[00:01] <vorlon> jbicha: rust-pango not looking like it's going to make it, autopkgtests looking rather stuck for rust-gtk on arm64
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231009.1)
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231009.1)
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231009.1)
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231009.1)
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231009.1)
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted etlcpp [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [20.37.2+dfsg-1]
[01:43] <vorlon> xnox: no dice on dkms.  iptables-netflow looks for `gcc` and can't find it since you dropped that dep also.  openafs and zfs-linux also fail, I suspect for similar reason.  Not going to wait on them
[02:23] <vorlon> base-files migrating, and dkms missed the boat per above
[02:30] <vorlon> xnox: and yes, openafs and zfs-linux are the same problem, they need gcc not gcc-13
[03:04] <vorlon> respins away
[03:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231009.1)
[03:07] <Eickmeyer> 2 minutes. New record. XD
[03:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Minimal amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[04:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected openssl-pkcs11-sign-provider [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[04:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Unity Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Cinnamon Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+icicle [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+licheerv [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+nezha [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive2 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010)
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+x13s [Mantic Final] (20231010.1) has been added
[08:23] <dbungert> I am investigating LP: #2038856
[08:25] <sil2100> dbungert: thank you o/
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libpisp [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu23.10.1]
[09:37] <GunnarHj> sil2100: Want to mention https://code.launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/453086 as a possible candidate for 23.10. But the foundations folks are not awake yet..
[09:37] <sil2100> GunnarHj: I think dbungert and bdmurray are looking into it!
[09:37] <sil2100> I just heard them talk about this, as they're here with me in London
[09:38] <GunnarHj> sil2100: Ah, good.
[09:39] <utkarsh2102> T-2 days! \o/
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (jammy-proposed/main) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.20 => 20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.21] (core, kernel)
[09:47] <LocutusOfBorg> !isitout :)
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (lunar-proposed/main) [20230323.gitbcdcfbcf-0ubuntu1.7 => 20230323.gitbcdcfbcf-0ubuntu1.8] (core, kernel)
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (mantic-proposed/main) [1:45.0-1ubuntu2 => 1:45.0-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-packagekit (mantic-proposed/universe) [43.0-1 => 43.0-2] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (lunar-proposed) [20230323.gitbcdcfbcf-0ubuntu1.8]
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.21]
[11:43] <bdmurray> GunnarHj: What kind of testing did you do of your font change? Neither dbungert or I can confirm the fix is working.
[11:43] <bdmurray> GunnarHj: The distribution upgrade dialog is corrupt at the end of the upgrade process.
[12:28] <xnox> vorlon: bdmurray: sil2100: seed change alone will fix x13s images to make them perfect https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/453233
[12:34] <bdmurray> xnox: perfect?
[12:41] <xnox> vorlon: bdmurray: sil2100: another option is to add those packages on linux-meta-laptop (which is wrong, but a good workaround)
[12:46] <seb128> hey there, as a FYI we have a regression on the desktop installer due to a recent subiquity change restricting the permission of the log directory
[12:46] <seb128> we will need to update the installer snap and rebuild the desktop ISO
[12:46] <utkarsh2102> uh oh
[12:46] <seb128> https://github.com/canonical/subiquity/pull/1830
[12:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Pull 1830 in canonical/subiquity "log: move /var/log/installer back to 0770 root:adm" [Open]
[12:47] <utkarsh2102> seb128: oh yeah, that's right, we're on top of this already
[12:47] <seb128> it's not only the logs impacted, that's also the directory where we story our telemetry records
[12:47] <utkarsh2102> I mean, this is known and it's being worked through
[12:48] <xnox> seb128: oooh, and maybe ubuntu-meta can be respun too, to make ubuntu-desktop on arm64 perfect, as per my above seed change.
[12:48] <utkarsh2102> :P
[12:48] <seb128> xnox, I'm not release team members so I can't help you there!
[12:48] <seb128> utkarsh2102, ack, I was just pointing it out in case it was not obvious that we will want to respin for it
[12:49] <utkarsh2102> yeah!
[12:49] <dbungert> seb128: one more please https://github.com/canonical/subiquity/pull/1831, the merge
[12:49] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Pull 1831 in canonical/subiquity "log: move /var/log/installer back to 0770 root:adm" [Open]
[12:50] <xnox> seb128: at least desktop team review, to ok accepting such recommentds on desktop-minimal on arm64
[12:50] <seb128> xnox, ack, seems fine to me
[12:56] <fossfreedom_> dbungert: so this subiquity change needs to be pulled into the UB installer snap as well?  Thus a respin of budgie?
[12:57] <bdmurray> fossfreedom_: yes
[12:57] <bdmurray> fossfreedom_: well maybe
[12:59] <dbungert> seb128: is the telemetry code in ubuntu-desktop-provision or directly in ubuntu-desktop-installer
[13:01] <seb128> dbungert, in ubuntu-desktop-provisioj
[13:01] <bdmurray> fossfreedom_: so based off those two answers we think you should respin?
[13:05] <GunnarHj> bdmurray, dbungert: I did: "sudo env XDG_SESSION_TYPE=x11 ./mantic". (XDG_SESSION_TYPE is otherwise set in do-release-upgrade.)
[13:10] <GunnarHj> bdmurray, dbungert: For me it works as expected with MATE, but TBH I haven't tested standard Ubuntu with the MP changes.
[13:11] <sil2100> JFYI everyone: we'll be possibly re-spinning all subiquity-based flavors somewhen today
[13:11] <bdmurray> GunnarHj: Hmm, I saw the distribution upgrade become corrupted but did not set XDG_SESSION_TYPE
[13:12] <bdmurray> s/possibly/probably/
[13:12] <dbungert> seb128: change is merged, subiquity_client stuff onward merges should now be possible
[13:14] <GunnarHj> bdmurray: Then it hit a 'return' statement early in the function. ;) I.e. the check to avoid that it's not run for servers and ssh connections.
[13:16] <GunnarHj> * stay away from double negatives *
[13:20] <seb128> dbungert, thanks
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (mantic-proposed/main) [1:23.10.8 => 1:23.10.9] (core)
[13:57] <fossfreedom_> bdmurray: sounds like UB needs a respin - but first obviously I need to pull in the changes - assuming they are ready - and then build the snap
[13:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.9]
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (mantic-proposed/main) [1:23.10.8 => 1:23.10.9] (core)
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (mantic-proposed/main) [1.524 => 1.524.1] (core)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (jammy-proposed/main) [1:1.7.0-1build1 => 1:1.7.0-1ubuntu0.1] (core)
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (mantic-proposed/main) [1:23.10.8 => 1:23.10.9] (core)
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.9]
[14:46] <georgiag> hi! can I get someone to take a look at and sponsor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032851 ? this is preventing some users from upgrading apparmor from bionic to focal
[14:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2032851 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "package apparmor 2.12-4ubuntu5.3 failed to install/upgrade: new apparmor package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Undecided, In Progress]
[14:58] <fossfreedom_> dbungert: I've pulled in the latest ubuntu-desktop-provision via dependabot ... but this time the snap has failed to build.  Any ideas? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/691240451/buildlog_snap_ubuntu_jammy_amd64_ubuntu-budgie-installer_BUILDING.txt.gz
[15:05] <sil2100> xnox: merged!
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2 => 2.13.3-7ubuntu5.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:18] <utkarsh2102> georgiag: hey! sponsored your upload^ :)
[15:18] <georgiag> thanks utkarsh2102 :)
[15:19] <dbungert> fossfreedom_: That's an unusual failure, I haven't seen that yet.  It sounds like network issues.  Do you get better results on a rebuild?
[15:20] <fossfreedom_> ... lets hit the rebuild again...
[15:29] <fheimes> could the @ubuntu-sru team please have a look at the powerpc-utils SRU for focal that is in unapproved?
[15:29] <fheimes> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=powerpc-utils
[15:34] <xnox> vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/453233
[15:34] <xnox> 1 one of them in main; 2 are in universe
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (mantic-proposed/main) [1:23.10.8 => 1:23.10.9] (core)
[15:59] <dbungert> https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/blob/928b7e37faa81aadd6d0fdb9147e2a87440e7b8c/cloudinit/distros/debian.py#L74 - locale generation in cloud-init, I believe
[16:05] <utkarsh2102> fheimes: probably see if RAOF or rbasak can take a look :)
[16:06] <dbungert> waveform: would it make sense to just disable the locale module at the cloud.cfg level?
[16:12] <waveform> very tempted
[16:44] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release (cc bdmurray): tl;dr lubuntu-update-notifier doesn't prompt the user at all for new release upgrades, and there's no graphical menu entry for it. I have local, tested fixes. It's kind of on the border between RC/0-day SRU/regular SRU so I'd like some thoughts.
[16:44] <tsimonq2> (And yes, it queries `/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade -c` to make that determination. :) )
[16:47] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: wouldn't that be for Lunar and not Mantic?
[16:48] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Correct, but I would like to assume the development release gets fixes first :)
[16:48] <bdmurray> pfft
[16:48] <tsimonq2> I mean, the versions in Jammy, Lunar, and Mantic are basically identical, so :D
[16:50] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: I'll happily prepare an SRU for the stable releases, what's your take on Mantic?
[16:50] <bdmurray> I think we could do a speedy release of the Lunar and let Mantic through as normal
[16:51] <tsimonq2> Sounds great, I'll get started :)
[17:11] <utkarsh2102> the day I find "the" client that just works and won't keep throwing me out, I'll be invincible.
[17:14] <fossfreedom_> Dbungert after a test install with the new snap /var/log/installer has 0710 root:root rights
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (mantic-proposed/main) [3.0.11-1ubuntu11 => 3.0.11-1ubuntu12] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:23] <dbungert> fossfreedom_: that is unexpected.  I'll test as soon as I can.
[17:39] <xnox> vorlon: bdmurray: the autopkgtest regressions are real for dkms and the fix is uploaded above diff is http://launchpadlibrarian.net/691257895/dkms_3.0.11-1ubuntu11_3.0.11-1ubuntu12.diff.gz basically some dkms whilst using gcc-13 to build the kernel module, use autoconf to "configure" themself and thus also need the gcc symlink to gcc-13
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (mantic-proposed) [3.0.11-1ubuntu12]
[17:42] <dbungert> fossfreedom_: what channel do you suggest testing?  edge?
[17:42] <fossfreedom_> snap refresh ubuntu-budgie-installer --edge
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.9]
[17:56] <xnox> sil2100: livefs build build-log has 'installing flash-kernel' failing for layers to be published to ensure it is in the right layer. but looks like x13s ready to be respun (when other stuff is ready too, i guess it is also affected by base-files?)
[17:56] <xnox> unless base-files respin already has happened
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: protection-domain-mapper (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.0-4 => 1.0-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:56] <xnox> muppet, probably did already happen
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted protection-domain-mapper [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-4ubuntu1]
[17:58] <dbungert> fossfreedom_: looks correct to me?  I see 0770 root:adm
[17:59] <fossfreedom_> hmm - I did two installs - both installed with 0710 root:root
[17:59] <utkarsh2102> uh
[18:02] <fossfreedom_> ... trying a third install... :)
[18:06] <dbungert> I'm 2 for 2 on it looking correct.  fossfreedom_: in detail, would you explain to me your test procedure?  I'm using the 20231010 ISO, launching installer, observing undesired permissions on /var/log/installer (0700 root:root), snap refresh to edge, launch installer again, observering /var/log/installer 0770 root:adm
[18:08] <xnox> vorlon: sil2100: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/debian-cd/+git/debian-cd/+merge/453255 if i could have a build of that without "--live" that would be nice.
[18:10] <vorlon> "without --live" yeah HBD
[18:10] <fossfreedom_> boot the iso (efi virtualbox) - snap refresh ubuntu-budgie-installer --edge ... then snap run ubuntu-budgie-installer - after install login and observe permissions issue on /var/log/installer - sudo -i and then ls -ld /var/log/installer dbungert
[18:13] <vorlon> xnox: merged, deployed, but I'm not going to try to trigger an ISO-only respin because I've never found that I'm able to get the set of knobs right to do it, you can get this when we do the respin for u-d-i or you can convince sil2100 to do it if he has the runes memorized
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info (xenial-backports/main) [0.18~ubuntu16.04.1 => 0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1~bpo16.04.1] (core)
[18:19] <fossfreedom_> third install - same issue.  I then tried boot the iso - ls -ld /var/log/installer  permissions was 0700 root:root  ... run the existing installer snap run ubuntu-budgie-installer - permissions on the installer folder didnt change dbungert
[18:20] <fossfreedom_> refresh from edge channel and indeed on the live iso changed to 0770 root:adm
[18:23] <xnox> vorlon: ack, i am happy to wait for u-d-i respin, as otherwise i am ready
[18:25] <vorlon> fossfreedom_: London is EOD, I'll be on point for triggering any image respins as necessary (assuming you don't have access to do this directly for budgie on the iso tracker), just let me know when ubuntu-budgie-installer is in the stable channel and you're ready for a respin
[18:28] <fossfreedom_> vorlon: we are ready whenever ubuntu itself needs to respin - i've just pushed the installer to stable,stable-ubuntu-23.10
[18:28] <fossfreedom_> 7.30pm London (which is my time) ... is very definitely EOD!
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info [source] (xenial-backports) [0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1~bpo16.04.1]
[18:45] <vorlon> fossfreedom_: thanks, respinning budgie now then, it doesn't need to be synced with the Ubuntu respin
[18:52] <dbungert> fossfreedom_: thank you.  I've confirmed the difference in behavior.  It will be addressed.
[18:58] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Bug 2038958 will be tracking this, I'm going for a quick walk to clear my head before I give this the final sign-off.
[18:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2038958 in lubuntu-update-notifier (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Add support for release upgrading" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2038958
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-update-notifier (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.5.1~22.04.3 => 0.5.1~22.04.4] (lubuntu)
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-update-notifier (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.5.4 => 0.6.0~23.04.1] (lubuntu)
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-update-notifier (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.5.4 => 0.6.0] (lubuntu)
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010.1)
[19:42] <slyon> xnox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qrtr/+bug/2038942/comments/2 (src:qrtr, pending security ACK), next up: protection-domain-mapper
[19:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038942 in qrtr (Ubuntu) "[MIR] protection-domain-mapper & qrtr" [Undecided, New]
[20:22] <Eickmeyer> About to test on Ubuntu Desktop Legacy, but we've got a nasty one: bug 2038883
[20:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2038883 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity missing auto-resize disk partioning option" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2038883
[20:28] <fossfreedom_> Eickmeyer: what's the size of the drive you are trying to-do a side-by-side on?
[20:29] <Eickmeyer> fossfreedom_: Standby...
[20:29] <Eickmeyer> fossfreedom_: It was able to do it the other day, that's why this is concerning.
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231010) has been added
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Mantic Final] (20231010) has been added
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Mantic Final] (20231010) has been added
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Mantic Final] (20231010) has been added
[20:30] <Eickmeyer> fossfreedom_: 25GB, so plenty of room when only 10GB used.
[20:31]  * Eickmeyer tries with 64GB
[20:32] <fossfreedom_> just trying to reproduce this on UB legacy.  With a fairly small drive, that option does disappear.  But a  little surprised to see it hidden if 15GB free.
[20:33] <Eickmeyer> OK, success: it showed up on a 64 GB drive.
[20:34] <Eickmeyer> Params must've changed?
[20:36] <Eickmeyer> Ubuntu Studio wants a minimum of 24.4GB now, that might be why.
[20:36] <fossfreedom_> I have a 25GB drive and have the side by side option for a previous UB install
[20:37] <slyon> xnox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qrtr/+bug/2038942/comments/3 (pd-mapper)
[20:37] <Eickmeyer> Ok, false alarm.
[20:37] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038942 in qrtr (Ubuntu) "[MIR] protection-domain-mapper & qrtr" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[21:53] <Eickmeyer> Great news: Edubuntu and Ubuntu Studio are both good-to-go, pending no further respins.
[21:53] <Eickmeyer> Holding back on marking as ready until I know for certain.
[22:07] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: thanks for confirming.  As of now we are aware of no critical bugs anywhere that would necessitate a world respin
[22:11] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Thanks for the help. I'll be around tomorrow for any last-minute amd64 testing that needs to happen for anyone. For now, we've had a sick dog and I was up off/on, so I go pass out now.
[22:14] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: feel free to mark the current images ready at your convenience tho, the flag gets cleared if we do respin
[22:20] <liushuyu> Hi release team, schopin and I would like to know if it's safe to upload the changes outlined in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/2036123 to mantic at this time. Thanks!
[22:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036123 in rustc (Ubuntu) "Remove Windows libraries from Rust source package" [Medium, New]
[22:24] <vorlon> liushuyu, schopin: thanks, let's treat this as an FFe request bug
[22:25] <vorlon> I've subscribed ubuntu-release to it and left a prelim comment, but I'm still reviewing
[22:28] <vorlon> liushuyu: ok bug updated, awaits your input
[22:37] <liushuyu> vorlon: replied as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/2036123/comments/4
[22:37] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036123 in rustc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Remove Windows libraries from Rust source package" [Medium, Incomplete]
[22:37] <xnox> vorlon: qrtr & protection-domain-mapper uploads incoming
[22:40] <vorlon> liushuyu: FFe approved
[22:42] <liushuyu> vorlon: Thank you! I have added the part about the SRU in the comment
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qrtr (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.0-2 => 1.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qrtr [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-2ubuntu1]
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: protection-domain-mapper (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.0-4ubuntu1 => 1.0-4ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted protection-domain-mapper [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-4ubuntu2]
[23:55] <vorlon> xnox: hmm the comment at the top of data/mantic/ubuntu-pool-amd64.packages is false, it also includes the Recommends of gamemode LP: #2034996
[23:55] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2034996 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Mantic amd64 daily ISO also installs i386 packages" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2034996