| === chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-wartortle-amd-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal | 03:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-wartortle-amd-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy | 03:53 | |
| === Eickmeyer is now known as Erich | ||
| === Erich is now known as Eickmeyer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-somerville-wartortle-amd-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] | 06:56 | |
| RikMills | ubuntu-release: is do-release-upgrade on jammy meant to offer to upgrade to lunar, now that kinetic is EOL? | 09:55 |
|---|---|---|
| ricotz | hello, can I get the priority bumped of this libreoffice/riscv64 build, weirdly the archive rebuild has a higher priority than backport builds -- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.5.7-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1/+build/26821168 | 13:14 |
| ricotz | teward, hi :), please see ^ | 13:59 |
| teward | ricotz: i have no control of that. backports pocket has lower priority than standard pockets. always had. so patience is required | 14:09 |
| ricotz | teward, yeah, I know that, I am referring to the ongoing archive rebuilds which have a Build score of 1410 while backports even have 1010 | 14:12 |
| ricotz | e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20231017-jammy-updates | 14:12 |
| ricotz | riscv64 59 4586 jobs (3 days) | 14:13 |
| teward | previous message stands, cant do anything about the build queues | 14:13 |
| teward | build queue priority is something I cant touch and more or less is autodetermined | 14:14 |
| ricotz | thanks, I was asking to bump the score for this specific libreoffice build | 14:14 |
| teward | beyond my purview. not even sure it can be done | 14:14 |
| ricotz | ok, archive admins should be able to, so hopefully someone reads this | 14:14 |
| teward | as i said before, patience is required. | 14:15 |
| ricotz | this can be done | 14:15 |
| ricotz | thanks | 14:15 |
| teward | i dont know if ubuntu-archive has that capability or not | 14:15 |
| teward | they might not | 14:15 |
| teward | but i'm not an archive admin so | 14:15 |
| teward | *goes back to eating breakfast* | 14:16 |
| ricotz | might be reasonable to rethink the scores in this case, e.g. assigning 1050 to backports by default, or lower score of the archive rebuilds | 14:17 |
| teward | https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/BuildScores | 14:17 |
| ricotz | even PPA build get 2510 | 14:17 |
| ricotz | I see | 14:18 |
| teward | sounds like a Launchpad design issue that should be raised there | 14:18 |
| teward | ricotz: also be aware that for alternative archs the build farm may not have many builders available for the arch too | 14:19 |
| teward | hence the backlogs | 14:19 |
| teward | see https://launchpad.net/builders | 14:19 |
| ricotz | I am aware of this site ;) | 14:20 |
| bdmurray | RikMills: yes | 14:29 |
| bdmurray | RikMills: Does it not? | 14:29 |
| cjwatson | ricotz: bumped | 14:53 |
| RikMills | bdmurray: that is fine. I just had thought that it would not try to jump eol releases. plus had not noticed that behaviour before. such are things | 15:02 |
| bdmurray | RikMills: its been like that for years. ;-) Its a way of getting more test coverage of the LTS to LTS upgrade path. | 15:04 |
| RikMills | bdmurray: that must have inexplicably passed me by then. thx :) | 15:04 |
| ricotz | cjwatson, thank you | 15:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [23.3.1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 23.3.2-0ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud) | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [23.3.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 23.3.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud) | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (mantic-proposed/main) [23.3.1-0ubuntu2 => 23.3.2-0ubuntu0~23.10.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud) | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (lunar-proposed/main) [23.3.1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 => 23.3.2-0ubuntu0~23.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud) | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (focal-proposed) [15.2.17-0ubuntu0.20.04.5] | 19:10 | |
| === sergiodj_ is now known as sergiodj | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia-dashboard [source] (focal-proposed) [5.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] | 20:10 | |
| guiverc | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/mantic-minotaur-23-10-release-status-tracking/37887 still lists 23.10 as in progress; not released? is that correct? | 21:04 |
| tsimonq2 | guiverc: Probably not, I remember hearing rumblings a day or two ago that 23.10.1 was released - ubuntu-release can you comment? | 21:07 |
| Eickmeyer | guiverc, tsimonq2: I think it remains that way until the upgrade blocker gets fixed, which won't happen until nn opens. | 21:07 |
| guiverc | thanks Eickmeyer & tsimonq2 (yeah i posted '23.10 released' to fridge after ML was pasted as ~normal) | 21:15 |
| Eickmeyer | guiverc: For all intents and purposes, 23.10 is released, but upgrades aren't enabled. | 21:15 |
| guiverc | that i know; even noted fix released (lunar-mantic) on blocker bug; didn't expect that page to say 'in progress' though | 21:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!