/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/10/25/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== Unit193 is now known as Montresor
nteodosioWe need bug 2029473 released to release update-manager with Ubuntu Pro. What is preventing Fix committed -> Fix released?08:39
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029473 in software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202947308:39
seb128nteodosio, I expect they probably don't do regular review of the queues for series out of standard support...08:47
seb128rbasak, ^ could you perhaps review that during your shift today? and is my assumption right/if so is that a better way for us to flag those uploads or should we just try to ping SRU vanguards?08:47
rbasaknteodosio: I'll try and have a look on my shift today.09:43
ginggs@pilot in11:10
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Final Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: ginggs
rbasakseb128, nteodosio: the software-properties upload to Xenial links bug 2029089 instead of bug 2029473 I think?12:03
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029089 in distro-info (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Please backport UbuntuDistroInfo().get_all(result='object') to Xenial" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202908912:03
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029473 in software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202947312:03
rbasakI also found bug 2003527 which I think is the same thing but in the newer series, as I was surprised that if we're additionally adding Xenial then the old bug isn't being used.12:05
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2003527 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Replace the Livepatch tab by an Ubuntu Pro one" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200352712:05
rbasakHow do you want to organise the various bugs here?12:05
nteodosiorbasak, true it should be linking 2029473.12:08
seb128rbasak, nteodosio, let me fix that and reupload12:09
rbasakThanks.12:10
nteodosioBug 2029089 is no longer a requirement since bug 1978940 was fixed. Sorry, the situation is definitely messy because of the various components involved.12:11
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2029089 in distro-info (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Please backport UbuntuDistroInfo().get_all(result='object') to Xenial" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202908912:11
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1978940 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) "u-a-t fails when distro-info is installed from backports on Xenial" [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197894012:11
rbasakAh12:12
rbasakWell maybe it's easiest to pretend it still is? Because it's in proposed already and has been there for a while, and you have a versioned depends on it now.12:13
rbasakBut I don't understand how bug 1978940 stops it being an issue. What if a user doesn't have backports enabled?12:14
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1978940 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) "u-a-t fails when distro-info is installed from backports on Xenial" [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197894012:15
nteodosiorbasak, backports are not enabled by default?12:16
nteodosioIf not then yes we'd better depend on the former one.12:16
rbasakbackports are not enabled by default> users won't receive backports by default. They are opt-in.12:17
rbasakOK, so we can leave everything as-is, release them together, and we should be OK I think.12:17
rbasakAs long as the Depends line won't force a downgrade if the user has the backports version installed. I'll check that.12:18
nteodosioA downgrade of distro-info? Could it do that even though the backports version is higher than the proposed?12:18
rbasakIf it's higher than the proposed version then that's fine - that's what I hadn't checked.12:19
nteodosioAh alright. And thank you for having a look.12:19
ginggs@pilot out15:03
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Final Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A
jbicha@pilot in15:09
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Mantic Final Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: jbicha
rbasakmfo: could you take a look at bug 2038648 please - not necessarily you, but do you know who is looking after sosreport nowadays who might be able to take a look?15:28
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2038648 in sosreport (Ubuntu Bionic) "package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/203864815:28
mforbasak, sure! i'll ping nikhil about it; he's subscribed to all bugs in sosreport, so may already be aware, but just in case.15:34
rbasakThanks!15:34
mforbasak, You're welcome15:34
=== fabiomirmar_ is now known as fabiomirmar
nkshirsahi mfo rbasak o/ looking at 203864816:23
adrienusing git-ubuntu's .experimental-emptydirfixup, I can't tell it it actually does something: I ran it once and it changed the commit hash but when I run it again, it mentions reinstating the same directory, yet gives the same hash, and dpkg-buildpackage is still unhappy20:12
rbasakadrien: "git ls-tree -rt commitish|grep 4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904" should list all empty directories in a given commit.20:37
rbasakDoes that help?20:37
rbasakIf you're hitting the empty directory issue, then eg. pkg/ubuntu/devel should have some listed, commits you add won't initially, and correct use of emptydirfixup should restore them.20:38
adrienI can see the directory; dpkg-buildpackage -S says "dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory wycheproof", is that actually normal?20:53
adrienand I have a bunch of modified files and I don't understand why (I know they're related to patches but the git tree is clean and I have no .pc directory), so I'll head to my bed now21:01
rbasakThat sounds unrelated to git-ubuntu/git's empty directory issue21:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!