[14:31] <sarnold> good morning
[14:32] <slyon> heyho! o/
[14:32] <slyon> c_paelzer is out today. So I can run the meeting.
[14:32] <eslerm> hello o/
[14:32] <slyon> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[14:32] <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:32:32 UTC.  The chair is slyon.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[14:32] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[14:32] <joalif> ο/
[14:32] <slyon> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold c_paelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe )
[14:32] <slyon> #topic current component mismatches
[14:32] <slyon> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
[14:32] <slyon> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[14:32] <slyon> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[14:33] <slyon> Nothing new (as expected, archive is still frozen)
[14:33] <slyon> #topic New MIRs
[14:33] <slyon> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
[14:33] <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:33] <sarnold> oh hello perl
[14:33] <slyon> We have a bunch of reviews to do for the big libmail-dmarc-perl tree
[14:34] <slyon> I guess we have 3 reviewer here today (incl. didrocks who agreed to take 1 per week). So let's just assign a few.
[14:34] <slyon> I'd like to take the libnet-idn-encode-perl one as I have some context on that.
[14:34] <slyon> Any preference, joalif ?
[14:35] <joalif> none in particular, no preference
[14:35] <slyon> ok. So bug #2039456 for joalif
[14:35] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2039456 in libnet-ip-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libnet-ip-perl (as libmail-dmarc-perl dependency)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039456
[14:35] <joalif> ok
[14:35] <slyon> bug #2038929 for slyon
[14:35] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2038929 in libnet-idn-encode-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libnet-idn-encode-perl (as libmail-dmarc-perl dependency)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2038929
[14:35] <slyon> bug #2037405 for didrocks
[14:35] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2037405 in libemail-abstract-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libemail-abstract-perl (libemail-sender-perl dependency as libmail-dmarc-perl dependency)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2037405
[14:36] <slyon> The rest needs to wait for next week due to our rate-limiting.
[14:36] <slyon> (of course anybody is free to voluntarily pick more)
[14:36] <slyon> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[14:36] <slyon> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
[14:36] <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:37] <slyon> update on bug #1877696 from eslerm – nothing to do for us
[14:37] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1877696 in openscap (Ubuntu) "[MIR] openscap" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1877696
[14:38] <slyon> update on bug #2023971 ...
[14:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2023971 in libmail-dmarc-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2023971
[14:39] <sarnold> mirespace has been *busy*
[14:39]  * slyon re-assigning didrocks to bug #2039563 as that should get priority over the libemail-abstract-perl one, according to Miriam's update here
[14:39] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2039563 in libregexp-common-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libregexp-common-perl (as a libmail-dmarc-perl dependency)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039563
[14:40] <slyon> Indeed! Lot's of work went into this package splitting and paperwork!
[14:40] <slyon> #topic Process/Documentation improvements
[14:40] <slyon> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues
[14:40] <slyon> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls
[14:40] <slyon> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues
[14:41] <slyon> Nothing new...
[14:41] <slyon> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
[14:41] <slyon> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
[14:41] <slyon> Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place.
[14:41] <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:41] <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:41] <slyon> Internal link
[14:41] <slyon> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
[14:41] <slyon> eslerm: sarnold: Any updates?
[14:42] <sarnold> I've been out for nearly three weeks, no context on anything lately :)
[14:42] <eslerm> we're going to make a PR to request no new security MIRs after a certain date, perhaps beta freeze, without approval from Alex or similar
[14:42] <eslerm> the x13s packages were a bit tight, and rough
[14:43] <slyon> Yes, those were VERY last-minute.
[14:43] <sarnold> we've never liked the lack of deadlines but understood that we didn't have the capacity to do better
[14:43] <slyon> Refining this policy through a PR sounds like a good plan. I'm looking forward to your proposal!
[14:44] <sarnold> we're doing better now, and having some more predictability on when exactly we expect a cycle's requests to be made has been making more and more sense, and the x13s packages just crystalized that this could be done better for everyone :)
[14:44] <eslerm> nothing much else new, we have been discussing fuzzing all the new perl packages
[14:44] <sarnold> i'm leaning towards MIRs need to be filed before feature freeze, but there's good arguments for lots of dates. please do try to think about what would make the most sense
[14:45] <slyon> Yes. We should all think about that already, so we can comment on the PR, once ready.
[14:45] <eslerm> will do, I was thinking of two dates possibly, the latter being actual assignment to our team
[14:46] <sarnold> I think that's us done
[14:47] <slyon> #topic Any other business?
[14:47] <eslerm> none
[14:47] <sarnold> i'll try to get to the new meeting time poll soon, but this is a hiring-heavy week
[14:48] <slyon> ^ Good! I think we're missing some more votes on that one (check your emails for the link)
[14:48] <eslerm> ^^
[14:49] <slyon> Thanks, that's all folks! Enjoy 10 min back :)
[14:49] <sarnold> woot, thanks slyon, eslerm, joalif :)
[14:49] <eslerm> thanks all o/
[14:49] <joalif> thnaks slyon, all :)
[14:49] <slyon> #endmeeting
[14:49] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 14:49:51 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-10-17-14.32.moin.txt