| === Unit193 is now known as Montresor | ||
| nteodosio | We need bug 2029473 released to release update-manager with Ubuntu Pro. What is preventing Fix committed -> Fix released? | 08:39 |
|---|---|---|
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029473 in software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2029473 | 08:39 | |
| seb128 | nteodosio, I expect they probably don't do regular review of the queues for series out of standard support... | 08:47 |
| seb128 | rbasak, ^ could you perhaps review that during your shift today? and is my assumption right/if so is that a better way for us to flag those uploads or should we just try to ping SRU vanguards? | 08:47 |
| rbasak | nteodosio: I'll try and have a look on my shift today. | 09:43 |
| ginggs | @pilot in | 11:10 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Final Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: ginggs | ||
| rbasak | seb128, nteodosio: the software-properties upload to Xenial links bug 2029089 instead of bug 2029473 I think? | 12:03 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029089 in distro-info (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Please backport UbuntuDistroInfo().get_all(result='object') to Xenial" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2029089 | 12:03 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029473 in software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2029473 | 12:03 | |
| rbasak | I also found bug 2003527 which I think is the same thing but in the newer series, as I was surprised that if we're additionally adding Xenial then the old bug isn't being used. | 12:05 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2003527 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Replace the Livepatch tab by an Ubuntu Pro one" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2003527 | 12:05 | |
| rbasak | How do you want to organise the various bugs here? | 12:05 |
| nteodosio | rbasak, true it should be linking 2029473. | 12:08 |
| seb128 | rbasak, nteodosio, let me fix that and reupload | 12:09 |
| rbasak | Thanks. | 12:10 |
| nteodosio | Bug 2029089 is no longer a requirement since bug 1978940 was fixed. Sorry, the situation is definitely messy because of the various components involved. | 12:11 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029089 in distro-info (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Please backport UbuntuDistroInfo().get_all(result='object') to Xenial" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2029089 | 12:11 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1978940 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) "u-a-t fails when distro-info is installed from backports on Xenial" [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978940 | 12:11 | |
| rbasak | Ah | 12:12 |
| rbasak | Well maybe it's easiest to pretend it still is? Because it's in proposed already and has been there for a while, and you have a versioned depends on it now. | 12:13 |
| rbasak | But I don't understand how bug 1978940 stops it being an issue. What if a user doesn't have backports enabled? | 12:14 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1978940 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) "u-a-t fails when distro-info is installed from backports on Xenial" [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978940 | 12:15 | |
| nteodosio | rbasak, backports are not enabled by default? | 12:16 |
| nteodosio | If not then yes we'd better depend on the former one. | 12:16 |
| rbasak | backports are not enabled by default> users won't receive backports by default. They are opt-in. | 12:17 |
| rbasak | OK, so we can leave everything as-is, release them together, and we should be OK I think. | 12:17 |
| rbasak | As long as the Depends line won't force a downgrade if the user has the backports version installed. I'll check that. | 12:18 |
| nteodosio | A downgrade of distro-info? Could it do that even though the backports version is higher than the proposed? | 12:18 |
| rbasak | If it's higher than the proposed version then that's fine - that's what I hadn't checked. | 12:19 |
| nteodosio | Ah alright. And thank you for having a look. | 12:19 |
| ginggs | @pilot out | 15:03 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Final Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| jbicha | @pilot in | 15:09 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Final Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: jbicha | ||
| rbasak | mfo: could you take a look at bug 2038648 please - not necessarily you, but do you know who is looking after sosreport nowadays who might be able to take a look? | 15:28 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2038648 in sosreport (Ubuntu Bionic) "package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2038648 | 15:28 | |
| mfo | rbasak, sure! i'll ping nikhil about it; he's subscribed to all bugs in sosreport, so may already be aware, but just in case. | 15:34 |
| rbasak | Thanks! | 15:34 |
| mfo | rbasak, You're welcome | 15:34 |
| === fabiomirmar_ is now known as fabiomirmar | ||
| nkshirsa | hi mfo rbasak o/ looking at 2038648 | 16:23 |
| adrien | using git-ubuntu's .experimental-emptydirfixup, I can't tell it it actually does something: I ran it once and it changed the commit hash but when I run it again, it mentions reinstating the same directory, yet gives the same hash, and dpkg-buildpackage is still unhappy | 20:12 |
| rbasak | adrien: "git ls-tree -rt commitish|grep 4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904" should list all empty directories in a given commit. | 20:37 |
| rbasak | Does that help? | 20:37 |
| rbasak | If you're hitting the empty directory issue, then eg. pkg/ubuntu/devel should have some listed, commits you add won't initially, and correct use of emptydirfixup should restore them. | 20:38 |
| adrien | I can see the directory; dpkg-buildpackage -S says "dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory wycheproof", is that actually normal? | 20:53 |
| adrien | and I have a bunch of modified files and I don't understand why (I know they're related to patches but the git tree is clean and I have no .pc directory), so I'll head to my bed now | 21:01 |
| rbasak | That sounds unrelated to git-ubuntu/git's empty directory issue | 21:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!