[14:59] <bdrung> \o
[15:00] <ogayot> o/
[15:00] <liushuyu> o/
[15:01] <adrien> \o
[15:01] <dviererbe> o/
[15:01] <mkukri> o/
[15:01] <slyon> o/
[15:01] <pushkarnk> o/
[15:02] <mateus-morais> o/
[15:02] <upils> o/
[15:04] <mclemenceau> o/
[15:05] <zhsj> o/
[15:06] <adrien> pushkarnk: do you have more details about the key store stuff?
[15:06] <bdrung> #startmeeting
[15:06] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:06:57 UTC.  The chair is bdrung.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:07] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:07] <bdrung> #topic Lightning rounds
[15:07] <bdrung> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-19-oct-2023/39594
[15:08] <pushkarnk> adrien: yes, I have it internally documented. I can share it with you.
[15:10] <adrien> pushkarnk: thanks
[15:11] <bdmurray> bdrung: Has a test been added for apport to ensure the data is collected in the crash?
[15:11] <pushkarnk> adrien: basically, PKCS#12 is not FIPS approved :/
[15:12] <bdmurray> slyon: you were asking about an early release for bug 2039503 right?
[15:12] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2039503 in network-manager (Ubuntu Mantic) "package network-manager 1.44.2-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed network-manager package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10" [Critical, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039503
[15:13] <slyon> correct
[15:13] <slyon> SRU verification is done and autopkgtest failures should be resolved
[15:15] <bdrung> bdmurray, https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/224 modifies the test cases to cover the crash reporting part.
[15:15] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Pull 224 in canonical/apport "ui: don't rely on Dependencies to know if collect_info() has been run" [Merged]
[15:15] <bdrung> (see https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/224/commits/a16de4ec2771012a19e5d6b3075b3a914bf6a851)
[15:16] <slyon> danilogondolfo: FYI: I just pushed https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/netplan/+git/ubuntu/log/?h=ubuntu-mantic so you can target your SRU branch against that one
[15:16] <danilogondolfo> slyon, thank you :)
[15:19] <bdrung> everybody done with reading and asking questions?
[15:22] <bdmurray> dbungert: there was an issue you saw during the release
[15:22] <bdmurray> when you were doing upgrade testing with disk layouts iirc
[15:22] <dbungert> bdmurray: ah, the grub thing?  yes, I added some info to a bug, let me dig up a number
[15:23] <dbungert> LP: #1937011
[15:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 1937011 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu) "package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.169+2.04-1ubuntu45 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1937011
[15:23] <dbungert> I concluded it wasn't a new problem and added a reproducer script to the bug
[15:24] <bdmurray> so want to fix the typo in the description
[15:25] <bdmurray> bdrung: I think we can move on
[15:26] <bdrung> #topic Release incoming bugs
[15:26] <bdrung> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:26] <bdrung> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/2038807
[15:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2038807 in packagekit (Ubuntu) "/usr/libexec/packagekitd:6:g_assertion_message:g_assertion_message_expr:pk_transaction_dispose:pk_transaction_dispose:g_object_unref" [High, New]
[15:28] <bdmurray> It only has 219 crashes so far...
[15:28] <bdmurray> But then again upgrades aren't enabled yet
[15:29] <bdrung> there are not that many crash reports at all on errors.ubuntu.com for mantic: https://errors.ubuntu.com/?release=Ubuntu%2023.10&period=month
[15:30] <bdmurray> Let's save it for next week when julian is back
[15:30] <bdrung> okay
[15:30] <bdrung> next: bug #2039268
[15:30] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2039268 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "When upgrading to Mantic, it fails to install snap firmware-updater" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039268
[15:31] <bdmurray> I've made contact with the snapd team about this.
[15:31] <bdmurray> I'm not certain it is something fixable in ubuntu-release-upgrader
[15:32] <bdrung> so leave it there to keep it on the list for the snapd team?
[15:32] <bdmurray> Having said that having Nick look at it when he gets back would be good
[15:32] <bdmurray> So let's foundations-todo it and we can close the card if the snapd team comes back with something helpful
[15:33] <bdrung> okay, tagged
[15:34] <bdrung> next: bug #2037894
[15:34] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2037894 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "broadcom-sta-dkms not installed post-installation" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2037894
[15:35] <bdmurray> this reporter again?
[15:36] <danilogondolfo> so annoying
[15:36] <bdmurray> I'll tag it rls-mm-notfixing
[15:38] <bdrung> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:38] <bdrung> empty for us
[15:38] <bdrung> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:38] <bdrung> bug #1990798
[15:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1990798 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "do-release-upgrade fails if ESM enabled" [Critical, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990798
[15:39] <bdrung> According to the last comments, this bug cannot be reproduced and logs are missing.
[15:42] <bdrung> Should we remove the incoming tag or just wait until it expires?
[15:43] <bdmurray> Wait but maybe the QA team should setup an automated test for this
[15:43] <bdrung> okay, leaving it untouched
[15:43] <bdrung> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:44] <bdrung> nothing for us
[15:44] <bdrung> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:44] <bdrung> #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:44] <bdrung> interestingly there are two packages on the list
[15:44] <bdmurray> because there isn't a devel release?
[15:45] <bdrung> but shouldn't it be empty then?
[15:45] <bdrung> anyway
[15:45] <bdrung> #topic AOB
[15:45] <adrien> swi-prolog's "error: test cat2: no_exception"
[15:49] <bdrung> adrien, do you want to look at the swi-prolog/9.0.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1 failure?
[15:51] <bdrung> any last words?
[15:51] <adrien> bdrung: not really :D
[15:51] <bdrung> then let's keep it for next week.
[15:51] <bdrung> #endmeeting
[15:51] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:51:51 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-10-19-15.06.moin.txt
[15:52] <adrien> but I don't have urgent things on my plate next week
[15:52] <adrien> this thing might require a PPC64 machine first and that might take some time to provision :D