[09:17] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, what is the plan for NN opening?
[10:39] <sil2100> fossfreedom_: hey! A quick heads-up... I am respinning the 23.10.1 images, which should be essentially a no-op rebuild
[10:39] <sil2100> Since I needed to correct the .disk/info and iso labels
[10:39] <sil2100> I will triple-confirm that there are no other changes of course
[10:41] <fossfreedom_> hmm - fair enough.  I'm personally not around to be able to smoke-test this until late this evening (UK time) sil2100  ... I can poke the team but will be in a similar situation
[10:42] <sil2100> fossfreedom_: no worries, it's best to play it safe, no rush. Give me a sign when you have a moment and be able to +1 the new images. I'll get in touch once I confirm that we are 1:1 with the previous ones minus the metadata
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231016.1)
[11:28] <sil2100> fossfreedom_: new image there ^ I checked the manifests and lists, no changes there. Now looking into the actual labels
[11:33] <sil2100> Sizes look the same, .disk/info and iso label look correct
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231016.1)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+x13s [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231016.1)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keystone (focal-proposed/main) [2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.1-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:31] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: My *guess* is that they're solving the l10n issues and such with Mantic before they open a new can of worms.
[14:50] <dbungert> also until the name is known, not much of the opening can happen.
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia-dashboard (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 5.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] (no packageset)
[15:12] <sil2100> fossfreedom_: I'm doing a quick VM test install of the budgie respin
[15:12] <sil2100> fossfreedom_: as mentioned, I confirmed that only the metadata changed between now and Friday. I asked bdmurray and vorlon to confirm that as well
[15:13] <sil2100> fossfreedom_: if this installation succeeds, would you be fine in marking Budgie green? We'd want to release soon
[15:13] <fossfreedom_> happy to
[15:13] <fossfreedom_> looking on the iso qa tracker - quite a few results - some good - some not so
[15:14] <fossfreedom_> but nothing appears to be new
[15:22] <sil2100> fossfreedom_: thank you!
[15:22] <sil2100> And apologies for the churn
[15:40] <bdmurray> what dbungert said is correct
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (lunar-proposed/main) [2.26.1-0ubuntu2 => 2.26.1-0ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:48] <schopin> ^ Could I get SRU review for this apport upload? It affects crash reporting, which I think we want during upgrades? (do we?)
[15:49] <bdmurray> I'll have a look at the SRU
[15:50] <bdmurray> schopin: Is there a timeline for a "better solution"?
[15:51] <bdmurray> schopin: I just read comment #6 no need to reply
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.26.1-0ubuntu2.1]
[17:22] <ricotz> hello SRU team, please let libreoffice/lunar transition to -updates, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2037274
[17:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037274 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Lunar) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.5.7 for lunar" [Medium, Fix Committed]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (jammy-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 20220915-0ubuntu0.22.04.2~ppa1] (no packageset)
[17:25] <Eickmeyer> please reject ^ Meant to upload to PPA
[17:26] <Eickmeyer> (working on SRU)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected plasma-distro-release-notifier [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220915-0ubuntu0.22.04.2~ppa1]
[17:30] <Eickmeyer> ta
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+x13s [Mantic Final] has been marked as ready
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 45 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (mantic-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu1 => 20220915-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:14] <Eickmeyer> Sorry, please reject ^ Needs one more change.
[21:14] <Eickmeyer> Also lacks bug in changelog. 🤦
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected plasma-distro-release-notifier [source] (mantic-proposed) [20220915-0ubuntu2]
[21:19] <Eickmeyer> ta
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (jammy-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 20220915-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (no packageset)
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (mantic-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu1 => 20220915-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (lunar-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu1 => 20220915-0ubuntu1.23.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: trove-dashboard (jammy-proposed/universe) [18.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 18.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack)
[22:28] <vorlon> tsimonq2: uh why does xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt Depends: -dev packages
[22:55] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: well I just tracked the dependency chain multimedia-puredata -> deken -> python3-virtualenv -> build-essential -> libc6-dev and, um. maybe you want to talk to the Debian maintainer of deken about dropping this recommends, which thankfully is unused in the package
[22:56] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ack. I'll see what I can do.
[22:56] <Eickmeyer> Sounds like a bug report, actually.
[23:01] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Referring to the version in our archive? Because I'm showing a totally different dep/rec situation in Debian with 0.9.14-1.
[23:02] <vorlon> yes, I'm talking about Ubuntu
[23:02] <Eickmeyer> Looks like it's different. python3-virtualenv is a hard dep in 0.9.14-2 of deken.
[23:02] <Eickmeyer> That's latest in sid.
[23:04] <Eickmeyer> s/14-2/14-1
[23:12] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Are you saying python3-virtualenv should be dropped as a depends?
[23:28] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: yes, because no Debian package should ever be bypassing archive dependencies and venv'ing itself
[23:28] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Ack, I'll see what I can do.
[23:28] <vorlon> and when I looked at the actual code in mantic, it had Debian-specific logic to not venv
[23:29] <vorlon> so the code was good but the package depends (recommends) were wrong
[23:29] <Eickmeyer> I can actually remove the depends myself as part of the multimedia team, but I don't want to step on any toes.
[23:35] <vorlon> I can say the Recommends is unnecessary and broken in the version in mantic.  I don't know if the dep in unstable is unnecessary and broken, or necessary and broken.
[23:36] <Eickmeyer> Well, I have a MR ready to go in Debian: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/deken/-/merge_requests/3
[23:36] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Merge 3 in multimedia-team/pd/deken "Update control" [Opened]
[23:36] <Eickmeyer> (quoted you directly)