> I'll remember that, tomreyn
[19:29] <tomreyn> leftyfb: thanks. (and if this is now fully handled, could you please...)
[19:30] <tomreyn> Guest1124: i liked ogra better ;)
[19:33] <Eickmeyer> Guest1124/ogra needs sasl/identify. :)