[01:48] [telegram] Heeey. It’s being worked out, we had some LP deployment thingy. Steve and Brian are working through things and they’ll handoff to me when I start my day tomorrow (UK time) and I’ll take it from there. You’ll start to see things soon. ;) (re @tsimonq2: @utkarsh2102 Respectfully, what's the holdup with opening noble? :)) [02:51] Alright, the initial window of the network modifier is now (mostly) implemented, now I just have to create all of the settings windows, the add network window, the remove network window, and their functionality, and then we have an app :D [02:52] Can someone give me back Git access? I'd like to be able to push my current work-in-progress project to Lubuntu's git infra so it can be reviewed/modded/whatever by others (plus just in case something goes wrong and I vanish, nothing is lost) [02:52] I can push it to GitHub if that's not feasible at this time. [03:47] [matrix] https://matterbridge.lubuntu.me/c9bc1d58/image.png [03:47] [matrix] wrong screenshot [03:48] [matrix] https://matterbridge.lubuntu.me/4e7af246/image.png [03:48] [matrix] right screenshot [03:48] [matrix] Making progress! [17:24] [telegram] @tsimonq2 Figure out how to make Sitter's ideas work with your patch? [17:36] [telegram] I'm juggling it :) you'll be the first to know [17:36] [telegram] [17:36] [telegram] I apologize for any delays (re @Eickmeyer: @tsimonq2 Figure out how to make Sitter's ideas work with your patch?) [17:37] [telegram] No worries. Got people pinging about upgrades, it's possible they're already getting the notification about EOL coming but don't have the upgrade path yet. This entire ubuntu-release-upgrader font bug is getting rather annoying, and having to explain it over and over again to people even more so. (re @tsimonq2: I'm juggling it :) you'll be the first to know [17:37] [telegram] [17:37] [telegram] I apologize for any delays) [19:16] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (noble-proposed/universe) [1:23.10.4 => 1:24.04.1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio) [19:16] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: calamares (noble-proposed/universe) [3.3.0-alpha2-0ubuntu6 => 3.3.0-alpha4-0ubuntu1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio) [19:16] * Eickmeyer gets heart attack from notifications in several channels from that [19:19] so Noble is open but we still don't know the secondary codename? [19:19] That's correct. [19:20] hmph [19:20] * arraybolt3_wc continues coding the network editor in the mean time [19:38] And we can now delete networks! \o/ [19:38] for network in public_networks; do delete --force $network; done [19:38] "Wtf my WiFi isn't working?" [19:38] >_< [19:39] you aren't supposed to delete ALL of them! [19:39] XD [19:39] Technically you can though :P [19:39] And I haven't implemented the network *creator* yet so... [19:39] hah :D [19:39] But, one more button working :) [19:40] Very nice, keep up the good work :D [19:40] Thanks :) (I'm shamelessly stealing bits and pieces from plasma-nm where convenient :P open-source is awesome) [19:41] shhhhh :P [19:42] I mean, this tweet only has 7800 views :P [19:42] https://twitter.com/LubuntuOfficial/status/1715370926143873310 [19:42] No pressure. ;) [19:43] hehe [22:04] Licensing question - what license do we want for lubuntu-connection-editor? I was going to slap on GPL-3.0-or-later since it's compatible with the plasma-nm code I'm horking from and seems like a sane enough choice, but if someone would prefer some other GPL or LGPL license, I can change it quite easily. [22:05] (GPL-2.0-or-later might be preferable, idk) [22:39] [telegram] *shrug* you're the author, I honestly don't care as long as it can go in the archive and isn't stupidly permissive [22:40] [telegram] I guess GPL-3 if you can't decide on one [22:45] If there's not a preference, I don't see the value in the extra permissiveness of GPLv2, and I'm a bit more sure that GPLv3 will be compatible with the code I've integrated than GPLv2 (I'd have to do extra checks to see if GPLv2 is viable), so GPLv3+ it is. [22:51] [telegram] Sounds good