[00:03] <xnox> vorlon: it was correct when the comment was written, then it was stale forever, and then eventually i did regen, and at the time i recall chasing all of those new deps to check with desktop team if it is or is not expected to seed all of that gamemode i386 stuff, and they did at the time sign off on that.
[00:03] <xnox> and yes, after doing all that, i failed to keep that comment up to date
[00:03] <vorlon> ok
[00:03] <xnox> that was a few cycles back.
[00:03] <vorlon> I remember past discussion of gamemode, so I'm not fussed
[00:03] <vorlon> I'm kind of surprised an install pulls it in?
[00:04] <xnox> cause this cycle update was one library drop (merge) and rename of 525 to 535
[00:04] <xnox> vorlon: apperantly it's desktop-minimal
[00:04] <vorlon> no, I'm surprised that installing a system figures out that the i386 recommends need to be resolved
[00:04] <vorlon> unless this was implemented explicitly in u-d-i/ubiquity/subiquity
[00:05] <xnox> oh, that i do not know
[00:05] <xnox> i only know that those debs are missing from the live session
[00:05] <xnox> (or an appropriate layer to be more correct)
[00:05] <xnox> to be honest now that we do run germinate during lviecd-rootfs / ubuntu-image builds
[00:05] <xnox> i really do want to get my multiarch support merged
[00:06] <xnox> and then update livecd-rootfs to do that style of resolution.
[00:06] <xnox> because then i386 packages will end up preinstalled
[00:06] <xnox> just in time for them to fail with 2038 bugs
[00:06] <vorlon> pff who cares about 2038 bugs in games
[00:06] <xnox> oh i better hope all checkpoints & progress saves work
[00:07] <xnox> because otherwise......
[00:07] <vorlon> it's a 32-bit executable, having it believe that it's 1970 is a feature
[00:07] <xnox> i actually believe it gets stuck at 00 time
[00:07] <xnox> as in last time in 2038 blah blah
[00:07] <xnox> need to check that actually
[00:52] <mwhudson> something something time namespaces
[01:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010.1)
[01:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231010.1)
[02:30] <vorlon> look at those images respin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-N1yJyrQRY
[02:41] <kc2bez> XD
[02:58] <Eickmeyer> Was expecting "You Spin Me Round" by Dead or Alive. Still wasn't disappointed.
[03:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[03:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+x13s [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[04:13] <vorlon> fossfreedom_: hey, so, the last ~10 hours has been spent pushing subiquity changes through to validate that we're getting filesystem perms correct in the target system, and this only landed in subiquity trunk ~6h ago.  The only files in the target system that appear to have been confirmed to have wrong perms after install are /var/log/installer; but this was driven by bug reports from the Desktop
[04:13] <vorlon> team and justified an Ubuntu Desktop respin
[04:14] <vorlon> fossfreedom_: so, same issue you discussed with dbungert
[04:14] <vorlon> fossfreedom_: anyway, it's your call whether to respin Budgie for it, but the subiquity prerequisites are there
[04:17] <vorlon> xnox: I think you should double check that flash-kernel isn't marked for autoremoval after install with the new image
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011.1)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-arcanine-14-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-chansey-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-davos-rpl-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-arcanine-14-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-chansey-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-davos-rpl-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[08:11] <philroche> release-team: What is the current status of the ubuntu-release-upgrader migration? Cloud team are holding back on image build on the assumption that this was a release blocker. Is this still true?
[08:20] <bdmurray> philroche: u-r-u is not a release blocker due to the way the upgrade process works
[08:28] <bdmurray> fossfreedom_: we are still interested to hear about whether or not you want a respin
[08:29] <philroche> bdmurray: ack. We will kick off builds
[08:32] <fossfreedom_> bdmurray: I did a quick test of the rebuilt snap this morning - looked ok so I hit the iso rebuild button.  think it has completed.  need to check.
[08:38] <bdmurray> fossfreedom_: I do see a 20231011 image for budgie
[08:40] <fossfreedom_> thx.  Yeah the size is identical to yesterdays build. spooky.
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.9]
[08:58] <bdmurray> I hope the checksum isn't the same.
[09:01] <fossfreedom_> bdmurray: my bad - I forgot to release the snap to stable/ubuntu-23.10 - we'll need another respin
[09:05] <bdmurray> :-(
[09:06] <fossfreedom_> ... if you  want to take the positive out of this ... shows that the build process is very accurately repeatable ...!
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-packagekit [sync] (mantic-proposed) [43.0-2]
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-meta [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.524.1]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011.1)
[10:13] <utkarsh2102> T-1!!!!!
[10:18] <bdmurray> fossfreedom_: given the 20231011.1 you did a respin and succeeded correct?
[10:19] <fossfreedom_> bdmurray: first smoke test works nicely - /var/log/installer post install now accessible.  Didn't notice anything adverse when looking around.  Now trying a side-by-side.
[10:22] <fossfreedom_> bdmurray: this bug report sounds worrying.  Any thoughts? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntubudgie/+bug/2038965
[10:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038965 in Ubuntu Budgie "Installer not allowing completion of 'Who are you' screen before jumping to the slideshow." [Undecided, New]
[10:27] <bdmurray> fossfreedom_: Its vague enough that somebody should try recreating it
[10:27] <dbungert> this bug has no logs, but the same user is having mirror problems on LP: #2038987\
[10:27] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038987 in subiquity "install failed crashed with CalledProcessError (apt mirror out of sync)" [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2038987
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (mantic-updates/main) [1.524 => 1.524.1] (core)
[11:08] <slyon> FYI: I talked through the crash in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2038811 with danilogondolfo. (NetworkManager can crash on more complex 802.1x connection profiles during the "Netplan everywhere" migration). NM is auto-restarted and the crash handled gracefully. We understand the issue in Netplan and will prepare an SRU, it should not affect the release. CC seb128 sil2100
[11:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038811 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "/usr/sbin/NetworkManager:6:g_assertion_message:g_assertion_message_expr:_internal_write_connection:nms_keyfile_writer_connection:nms_keyfile_plugin_update_connection" [High, New]
[11:09] <seb128> slyon, ack, thanks for investigating and for the status update!
[11:10] <seb128> slyon, could someone also post some of those debug info on the report?
[11:10] <slyon> Yes, I'll update the bug report after lunch
[11:13] <seb128> thanks
[11:16] <mjdonis> @release-team hi, we have an image published now @ http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/minimal/daily/mantic/20231011/ . That's our release candidate for cloud minimal download
[11:26] <sil2100> slyon: thank you!
[11:26] <sil2100> mjdonis: excellent, thank you for the heads up
[11:31] <bdmurray> slyon: is this something you want SRU'ed post haste?
[11:34] <jbicha> ginggs: could you reconsider gnome-packagekit? It is "seeded" only because it's in https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/packagesets/mantic/desktop-extra but it's not seeded on any release images. The upload fixes a FTBFS
[11:43] <utkarsh2102> mjdonis: ah, nice, I was gonna ask :)
[11:44] <utkarsh2102> one thing off my list! \o/
[11:45] <utkarsh2102> mjdonis: wait, this is only a minimal image
[11:45] <utkarsh2102> what about the base images?
[11:47] <mjdonis> utkarsh2102 still building. riscv takes a long time
[11:47] <utkarsh2102> hah
[11:47] <utkarsh2102> okeydoke
[11:48] <utkarsh2102> mjdonis: could you ping me once we have both/all the images ready?
[11:48] <utkarsh2102> kajiya__, philroche^
[11:48] <mjdonis> utkarsh2102 sure
[11:48] <utkarsh2102> super! ^.^
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (mantic-proposed/main) [1:23.10.9 => 1:23.10.10] (core)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+x13s [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011.1)
[12:09] <fossfreedom_> @dbungert a bit more info here with a /var/log/installer tarball  - but really not sure what is going on.  I can't reproduce what the OP is seeing apparently repeatedly. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038965  ... any inspirational thoughts on this please?
[12:10] <slyon> bdmurray: we'll first try to come up with a proper fix. I don't think we need to rush that SRU.
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-settings-daemon (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.1.1.1-3 => 3.1.1.1-3ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.10]
[13:15] <ginggs> jbicha: I didn't see a bug in Launchpad, nor even a mention of it here
[13:16] <jbicha> ginggs: yes it doesn't have a LP bug, but I believe it would migrate within a few hours if accepted. Sorry for not commenting here about the sync sooner
[13:16] <ginggs> but yes, we would reconsider the sync with a FTBFS bug in Launchpad
[13:27] <jbicha> bug 2039053
[13:27] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2039053 in gnome-packagekit (Ubuntu) "gnome-packagekit fails to build because of test failure" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039053
[13:37] <ginggs> jbicha: thanks, i don't think I can resurrect your sync, would you sync again please?
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-packagekit (mantic-proposed/universe) [43.0-1 => 43.0-2] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wayfire (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1 => 0.7.5-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wayfire [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.5-2]
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nala (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.12.2 => 0.14.0] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nala [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.14.0]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rustc (mantic-proposed/main) [1.71.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu2 => 1.71.1+dfsg0ubuntu2-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-proliantutils (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.16.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.16.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-scciclient (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.15.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.15.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[14:38]  * tsimonq2 yawns and waves
[14:38] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: The short answer to your BR comment is yeah, lxqt-sudo takes care of that :) we did a similar dance with launching Calamares itself
[14:38]  * tsimonq2 grabs some actual stats to back that up
[14:41] <mjdonis> utkarsh2102 cloud base minimal download release candidate is published now @ https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/daily/server/mantic/20231011/ :)
[14:41] <mjdonis> sorry, I meant base download
[14:45] <utkarsh2102> mjdonis: great! thank you!
[14:46] <utkarsh2102> mjdonis: okay, I suppose you've validated minimal and base images links the right images and that I can check it off from my side?
[14:48] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: I'm willing/able/prepared to throw you a fix for lxqt-sudo ASAP if it needs it :)
[14:55] <mjdonis> utkarsh2102 yes!
[14:57] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: so environment variables are *not* being passed to do-release-upgrade?
[14:58] <jbicha> ginggs: I synced gnome-packagekit again, thanks
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ironic (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:23.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:23.0.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack)
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-packagekit [sync] (mantic-proposed) [43.0-2]
[15:00] <ginggs> jbicha: ^
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ironic [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.0.0-0ubuntu3]
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-scciclient [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.15.0-0ubuntu2]
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-proliantutils [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.16.0-0ubuntu2]
[15:02] <utkarsh2102> thank you, mjdonis! \o
[15:02] <coreycb> hello release team, apologies for the late uploads. I've uploaded 3 new packages for openstack to the mantic unapproved queue with fixes for LP:#2039055. if it's not too late, it would be great to get those accepted.
[15:02] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2039055 in python-scciclient (Ubuntu) "Revert switch from pysnmp4 (Build-)Dependency to lextudio pysnmp" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039055
[15:05] <bdmurray> coreycb: new packages will require archive admin review
[15:06] <coreycb> bdmurray: ok thanks. I'll highlight ubuntu-archive for that request.
[15:07] <vorlon> coreycb, bdmurray: scrollback shows they were auto-accepted
[15:07] <coreycb> vorlon: oh yes, they were. great, thanks.
[15:08] <ginggs> i accepted the openstack uploads
[15:09] <ginggs> they are in a packageset
[15:11] <vorlon> ah
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rustc [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.71.1+dfsg0ubuntu2-0ubuntu1]
[15:11] <vorlon> sorry, I see, the confusion was coreycb said "new packages" but they're not NEW packages :)
[15:12] <coreycb> ah, yeah, sorry!
[15:18] <xnox> sil2100: vorlon: bdmurray: please respin project ubuntu arches arm64 subarch x13s --live to pick up ubuntu-desktop-installer revision 1262; amd64 unchanged.
[15:19] <vorlon> xnox: sil2100: bdmurray:
[15:19] <vorlon> doing
[15:20] <xnox> will be at tennis 6pm-7pm so can test it then when it pops out
[15:20] <xnox> otherwise mclemenceau can test it too
[15:20] <vorlon> respinning now
[15:20] <xnox> and if all good, it will be good for release and prepublsihing
[15:21] <xnox> sure but livefs build takes a while
[16:02] <mclemenceau> vorlon: Ack, happy to test the latest when available, let me know!
[16:07] <vorlon> mclemenceau: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/449/builds/288399/testcases -> "subscribe" :-)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-compute-runtime (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.35~git20230926-1 => 23.35.27191.9-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-compute-runtime [sync] (mantic-proposed) [23.35.27191.9-1]
[16:41] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Negative.
[16:41] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: At least, not the one you mentioned.
[16:42] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Let me add an argument to lxqt-sudo bypassing that, and I'll follow up with a new set of uploads.
[16:42] <tsimonq2> vorlon: ^^^ (might want to get up to speed if Brian is EOD :) )
[16:42] <tsimonq2> If it *needs* to be an SRU for Mantic at this point, say the word, otherwise I'm prepared to finish testing with this.
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+x13s [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011.2)
[17:02] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: I asked a NOT question and you responded negative so that means yes?
[17:14] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Let me state it clearly: no, it does not expose *that* environment variable. :)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+icicle [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+licheerv [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+nezha [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive2 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity riscv64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxqt-sudo (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu2] (lubuntu)
[17:18] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: Ideally we'd pass all environment variables
[17:18] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: See the lxqt-sudo upload :)
[17:18] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: is there one for lunar?
[17:20] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: In progress
[17:21] <bdmurray> I'll try and be more patient
[17:21] <tsimonq2> Despite the two cups of coffee I've had this morning, I still feel like I'm not typing fast enough and it's not you :)
[17:22] <tsimonq2> I'd estimate 10-15 minutes before I have uploads ready, add another 10-15 for the SRU template
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-update-notifier (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.5.4 => 0.6.1] (lubuntu)
[17:23] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Anyway, you have the Mantic upload in the queue ^ so if you're inclined to process that separately, go for it
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lubuntu-update-notifier [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.6.0]
[17:32] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: thinking about it there should probably be a versioned dep from lubuntu-update-notifier on lxqt-sudo.
[17:32] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Isn't there?
[17:32] <tsimonq2> :)
[17:32] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: Maybe I'll look
[17:34] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: Okay, there is but we really want the lunar lxqt-sudo update though
[17:34] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Patches done locally, I'm writing the SRU as we speak
[17:37] <vorlon> tsimonq2: I expect we want this as an SRU for mantic also, since it's not relevant to the install images, so acceptance should gate on that SRU writing
[17:37] <tsimonq2> "Where problems could occur" - always the hardest part ;)
[17:37] <tsimonq2> vorlon: ack :)
[17:39] <vorlon> tsimonq2: which means I'm going to reject lxqt-sudo, because even if you weren't targeting SRU, per the freeze email we want bug links in the changelog for anything uploaded to the queue at this point
[17:39] <tsimonq2> vorlon: ack, re-uploading in 2s
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lxqt-sudo [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu2]
[17:42] <tsimonq2> vorlon, bdmurray: bug 2039093
[17:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2039093 in lxqt-sudo (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Add -E support to lxqt-sudo" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039093
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxqt-sudo (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu1.1] (lubuntu)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxqt-sudo (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.2.0-1ubuntu1.1] (lubuntu)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxqt-sudo (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.17.0-0ubuntu1.1] (lubuntu)
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-update-notifier (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.5.4 => 0.6.0~23.04.2] (lubuntu)
[17:49]  * tsimonq2 passes the ball back
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-update-notifier (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.5.1~22.04.3 => 0.5.1~22.04.5] (lubuntu)
[17:50]  * tsimonq2 wonders if lubuntu-update-notifier/mantic/UNAPPROVED needs a new version or if it's cool.
[17:52] <vorlon> it has a bug ref
[17:59] <tsimonq2> *shrug* cool, I'll be around for testing if accepted :)
[18:10] <vorlon> tsimonq2: as it's not really coupled to the release, I'm going to leave it to the standard SRU process
[18:11] <tsimonq2> vorlon: No worries, thanks for your help.
[18:14]  * waveform pokes his head out of the bunker of pi ...
[18:15] <waveform> "so, hey ... how would the release team feel about re-spinning the raspi images?"
[18:15] <waveform> (I've just figured out a fix for the 3B+ ethernet issue)
[18:15] <waveform> which would require a tweak to the ubuntu-raspi-settings package
[18:16] <tsimonq2> 🥳
[19:00] <jbicha> waveform: ubuntu-raspi-settings is the same source package as ubuntu-settings so would need respins of Edubuntu, Kylin, Unity & Ubuntu Desktop
[19:02] <Eickmeyer> The question is, can it be 0-day SRU or is it necessary for the .img images?
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[19:22] <vorlon> waveform: hi
[19:24] <vorlon> waveform: hard NACK for anything that changes the ubuntu-settings source package, which would require respins of the other images also, but let's talk
[19:24] <jawn-smith> vorlon: o/
[19:24] <vorlon> jawn-smith: hey ther
[19:24] <vorlon> e
[19:24] <jawn-smith> Obviously waveform is the expert but I may be able to speak to some technical details of that bug if you need
[19:25] <vorlon> jawn-smith: I want the technical details of the fix, if you can speak to that :)
[19:26] <vorlon> jawn-smith: is this LP: #2038964?
[19:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038964 in ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu) "raspi ethernet rename is racy" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2038964
[19:26] <jawn-smith> Yes
[19:26] <jawn-smith> https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+git/ubuntu-settings/+merge/453340
[19:27] <xnox> vorlon: arm64+x13s passed, and can be marked ready for release.
[19:27] <vorlon> xnox: sw3333t
[19:27] <jawn-smith> TL;DR is that you go into /lib/systemd/network/10-raspi-eth0.link and change the OriginalName= line
[19:28] <vorlon> jawn-smith: so it is definitively a bug in the contents of a file shipped in the ubuntu-raspi-settings binary package and we should in no way attempt to bypass that binary package in fixing this bug. check
[19:28] <vorlon> jawn-smith, waveform which brings me to my outside-the-box suggestion that the ubuntu-raspi-settings package doesn't have to be built from the ubuntu-settings source package
[19:29] <vorlon> why NOT change that the day before release?
[19:29] <jawn-smith> The actual difference as far as I understand it is in kernel 6.2.0 vs 6.5.0, and this change to the .link file is more of a workaround
[19:29] <vorlon> ok well you're clearly not getting a new kernel before tomorrow so
[19:30] <jawn-smith> definitely not
[19:31] <vorlon> jawn-smith: I would fast track an upload of a new ubuntu-raspi-settings source package that clones the existing ubuntu-settings source but does not build the ubuntu-settings binary package and includes the fix for this bug
[19:31] <jawn-smith> Are you asking me to make that package?
[19:31] <vorlon> you're a core-dev, right? you can upload it :-)
[19:32] <jawn-smith> Wouldn't this require a seed change too?
[19:32] <vorlon> nope
[19:32] <vorlon> I would slip the package into main during queue review, add a team subscriber to the package in launchpad, and everything else stays the same
[19:33] <vorlon> for follow-through, we would also need to update ubuntu-settings to stop building ubuntu-raspi-settings and would want to upload that to mantic-proposed, because otherwise that package can't be SRUed
[19:38]  * Eickmeyer 's head explodes, but is glad Edubuntu doesn't have to respin
[19:38] <jawn-smith> I'm making the new source package
[19:38] <Eickmeyer> jawn-smith: Good to read you!
[19:38] <jawn-smith> o/ good to be active again
[19:53] <jawn-smith> uploaded it to a PPA but the build failed. Investigating
[19:54] <waveform> right, back again -- let me read the back-scroll
[19:57] <waveform> okay, all caught up -- suggestion for a new ubuntu-raspi-settings source package sounds excellent to me; the raspi-related bits of ubuntu-settings are basically an overgrown carbunkle on the side of that package anyway
[19:57] <tsimonq2> 🤸🤸🤸
[19:58] <jawn-smith> cool, I'm putting that together but admittedly my packaging is a little rusty
[19:59] <waveform> okay, yell if you need me to take over or test or what have you
[20:00] <jbicha> bdmurray: I am having trouble getting an upgrade of Ubuntu MATE from 23.04 to 23.10 to use ubuntu-release-upgrader 23.10* it has 23.04.6 installed instead until too late in the upgrade
[20:00] <vorlon> waveform: this is a respin for all 3 raspi images including Desktop.  If we do this, what's the plan for qualifying the final images for release?
[20:00] <waveform> vorlon, large quantities of caffeine and a late morning tomorrow?
[20:01] <vorlon> jbicha: what are you expecting to see?  are you looking for the fixes from 1:23.10.10?
[20:01] <jbicha> vorlon: yes. I thought that update-manager was supposed to use mantic's u-r-u
[20:01] <vorlon> waveform: so how long end-to-end does it take you to test everything you are planning to test between now and then?
[20:02] <vorlon> jbicha: which has not been published yet in mantic-updates
[20:02] <vorlon> jbicha: no, sorry, it looks like maybe it has now http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/mantic-updates/main/binary-amd64/
[20:03] <vorlon> jbicha: however, bdmurray indicated he needed to make a change to the meta-releases file to point at -updates
[20:03] <waveform> well, starting at 10ish this morning I *just* about finished testing everything by 19:00. So realistically, no I'm not going to re-test everything before I collapse tonight. However, I can re-test, let's say 2B, 3B+, Zero 2W, a single 4B (little point doing 2GB, 4GB, 8GB, and 400 for this as they're all equivalent hardware for this change), 5B and a CM4 for good measure
[20:04] <jawn-smith> vorlon: I could do some tests tomorrow as well
[20:04] <jawn-smith> though I don't have a 5B and my CM4 board seems to be a brick
[20:04] <jbicha> ok, this was what apt in Ubuntu MATE was seeing during the upgrade: https://bicha.net/i/ubuntu-mate-lunar-mantic-upgrade.png
[20:05] <vorlon> waveform: you should expect ~2h from the time I get an upload to the NEW queue to the time the first image is spit out
[20:05] <vorlon> jbicha: yes, it is published now, I was slightly out of date wrt that.  The package in the target release is irrelevant to what is used for the upgrader
[20:06] <vorlon> that comes from the release upgrader tarball, and nothing yet points to the new tarball in mantic-updates
[20:07] <jbicha> ok
[20:08] <waveform> vorlon, fair enough and yes I can still get some useful testing done tonight if jawn-smith (or me) is quick about splitting the package
[20:09] <jawn-smith> well hey waveform do you want to go take a look at the new source package I put in a PPA called raspackages? Version number is definitely wrong but could you review the rest?
[20:09] <waveform> on it
[20:10] <vorlon> jbicha: for reference: https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-development
[20:10] <vorlon> jawn-smith, waveform: to be clear from my side it's a lot easier to review this with both AA and Release hats if the source is identical to ubuntu-settings except for dropping the non-raspi binary packages from debian/control
[20:11] <waveform> ack
[20:11] <vorlon> (easier and therefore faster)
[20:13] <jawn-smith> vorlon: that's pretty much what I did, but meson.build also needed some changes to make it build successfully
[20:13] <vorlon> ack
[20:13] <jawn-smith> it probably needs some other packaging updates as well, my attention is somewhat divided at the moment
[20:36] <jawn-smith> vorlon: uploaded
[20:36]  * vorlon rubs his hands together
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-raspi-settings (mantic-proposed/primary) [23.10.6]
[20:38] <jawn-smith> vorlon: what TZ are you in this week?
[20:38] <vorlon> jawn-smith: PT
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+x13s [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[20:39] <vorlon> jawn-smith: I won't require a reupload but the Vcs-Git for this almost certainly shouldn't go under ~ubuntu-desktop
[20:39] <jawn-smith> Cool. Hello from the other coast
[20:39] <jawn-smith> Yeah I was wondering about that line :)
[20:40] <mwhudson> jawn-smith: vorlon is on internet time, always
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-raspi-settings [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.6]
[20:40] <vorlon> but not https://www.swatch.com/en-us/internet-time.html
[20:42] <jawn-smith> Hey mwhudson, long time no see
[20:42] <mwhudson> oh right not that
[20:42] <mwhudson> jawn-smith: howdy
[20:43] <jawn-smith> I don't live in TX anymore!

[20:44] <mwhudson> jawn-smith: what is the philly equivalent? i could be rude and say the sound of gunfire?
[20:44] <jawn-smith> yeah cause TX didn't have any guns...
[20:44] <vorlon> mwhudson: it would be rude to suggest that because ^^
[20:45] <mwhudson> true
[20:45] <jawn-smith> This time of year our traditional greeting is "go birds" in honor of our football team
[20:47] <vorlon> waveform, jawn-smith: to make sure we don't fail to clean this up: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2039104
[20:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2039104 in ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Mantic) "ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control" [Undecided, New]
[20:48] <waveform> vorlon, thanks
[20:48] <vorlon> waveform, jawn-smith: also we should make sure to fix the maintainer field for ubuntu-raspi-settings which I overlooked was 'Desktop'
[20:49] <jawn-smith> yeah I wasn't sure about that either
[20:49] <waveform> yeah, there's a ton of other stuff that can be deleted (debian/ubuntu-settings.* and a bunch of stuff outside debian/ too); I'll stick it on my list
[20:50] <vorlon> sure.  that stuff's just vestigial, vs being outright incorrect :)
[20:52] <jawn-smith> Dave and I discussed getting rid of some of the vestigial stuff but decided to ignore it to make the diff as minimal as possible
[20:52] <jawn-smith> for ease of review
[20:53] <vorlon> yes thank you
[20:59] <jawn-smith> So we'll have images in a little under 2 hours?
[21:01] <vorlon> jawn-smith: that is the target timeline. the package is built and published according to launchpad but needs to be seen by https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html, then copied to the release pocket, then publisher run, then I kick off image builds
[21:01] <vorlon> last raspi server image build took ~40m, desktop ~65m
[21:06] <jawn-smith> cool, I'm gonna go hop on the bike then
[21:12] <vorlon> the publisher will take a bit of time right now, there are both jammy SRU releases and focal security updates getting published in this round.  But the above estimate stands
[21:14] <vorlon> 2023-10-11 21:14:34 DEBUG   Skipping release files for warty/BACKPORTS
[21:14] <vorlon> I mean, good
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Minimal amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qviaggiatreno (mantic-proposed/universe) [2013.7.3-10 => 2013.7.3-12] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qviaggiatreno [sync] (mantic-proposed) [2013.7.3-12]
[21:27] <Eickmeyer> I need to try again, but just had a nasty upgade test fail for Edubuntu: bug 2039107. Log says I/O error, but that seems highly unlikely, hence I'm going to test again.
[21:27] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2039107 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "package linux-image-6.5.0-9-generic 6.5.0-9.9 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1" [Critical, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039107
[21:32] <ahasenack>  full /boot perhaps?
[21:33] <Eickmeyer> Negative. /boot is not separate on this one.
[21:38] <Eickmeyer> ahasenack: For context, this was an upgrade 23.04 -> 23.10 test.
[22:32] <Eickmeyer> Update on bug 2039107: It was a VM glitch. Invalid bug.
[22:32] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2039107 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "package linux-image-6.5.0-9-generic 6.5.0-9.9 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1" [Undecided, Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039107
[22:37] <vorlon> jawn-smith, waveform: I've been afk for the past half hour, and the image builds didn't kick off yet like I expected, so poking harder
[22:39] <vorlon> ok the publisher is running so it'll get there Eventually
[22:39] <vorlon> it does mean the first images will be a bit longer than 2h though
[22:40] <waveform> ok
[22:41] <vorlon> 2h from the original start point, that is.  It might be another 1h from now
[22:41] <waveform> yup -- I'll be around :)
[22:47] <vorlon> it's published. images spinning
[22:48] <vorlon> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/cpc/+build/510949 https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/cpc/+build/510950 https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu-preinstalled/+build/510948
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] has been disabled
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] has been disabled
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Mantic Final] has been disabled
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011)
[23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Edubuntu amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231011.2)
[23:56] <vorlon> jawn-smith: waveform: ^
[23:56] <ItzSwirlz> because i still havent gotten around to getting privileges for marking images as ready on the qa tester,
[23:56] <waveform> yup, already grabbed 'em and into testing
[23:56] <ItzSwirlz> cinnamon is good to go :thumbs_up:
[23:56] <ItzSwirlz> can someone mark them as ready for me :)